{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,23]],"date-time":"2026-10-23T01:27:29Z","timestamp":1792718849624,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,6]],"date-time":"2017-01-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483660800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-016-1296-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,6]],"date-time":"2017-01-06T12:52:09Z","timestamp":1483707129000},"page":"1681-1703","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Prioritised ceteris paribus logic for counterfactual reasoning"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"195","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7722-0023","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Patrick","family":"Girard","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marcus A.","family":"Triplett","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"1296_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1080\/00455091.1974.10716947","volume":"4","author":"J Bennett","year":"1974","unstructured":"Bennett, J. (1974). Review of Lewis (1973). The Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 4, 381\u2013402.","journal-title":"The Canadian Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"1296_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781107050884","volume-title":"Modal logic","author":"P Blackburn","year":"2001","unstructured":"Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., & Venema, Y. (2001). Modal logic. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"1296_CR3","first-page":"475","volume":"2","author":"M Dalal","year":"1988","unstructured":"Dalal, M. (1988). Investigations into a theory of knowledge base revision: preliminary report. Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2, 475\u2013479.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"1","key":"1296_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1002\/int.4550090107","volume":"9","author":"LF Cerro del","year":"1994","unstructured":"del Cerro, L. F., & Herzig, A. (1994). Interference logic = conditional logic + frame axiom. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 9(1), 119\u2013130.","journal-title":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems"},{"key":"1296_CR5","unstructured":"del Cerro, L. F., & Herzig, A. (1996). Belief change and dependence. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge (pp. 147\u2013161). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc."},{"key":"1296_CR6","first-page":"48109","volume":"1001","author":"J Doyle","year":"1994","unstructured":"Doyle, J., & Wellman, M. P. (1994). Representing preferences as ceteris paribus comparatives. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48109\u2013482110.","journal-title":"Ann Arbor"},{"key":"1296_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Elga, A. (2001). Statistical mechanics and the asymmetry of counterfactual dependence. Philosophy of Science, 68(3), S313\u2013S324.","DOI":"10.1086\/392918"},{"key":"1296_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/LXXXIV.1.451","volume":"84","author":"K Fine","year":"1975","unstructured":"Fine, K. (1975). Review of Lewis\u2019 counterfactuals. Mind, 84, 451\u2013458.","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"1296_CR9","unstructured":"Girard, P., Triplett, M.A. (2015). Ceteris paribus logic in counterfactual reasoning. In Proceedings of TARK XV."},{"key":"1296_CR10","volume-title":"Mainstream and formal epistemology","author":"VF Hendricks","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hendricks, V. F. (2006). Mainstream and formal epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"1296_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holliday, W.H. (2014). Epistemic closure and epistemic logic I: Relevant alternatives and subjunctivism. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 44(1), 1\u201362.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-013-9306-2"},{"issue":"3","key":"1296_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(91)90069-V","volume":"52","author":"H Katsuno","year":"1991","unstructured":"Katsuno, H., & Mendelzon, A. O. (1991). Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change. Artificial Intelligence, 52(3), 263\u2013294.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"1296_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee Bowie, G. (1979). The similarity approach to counterfactuals: Some problems. No\u00fbs, 13(4), 477\u2013498.","DOI":"10.2307\/2215340"},{"key":"1296_CR14","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press."},{"key":"1296_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1979). Counterfactual dependence and time\u2019s arrow. No\u00fbs, 13(4), 455\u2013476.","DOI":"10.2307\/2215339"},{"issue":"3","key":"1296_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.2307\/2215221","volume":"18","author":"S McCall","year":"1984","unstructured":"McCall, S. (1984). Counterfactuals based on real possible worlds. No\u00fbs, 18(3), 463.","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"key":"1296_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511801174","volume-title":"An introduction to non-classical logic: From if to is","author":"G Priest","year":"2008","unstructured":"Priest, G. (2008). An introduction to non-classical logic: From if to is. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"1296_CR18","unstructured":"Proietti, C. (2009). Ceteris paribus modalities and the future contingents problem. Logics for Dynamics of Information and Preferences., 173(1), 304\u2013325."},{"issue":"1","key":"1296_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-009-9677-7","volume":"173","author":"C Proietti","year":"2010","unstructured":"Proietti, C., & Sandu, G. (2010). Fitch\u2019s paradox and ceteris paribus modalities. Synthese, 173(1), 75\u201387.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"284","key":"1296_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/64.4.299","volume":"64","author":"J Schaffer","year":"2004","unstructured":"Schaffer, J. (2004). Counterfactuals, causal independence and conceptual circularity. Analysis, 64(284), 299\u2013308.","journal-title":"Analysis"},{"key":"1296_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schurz, G. (2002). Ceteris paribus laws: Classification and deconstruction. Erkenntnis (1975-), 57(3), 351\u2013372.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1021582327947"},{"key":"1296_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Seligman, J., & Girard, P. (2011). Flexibility in ceteris paribus reasoning. The Australasian Journal of Logic, 10(0), 67\u201399.","DOI":"10.26686\/ajl.v10i0.1826"},{"issue":"7","key":"1296_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.5840\/jphil2003100710","volume":"100","author":"M Tooley","year":"2003","unstructured":"Tooley, M. (2003). The Stalnaker-Lewis approach to counterfactuals. The Journal of philosophy, 100(7), 371\u2013377.","journal-title":"The Journal of philosophy"},{"issue":"1","key":"1296_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-008-9085-3","volume":"38","author":"J Benthem van","year":"2009","unstructured":"van Benthem, J., Girard, P., & Roy, O. (2009). Everything else being equal: A modal logic for ceteris paribus preferences. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38(1), 83\u2013125.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"1296_CR25","volume-title":"The logic of preference","author":"GH Wright von","year":"1963","unstructured":"von Wright, G. H. (1963). The logic of preference. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"1296_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-004-6256-9","volume":"150","author":"R Wasserman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Wasserman, R. (2006). The future similarity objection revisited. Synthese, 150(1), 57\u201367.","journal-title":"Synthese"}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1296-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1296-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1296-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,17]],"date-time":"2019-09-17T03:07:12Z","timestamp":1568689632000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1296-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,6]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]}},"alternative-id":["1296"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1296-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,6]]}}}