{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T15:42:17Z","timestamp":1789054937413,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":56,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,30]],"date-time":"2016-12-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483056000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004963","name":"Seventh Framework Programme","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["1225\/02\/03"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["1225\/02\/03"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004963","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-016-1299-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,30]],"date-time":"2016-12-30T12:54:28Z","timestamp":1483102468000},"page":"1715-1740","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["A probabilistic analysis of argument cogency"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"195","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4870-6331","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"David","family":"Godden","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7173-7964","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Frank","family":"Zenker","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"1299_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bayes, T. (1763\/1958). An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 53, 370\u2013418. Reprinted in Biometrika, 45, 296\u2013315.","DOI":"10.1098\/rstl.1763.0053"},{"key":"1299_CR2","first-page":"1","volume":"4","author":"JA Blair","year":"2011","unstructured":"Blair, J. A. (2011). Informal logic and its early historical development. Studies in Logic, 4, 1\u201316.","journal-title":"Studies in Logic"},{"key":"1299_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blair, J. A. (2012). Relevance, acceptability and sufficiency today. In C. Tindale (Ed.), Groundwork in the theory of argumentation (pp. 87\u2013100). Dordrecht: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-2363-4_8"},{"key":"1299_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v9i2.2671","volume":"9","author":"JA Blair","year":"1987","unstructured":"Blair, J. A., & Johnson, R. (1987). The current state of informal logic. Informal Logic, 9, 147\u2013151.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"1299_CR5","unstructured":"Bradley, S. (2015). Imprecise probabilities. In E. N. Zalta et al. (Eds.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, 2015 edition. Stanford, CA: Center for Study of Language and Information. http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/sum2015\/entries\/imprecise-probabilities\/"},{"key":"1299_CR6","volume-title":"An introduction to the philosophy of induction and probability","author":"JL Cohen","year":"1989","unstructured":"Cohen, J. L. (1989). An introduction to the philosophy of induction and probability. Oxford: Oxford UP."},{"key":"1299_CR7","volume-title":"The logical foundations of probability","author":"R Carnap","year":"1962","unstructured":"Carnap, R. (1962). The logical foundations of probability (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.","edition":"2"},{"key":"1299_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3579","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-012-0211-y","volume":"190","author":"A Corner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Corner, A., & Hahn, U. (2013). Normative theories of argumentation: Are some norms better than others? Synthese, 190, 3579\u20133610.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"1299_CR9","unstructured":"Corner, A., Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2006). The slippery slope argument: Probability, utility and category reappraisal. In R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 1145\u20131150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum."},{"key":"1299_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1119\/1.1990764","volume":"14","author":"RT Cox","year":"1946","unstructured":"Cox, R. T. (1946). Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation. American Journal of Physics, 14, 1\u201310.","journal-title":"American Journal of Physics"},{"key":"1299_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.56021\/9780801869822","volume-title":"The algebra of probable inference","author":"RT Cox","year":"1961","unstructured":"Cox, R. T. (1961). The algebra of probable inference. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins UP."},{"key":"1299_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2015.04.017","volume":"142","author":"I Douven","year":"2015","unstructured":"Douven, I., & Schupbach, J. N. (2015). The role of explanatory considerations in updating. Cognition, 142, 299\u2013311.","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"1299_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.128.6.978","volume":"128","author":"JSTB Evans","year":"2002","unstructured":"Evans, J. S. T. B. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 978\u2013996.","journal-title":"Psychological Bulletin"},{"key":"1299_CR14","unstructured":"Fitelson, B. (2001). Studies in Bayesian confirmation theory. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin at Madison. http:\/\/fitelson.org\/thesis.pdf ."},{"key":"1299_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-008-9398-3","volume":"172","author":"D Godden","year":"2010","unstructured":"Godden, D. (2010). The importance of belief in argumentation: Belief, commitment and the effective resolution of a difference of opinion. Synthese, 172, 397\u2013414.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"1299_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v27i3.485","volume":"27","author":"D Godden","year":"2007","unstructured":"Godden, D., & Walton, D. (2007). Advances in the theory of argumentation schemes and critical questions. Informal Logic, 27, 267\u2013292.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"1299_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v35i1.4173","volume":"35","author":"D Godden","year":"2015","unstructured":"Godden, D., & Zenker, F. (2015). Denying antecedents and affirming consequents: The state of the art. Informal Logic, 35, 88\u2013134.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"1299_CR18","volume-title":"A practical study of argument","author":"T Govier","year":"2010","unstructured":"Govier, T. (2010). A practical study of argument (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.","edition":"7"},{"key":"1299_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.00765","volume":"5","author":"U Hahn","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hahn, U. (2014). The Bayesian boom: Good thing or bad? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 765. doi: 10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.00765 .","journal-title":"Frontiers in Psychology"},{"key":"1299_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1833","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-015-0815-0","volume":"193","author":"U Hahn","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hahn, U., & Hornikx, J. (2016). A normative framework for argument quality: Argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation. Synthese, 193, 1833\u20131873.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"1299_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-005-5233-2","volume":"152","author":"U Hahn","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2006a). A Bayesian approach to informal argument fallacies. Synthese, 152, 207\u2013236.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"1299_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v26i1.428","volume":"26","author":"U Hahn","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2006b). A normative theory of argument strength. Informal Logic, 26, 1\u201324.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"1299_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"704","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.114.3.704","volume":"114","author":"U Hahn","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hahn, U., & Oaksford, M. (2007). The rationality of informal argumentation: A Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies. Psychological Review, 114, 704\u2013732.","journal-title":"Psychological Review"},{"key":"1299_CR24","unstructured":"Hahn, U., Oaksford, M., & Bayindir, H. (2005). How convinced should we be by negative evidence? In B. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 887\u2013892). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"key":"1299_CR25","unstructured":"Hahn, U., Oaksford, M., & Corner, A. (2005). Circular arguments, begging the question and the formalization of argument strength. In A. Russell, T. Honkela, K. Lagus, & M. P\u00f6ll\u00e4 (Eds.), Proceedings of AMKLC\u201905, International symposium on adaptive models of knowledge, language and cognition (pp. 34\u201340). Espoo: Helsinki University of Technology."},{"key":"1299_CR26","unstructured":"Hajek, A. (2008). Dutch book arguments. In P. Anand, P. Pattanaik, & C. Puppe (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of rational and social choice (pp. 173\u2013195). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1299_CR27","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"C Hamblin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamblin, C. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen."},{"key":"1299_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Harris, A. J. L., Hahn, U., Madsen, J. K., & Hsu, A. (2015). The appeal to expert opinion: Quantitative support for a Bayesian network approach. Cognitive Science. doi: 10.1111\/cogs.12276 .","DOI":"10.1111\/cogs.12276"},{"key":"1299_CR29","first-page":"102","volume":"16","author":"R Hertwig","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hertwig, R., Ortmann, A., & Gigerenzer, G. (1997). Deductive competence: A desert devoid of content and context. Current Psychology of Cognition, 16, 102\u2013107.","journal-title":"Current Psychology of Cognition"},{"key":"1299_CR30","volume-title":"Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach","author":"C Howson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (2006). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (3rd ed.). La Salle, IL: Open Court.","edition":"3"},{"key":"1299_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1023\/B:ARGU.0000024021.99800.90","volume":"18","author":"P Ikuenobe","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ikuenobe, P. (2004). On the theoretical unification and nature of the fallacies. Argumentation, 18, 189\u2013211.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"1299_CR32","volume-title":"The logic of decision","author":"R Jeffrey","year":"1983","unstructured":"Jeffrey, R. (1983). The logic of decision (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.","edition":"2"},{"key":"1299_CR33","volume-title":"Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument","author":"R Johnson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Johnson, R. (2000). Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earbaum."},{"key":"1299_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v26i3.453","volume":"26","author":"RH Johnson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Johnson, R. H. (2006). Making sense of informal logic. Informal Logic, 26, 231\u2013258.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"1299_CR35","first-page":"17","volume":"4","author":"R Johnson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Johnson, R. (2011). Informal logic and deductivism. Studies in Logic, 4, 17\u201337.","journal-title":"Studies in Logic"},{"key":"1299_CR36","first-page":"340","volume-title":"Handbook of the logic of argument and inference: Turn towards the practical","author":"R Johnson","year":"2002","unstructured":"Johnson, R., & Blair, J. A. (2002). Informal logic and the reconfiguration of logic. In D. Gabbay, R. Johnson, H. Ohlbach, & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the logic of argument and inference: Turn towards the practical (pp. 340\u2013396). Amsterdam: Elsevier."},{"key":"1299_CR37","unstructured":"Johnson, R., & Blair, J. A. (2006). Logical self defense (3rd ed.). New York: International Debate Education Association (First edition 1977, Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson)."},{"key":"1299_CR38","unstructured":"Joyce, J. (2009). Bayes\u2019 theorem. In E. N. Zalta et al. (Eds.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, 2009 edition (pp. 1\u201347). Stanford, CA: Center for Study of Language and Information. http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/spr2009\/entries\/bayes-theorem\/"},{"key":"1299_CR39","unstructured":"Kolmogorov, A. N. (1933). Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitrechnung, Ergebnisse Der Mathematik. Berlin: Springer (translated as: (1950). Foundations of Probability. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company)."},{"key":"1299_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v24i1.2132","volume":"24","author":"K Korb","year":"2004","unstructured":"Korb, K. (2004). Bayesian informal logic and fallacy. Informal Logic, 24, 41\u201370.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"1299_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1037\/h0085798","volume":"58","author":"M Oaksford","year":"2004","unstructured":"Oaksford, M., & Hahn, U. (2004). A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance. Canadian Journal for Experimental Psychology, 58, 75\u201385.","journal-title":"Canadian Journal for Experimental Psychology"},{"key":"1299_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5357-0_10","volume-title":"Bayesian argumentation: The practical side of probability","author":"N Pfeifer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pfeifer, N. (2013). On argument strength. In F. Zenker (Ed.), Bayesian argumentation: The practical side of probability (pp. 185\u2013193). Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"1299_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0783-1","volume-title":"Argument, inference and dialectic","author":"RC Pinto","year":"2001","unstructured":"Pinto, R. C. (2001). Argument, inference and dialectic. Dordrecht: Kluwer."},{"issue":"2","key":"1299_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v17i2.2418","volume":"17","author":"LH Powers","year":"1995","unstructured":"Powers, L. H. (1995). The one fallacy theory. Informal Logic, 17(2), 303\u2013314.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"1299_CR45","unstructured":"Ramsey, F. (1926\/1931). Truth and probability. In R. Braithwaite (Ed.), The foundations of mathematics and other essays (pp. 156\u2013198). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul."},{"key":"1299_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199697502.001.0001","volume-title":"The laws of belief: Ranking functions and their applications","author":"W Spohn","year":"2012","unstructured":"Spohn, W. (2012). The laws of belief: Ranking functions and their applications. Oxford: Oxford UP."},{"key":"1299_CR47","unstructured":"Strevens, M. (2012). Notes on Bayesian confirmation theory. http:\/\/www.strevens.org\/bct\/"},{"key":"1299_CR48","unstructured":"Talbot, W. (2011). Bayesian epistemology. In E. N. Zalta et al. (Eds.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, 2011 edition (pp. 1\u201334). Stanford, CA: Center for Study of Language and Information. http:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/sum2011\/entries\/epistemology-bayesian\/"},{"key":"1299_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-9473-5","volume-title":"Handbook of argumentation theory","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"2014","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wegemans, J. (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"1299_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511498879","volume-title":"A theory of argument","author":"M Vorobej","year":"2006","unstructured":"Vorobej, M. (2006). A theory of argument. New York: Cambridge UP."},{"key":"1299_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v35i4.4335","volume":"35","author":"D Walton","year":"2015","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Gordon, T. (2015). Formalizing informal logic. Informal Logic, 35, 508\u2013538.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"1299_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge UP."},{"key":"1299_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v20i2.2266","volume":"20","author":"J Woods","year":"2000","unstructured":"Woods, J. (2000). How philosophical is informal logic? Informal Logic, 20, 139\u2013167.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"1299_CR54","volume-title":"Fallacies: Selected papers 1972\u20131982","author":"J Woods","year":"2007","unstructured":"Woods, J., & Walton, D. (2007). Fallacies: Selected papers 1972\u20131982. London: College Publications."},{"key":"1299_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5357-0","volume-title":"Bayesian argumentation: The practical side of probability","author":"F Zenker","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zenker, F. (2013). Bayesian argumentation: The practical side of probability. In F. Zenker (Ed.), Bayesian argumentation: The practical side of probability (pp. 1\u201311). Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"1299_CR56","unstructured":"Zenker, F. (2016). The polysemy of \u2018fallacy\u2019\u2014or \u2018bias\u2019, for that matter. In: Bondy, P., and Benaquista, L. (eds). Argumentation, objectivity and bias (Proceedings of the 11th conference of the ontario society for the study of argumentation, 18\u201321 May, 2016) (pp. 1\u201314). Windsor, ON: OSSA. http:\/\/scholar.uwindsor.ca\/ossaarchive\/OSSA11\/"}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1299-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1299-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1299-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,21]],"date-time":"2023-08-21T14:10:18Z","timestamp":1692627018000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1299-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,30]]},"references-count":56,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,4]]}},"alternative-id":["1299"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-016-1299-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,30]]}}}