{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,2]],"date-time":"2026-07-02T02:11:42Z","timestamp":1782958302512,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":63,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,9]],"date-time":"2017-09-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1504915200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-017-1551-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,11]],"date-time":"2017-09-11T16:25:04Z","timestamp":1505147104000},"page":"2845-2854","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Defeaters in current epistemology: introduction to the special issue"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"195","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4596-8528","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luca","family":"Moretti","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tommaso","family":"Piazza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"1551_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1093\/0195130057.003.0003","volume-title":"The oxford handbook of epistemology","author":"R Audi","year":"2002","unstructured":"Audi, R. (2002). The sources of knowledge. In P. Moser (Ed.), The oxford handbook of epistemology (pp. 71\u201394). Oxford: OUP."},{"key":"1551_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/0199275742.001.0001","volume-title":"Justification without awareness","author":"M Bergman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Bergman, M. (2006). Justification without awareness. Oxford: OUP."},{"key":"1551_CR3","first-page":"53","volume-title":"Midwest studies in philosophy","author":"L Bonjour","year":"1980","unstructured":"Bonjour, L. (1980). Externalist theories of empirical knowledge. In P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy (Vol. 5, pp. 53\u201373). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"1551_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"371","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-010-9581-5","volume":"155","author":"B Carey","year":"2011","unstructured":"Carey, B. (2011). Possible disagreements and defeat. Philosophical Studies, 155(3), 371\u2013381.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"1551_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carter, A., & Navarro, J. (2017). The defeasibility of knowledge-how. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. doi: 10.1111\/phpr.12441 .","DOI":"10.1111\/phpr.12441"},{"key":"1551_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/0195115058.001.0001","volume-title":"A priori justification","author":"A Casullo","year":"2003","unstructured":"Casullo, A. (2003). A priori justification. Oxford: OUP."},{"issue":"1","key":"1551_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/ans129","volume":"73","author":"J Chandler","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chandler, J. (2013). Defeat reconsidered. Analysis, 73(1), 49\u201351.","journal-title":"Analysis"},{"issue":"2","key":"1551_CR8","first-page":"147","volume":"1","author":"R Chisholm","year":"1964","unstructured":"Chisholm, R. (1964). The ethics of requirement. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1(2), 147\u2013153.","journal-title":"American Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"1551_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9264.2007.00224.x","volume":"107","author":"D Christensen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2007a). Epistemic self-respect. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 107, 319\u2013337.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society"},{"key":"1551_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199237067.003.0001","volume-title":"Oxford studies in epistemology","author":"D Christensen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2007b). Does Murphy\u2019s law apply in epistemology? Self-doubt and rational ideals. In T. S. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 2, pp. 3\u201331). Oxford: OUP."},{"issue":"2","key":"1551_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-2006-035","volume":"116","author":"D Christensen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2007c). Epistemology of disagreement: The good news. Philosophical Review, 116(2), 187\u2013217.","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"issue":"5","key":"1551_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1747-9991.2009.00237.x","volume":"4","author":"D Christensen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2009). Disagreement as evidence: The epistemology of controversy. Philosophy Compass, 4(5), 1\u201312.","journal-title":"Philosophy Compass"},{"issue":"1","key":"1551_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2010.00366.x","volume":"81","author":"D Christensen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81(1), 185\u2013215.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"1551_CR14","first-page":"113","volume":"45","author":"A Coates","year":"2012","unstructured":"Coates, A. (2012). Rational epistemic akrasia. American Philosophical Quarterly, 45(2), 113\u2013124.","journal-title":"American Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"1551_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199698370.003.0006","volume-title":"The epistemology of disagreement: New essays","author":"S Cohen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cohen, S. (2013). A defense of the (almost) equal weight view. In D. Christensen & J. Lackey (Eds.), The epistemology of disagreement: New essays (pp. 98\u2013117). Oxford: OUP."},{"issue":"3","key":"1551_CR16","first-page":"237","volume":"49","author":"J Comesana","year":"2012","unstructured":"Comesana, J. (2012). Conciliation and peer-demotion in the epistemology of disagreement. American Philosophical Quarterly, 49(3), 237\u2013252.","journal-title":"American Philosophical Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"1551_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1080\/00048402.2015.1009127","volume":"94","author":"C Almeida De","year":"2015","unstructured":"De Almeida, C., & Fett, J. R. (2015). Defeasibility and gettierization: A reminder. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 94(1), 152\u2013169.","journal-title":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy"},{"issue":"17","key":"1551_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4099","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-014-0516-0","volume":"191","author":"P Dennis","year":"2014","unstructured":"Dennis, P. (2014). Criteria for indefeasible knowledge: John McDowell and \u2018epistemological disjunctivism\u2019. Synthese, 191(17), 4099\u20134113.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"1551_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199550623.001.0001","volume-title":"Knowledge in an uncertain world","author":"J Fantl","year":"2009","unstructured":"Fantl, J., & McGrath, M. (2009). Knowledge in an uncertain world. Oxford: OUP."},{"key":"1551_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1520-8583.2005.00055.x","volume":"19","author":"R Feldman","year":"2005","unstructured":"Feldman, R. (2005). Respecting the evidence. Philosophical Perspectives, 19, 95\u2013119. (Epistemology).","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"issue":"3","key":"1551_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.3366\/E1742360009000720","volume":"6","author":"R Feldman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Feldman, R. (2009). Evidentialism, higher-order evidence, and disagreement. Episteme, 6(3), 294\u2013312.","journal-title":"Episteme"},{"key":"1551_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0017.2009.01364.x","volume":"24","author":"K Gl\u00fcer-Pagin","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gl\u00fcer-Pagin, K. (2009). In defence of a doxastic account of experience. Mind and Language, 24, 297\u2013373.","journal-title":"Mind and Language"},{"issue":"1","key":"1551_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1163\/18756735-90000857","volume":"79","author":"T Grundmann","year":"2009","unstructured":"Grundmann, T. (2009). Reliabilism and the problem of defeaters. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 79(1), 65\u201376.","journal-title":"Grazer Philosophische Studien"},{"key":"1551_CR24","first-page":"156","volume-title":"Routledge companion to epistemology","author":"T Grundmann","year":"2011","unstructured":"Grundmann, T. (2011). Defeasibility theories. In S. Bernecker & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Routledge companion to epistemology (pp. 156\u2013256). London: Routledge."},{"issue":"4","key":"1551_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"718","DOI":"10.1111\/nous.12026","volume":"48","author":"S Horowitz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Horowitz, S. (2014). Epistemic akrasia. Nous, 48(4), 718\u2013744.","journal-title":"Nous"},{"key":"1551_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.5840\/jpr_2008_16","volume":"33","author":"M Janvid","year":"2008","unstructured":"Janvid, M. (2008). The experiential defeasibility and overdetermination of a priori justification. Journal of Philosophical Research, 33, 121\u2013128.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Research"},{"key":"1551_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.5840\/jpr2012376","volume":"37","author":"M Janvid","year":"2012","unstructured":"Janvid, M. (2012). Toward a default and challenge model of a priori warrant. Journal of Philosophical Research, 37, 135\u2013154.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"1551_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-010-9752-0","volume":"182","author":"DM Johnson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Johnson, D. M. (2011). Proper function and defeating experiences. Synthese, 182(3), 433\u2013447.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"1551_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199285891.003.0007","volume-title":"Oxford studies in epistemology","author":"T Kelly","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kelly, T. (2005). The epistemic significance of disagreement. In J. Hawthorne & T. S. Gendler (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 1, pp. 167\u2013196). Oxford: OUP."},{"key":"1551_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199226078.003.0007","volume-title":"Disagreement","author":"T Kelly","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kelly, T. (2010). Peer disagreement and higher-order evidence. In R. Feldman & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement (pp. 111\u2013174). Oxford: OUP."},{"key":"1551_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"792","DOI":"10.2307\/2025680","volume":"73","author":"P Klein","year":"1976","unstructured":"Klein, P. (1976). Knowledge, causality, and defeasibility. The Journal of Philosophy, 73, 792\u2013812.","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophy"},{"issue":"2","key":"1551_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-004-7798-x","volume":"126","author":"J Lackey","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lackey, J. (2005). Testimony and the infant\/child objection. Philosophical Studies, 126(2), 163\u2013190.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"1551_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199219162.001.0001","volume-title":"Learning from words. Testimony as a source of knowledge","author":"J Lackey","year":"2008","unstructured":"Lackey, J. (2008). Learning from words. Testimony as a source of knowledge. Oxford: OUP."},{"issue":"2","key":"1551_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1111\/phpr.12090","volume":"88","author":"M Lasonen-Aarnio","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (2014). Higher-order evidence and the limits of defeat. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(2), 314\u2013345.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"8","key":"1551_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.2307\/2024435","volume":"66","author":"K Lehrer","year":"1969","unstructured":"Lehrer, K., & Paxson, T. (1969). Knowledge: Undefeated justified true belief. The Journal of Philosophy, 66(8), 225\u2013237.","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophy"},{"issue":"3","key":"1551_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.3366\/E1742360009000707","volume":"6","author":"J Matheson","year":"2009","unstructured":"Matheson, J. (2009). Conciliatory views of disagreement, and higher-order evidence. Episteme, 6(3), 269\u2013279.","journal-title":"Episteme"},{"key":"1551_CR37","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Experience, norm, and nature","author":"J McDowell","year":"2008","unstructured":"McDowell, J. (2008). Avoiding the myth of the given. In J. Lindgaard & J. McDowell (Eds.), Experience, norm, and nature (pp. 1\u201314). Oxford: Wiley."},{"issue":"3","key":"1551_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1080\/13869795.2010.501905","volume":"13","author":"J McDowell","year":"2010","unstructured":"McDowell, J. (2010). Tyler Burge on disjunctivism. Philosophical Explorations, 13(3), 243\u2013255.","journal-title":"Philosophical Explorations"},{"key":"1551_CR39","volume-title":"Perception as a capacity for knowledge","author":"J McDowell","year":"2011","unstructured":"McDowell, J. (2011). Perception as a capacity for knowledge. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"1551_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-013-0238-z","volume":"170","author":"G Melis","year":"2014","unstructured":"Melis, G. (2014). Understanding undermining defeat. Philosophical Studies, 170(3), 433\u2013442.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"issue":"2","key":"1551_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/anu153","volume":"75","author":"L Moretti","year":"2015","unstructured":"Moretti, L. (2015). Phenomenal conservatism. Analysis, 75(2), 296\u2013309.","journal-title":"Analysis"},{"key":"1551_CR42","unstructured":"Moretti, L., & Piazza, T. (2013). Transmission of justification and warrant. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/transmission-justification-warrant\/ ."},{"key":"1551_CR43","volume-title":"Knowledge and justification","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1974","unstructured":"Pollock, J. L. (1974). Knowledge and justification. Princeton: Princeton University Press."},{"issue":"4","key":"1551_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","volume":"11","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pollock, J. L. (1987). Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 481\u2013518.","journal-title":"Cognitive Science"},{"key":"1551_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199557912.001.0001","volume-title":"Epistemological disjunctivism","author":"D Pritchard","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pritchard, D. (2012). Epistemological disjunctivism. Oxford: OUP."},{"key":"1551_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1111\/0029-4624.00277","volume":"34","author":"J Pryor","year":"2000","unstructured":"Pryor, J. (2000). The skeptic and the dogmatist. Nous, 34, 517\u2013549.","journal-title":"Nous"},{"key":"1551_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199899494.003.0005","volume-title":"Seemings and justification: New essays on dogmatism and phenomenal conservatism","author":"J Pryor","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pryor, J. (2013). Problems for credulism. In C. Tucker (Ed.), Seemings and justification: New essays on dogmatism and phenomenal conservatism (pp. 89\u2013132). NY: OUP."},{"issue":"3","key":"1551_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-011-0050-2","volume":"190","author":"A Rotondo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rotondo, A. (2013). Undermining, circularity, and disagreement. Synthese, 190(3), 563\u2013584.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"2","key":"1551_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-011-9823-1","volume":"163","author":"J Schechter","year":"2011","unstructured":"Schechter, J. (2011). Rational self-doubt and the failure of closure. Philosophical Studies, 163(2), 429\u2013452.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"issue":"3","key":"1551_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1111\/phpr.12087","volume":"88","author":"N Silins","year":"2014","unstructured":"Silins, N. (2014). The agony of defeat? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(3), 505\u2013532.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"1551_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-012-9891-x","volume":"169","author":"S Sturgeon","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sturgeon, S. (2014). Pollock on defeasible reasons. Philosophical Studies, 169(1), 105\u2013118.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"1551_CR52","unstructured":"Sudduth, M. (2017). Defeaters in epistemology. In J. Fieser & B. Dowden (Eds.), Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. http:\/\/www.iep.utm.edu\/ep-defea\/ ."},{"issue":"1","key":"1551_CR53","first-page":"12","volume":"11","author":"M Swain","year":"1974","unstructured":"Swain, M. (1974). Epistemic defeasibility. American Philosophical Quarterly, 11(1), 12\u201325.","journal-title":"American Philosophical Quarterly"},{"issue":"239","key":"1551_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9213.2009.611.x","volume":"60","author":"M Thune","year":"2010","unstructured":"Thune, M. (2010). \u2018Partial defeaters\u2019 and the epistemology of disagreement. Philosophical Quarterly, 60(239), 355\u2013372.","journal-title":"Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"1551_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9213.2006.461.x","volume":"56","author":"J Thurow","year":"2006","unstructured":"Thurow, J. (2006). Experientially defeasible a priori justification. Philosophical Quarterly, 56, 596\u2013602.","journal-title":"Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"1551_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198722762.003.0009","volume-title":"Oxford studies in epistemology","author":"M Titelbaum","year":"2015","unstructured":"Titelbaum, M. (2015). Rationality\u2019s fixed point (or: in defence of right reason). In S. T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 5, pp. 253\u2013294). Oxford: OUP."},{"issue":"3","key":"1551_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-007-9194-9","volume":"142","author":"L Warenski","year":"2009","unstructured":"Warenski, L. (2009). Naturalism, fallibilism, and the a priori. Philosophical Studies, 142(3), 403\u2013426.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"1551_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199698370.003.0004","volume-title":"The epistemology of disagreement: New essays","author":"B Weatherson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Weatherson, B. (2013). Disagreements, philosophical, and otherwise. In D. Christensen & J. Lackey (Eds.), The epistemology of disagreement: New essays (pp. 54\u201373). Oxford: OUP."},{"issue":"2","key":"1551_CR59","first-page":"1","volume":"189","author":"R Wedgwood","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wedgwood, R. (2011). Justified inference. Synthese, 189(2), 1\u201323.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"4","key":"1551_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/axp007","volume":"60","author":"J Weisberg","year":"2009","unstructured":"Weisberg, J. (2009). Commutativity or holism: A dilemma for conditionalizers. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60(4), 793\u2013812.","journal-title":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"1551_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/axt052","volume":"66","author":"J Weisberg","year":"2015","unstructured":"Weisberg, J. (2015). Updating, undermining, and independence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66(1), 121\u2013159.","journal-title":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"1551_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470696675","volume-title":"The Philosophy of philosophy","author":"T Williamson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Williamson, T. (2007). The Philosophy of philosophy. Oxford: OUP."},{"key":"1551_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0309-7013.2004.00121.x","volume":"78","author":"C Wright","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wright, C. (2004). Warrant for nothing (and foundations for free?). Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary, 78, 167\u2013212.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary"}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-017-1551-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-017-1551-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-017-1551-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,6,26]],"date-time":"2024-06-26T21:14:09Z","timestamp":1719436449000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-017-1551-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,9]]},"references-count":63,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,7]]}},"alternative-id":["1551"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-017-1551-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,9]]}}}