{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,7]],"date-time":"2025-10-07T23:28:29Z","timestamp":1759879709079,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":77,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,15]],"date-time":"2018-09-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1536969600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,15]],"date-time":"2018-09-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1536969600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001711","name":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F\u00f6rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["300P1-164569"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["300P1-164569"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001711","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-018-01896-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,16]],"date-time":"2018-09-16T09:32:50Z","timestamp":1537090370000},"page":"3459-3480","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["On the generality argument for the knowledge norm"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"197","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9233-5868","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Davide","family":"Fassio","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"1896_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1554.001.0001","volume-title":"Belief\u2019s own ethics","author":"J Adler","year":"2002","unstructured":"Adler, J. (2002). Belief\u2019s own ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"key":"1896_CR2","volume-title":"Epistemic justification","author":"W Alston","year":"1989","unstructured":"Alston, W. (1989). Epistemic justification. Ithaca: Cornell University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199550005.001.0001","volume-title":"Kinds of reasons: An essay in the philosophy of action","author":"M Alvarez","year":"2010","unstructured":"Alvarez, M. (2010). Kinds of reasons: An essay in the philosophy of action. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR4","volume-title":"Kantian ethics almost without apology","author":"M Baron","year":"1995","unstructured":"Baron, M. (1995). Kantian ethics almost without apology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"1896_CR5","first-page":"387","volume":"2","author":"M Baron","year":"2005","unstructured":"Baron, M. (2005). Justifications and excuses. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law,2(2), 387\u2013406.","journal-title":"Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law"},{"key":"1896_CR6","unstructured":"Benton, M. A. (2014). Knowledge norms. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved September 1, 2018, from http:\/\/www.iep.utm.edu\/kn-norms\/ ."},{"issue":"1","key":"1896_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2007.00004.x","volume":"74","author":"A Bird","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bird, A. (2007). Justified judging. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,74(1), 81\u2013110.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"1896_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1111\/1533-6077.00003","volume":"13","author":"PA Boghossian","year":"2003","unstructured":"Boghossian, P. A. (2003). The normativity of content. Philosophical Issues,13(1), 31\u201345.","journal-title":"Philosophical Issues"},{"key":"1896_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118609088","volume-title":"Rationality through reasoning","author":"J Broome","year":"2013","unstructured":"Broome, J. (2013). Rationality through reasoning. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell."},{"issue":"3","key":"1896_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0114.2012.01433.x","volume":"93","author":"JA Capes","year":"2012","unstructured":"Capes, J. A. (2012). Blameworthiness without wrongdoing. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly,93(3), 417\u2013437.","journal-title":"Pacific Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"1896_CR11","volume-title":"Practical reality","author":"J Dancy","year":"2000","unstructured":"Dancy, J. (2000). Practical reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR12","first-page":"77","volume-title":"Laws and models in science","author":"P Engel","year":"2004","unstructured":"Engel, P. (2004). Truth and the aim of belief. In D. Gillies (Ed.), Laws and models in science (pp. 77\u201397). London: King\u2019s College Publications."},{"issue":"1","key":"1896_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8349.2013.00226.x","volume":"87","author":"P Engel","year":"2013","unstructured":"Engel, P. (2013). Doxastic correctness. Aristotelian Society Supplementary,87(1), 199\u2013216.","journal-title":"Aristotelian Society Supplementary"},{"issue":"216","key":"1896_CR14","first-page":"471","volume":"54","author":"D Fassio","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fassio, D. (2011). Belief, correctness and normativity. Logique et Analyse,54(216), 471\u2013486.","journal-title":"Logique et Analyse"},{"key":"1896_CR15","unstructured":"Fassio, D. (2015). The aim of belief. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved September 1, 2018, from https:\/\/www.iep.utm.edu\/beli-aim\/ ."},{"issue":"9","key":"1896_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2137","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-016-0792-2","volume":"174","author":"D Fassio","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fassio, D. (2017). Is there an epistemic norm of practical reasoning? Philosophical Studies,174(9), 2137\u20132166.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"1896_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1093\/0195130057.003.0013","volume-title":"The Oxford handbook of epistemology","author":"R Feldman","year":"2002","unstructured":"Feldman, R. (2002). Epistemological duties. In P. Moser (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of epistemology (pp. 362\u2013384). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199239351.001.0001","volume-title":"Offences and defences: Selected essays in the philosophy of criminal law","author":"J Gardner","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gardner, J. (2007). Offences and defences: Selected essays in the philosophy of criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"1896_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-009-9655-0","volume":"178","author":"M Gerken","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gerken, M. (2011). Warrant and action. Synthese,178(3), 529\u2013547.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"1","key":"1896_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1533-6077.2005.00070.x","volume":"15","author":"A Gibbard","year":"2005","unstructured":"Gibbard, A. (2005). Truth and correct belief. Philosophical Issues,15(1), 338\u2013350.","journal-title":"Philosophical Issues"},{"key":"1896_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199673391.001.0001","volume-title":"The norm of belief","author":"J Gibbons","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gibbons, J. (2013). The norm of belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"1896_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"88","DOI":"10.1086\/656328","volume":"121","author":"PA Graham","year":"2010","unstructured":"Graham, P. A. (2010). In defense of objectivism about moral obligation. Ethics,121(1), 88\u2013115.","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"1896_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"388","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2012.00608.x","volume":"88","author":"PA Graham","year":"2014","unstructured":"Graham, P. A. (2014). A sketch of a theory of moral blameworthiness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,88(2), 388\u2013409.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"key":"1896_CR24","volume-title":"Knowledge and lotteries","author":"J Hawthorne","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199698370.003.0002","volume-title":"The epistemology of disagreement: New essays","author":"J Hawthorne","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hawthorne, J., & Srinivasan, A. (2013). Disagreement without transparency: some bleak thoughts. In D. Christensen & J. Lackey (Eds.), The epistemology of disagreement: New essays (pp. 9\u201330). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"10","key":"1896_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.5840\/jphil20081051022","volume":"105","author":"J Hawthorne","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hawthorne, J., & Stanley, J. (2008). Knowledge and action. Journal of Philosophy,105(10), 571\u2013590.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"1896_CR27","first-page":"142","volume-title":"Themes from G.E. Moore","author":"M Huemer","year":"2007","unstructured":"Huemer, M. (2007). Moore\u2019s paradox and the norm of belief. In S. Nuccetelli & G. Seay (Eds.), Themes from G.E. Moore (pp. 142\u2013157). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"1896_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1002\/tht3.244","volume":"6","author":"N Hughes","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hughes, N. (2017a). No excuses: Against the knowledge norm of belief. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy,6(3), 157\u2013166.","journal-title":"Thought: A Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"1896_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-017-1639-x","author":"N Hughes","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hughes, N. (2017b). Dilemmic epistemology. Synthese. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-017-1639-x .","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"197","key":"1896_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"433","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9213.00152","volume":"50","author":"J Hyman","year":"1999","unstructured":"Hyman, J. (1999). How knowledge works. Philosophical Quarterly,50(197), 433\u2013451.","journal-title":"Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"1896_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198735779.001.0001","volume-title":"Action, knowledge, and will","author":"J Hyman","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hyman, J. (2015). Action, knowledge, and will. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198754282.001.0001","volume-title":"The normativity of rationality","author":"B Kiesewetter","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kiesewetter, B. (2017). The normativity of rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"455","key":"1896_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"509","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzi509","volume":"114","author":"N Kolodny","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kolodny, N. (2005). Why be rational? Mind,114(455), 509\u2013563.","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"1896_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00355744","volume":"59","author":"J Kvanvig","year":"1990","unstructured":"Kvanvig, J., & Menzel, C. (1990). The basic notion of justification. Philosophical Studies,59, 235\u2013261.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"1896_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139060097","volume-title":"Justification and the truth-connection","author":"C Littlejohn","year":"2012","unstructured":"Littlejohn, C. (2012). Justification and the truth-connection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9264.2013.00356.x","volume":"113","author":"C Littlejohn","year":"2013","unstructured":"Littlejohn, C. (2013). The Russellian retreat. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,113, 293\u2013320.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society"},{"key":"1896_CR37","unstructured":"Littlejohn, C. (forthcoming). A plea for epistemic excuses. In F. Dorsh & J. Dutant (Eds.), The New Evil Demon Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR38","volume-title":"Oxford studies in metaethics","author":"E Lord","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lord, E. (2015). Acting for the right reasons, abilities, and obligation. In R. Schafer-Landau (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaethics (Vol. 10). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198815099.001.0001","volume-title":"The importance of being rational","author":"E Lord","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lord, E. (2018). The importance of being rational. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-017-1418-8","author":"BJC Madison","year":"2017","unstructured":"Madison, B. J. C. (2017). On justifications and excuses. Synthese. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-017-1418-8 .","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"3","key":"1896_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1746-8361.2011.01270.x","volume":"65","author":"C McHugh","year":"2011","unstructured":"McHugh, C. (2011). What do we aim at when we believe? Dialectica,65(3), 369\u2013392.","journal-title":"Dialectica"},{"issue":"5","key":"1896_CR42","first-page":"121","volume":"4","author":"C McHugh","year":"2017","unstructured":"McHugh, C., & Way, J. (2017). Objectivism and perspectivism about the epistemic ought. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy,4(5), 121\u2013145.","journal-title":"Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"1896_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199254408.001.0001","volume-title":"Understanding people: Normativity and rationalizing explanation","author":"A Millar","year":"2004","unstructured":"Millar, A. (2004). Understanding people: Normativity and rationalizing explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR44","volume-title":"Spheres of reason","author":"A Millar","year":"2009","unstructured":"Millar, A. (2009). How reasons for action differ from reasons for belief. In Simon Robertson (Ed.), Spheres of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR45","volume-title":"Les concepts de l\u2019\u00e9thique","author":"R Ogien","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ogien, R., & Tappolet, C. (2009). Les concepts de l\u2019\u00e9thique. Houston: Hermann."},{"issue":"4","key":"1896_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9329.00098","volume":"12","author":"P Railton","year":"1999","unstructured":"Railton, P. (1999). Normative force and normative freedom: Hume and Kant, but not Hume versus Kant. Ratio,12(4), 320\u2013353.","journal-title":"Ratio"},{"key":"1896_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511613982","volume-title":"Facts, values, and norms: Essays toward a morality of consequence","author":"P Railton","year":"2003","unstructured":"Railton, P. (2003). Facts, values, and norms: Essays toward a morality of consequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199291885.003.0002","volume-title":"Oxford studies in metaethics","author":"P Railton","year":"2006","unstructured":"Railton, P. (2006). Normative guidance. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaethics (Vol. 1, pp. 3\u201334). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR49","volume-title":"Practical reason and norms","author":"J Raz","year":"1975","unstructured":"Raz, J. (1975). Practical reason and norms. Paris: Hutchinson."},{"issue":"3","key":"1896_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"611","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00128.x","volume":"63","author":"G Rosen","year":"2001","unstructured":"Rosen, G. (2001). Brandom on modality, normativity and intentionality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,63(3), 611\u2013623.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"key":"1896_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674043145","volume-title":"Moral dimensions: Permissibility, meaning, blame","author":"T Scanlon","year":"2008","unstructured":"Scanlon, T. (2008). Moral dimensions: Permissibility, meaning, blame. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"1896_CR52","first-page":"1","volume":"3","author":"T Schroeder","year":"2003","unstructured":"Schroeder, T. (2003). Donald Davidson\u2019s theory of mind is non-normative. Philosophers\u2019 Imprint,3(1), 1\u201314.","journal-title":"Philosophers\u2019 Imprint"},{"issue":"4","key":"1896_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-112-4-447","volume":"112","author":"N Shah","year":"2003","unstructured":"Shah, N. (2003). How truth governs belief. Philosophical Review,112(4), 447\u2013482.","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"issue":"4","key":"1896_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-114-4-497","volume":"114","author":"N Shah","year":"2005","unstructured":"Shah, N., & Velleman, J. D. (2005). Doxastic deliberation. Philosophical Review,114(4), 497\u2013534.","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"1896_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1111\/phis.12077","volume":"26","author":"M Simion","year":"2016","unstructured":"Simion, M., Kelp, C., & Ghijsen, H. (2016). Norms of belief. Philosophical Issues,26(1), 374\u2013392.","journal-title":"Philosophical Issues"},{"issue":"2","key":"1896_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0068.2010.00787.x","volume":"46","author":"D Smithies","year":"2012","unstructured":"Smithies, D. (2012). The normative role of knowledge. No\u00fbs,46(2), 265\u2013288.","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"key":"1896_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9781400836918","volume-title":"Knowing full well","author":"E Sosa","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sosa, E. (2010). Knowing full well. Princeton: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/0199288038.001.0001","volume-title":"Knowledge and practical interests","author":"J Stanley","year":"2005","unstructured":"Stanley, J. (2005). Knowledge and practical interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"1896_CR59","first-page":"42","volume":"27","author":"M Stocker","year":"1973","unstructured":"Stocker, M. (1973). Act and agent evaluations. Review of Metaphysics,27(1), 42\u201361.","journal-title":"Review of Metaphysics"},{"key":"1896_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/7262.001.0001","volume-title":"Without justification","author":"J Sutton","year":"2007","unstructured":"Sutton, J. (2007). Without justification. Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"key":"1896_CR61","volume-title":"Ignorance: A case for scepticism","author":"PK Unger","year":"1975","unstructured":"Unger, P. K. (1975). Ignorance: A case for scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR62","unstructured":"von Wright, G. H. (Ed.). (1983). On the logic of norms and action. In Practical reason, philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Blackwell."},{"key":"1896_CR63","first-page":"267","volume":"16","author":"R Wedgwood","year":"2002","unstructured":"Wedgwood, R. (2002). The aim of belief. Philosophical Perspectives,16, 267\u2013297.","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"key":"1896_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1093\/0199257361.003.0009","volume-title":"Weakness of will and practical irrationality","author":"R Wedgwood","year":"2003","unstructured":"Wedgwood, R. (2003). Choosing rationally and choosing correctly. In S. Stroud & C. Tappolet (Eds.), Weakness of will and practical irrationality (pp. 201\u2013229). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"1896_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-005-2317-2","volume":"126","author":"R Wedgwood","year":"2005","unstructured":"Wedgwood, R. (2005). Railton on normativity. Philosophical Studies,126(3), 463\u2013479.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"1896_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199251315.001.0001","volume-title":"The nature of normativity","author":"R Wedgwood","year":"2007","unstructured":"Wedgwood, R. (2007). The nature of normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"1896_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8349.2013.00227.x","volume":"87","author":"R Wedgwood","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wedgwood, R. (2013). Doxastic correctness. Aristotelian Society Supplementary,87(1), 217\u2013234.","journal-title":"Aristotelian Society Supplementary"},{"issue":"2","key":"1896_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1746-8361.2009.01204.x","volume":"64","author":"D Whiting","year":"2010","unstructured":"Whiting, D. (2010). Should I believe the truth? Dialectica,64(2), 213\u2013224.","journal-title":"Dialectica"},{"key":"1896_CR69","volume-title":"The aim of belief","author":"D Whiting","year":"2013","unstructured":"Whiting, D. (2013). Nothing but the truth: On the norms and aims of belief. In T. Chan (Ed.), The aim of belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR70","volume-title":"Knowledge and its limits","author":"T Williamson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"219","key":"1896_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0031-8094.2005.00396.x","volume":"55","author":"T Williamson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Williamson, T. (2005a). Contextualism, subject-sensitive invariantism and knowledge of knowledge. Philosophical Quarterly,55(219), 213\u2013235.","journal-title":"Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"1896_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199267408.003.0004","volume-title":"Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning, and truth","author":"T Williamson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Williamson, T. (2005b). Knowledge, context, and the agent\u2019s point of view. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning, and truth (pp. 91\u2013114). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR73","volume-title":"Epistemology: New essays","author":"T Williamson","year":"2008","unstructured":"Williamson, T. (2008). Why epistemology cannot be operationalized. In Q. Smith (Ed.), Epistemology: New essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR74","unstructured":"Williamson, T. (forthcoming). Justifications, excuses, and sceptical scenarios. In F. Dorsch & J. Dutant (Eds.), The new evil demon. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1896_CR75","volume-title":"Philosophical Investigations, 4th edition (trans. Hacker and Schulte)","author":"L Wittgenstein","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations, 4th edition (trans. Hacker and Schulte). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell."},{"key":"1896_CR76","volume-title":"An essay on moral responsibility","author":"MJ Zimmerman","year":"1988","unstructured":"Zimmerman, M. J. (1988). An essay on moral responsibility. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield."},{"key":"1896_CR77","volume-title":"Living with uncertainty: The moral significance of ignorance","author":"MJ Zimmerman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Zimmerman, M. J. (2009). Living with uncertainty: The moral significance of ignorance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-018-01896-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-018-01896-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-018-01896-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,10]],"date-time":"2024-07-10T10:58:24Z","timestamp":1720609104000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-018-01896-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,15]]},"references-count":77,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,8]]}},"alternative-id":["1896"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-018-01896-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0039-7857"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1573-0964"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,9,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 January 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 July 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 September 2018","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}