{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,17]],"date-time":"2026-03-17T08:40:33Z","timestamp":1773736833680,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":97,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,25]],"date-time":"2018-04-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1524614400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,25]],"date-time":"2018-04-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1524614400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004836","name":"Det Frie Forskningsr\u00e5d","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["4001-00059B FKK"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["4001-00059B FKK"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004836","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-018-1788-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,25]],"date-time":"2018-04-25T16:12:06Z","timestamp":1524672726000},"page":"2823-2847","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Disagreement and the division of epistemic labor"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"197","author":[{"given":"Bj\u00f8rn G.","family":"Hallsson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Klemens","family":"Kappel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,25]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"1788_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.x","volume":"29","author":"D Abrams","year":"1990","unstructured":"Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Psychology,29(2), 97\u2013119.","journal-title":"British Journal of Psychology"},{"issue":"257","key":"1788_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"541","DOI":"10.1093\/pq\/pqu034","volume":"64","author":"K Ahlstrom-Vij","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ahlstrom-Vij, K., & Dunn, J. (2014). A defence of epistemic consequentialism. Philosophical Quarterly,64(257), 541\u2013551.","journal-title":"Philosophical Quarterly"},{"issue":"6","key":"1788_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1037","DOI":"10.1037\/h0077720","volume":"39","author":"CA Anderson","year":"1980","unstructured":"Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39(6), 1037\u20131049. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0077720 .","journal-title":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"},{"key":"1788_CR4","unstructured":"Andreou, C. (2017). Dynamic choice. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/spr2017\/entries\/dynamic-choice\/ . Accessed 1 Dec 2017."},{"issue":"9","key":"1788_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1037\/h0093718","volume":"70","author":"S Asch","year":"1956","unstructured":"Asch, S. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied,70(9), 1\u201370.","journal-title":"Psychological Monographs: General and Applied"},{"key":"1788_CR6","unstructured":"Barber\u00e1, P. (2015). How social media reduces mass political polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S. In APSA conference paper."},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"337","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-2087645","volume":"122","author":"S Berker","year":"2013","unstructured":"Berker, S. (2013a). Epistemic teleology and the separateness of propositions. Philosophical Review,122(3), 337\u2013393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00318108-2087645 .","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"issue":"Epistemic Agenc","key":"1788_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1111\/phis.12019","volume":"23","author":"S Berker","year":"2013","unstructured":"Berker, S. (2013b). The rejection of epistemic consequentialism. Philosophical Issues,23(Epistemic Agency), 363\u2013387.","journal-title":"Philosophical Issues"},{"key":"1788_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511625190","volume-title":"Faces of intention: Selected essays on intention and agency","author":"ME Bratman","year":"1999","unstructured":"Bratman, M. E. (1999). Faces of intention: Selected essays on intention and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"1788_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1533-6077.2012.00219.x","volume":"22","author":"ME Bratman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Bratman, M. E. (2012). Time, rationality, and self-governance. Philosophical Issues,22(1), 73\u201388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1533-6077.2012.00219.x .","journal-title":"Philosophical Issues"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1080\/0020174X.2014.894271","volume":"57","author":"ME Bratman","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bratman, M. E. (2014). Temptation and the agent\u2019s standpoint. Inquiry,57(3), 293\u2013310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0020174X.2014.894271 .","journal-title":"Inquiry"},{"key":"1788_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/phpr.12436","author":"JR Carr","year":"2017","unstructured":"Carr, J. R. (2017). Epistemic utility theory and the aim of belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/phpr.12436 .","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"5","key":"1788_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1747-9991.2009.00237.x","volume":"4","author":"D Christensen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2009). Disagreement as evidence: The epistemology of controversy. Philosophy Compass,4(5), 756\u2013767. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1747-9991.2009.00237.x .","journal-title":"Philosophy Compass"},{"issue":"1","key":"1788_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2010.00366.x","volume":"LXXXI","author":"D Christensen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,LXXXI(1), 185\u2013215. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2010.00366.x .","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1111\/nous.12077","volume":"50","author":"D Christensen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2016). Conciliation, uniqueness and rational toxicity. No\u00fbs,50(3), 584\u2013603. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/nous.12077 .","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"issue":"16","key":"1788_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4003","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-014-0510-6","volume":"191","author":"C Cowie","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cowie, C. (2014). In defence of instrumentalism about epistemic normativity. Synthese,191(16), 4003\u20134017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-014-0510-6 .","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"10","key":"1788_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1379","DOI":"10.1177\/014616702236869","volume":"28","author":"E Dawson","year":"2002","unstructured":"Dawson, E., Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (2002). Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,28(10), 1379\u20131387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/014616702236869 .","journal-title":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin"},{"key":"1788_CR18","unstructured":"Dunn, J. (2013). Peer disagreement and group inquiry. Annual Meeting of the Indiana Philosophical Association."},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0068.2007.00656.x","volume":"41","author":"A Elga","year":"2007","unstructured":"Elga, A. (2007). Reflection and disagreement. No\u00fbs,41(3), 478\u2013502. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1468-0068.2007.00656.x .","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"issue":"476","key":"1788_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"953","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzq070","volume":"119","author":"D Enoch","year":"2010","unstructured":"Enoch, D. (2010). Not just a truthometer: Taking oneself seriously (but not too seriously) in cases of peer disagreement. Mind,119(476), 953\u2013997. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/fzq070 .","journal-title":"Mind"},{"issue":"6","key":"1788_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"978","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0033-2909.128.6.978","volume":"128","author":"JSBT Evans","year":"2002","unstructured":"Evans, J. S. B. T. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin,128(6), 978\u2013996. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/\/0033-2909.128.6.978 .","journal-title":"Psychological Bulletin"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03196976","volume":"11","author":"JSBT Evans","year":"1983","unstructured":"Evans, J. S. B. T., Barston, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory Cognition,11(3), 295\u2013306.","journal-title":"Memory Cognition"},{"issue":"1","key":"1788_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.2307\/3131397","volume":"55","author":"R Firth","year":"1981","unstructured":"Firth, R. (1981). Epistemic merit, intrinsic and instrumental. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association,55(1), 5\u201323.","journal-title":"Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association"},{"issue":"April","key":"1788_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2017.04.003","volume":"72","author":"JA Frimer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Frimer, J. A., Skitka, L. J., & Motyl, M. (2017). Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another\u2019s opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,72(April), 1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jesp.2017.04.003 .","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology"},{"key":"1788_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof","volume-title":"Relying on others: An essay in epistemology","author":"SC Goldberg","year":"2010","unstructured":"Goldberg, S. C. (2010). Relying on others: An essay in epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Pres. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof ."},{"key":"1788_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.3366\/epi.2011.0010","volume":"8","author":"SC Goldberg","year":"2011","unstructured":"Goldberg, S. C. (2011). The division of epistemic labour. Episteme,8, 112\u2013125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3366\/epi.2011.0010 .","journal-title":"Episteme"},{"issue":"2","key":"1788_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1017\/epi.2015.25","volume":"12","author":"AI Goldman","year":"2015","unstructured":"Goldman, A. I. (2015). Reliabilism, veritism, and epistemic consequentialism. Episteme,12(2), 131\u2013143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/epi.2015.25 .","journal-title":"Episteme"},{"key":"1788_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.21825\/philosophica.82194","volume":"78","author":"PJ Graham","year":"2006","unstructured":"Graham, P. J. (2006). Can testimony generate knowledge? Philosophica,78, 105\u2013127.","journal-title":"Philosophica"},{"issue":"488","key":"1788_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzt090","volume":"122","author":"H Greaves","year":"2013","unstructured":"Greaves, H. (2013). Epistemic decision theory. Mind,122(488), 915\u2013952. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/fzt090 .","journal-title":"Mind"},{"issue":"1","key":"1788_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1037\/1076-898X.12.1.31","volume":"12","author":"T Greitemeyer","year":"2006","unstructured":"Greitemeyer, T., Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., & Frey, D. (2006). Information sampling and group decision making: The effects of an advocacy decision procedure and task experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,12(1), 31\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/1076-898X.12.1.31 .","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied"},{"issue":"9","key":"1788_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e45457","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0045457","volume":"7","author":"L Hall","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hall, L., Johansson, P., & Strandberg, T. (2012). Lifting the veil of morality: Choice blindness and attitude reversals on a self-transforming survey. PLoS ONE,7(9), e45457. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0045457 .","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"4","key":"1788_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e60554","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0060554","volume":"8","author":"L Hall","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hall, L., Strandberg, T., P\u00e4rnamets, P., Lind, A., T\u00e4rning, B., & Johansson, P. (2013). How the polls can be both spot on and dead wrong: Using choice blindness to shift political attitudes and voter intentions. PLoS ONE,8(4), e60554. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0060554 .","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"7","key":"1788_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.2307\/2026523","volume":"82","author":"J Hardwig","year":"1985","unstructured":"Hardwig, J. (1985). Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy,82(7), 335\u2013349.","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"1788_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199698370.003.0002","volume-title":"The epistemology of disagreement: New essays","author":"J Hawthorne","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hawthorne, J., & Srinivasan, A. (2013). Disagreement without transparency: Some bleak thoughts. In D. Christensen & J. Lackey (Eds.), The epistemology of disagreement: New essays (pp. 9\u201330). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"494","key":"1788_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzu181","volume":"124","author":"B Hedden","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hedden, B. (2015). Time-slice rationality. Mind,124(494), 449\u2013491. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/fzu181 .","journal-title":"Mind"},{"issue":"6","key":"1788_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1037\/xge0000148","volume":"145","author":"EP Hennes","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hennes, E. P., Ruisch, B. C., Feygina, I., Monteiro, C. A., & Jost, J. T. (2016). Motivated Recall in the service of the economic system: The case of anthropogenic climate change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,145(6), 755\u2013771. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xge0000148 .","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General"},{"issue":"46","key":"1788_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16385","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.0403723101","volume":"101","author":"L Hong","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,101(46), 16385\u201316389.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"issue":"4","key":"1788_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.2307\/2667054","volume":"44","author":"KA Jehn","year":"1999","unstructured":"Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly,44(4), 741. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2667054 .","journal-title":"Administrative Science Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"1788_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-006-0012-2","volume":"157","author":"CS Jenkins","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jenkins, C. S. (2007). Entitlement and rationality. Synthese,157(1), 25\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-006-0012-2 .","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"5745","key":"1788_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1111709","volume":"310","author":"P Johansson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikstr\u00f6m, S., & Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science,310(5745), 116\u2013119. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.1111709 .","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"1788_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1005296023424","volume":"50","author":"M Jones","year":"2001","unstructured":"Jones, M., & Sugden, R. (2001). Positive confirmation bias in the acquisition of information. Theory and Decision,50(1), 59\u201399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1005296023424 .","journal-title":"Theory and Decision"},{"key":"1788_CR42","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Emerging trends in social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource","author":"DM Kahan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kahan, D. M. (2016). The politically motivated reasoning paradigm part 1: What politically motivated reasoning is and how to measure it. In R. A. Scott & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1\u201316). New York: Wiley."},{"issue":"1","key":"1788_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1017\/bpp.2016.2","volume":"1","author":"DM Kahan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., & Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy,1(1), 54\u201386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/bpp.2016.2 .","journal-title":"Behavioural Public Policy"},{"issue":"2","key":"1788_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1020212716425","volume":"110","author":"T Kelly","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kelly, T. (2002). The rationality of belief and some other propositional attitudes. Philosophical Studies,110(2), 163\u2013196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1020212716425 .","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"1788_CR45","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Oxford studies in epistemology","author":"T Kelly","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kelly, T. (2005). The epistemic significance of disagreement. In J. Hawthorne & T. S. Gendler (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 1, pp. 1\u201336). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"1788_CR46","volume-title":"The epistemology of disagreement: New essays","author":"T Kelly","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kelly, T. (2013). Disagreement and the burdens of judgment. In D. Christensen & J. Lackey (Eds.), The epistemology of disagreement: New essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR47","first-page":"227","volume":"51","author":"C Kelp","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kelp, C. (2014). Two for the knowledge goal of inquiry. American Philosophical Quarterly,51(3), 227\u2013232.","journal-title":"American Philosophical Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"1788_CR101","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009","volume":"55","author":"NL Kerr","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, S. R. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 623\u2013655.","journal-title":"Annual Review of Psychology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1788_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2010.00441.x","volume":"85","author":"NL King","year":"2012","unstructured":"King, N. L. (2012). Disagreement: What\u2019s the problem? Or a good peer is hard to find. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,85(2), 249\u2013272. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2010.00441.x .","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.2009.01045.x","volume":"75","author":"SH Klausen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Klausen, S. H. (2009). Two notions of epistemic normativity. Theoria,75(3), 161\u2013178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1755-2567.2009.01045.x .","journal-title":"Theoria"},{"issue":"2","key":"1788_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1017\/epi.2012.3","volume":"9","author":"M Kopec","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kopec, M. (2012). We ought to agree: A consequence of repairing Goldman\u2019s group scoring rule. Episteme,9(2), 101\u2013114. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/epi.2012.3 .","journal-title":"Episteme"},{"key":"1788_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-017-1388-x","author":"M Kopec","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kopec, M. (2017). A pluralistic account of epistemic rationality. Synthese. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-017-1388-x .","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"5","key":"1788_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1016\/j.anbehav.2010.12.018","volume":"81","author":"S Krause","year":"2011","unstructured":"Krause, S., James, R., Faria, J. J., Ruxton, G. D., & Krause, J. (2011). Swarm intelligence in humans: Diversity can trump ability. Animal Behaviour,81(5), 941\u2013948. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.anbehav.2010.12.018 .","journal-title":"Animal Behaviour"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.108.3.480","volume":"108","author":"Z Kunda","year":"1990","unstructured":"Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin,108(3), 480\u2013498. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-2909.108.3.480 .","journal-title":"Psychological Bulletin"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00418.x","volume":"70","author":"J Lackey","year":"2005","unstructured":"Lackey, J. (2005). Memory as a generative epistemic source. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,70(3), 636\u2013658.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"key":"1788_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199219162.001.0001","volume-title":"Learning from words: Testimony as a source of knowledge","author":"J Lackey","year":"2008","unstructured":"Lackey, J. (2008). Learning from words: Testimony as a source of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"Feldman 2007","key":"1788_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-2010-028","volume":"120","author":"B Lam","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lam, B. (2011). On the rationality of belief-invariance in light of peer disagreement. Philosophical Review,120(Feldman 2007), 207\u2013245. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/00318108-2010-028 .","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"issue":"6","key":"1788_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1079","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-011-9881-0","volume":"190","author":"B Lam","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lam, B. (2013). Calibrated probabilities and the epistemology of disagreement. Synthese,190(6), 1079\u20131098. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-011-9881-0 .","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1031(86)90022-3","volume":"22","author":"PR Laughlin","year":"1986","unstructured":"Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,22(3), 177\u2013189.","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology"},{"key":"1788_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139060097","volume-title":"Justification and the truth-connection","author":"C Littlejohn","year":"2012","unstructured":"Littlejohn, C. (2012). Justification and the truth-connection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"11","key":"1788_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2098","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.37.11.2098","volume":"37","author":"CG Lord","year":"1979","unstructured":"Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37(11), 2098\u20132109.","journal-title":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"1788_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9248.2012.01005.x","volume":"62","author":"RC Luskin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Luskin, R. C., O\u2019Flynn, I., Fishkin, J. S., & Russell, D. (2012). Deliberating across deep divides. Political Studies,62(1), 116\u2013135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9248.2012.01005.x .","journal-title":"Political Studies"},{"issue":"20","key":"1788_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5077","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1618722114","volume":"114","author":"RP Mann","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mann, R. P., & Helbing, D. (2016). Minorities report: optimal incentives for collective intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,114(20), 5077\u20135082. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1618722114 .","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.3366\/E1742360009000707","volume":"6","author":"JD Matheson","year":"2009","unstructured":"Matheson, J. D. (2009). Conciliatory views of disagreement and higher-order evidence. Episteme,6(3), 269\u2013279. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3366\/E1742360009000707 .","journal-title":"Episteme"},{"issue":"4","key":"1788_CR64","first-page":"1","volume":"3","author":"JD Matheson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Matheson, J. D. (2014). A puzzle about disagreement and rationality. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective,3(4), 1\u20133.","journal-title":"Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective"},{"key":"1788_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13398-014-0173-7.2","author":"JD Matheson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Matheson, J. D. (2015). The epistemic significance of disagreement. Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13398-014-0173-7.2 .","journal-title":"Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy"},{"issue":"5","key":"1788_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1080\/09672559.2017.1381408","volume":"25","author":"P McQueen","year":"2017","unstructured":"McQueen, P. (2017). When should we regret? International Journal of Philosophical Studies,25(5), 608\u2013623. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09672559.2017.1381408 .","journal-title":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies"},{"issue":"2","key":"1788_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/s11299-011-0085-6","volume":"10","author":"H Mercier","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mercier, H. (2011). What good is moral reasoning? Mind Society,10(2), 131\u2013148. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11299-011-0085-6 .","journal-title":"Mind Society"},{"issue":"2","key":"1788_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X10000968","volume":"34","author":"H Mercier","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences,34(2), 57\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0140525X10000968 .","journal-title":"The Behavioral and Brain Sciences"},{"issue":"January 2012","key":"1788_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"352","DOI":"10.3366\/E1742360007000135","volume":"4","author":"M Moffett","year":"2007","unstructured":"Moffett, M. (2007). Reasonable disagreement and rational group inquiry. Episteme,4(January 2012), 352\u2013367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3366\/E1742360007000135 .","journal-title":"Episteme"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1080\/135467898394148","volume":"4","author":"D Moshman","year":"1998","unstructured":"Moshman, D., & Geil, M. (1998). Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective rationality. Thinking and Reasoning,4(3), 231\u2013248.","journal-title":"Thinking and Reasoning"},{"issue":"5","key":"1788_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof","volume":"5","author":"S Moss","year":"2015","unstructured":"Moss, S. (2015). Time-slice epistemology and action under indeterminacy. Oxford Studies in Epistemology,5(5), 172\u2013193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof .","journal-title":"Oxford Studies in Epistemology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1788_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1037\/h0027568","volume":"12","author":"S Moscovici","year":"1969","unstructured":"Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(2), 125\u2013135.","journal-title":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"},{"issue":"9","key":"1788_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167209337163","volume":"35","author":"GD Munro","year":"2009","unstructured":"Munro, G. D., & Stansbury, J. A. (2009). The dark side of self-affirmation: Confirmation bias and illusory correlation in response to threatening information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,35(9), 1143\u20131153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167209337163 .","journal-title":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin"},{"issue":"2","key":"1788_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1037\/1089-2680.2.2.175","volume":"2","author":"R Nickerson","year":"1998","unstructured":"Nickerson, R. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology,2(2), 175\u2013220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/1089-2680.2.2.175 .","journal-title":"Review of General Psychology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1788_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"303","DOI":"10.1007\/s11109-010-9112-2","volume":"32","author":"B Nyhan","year":"2010","unstructured":"Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior,32(2), 303\u2013330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11109-010-9112-2 .","journal-title":"Political Behavior"},{"key":"1788_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/105846002317246506","author":"V Price","year":"2002","unstructured":"Price, V., Cappella, J. N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/105846002317246506 .","journal-title":"Political Communication"},{"key":"1788_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674042605","volume-title":"A theory of justice","author":"J Rawls","year":"1971","unstructured":"Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press."},{"key":"1788_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0171108","author":"A Rieznik","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rieznik, A., Moscovich, L., Frieiro, A., Figini, J., Catalano, R., Garrido, J. M., et al. (2017). A massive experiment on choice blindness in political decisions: Confidence, confabulation, and unconscious detection of self-deception. PLoS ONE. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0171108 .","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"6","key":"1788_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1080","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.91.6.1080","volume":"91","author":"S Schulz-Hardt","year":"2006","unstructured":"Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,91(6), 1080\u20131093. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.91.6.1080 .","journal-title":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"},{"key":"1788_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-5978(02)00001-8","volume":"88","author":"S Schulz-Hardt","year":"2002","unstructured":"Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M., & Frey, D. (2002). Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,88, 563\u2013586. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0749-5978(02)00001-8 .","journal-title":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1093\/ijpor\/eds029","volume":"25","author":"TJ Shih","year":"2013","unstructured":"Shih, T. J., Scheufele, D. A., & Brossard, D. (2013). Disagreement and value predispositions: Understanding public opinion about stem cell research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research,25(3), 357\u2013367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ijpor\/eds029 .","journal-title":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research"},{"issue":"6","key":"1788_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1467","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.48.6.1467","volume":"48","author":"G Stasser","year":"1985","unstructured":"Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,48(6), 1467\u20131478. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.48.6.1467 .","journal-title":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1788_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9760.00148","volume":"10","author":"CR Sunstein","year":"2002","unstructured":"Sunstein, C. R. (2002). The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy,10(2), 175\u2013195.","journal-title":"Journal of Political Philosophy"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"755","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x","volume":"50","author":"CS Taber","year":"2006","unstructured":"Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science,50(3), 755\u2013769.","journal-title":"American Journal of Political Science"},{"issue":"3","key":"1788_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-013-0139-1","volume":"168","author":"B Talbot","year":"2014","unstructured":"Talbot, B. (2014). Truth promoting non-evidential reasons for belief. Philosophical Studies,168(3), 599\u2013618. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-013-0139-1 .","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"1788_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof","volume":"5","author":"MG Titelbaum","year":"2013","unstructured":"Titelbaum, M. G. (2013). Rationality\u2019s fixed point (or: In defense of right reason). Oxford Studies in Epistemology,5, 253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof .","journal-title":"Oxford Studies in Epistemology"},{"issue":"8","key":"1788_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2122","DOI":"10.1111\/cogs.12303","volume":"40","author":"E Trouche","year":"2016","unstructured":"Trouche, E., Johansson, P., Hall, L., & Mercier, H. (2016). The selective laziness of reasoning. Cognitive Science,40(8), 2122\u20132136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/cogs.12303 .","journal-title":"Cognitive Science"},{"issue":"5","key":"1788_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1958","DOI":"10.1037\/a0037099","volume":"143","author":"E Trouche","year":"2014","unstructured":"Trouche, E., Sander, E., & Mercier, H. (2014). Arguments, more than confidence, explain the good performance of reasoning groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,143(5), 1958\u20131971. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0037099 .","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General"},{"issue":"5","key":"1788_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.2307\/2026388","volume":"81","author":"BC van Fraassen","year":"1984","unstructured":"van Fraassen, B. C. (1984). Belief and the will. Journal of Philosophy,81(5), 235\u2013256.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"1788_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546","volume":"58","author":"D van Knippenberg","year":"2007","unstructured":"van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology,58, 515\u2013541. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546 .","journal-title":"Annual Review of Psychology"},{"issue":"8","key":"1788_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.36.8.872","volume":"36","author":"A Vinokur","year":"1978","unstructured":"Vinokur, A., & Burnstein, E. (1978). Depolarization of attitudes in groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36(8), 872\u2013885. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.36.8.872 .","journal-title":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"},{"issue":"February 2015","key":"1788_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1080\/14640746808400161","volume":"20","author":"PC Wason","year":"1968","unstructured":"Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20(February 2015), 273\u2013281. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14640746808400161 .","journal-title":"The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology"},{"key":"1788_CR92","unstructured":"Weatherson, B. (2016). Normative externalism. Unpublished manuscript."},{"key":"1788_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199251315.001.0001","volume-title":"The nature of normativity","author":"R Wedgwood","year":"2007","unstructured":"Wedgwood, R. (2007). The nature of normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199251315.001.0001 ."},{"issue":"1","key":"1788_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1520-8583.2010.00204.x","volume":"24","author":"R White","year":"2010","unstructured":"White, R. (2010). You just believe that because\u2026. Philosophical Perspectives,24(1), 573\u2013615. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1520-8583.2010.00204.x .","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"issue":"6","key":"1788_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721415599543","volume":"24","author":"AW Woolley","year":"2015","unstructured":"Woolley, A. W., Aggarwal, I., & Malone, T. W. (2015). Collective intelligence and group performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science,24(6), 420\u2013424. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963721415599543 .","journal-title":"Current Directions in Psychological Science"}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-018-1788-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-018-1788-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-018-1788-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,21]],"date-time":"2022-08-21T00:30:49Z","timestamp":1661041849000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-018-1788-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,25]]},"references-count":97,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]}},"alternative-id":["1788"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-018-1788-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,4,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 February 2017","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 April 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 April 2018","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}