{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]],"date-time":"2026-02-27T12:46:12Z","timestamp":1772196372614,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":50,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,15]],"date-time":"2019-02-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1550188800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-019-02083-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,15]],"date-time":"2019-02-15T15:18:56Z","timestamp":1550243936000},"page":"1391-1428","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Defeasible normative reasoning"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"197","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3213-8907","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wolfgang","family":"Spohn","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"2083_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-7091-7118-9","volume-title":"Normative systems","author":"CE Alchourr\u00f3n","year":"1971","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C. E., & Bulygin, E. (1971). Normative systems. Wien: Springer."},{"key":"2083_CR2","first-page":"123","volume-title":"New studies on deontic logic","author":"CE Alchourr\u00f3n","year":"1981","unstructured":"Alchourr\u00f3n, C. E., & Makinson, D. (1981). Hierarchies of regulations and their logic. In R. Hilpinen (Ed.), New studies on deontic logic (pp. 123\u2013148). Dordrecht: Reidel."},{"key":"2083_CR3","volume-title":"The logic of legal requirements. Essays on defeasibility","year":"2012","unstructured":"Beltr\u00e1n, J. F., & Ratti, G. B. (Eds.). (2012). The logic of legal requirements. Essays on defeasibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2083_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-0387-2_4","volume-title":"Handbook of philosophical logic","author":"J Carmo","year":"2002","unstructured":"Carmo, J., & Jones, Andrew J. L. (2002). Deontic logic and contrary-to-duties. In D. Gabbay & P. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic (Vol. 8, pp. 265\u2013343). Dordrecht: Kluwer."},{"key":"2083_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/24.2.33","volume":"24","author":"RM Chisholm","year":"1963","unstructured":"Chisholm, R. M. (1963). Contrary-to-duty imperatives and deontic logic. Analysis,24, 33\u201336.","journal-title":"Analysis"},{"key":"2083_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198244127.001.0001","volume-title":"The probable and the provable","author":"L Jonathan Cohen","year":"1977","unstructured":"Cohen, L. Jonathan. (1977). The probable and the provable. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2083_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(96)00038-0","volume":"89","author":"A Darwiche","year":"1997","unstructured":"Darwiche, A., & Pearl, J. (1997). On the logic of iterated belief revision. Artificial Intelligence,89, 1\u201329.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"2083_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1351","DOI":"10.1007\/s10670-017-9879-1","volume":"82","author":"A Fuhrmann","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fuhrmann, A. (2017). Deontic modals: Why abandon the default approach. Erkenntnis,82, 1351\u20131365.","journal-title":"Erkenntnis"},{"key":"2083_CR9","volume-title":"Knowledge in flux. Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states","author":"P G\u00e4rdenfors","year":"1988","unstructured":"G\u00e4rdenfors, P. (1988). Knowledge in flux. Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press."},{"key":"2083_CR10","first-page":"220","volume-title":"Uncertainty in artificial intelligence","author":"PH Giang","year":"2000","unstructured":"Giang, P. H., & Shenoy, P. P. (2000). A qualitative linear utility theory for Spohn\u2019s theory of epistemic beliefs. In C. Boutilier & M. Goldszmidt (Eds.), Uncertainty in artificial intelligence (Vol. 16, pp. 220\u2013229). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann."},{"key":"2083_CR11","first-page":"241","volume-title":"Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems","author":"L Goble","year":"2013","unstructured":"Goble, L. (2013). Prima facie norms, normative conflicts, and dilemmas. In D. Gabbay, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems (pp. 241\u2013351). London: College Publications."},{"key":"2083_CR12","unstructured":"Goldszmidt, M., & Pearl, J. (1991). System Z+: A formalism for reasoning with variable strength defaults. In Proceedings of AAAI-91, Anaheim, CA (pp. 394\u2013404)."},{"key":"2083_CR14","unstructured":"Hansson, B. (1969). An analysis of some deontic logics. No\u00fbs 3, 373\u2013398, reprinted in: R. Hilpinen (ed.) (1971), Deontic logic: introductory and systematic readings, Dordrecht (pp. 121\u2013147)."},{"key":"2083_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-0814-3","volume-title":"A textbook of belief dynamics. Theory change and database updating","author":"SO Hansson","year":"1999","unstructured":"Hansson, S. O. (1999). A textbook of belief dynamics. Theory change and database updating. Dordrecht: Kluwer."},{"key":"2083_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1195","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2008.03.002","volume":"172","author":"M Hild","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hild, M., & Spohn, W. (2008). The measurement of ranks and the laws of iterated contraction. Artificial Intelligence,172, 1195\u20131218.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"2083_CR17","volume-title":"Knowledge and belief","author":"J Hintikka","year":"1962","unstructured":"Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and belief. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press."},{"key":"2083_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199744077.001.0001","volume-title":"Reasons as defaults","author":"JF Horty","year":"2012","unstructured":"Horty, J. F. (2012). Reasons as defaults. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2083_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1007\/s11225-007-9062-9","volume":"86","author":"F Huber","year":"2007","unstructured":"Huber, F. (2007). The consistency argument for ranking functions. Studia Logica,86, 299\u2013329.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"2083_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2167","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-013-0391-0","volume":"191","author":"F Huber","year":"2014","unstructured":"Huber, F. (2014). New foundations for conditionals. Synthese,191, 2167\u20132193.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"2083_CR21","unstructured":"Jeffrey, R. C. (1965). The logic of decision (2nd ed. 1983). Chicago: University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2083_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00869304","volume":"65","author":"AJI Jones","year":"1985","unstructured":"Jones, A. J. I., & P\u00f6rn, I. (1985). Ideality, sub-ideality and deontic logic. Synthese,65, 275\u2013290.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"2083_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1026110129951","volume":"40","author":"G Kern-Isberner","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kern-Isberner, G. (2004). A thorough axiomatization of a principle of conditional preservation in belief revision. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence,40, 127\u2013164.","journal-title":"Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"2083_CR24","volume-title":"Counterfactuals","author":"D Lewis","year":"1973","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell."},{"key":"2083_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.2307\/2184045","volume":"85","author":"D Lewis","year":"1976","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1976). Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities. The Philosophical Review,85, 297\u2013315.","journal-title":"The Philosophical Review"},{"key":"2083_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00869396","volume":"54","author":"B Loewer","year":"1983","unstructured":"Loewer, B., & Belzer, M. (1983). Dyadic deontic detachment. Synthese,54, 295\u2013318.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"2083_CR27","volume-title":"Games and decisions","author":"R Duncan Luce","year":"1957","unstructured":"Luce, R. Duncan, & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions. New York: Wiley."},{"key":"2083_CR28","unstructured":"Merin, A. (1996). Die Relevanz der Relevanz. Fallstudie zur Semantik der englischen Konjunktion \u2018but\u2019, Habilitationsschrift, University of Stuttgart 1996. Distributed as Arbeitsberichte des SFB 340, Nr. 142, Universities of Stuttgart and T\u00fcbingen, 1999."},{"key":"2083_CR29","volume-title":"Decision theory of rhetoric","author":"A Merin","year":"2006","unstructured":"Merin, A. (2006). Decision theory of rhetoric. Mimeograph: University of Konstanz."},{"key":"2083_CR30","unstructured":"Modgil, S. J., & Prakken, H. (2013). A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artificial Intelligence 195, 361\u2013397. (A corrected version is available at: http:\/\/www.staff.science.uu.nl\/~prakk101\/corraij13.html ."},{"key":"2083_CR31","volume-title":"Defeasible deontic logic","year":"1997","unstructured":"Nute, D. (Ed.). (1997). Defeasible deontic logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer."},{"key":"2083_CR32","first-page":"121","volume-title":"Proceedings TARK-90","author":"J Pearl","year":"1990","unstructured":"Pearl, J. (1990). System Z: A natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to default reasoning. In R. Parikh (Ed.), Proceedings TARK-90 (pp. 121\u2013135). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann."},{"key":"2083_CR33","volume-title":"Hume on is and ought","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pigden, C. R. (Ed.). (2010). Hume on is and ought. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan."},{"key":"2083_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","volume":"11","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pollock, J. L. (1987). Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science,11, 481\u2013518.","journal-title":"Cognitive Science"},{"key":"2083_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001","volume-title":"Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1995","unstructured":"Pollock, J. L. (1995). Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press."},{"key":"2083_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592","volume":"1","author":"H Prakken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Prakken, H. (2010). An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument and Computation,1, 93\u2013124.","journal-title":"Argument and Computation"},{"key":"2083_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00370671","volume":"57","author":"H Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken, H., & Sergot, M. J. (1996). Contrary-to-duty obligations. Studia Logica,57, 91\u2013115.","journal-title":"Studia Logica"},{"key":"2083_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prakken, H., & Sergot, M. J. (1997). Dyadic deontic logic and contrary-to-duty obligations. In Nute (1997) (pp. 223\u2013262).","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8851-5_10"},{"key":"2083_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/s1755020318000199","author":"E Raidl","year":"2018","unstructured":"Raidl, E. (2018). Completeness for counter-doxa conditionals\u2014Using ranking semantics. Review of Symbolic Logic. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s1755020318000199 .","journal-title":"Review of Symbolic Logic"},{"key":"2083_CR40","volume-title":"The right and the good","author":"WD Ross","year":"1930","unstructured":"Ross, W. D. (1930). The right and the good. Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"key":"2083_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198503064.001.0001","volume-title":"Change, choice and inference: A study of belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning","author":"H Rott","year":"2001","unstructured":"Rott, H. (2001). Change, choice and inference: A study of belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2083_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-011-9177-3","volume":"40","author":"H Rott","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rott, H. (2011). Reapproaching Ramsey: Conditionals and iterated belief change in the spirit of AGM. Journal of Philosophical Logic,40, 155\u2013191.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"2083_CR43","volume-title":"Handbook of legal reasoning and argumentation","author":"G Sartor","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sartor, G. (2018). Defeasibility in law. In G. Bongiovanni, G. Postema, A. Rotolo, G. Sartor, C. Valentini, & D. Walton (Eds.), Handbook of legal reasoning and argumentation. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"2083_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-3375-5","volume-title":"The is-ought problem. A study in philosophical logic","author":"G Schurz","year":"1997","unstructured":"Schurz, G. (1997). The is-ought problem. A study in philosophical logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer."},{"key":"2083_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00693275","volume":"4","author":"W Spohn","year":"1975","unstructured":"Spohn, W. (1975). An analysis of Hansson\u2019s dyadic deontic logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic,4, 237\u2013252.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"2083_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1015004212541","volume":"131","author":"W Spohn","year":"2002","unstructured":"Spohn, W. (2002). A brief comparison of Pollock\u2019s defeasible reasoning and ranking functions. Synthese,131, 39\u201356.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"2083_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-9198-8_8","volume-title":"Degrees of belief. An anthology","author":"W Spohn","year":"2009","unstructured":"Spohn, W. (2009). A survey of ranking theory. In F. Huber & C. Schmidt-Petri (Eds.), Degrees of belief. An anthology (pp. 185\u2013228). Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"2083_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199697502.001.0001","volume-title":"The laws of belief. Ranking theory and its philosophical applications","author":"W Spohn","year":"2012","unstructured":"Spohn, W. (2012). The laws of belief. Ranking theory and its philosophical applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2083_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1007\/s13194-014-0093-6","volume":"4","author":"W Spohn","year":"2014","unstructured":"Spohn, W. (2014). The epistemic account of ceteris paribus conditions. European Journal for the Philosophy of Science,4, 385\u2013408.","journal-title":"European Journal for the Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"2083_CR50","unstructured":"Spohn, W. (2015). Conditionals: A unified ranking-theoretic perspective. In Philosophers\u2019 Imprints 15(1), 1\u201330; see: http:\/\/quod.lib.umich.edu\/p\/phimp\/3521354.0015.001\/ ."},{"key":"2083_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1007\/s41412-017-0060-5","volume":"34","author":"W Spohn","year":"2017","unstructured":"Spohn, W. (2017). Knightian uncertainty meets ranking theory. Homo Oeconomicus,34, 293\u2013311.","journal-title":"Homo Oeconomicus"}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02083-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02083-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02083-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,14]],"date-time":"2024-07-14T20:36:07Z","timestamp":1720989367000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02083-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,15]]},"references-count":50,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]}},"alternative-id":["2083"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02083-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 December 2017","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 October 2018","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 January 2019","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 February 2019","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}