{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]],"date-time":"2026-01-20T16:08:11Z","timestamp":1768925291052,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":72,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"S25","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1548979200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-019-02113-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]],"date-time":"2019-02-01T07:02:50Z","timestamp":1549004570000},"page":"6023-6051","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Kuhn\u2019s two accounts of rational disagreement in science: an interpretation and critique"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"198","author":[{"given":"Markus","family":"Seidel","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"2113_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/35.4.313","volume":"35","author":"R Ariew","year":"1984","unstructured":"Ariew, R. (1984). The Duhem thesis. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 35(4), 313\u2013325.","journal-title":"The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"2113_CR2","unstructured":"Baghramian, M., & Carter, A. J. (2017) Relativism. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2017 edn). https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/sum2017\/entries\/relativism\/."},{"key":"2113_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/UPO9781844653065","volume-title":"Thomas Kuhn","author":"A Bird","year":"2000","unstructured":"Bird, A. (2000). Thomas Kuhn. Princeton: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"2113_CR4","unstructured":"Bird, A. (2013). Thomas Kuhn. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2013 edn). https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/fall2013\/entries\/thomas-kuhn\/."},{"key":"2113_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-94673-3","volume-title":"Epistemic relativism and scepticism. Unwinding the braid","author":"S Bland","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bland, S. (2018). Epistemic relativism and scepticism. Unwinding the braid. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan."},{"key":"2113_CR6","volume-title":"Knowledge and social imagery","author":"D Bloor","year":"1991","unstructured":"Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"issue":"4","key":"2113_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1177\/030631296026004005","volume":"26","author":"D Bloor","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bloor, D. (1996). Idealism and the sociology of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 26(4), 839\u2013856.","journal-title":"Social Studies of Science"},{"key":"2113_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199287185.001.0001","volume-title":"Fear of knowledge. Against relativism and constructivism","author":"P Boghossian","year":"2006","unstructured":"Boghossian, P. (2006). Fear of knowledge. Against relativism and constructivism. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2113_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-70052-6_2","volume-title":"Peter van Inwagen. Materialism, free will and god","author":"F B\u00f6gner","year":"2018","unstructured":"B\u00f6gner, F., Meyer, T., Schnieder, K., & Seidel, M. (2018). Rational peer disagreement upon sufficient evidence: Leaving the track to truth? In L. Jansen & P. M. N\u00e4ger (Eds.), Peter van Inwagen. Materialism, free will and god (pp. 17\u201339). Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"2113_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-6279-7_20","volume-title":"Rethinking scientific change and theory comparison: Stabilities, ruptures, incommensurabilities?","author":"M Carrier","year":"2008","unstructured":"Carrier, M. (2008). The aim and structure of methodological theory. In L. Soler, et al. (Eds.), Rethinking scientific change and theory comparison: Stabilities, ruptures, incommensurabilities? (pp. 273\u2013290). Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"2113_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1057\/9781137336644","volume-title":"Metaepistemology and relativism","author":"JA Carter","year":"2016","unstructured":"Carter, J. A. (2016). Metaepistemology and relativism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan."},{"issue":"2","key":"2113_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-2006-035","volume":"116","author":"D Christensen","year":"2007","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2007). Epistemology of disagreement: The good news. The Philosophical Review, 116(2), 187\u2013217.","journal-title":"The Philosophical Review"},{"key":"2113_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199226078.003.0005","volume-title":"Disagreement","author":"E Conee","year":"2010","unstructured":"Conee, E. (2010). Rational disagreement defended. In R. Feldman & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement (pp. 69\u201390). New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2113_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.2307\/3129898","volume":"47","author":"D Davidson","year":"1973","unstructured":"Davidson, D. (1973). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47, 5\u201320.","journal-title":"Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association"},{"key":"2113_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00484597","volume":"27","author":"D Davidson","year":"1974","unstructured":"Davidson, D. (1974). Belief and the basis of meaning. Synthese, 27, 309\u2013323.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"2113_CR15","first-page":"1","volume-title":"The seas of language","author":"M Dummett","year":"1993","unstructured":"Dummett, M. (1993). What is a theory of meaning? In M. Dummett (Ed.), The seas of language (pp. 1\u201333). Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"key":"2113_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195173079.003.0016","volume-title":"Philosophers without gods: Meditations on atheism and the secular life","author":"R Feldman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Feldman, R. (2007). Reasonable religious disagreements. In L. Antony (Ed.), Philosophers without gods: Meditations on atheism and the secular life (pp. 194\u2013214). New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2113_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199226078.001.0001","volume-title":"Disagreement","author":"R Feldman","year":"2010","unstructured":"Feldman, R., & Warfield, T. A. (2010). Introduction. In R. Feldman & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement (pp. 1\u20139). New York: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"4","key":"2113_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.4148\/jhap.v1i4.1301","volume":"1","author":"A George","year":"2012","unstructured":"George, A. (2012). Opening the door to Cloud-Cuckoo-Land: Hempel and Kuhn on rationality. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, 1(4), 1\u201317.","journal-title":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy"},{"key":"2113_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199226078.003.0009","volume-title":"Disagreement","author":"A Goldman","year":"2010","unstructured":"Goldman, A. (2010). Epistemic relativism and reasonable disagreement. In R. Feldman & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement (pp. 187\u2013215). New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2113_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-7055-7_4","volume-title":"Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis","author":"CG Hempel","year":"1983","unstructured":"Hempel, C. G. (1983). Valuation and objectivity in science. In R. S. Cohen & L. Laudan (Eds.), Physics, philosophy and psychoanalysis (pp. 73\u2013100). Dordrecht: Reidel."},{"key":"2113_CR20","volume-title":"Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science","author":"M Hesse","year":"1980","unstructured":"Hesse, M. (1980). Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. Brighton: The Harvester Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"2113_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1016\/0039-3681(90)90006-T","volume":"21","author":"P Hoyningen-Huene","year":"1990","unstructured":"Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1990). Kuhn\u2019s conception of incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 21(3), 481\u2013492.","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"2113_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/43.4.487","volume":"43","author":"P Hoyningen-Huene","year":"1992","unstructured":"Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1992). The interrelations between the philosophy, history and sociology of science in Thomas Kuhn\u2019s theory of scientific development. British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 43, 487\u2013501.","journal-title":"British Journal for Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"2113_CR23","volume-title":"Reconstructing scientific revolutions Thomas S. Kuhn\u2019s philosophy of science","author":"P Hoyningen-Huene","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1993). Reconstructing scientific revolutions Thomas S. Kuhn\u2019s philosophy of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-2404-4_10","volume-title":"EPSA philosophy of science Amsterdam 2009","author":"C Kelp","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kelp, C., & Douven, I. (2012). Sustaining a rational disagreement. In H. W. De Regt, et al. (Eds.), EPSA philosophy of science Amsterdam 2009 (pp. 101\u2013110). Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"2113_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0066-7373.2004.00081.x","volume":"104","author":"M K\u00f6lbel","year":"2004","unstructured":"K\u00f6lbel, M. (2004). Faultless disagreement. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 104, 53\u201373.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society"},{"key":"2113_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226217239.001.0001","volume-title":"The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and change","author":"TS Kuhn","year":"1977","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. S. (1977a). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. 320\u2013339). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226217239.001.0001","volume-title":"The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and change","author":"TS Kuhn","year":"1977","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. S. (1977b). Logic of discovery or psychology of research. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. 266\u2013292). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226217239.001.0001","volume-title":"The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and change","author":"TS Kuhn","year":"1977","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. S. (1977c). Second thoughts on paradigm. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. 293\u2013319). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226458106.001.0001","volume-title":"The structure of scientific revolutions","author":"TS Kuhn","year":"1996","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR30","first-page":"90","volume-title":"The road since Structure","author":"TS Kuhn","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. S. (2000a). The road since structure. In J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The road since Structure (pp. 90\u2013104). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR31","first-page":"13","volume-title":"The road since structure","author":"TS Kuhn","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. S. (2000b). What are scientific revolutions? In J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The road since structure (pp. 13\u201332). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR32","first-page":"224","volume-title":"The road since structure","author":"TS Kuhn","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. S. (2000c). Afterwords. In J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The road since structure (pp. 224\u2013252). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR33","first-page":"33","volume-title":"The road since structure","author":"TS Kuhn","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. S. (2000d). Commensurability, comparability, communicability. In J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The road since structure (pp. 33\u201357). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR34","first-page":"105","volume-title":"The road since structure","author":"TS Kuhn","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. S. (2000e). The trouble with the historical philosophy of science. In J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The road since structure (pp. 105\u2013120). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR35","first-page":"123","volume-title":"The road since structure","author":"TS Kuhn","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. S. (2000f). Reflections on my critics. In J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The road since structure (pp. 123\u2013175). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR36","first-page":"208","volume-title":"The road since structure","author":"TS Kuhn","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. S. (2000g). Rationality and theory choice. In J. Conant & J. Haugeland (Eds.), The road since structure (pp. 208\u2013215). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR37","first-page":"213","volume-title":"The later Wittgenstein on language","author":"M Kusch","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kusch, M. (2010). Kripke\u2019s Wittgenstein, on certainty, and epistemic relativism. In D. Whiting (Ed.), The later Wittgenstein on language (pp. 213\u2013230). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan."},{"key":"2113_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139171434.009","volume-title":"Criticism and the growth of knowledge","author":"I Lakatos","year":"1970","unstructured":"Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91\u2013196). London: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"2113_CR39","first-page":"55","volume-title":"Beyond positivism and relativism. Theory, method and evidence","author":"L Laudan","year":"1996","unstructured":"Laudan, L., & Leplin, Jarrett. (1996). Empirical equivalence and underdetermination. In L. Laudan (Ed.), Beyond positivism and relativism. Theory, method and evidence (pp. 55\u201373). Boulder: Westview Press."},{"key":"2113_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1533-6077.2004.00031.x","volume":"14","author":"S Luper","year":"2004","unstructured":"Luper, S. (2004). Epistemic relativism. Philosophical Issues, 14, 271\u2013295.","journal-title":"Philosophical Issues"},{"key":"2113_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139171434.008","volume-title":"Criticsm and the growth of knowledge","author":"M Masterman","year":"1970","unstructured":"Masterman, M. (1970). The nature of a paradigm. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticsm and the growth of knowledge (pp. 59\u201389). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"2113_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226511993.001.0001","volume-title":"Error and the growth of experimental knowledge","author":"DG Mayo","year":"1996","unstructured":"Mayo, D. G. (1996). Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2113_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7312\/mlad14668","volume-title":"Kuhn\u2019s legacy. Epistemology, metaphilosophy and pragmatism","author":"B Mladenovic","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mladenovic, B. (2017). Kuhn\u2019s legacy. Epistemology, metaphilosophy and pragmatism. New York: Columbia University Press."},{"key":"2113_CR44","first-page":"106","volume-title":"Rationality and relativism","author":"W Newton-Smith","year":"1982","unstructured":"Newton-Smith, W. (1982). Relativism and the possibility of interpretation. In M. Hollis & S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and relativism (pp. 106\u2013122). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press."},{"key":"2113_CR45","unstructured":"Oberheim, E., & Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2016). The incommensurability of scientific theories. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/win2016\/entries\/incommensurability\/."},{"issue":"477","key":"2113_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/fzr010","volume":"120","author":"S Okasha","year":"2011","unstructured":"Okasha, S. (2011). Theory choice and social choice: Kuhn versus Arrow. Mind, 120(477), 83\u2013115.","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"2113_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"266","DOI":"10.1002\/9781444392494.ch14","volume-title":"A companion to relativism","author":"D Pritchard","year":"2011","unstructured":"Pritchard, D. (2011). Epistemic relativism, epistemic incommensurability, and Wittgensteinian epistemology. In S. Hales (Ed.), A companion to relativism (pp. 266\u2013285). Oxford: Wiley."},{"key":"2113_CR48","volume-title":"Scientific realism. How science tracks truth","author":"S Psillos","year":"1999","unstructured":"Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific realism. How science tracks truth. London: Routledge."},{"key":"2113_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511625398","volume-title":"Reason, truth, and history","author":"H Putnam","year":"1981","unstructured":"Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth, and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"2113_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctv1c5cx5c.7","volume-title":"From a logical point of view","author":"WVO Quine","year":"1980","unstructured":"Quine, W. V. O. (1980). Two Dogmas of empiricism. In W. V. O. Quine (Ed.), From a logical point of view (pp. 20\u201346). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press."},{"key":"2113_CR51","first-page":"69","volume":"15","author":"G Rosen","year":"2001","unstructured":"Rosen, G. (2001). Nominalism, naturalism, and epistemic relativism. Philosophical Perspectives, 15, 69\u201391.","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"key":"2113_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1007\/s10670-014-9677-y","volume":"80","author":"H Rott","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rott, H. (2015). A puzzle about disputes and disagreements. Erkenntnis, 80, 167\u2013189.","journal-title":"Erkenntnis"},{"key":"2113_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2010.11.031","volume":"42","author":"DP Rowbottom","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rowbottom, D. P. (2011). Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science: A resolution on the group level. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A, 42, 117\u2013124.","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A"},{"key":"2113_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1086\/psaprocbienmeetp.1990.2.193077","volume":"1990","author":"WC Salmon","year":"1990","unstructured":"Salmon, W. C. (1990). The Appraisal of Theories: Kuhn meets Bayes. Proceedings of the Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1990, 325\u2013332.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association"},{"key":"2113_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"759","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/44.4.759","volume":"44","author":"H Sankey","year":"1993","unstructured":"Sankey, H. (1993). Kuhn\u2019s changing concept of incommensurability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44, 759\u2013774.","journal-title":"British Journal for the Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"2113_CR56","volume-title":"The incommensurability thesis","author":"H Sankey","year":"1994","unstructured":"Sankey, H. (1994). The incommensurability thesis. London: Ashgate."},{"key":"2113_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"562","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2011.09.012","volume":"42","author":"H Sankey","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sankey, H. (2011). Epistemic relativism and the problem of the criterion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 42, 562\u2013570.","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"2113_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-012-9139-6","volume":"32","author":"H Sankey","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sankey, H. (2013). Methodological incommensurability and epistemic relativism. Topoi, 32, 33\u201341.","journal-title":"Topoi"},{"key":"2113_CR59","first-page":"7","volume-title":"Incommensurability and related matters","author":"H Sankey","year":"2001","unstructured":"Sankey, H., & Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2001). Introduction. In P. Hoyningen-Huene & H. Sankey (Eds.), Incommensurability and related matters (pp. 7\u201336). Dordrecht: Kluwer."},{"issue":"1","key":"2113_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2012.06.004","volume":"44","author":"M Seidel","year":"2013","unstructured":"Seidel, M. (2013a). Why the epistemic relativist cannot use the sceptic\u2019s strategy. A comment on Sankey. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A, 44(1), 134\u2013139.","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A"},{"issue":"1","key":"2113_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2012.10.004","volume":"44","author":"M Seidel","year":"2013","unstructured":"Seidel, M. (2013b). Scylla and Charybdis of the epistemic relativist: Why the epistemic relativist still cannot use the Sceptic\u2019s Strategy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A., 44(1), 145\u2013149.","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A."},{"key":"2113_CR62","unstructured":"Seidel, M. (2013c). Between relativism and absolutism? The failure of Kuhn\u2019s moderate relativism. In: Hoeltje, M., Spitzley, T., & Spohn, W. (eds.), Was d\u00fcrfen wir glauben? Was sollen wir tun?\u2014Sektionsbeitr\u00e4ge des achten internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft f\u00fcr Analytische Philosophie e.V., Online-Ver\u00f6ffentlichung der Universit\u00e4t Duisburg-Essen (DuEPublico), (pp. 172\u2013185). http:\/\/duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de\/servlets\/DerivateServlet\/Derivate-33085\/GAP8_Proceedings.pdf."},{"key":"2113_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1057\/9781137377890","volume-title":"Epistemic relativism. A constructive critique","author":"M Seidel","year":"2014","unstructured":"Seidel, M. (2014a). Epistemic relativism. A constructive critique. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan."},{"issue":"2","key":"2113_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v34i2.3886","volume":"34","author":"M Seidel","year":"2014","unstructured":"Seidel, M. (2014b). Throwing the baby out with the water: From reasonably doubting epistemic authority to rampant scepticism about expertise. Informal Logic, 34(2), 192\u2013218.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"issue":"2","key":"2113_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v36i2.4621","volume":"36","author":"M Seidel","year":"2016","unstructured":"Seidel, M. (2016). The real struggle: An objective notion of expertise? Informal Logic, 36(2), 253\u2013264.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"issue":"1","key":"2113_CR66","first-page":"1","volume":"8","author":"L Soler","year":"2004","unstructured":"Soler, L. (2004). The incommensurability problem: Evolution, current approaches and recent issues. Philosophia Scientiae, 8(1), 1\u201338.","journal-title":"Philosophia Scientiae"},{"key":"2113_CR67","first-page":"595","volume-title":"The philosophy of W. V. Quine","author":"J Vuillemin","year":"1986","unstructured":"Vuillemin, J. (1986). On Duhem\u2019s and Quine\u2019s thesis. In L. E. Hahn & P. A. Schilpp (Eds.), The philosophy of W. V. Quine (pp. 595\u2013618). La Salle: Open Court."},{"key":"2113_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1520-8583.2005.00069.x","volume":"19","author":"R White","year":"2005","unstructured":"White, R. (2005). Epistemic permissiveness. Philosophical Perspectives, 19, 445\u2013459.","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"key":"2113_CR69","first-page":"313","volume-title":"The Routledge companion to philosophy of science","author":"J Worrall","year":"2014","unstructured":"Worrall, J. (2014). Theory-change in science. In M. Curd & S. Psillos (Eds.), The Routledge companion to philosophy of science (pp. 313\u2013323). London: Routledge."},{"key":"2113_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511997990","volume-title":"Kuhn\u2019s evolutionary social epistemology","author":"KB Wray","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wray, K. B. (2011). Kuhn\u2019s evolutionary social epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02113-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02113-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02113-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,14]],"date-time":"2024-07-14T13:28:10Z","timestamp":1720963690000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02113-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]]},"references-count":72,"journal-issue":{"issue":"S25","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]}},"alternative-id":["2113"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02113-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,2,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 October 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 January 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 February 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}