{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,22]],"date-time":"2025-10-22T02:49:26Z","timestamp":1761101366860,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":68,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"S25","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,30]],"date-time":"2019-03-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1553904000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,30]],"date-time":"2019-03-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1553904000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-019-02182-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,30]],"date-time":"2019-03-30T13:02:30Z","timestamp":1553950950000},"page":"6143-6158","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Some lessons from simulations of scientific disagreements"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"198","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5679-5787","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dunja","family":"\u0160e\u0161elja","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"2182_CR1","unstructured":"Arnold, E. (2006). The dark side of the force: When computer simulations lead us astray and \u201cmodel think\u201d narrows our imagination\u2014Pre-conference draft for the models and simulation conference, Paris, June 12\u201314. Accessed on October 31, 2018. https:\/\/eckhartarnold.de\/papers\/2006_simulations\/node10.html."},{"issue":"2","key":"2182_CR2","first-page":"101","volume":"XV","author":"E Arnold","year":"2013","unstructured":"Arnold, E. (2013). Simulation models of the evolution of cooperation as proofs of logical possibilities. How useful are they? Ethics and Politics, XV(2), 101\u2013138.","journal-title":"Ethics and Politics"},{"issue":"2","key":"2182_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1177\/0309132509343728","volume":"34","author":"TJ Barnes","year":"2010","unstructured":"Barnes, T. J., & Sheppard, E. (2010). Nothing includes everything\u2019: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 34(2), 193\u2013214.","journal-title":"Progress in Human Geography"},{"key":"2182_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beebe, J. R, Baghramian, M., O\u2019C Drury, L., & Dellsen, F., (2018). Divergent perspectives on expert disagreement: Preliminary evidence from climate science, climate policy, astrophysics, and public opinion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.01889.","DOI":"10.1080\/17524032.2018.1504099"},{"key":"2182_CR5","first-page":"4","volume":"8","author":"R Boero","year":"2005","unstructured":"Boero, R., & Squazzoni, F. (2005). Does empirical embeddedness matter? Methodological issues on agent-based models for analytical social science. Journal of artificial societies and social simulation, 8, 4.","journal-title":"Journal of artificial societies and social simulation"},{"key":"2182_CR6","first-page":"507","volume-title":"Proceedings of the advances in artificial intelligence: From theory to practice\u201430th international conference on industrial engineering and other applications of applied intelligent systems, IEA\/AIE 2017, Arras, France, 27\u201330 June 2017. Part I","author":"A Borg","year":"2017","unstructured":"Borg, A., Frey, D., \u0160e\u0161elja, D., & Stra\u00dfer, C. (2017). An argumentative agent-based model of scientific inquiry. In S. Benferhat, K. Tabia, & M. Ali (Eds.), Proceedings of the advances in artificial intelligence: From theory to practice\u201430th international conference on industrial engineering and other applications of applied intelligent systems, IEA\/AIE 2017, Arras, France, 27\u201330 June 2017. Part I (pp. 507\u2013510). Cham: Springer."},{"key":"2182_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-55665-8_27","volume-title":"Proceedings of the logic, rationality, and interaction: 6th international workshop, LORI 2017, Sapporo, Japan, 11\u201314 September 2017","author":"A Borg","year":"2017","unstructured":"Borg, A., Frey, D., \u0160e\u0161elja, D., & Stra\u00dfer, C. (2017). Examining network effects in an argumentative agent-based model of scientific inquiry. In A. Baltag, J. Seligman, & T. Yamada (Eds.), Proceedings of the logic, rationality, and interaction: 6th international workshop, LORI 2017, Sapporo, Japan, 11\u201314 September 2017 (pp. 391\u2013406). Berlin: Springer."},{"issue":"1","key":"2182_CR8","first-page":"285","volume":"43","author":"A Borg","year":"2018","unstructured":"Borg, A., Frey, D., \u0160e\u0161elja, D., & Stra\u00dfer, C. (2018). Epistemic effects of scientific interaction: Approaching the question with an argumentative agent-based model. Historical Social Research, 43(1), 285\u2013309.","journal-title":"Historical Social Research"},{"key":"2182_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Borg, A., Frey, D., \u0160e\u0161elja, D., & Stra\u00dfer, C. (2019). Theory-choice, transient diversity and the efficiency of scientific inquiry. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13194-019-0249-5.","DOI":"10.1007\/s13194-019-0249-5"},{"key":"2182_CR10","unstructured":"Casini, L. & Manzo, G. (2016). Agent-based models and causality: A methodological appraisal. In The IAS working paper series. http:\/\/urn.kb.se\/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-133332. Accessed 1 Dec 2018"},{"key":"2182_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-3932-1","volume-title":"Is water H2O? Evidence, Pluralism and Realism","author":"H Chang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chang, H. (2012). Is water H2O? Evidence, Pluralism and Realism. Berlin: Springer."},{"issue":"1","key":"2182_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2010.00366.x","volume":"81","author":"D Christensen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Christensen, D. (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81(1), 185\u2013215.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"2182_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2013.02.002","volume":"44","author":"H De Cruz","year":"2013","unstructured":"De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2013). The value of epistemic disagreement in scientific practice. The case of Homo oresiensis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(2), 169\u2013177.","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A"},{"key":"2182_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2547","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-012-0149-0","volume":"190","author":"R De Langhe","year":"2013","unstructured":"De Langhe, R. (2013). Peer disagreement under multiple epistemic systems. Synthese, 190, 2547\u20132556.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"2182_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctt6wrc78","volume-title":"Science, policy, and the value-free ideal","author":"HE Douglas","year":"2009","unstructured":"Douglas, H. E. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"2182_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2010.03.010","volume":"41","author":"I Douven","year":"2010","unstructured":"Douven, I. (2010). Simulating peer disagreements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 41(2), 148\u2013157.","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A"},{"key":"2182_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77, 321\u2013358.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"3","key":"2182_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"478","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0068.2007.00656.x","volume":"41","author":"A Elga","year":"2007","unstructured":"Elga, A. (2007). Reflection and disagreement. No\u00fbs, 41(3), 478\u2013502.","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"key":"2182_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199226078.003.0004","volume-title":"Diasagreement","author":"CZ Elgin","year":"2010","unstructured":"Elgin, C. Z. (2010). Persistent disagreement. In R. Feldman & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), Diasagreement (pp. 53\u201368). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"5","key":"2182_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"807","DOI":"10.1086\/673719","volume":"80","author":"KC Elliott","year":"2013","unstructured":"Elliott, K. C., & Willmes, D. (2013). Cognitive attitudes and values in science. Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 807\u2013817.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"2182_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1520-8583.2005.00055.x","volume":"19","author":"R Feldman","year":"2005","unstructured":"Feldman, R. (2005). Respecting the evidence. Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1), 95\u2013119.","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"key":"2182_CR22","first-page":"216","volume-title":"Epistemological puzzles about disagreement. Epistemology futures","author":"R Feldman","year":"2006","unstructured":"Feldman, R. (2006). Epistemological puzzles about disagreement. Epistemology futures (pp. 216\u2013326). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2182_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195173079.003.0016","volume-title":"Philosophers without gods","author":"R Feldman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Feldman, R. (2007). Reasonable religious disagreements. In L. M. Antony (Ed.), Philosophers without gods (pp. 194\u2013214). Oxford: OUP."},{"key":"2182_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fleisher, W. (2018a). How to endorse conciliationism. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7282\/t3-z234-rj23.","DOI":"10.7282\/t3-z234-rj23"},{"issue":"10","key":"2182_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2649","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-017-0976-4","volume":"175","author":"W Fleisher","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fleisher, W. (2018b). Rational endorsement. Philosophical Studies, 175(10), 2649\u20132675.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"2182_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Frey, D., & \u0160e\u0161elja, D. (2018a). Robustness and idealization in agent-based models of scientific interaction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjps\/axy039.","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/axy039"},{"key":"2182_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Frey, D., & \u0160e\u0161elja, D. (2018b). What is the epistemic function of highly idealized agent-based models of scientific inquiry? Philosophy of the Social Sciences. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0048393118767085.","DOI":"10.1177\/0048393118767085"},{"key":"2182_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199226078.003.0009","volume-title":"Disagreement","author":"A Goldman","year":"2010","unstructured":"Goldman, A. (2010). Epistemic relativism and reasonable disagreement. In R. Feldman & T. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement (pp. 187\u2013215). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2182_CR29","unstructured":"Grim, P. (2009). Threshold phenomena in epistemic networks. In AAAI fall symposium: complex adaptive systems and the threshold effect (pp. 53\u201360)."},{"issue":"04","key":"2182_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1017\/epi.2013.36","volume":"10","author":"P Grim","year":"2013","unstructured":"Grim, P., Singer, D. J., Fisher, S., Bramson, A., Berger, W. J., Reade, C., et al. (2013). Scientific networks on data landscapes: Question difficulty, epistemic success, and convergence. Episteme, 10(04), 441\u2013464.","journal-title":"Episteme"},{"key":"2182_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Harnagel, A. (2018). A mid-level approach to modeling scientific communities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.shpsa.2018.12.010.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2018.12.010"},{"key":"2182_CR32","first-page":"3","volume":"5","author":"R Hegselmann","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2002). Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5, 3.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation"},{"issue":"4","key":"2182_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1007\/s10614-005-6296-3","volume":"25","author":"R Hegselmann","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2005). Opinion dynamics driven by various ways of averaging. Computational Economics, 25(4), 381\u2013405.","journal-title":"Computational Economics"},{"issue":"3","key":"2182_CR34","first-page":"10","volume":"9","author":"R Hegselmann","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2006). Truth and cognitive division of labor: First steps towards a computer aided social epistemology. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(3), 10.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation"},{"key":"2182_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199226078.003.0007","volume-title":"Disagreement","author":"T Kelly","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kelly, T. (2010a). Peer disagreement and higher-order evidence. In R. Feldman & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement (pp. 111\u2013174). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2182_CR36","first-page":"183","volume":"24","author":"T Kelly","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kelly, T. (2010a). Peer disagreement and higher order evidence. Social Epistemology: Essential Readings, 24, 183\u2013217.","journal-title":"Social Epistemology: Essential Readings"},{"key":"2182_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kelp, C., & Douven, I. (2012). Sustaining a rational disagreement. In H. de Regt, S. Hartmann & S. Okasha (Eds.), EPSA philosophy of science: Amsterdam 2009. The European philosophy of science association proceedings (Vol. 1). Dordrecht: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-2404-4_10"},{"key":"2182_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1755-2567.2012.01149.x","volume":"79","author":"A Konigsberg","year":"2012","unstructured":"Konigsberg, A. (2012). The problem with uniform solutions to peer disagreement. Theoria, 79, 96.","journal-title":"Theoria"},{"key":"2182_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226217239.001.0001","volume-title":"The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change","author":"T Kuhn","year":"1977","unstructured":"Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago press."},{"key":"2182_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"839","DOI":"10.1007\/s11191-007-9114-6","volume":"18","author":"H Lacey","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lacey, H. (2009). The interplay of scientific activity, worldviews and value outlooks. Science and Education, 18, 839\u2013860.","journal-title":"Science and Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"2182_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-012-0074-6","volume":"163","author":"H Lacey","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lacey, H. (2013). Rehabilitating neutrality. Philosophical studies, 163(1), 77\u201383.","journal-title":"Philosophical studies"},{"key":"2182_CR42","first-page":"1","volume":"21","author":"H Lacey","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lacey, H. (2014). Science, respect for nature, and human well-being: Democratic values and the responsibilities of scientists today. Foundations of Science, 21, 1\u201317.","journal-title":"Foundations of Science"},{"key":"2182_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2015.05.009","volume":"53","author":"H Lacey","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lacey, H. (2015). \u2018Holding\u2019 and \u2018endorsing\u2019 claims in the course of scientific activities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 53, 89\u201395.","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A"},{"key":"2182_CR44","volume-title":"Science and values","author":"L Laudan","year":"1984","unstructured":"Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values. Berkeley: University of California Press."},{"key":"2182_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9780691187013","volume-title":"The fate of knowledge","author":"H Longino","year":"2002","unstructured":"Longino, H. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"2182_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226921822.001.0001","volume-title":"Studying human behavior: How scientists investigate aggression and sexuality","author":"HE Longino","year":"2013","unstructured":"Longino, H. E. (2013). Studying human behavior: How scientists investigate aggression and sexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2182_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Magnus, P. D. (2014). Science and rationality for one and all. Ergo. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3998\/ergo.12405314.0001.005.","DOI":"10.3998\/ergo.12405314.0001.005"},{"issue":"3","key":"2182_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"764","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1110069108","volume":"109","author":"W Mason","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2012). Collaborative learning in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(3), 764\u2013769.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"issue":"3","key":"2182_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1037\/a0012798","volume":"137","author":"WA Mason","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mason, W. A., Jones, A., & Goldstone, R. L. (2008). Propagation of innovations in networked groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(3), 422.","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General"},{"key":"2182_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Merdes, C. (2018). Strategy and the pursuit of truth. Synthese. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-018-HrB01985-xHrB.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-018-01985-x"},{"key":"2182_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1007\/1-4020-4251-5_10","volume-title":"Revisiting discovery and justification: Historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction","author":"T Nickles","year":"2006","unstructured":"Nickles, T. (2006). Heuristic appraisal: Context of discovery or justification? In J. Schickore & F. Steinle (Eds.), Revisiting discovery and justification: Historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction (pp. 159\u2013182). Amsterdam: Springer."},{"key":"2182_CR52","volume-title":"Rationality: A philosophical inquiry into the nature and the rationale of reason","author":"N Rescher","year":"1988","unstructured":"Rescher, N. (1988). Rationality: A philosophical inquiry into the nature and the rationale of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"4","key":"2182_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1177\/0048393110381212","volume":"41","author":"K Rolin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rolin, K. (2011). Diversity and dissent in the social sciences: The case of organization studies. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 41(4), 470\u2013494.","journal-title":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences"},{"issue":"2","key":"2182_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1086\/690717","volume":"84","author":"S Rosenstock","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rosenstock, S., O\u2019Connor, C., & Bruner, J. (2017). In epistemic networks, is less really more? Philosophy of Science, 84(2), 234\u2013252.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"2182_CR55","first-page":"1","volume":"32","author":"D \u0160e\u0161elja","year":"2017","unstructured":"\u0160e\u0161elja, D. (2017). Scientific pluralism and inconsistency toleration. Humana. Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 32, 1\u201329.","journal-title":"Humana. Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"2182_CR56","unstructured":"\u0160e\u0161elja, D. (2018). Exploring scientific inquiry via agent-based modeling (Forthcoming). http:\/\/philsci-archive.pitt.edu\/15120\/1\/Exploratory_ABMs.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2018."},{"key":"2182_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.21825\/philosophica.82146","volume":"86","author":"D \u0160e\u0161elja","year":"2012","unstructured":"\u0160e\u0161elja, D., Kosolosky, L., & Stra\u00dfer, C. (2012). Rationality of scientific reasoning in the context of pursuit: Drawing appropriate distinctions. Philosophica, 86, 51\u201382.","journal-title":"Philosophica"},{"key":"2182_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2195","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-011-9964-y","volume":"190","author":"D \u0160e\u0161elja","year":"2013","unstructured":"\u0160e\u0161elja, D., & Stra\u00dfer, C. (2013). Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates. Synthese, 190, 2195\u20132217.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"13","key":"2182_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3111","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-014-0476-4","volume":"191","author":"D \u0160e\u0161elja","year":"2014","unstructured":"\u0160e\u0161elja, D., & Stra\u00dfer, C. (2014). Epistemic justification in the context of pursuit: A coherentist approach. Synthese, 191(13), 3111\u20133141.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"2182_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2011.11.005","volume":"43","author":"D \u0160e\u0161elja","year":"2012","unstructured":"\u0160e\u0161elja, D., & Weber, E. (2012). Rationality and irrationality in the history of continental drift: Was the hypothesis of continental drift worthy of pursuit? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43, 147\u2013159.","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"2182_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00028.x","volume":"44","author":"M Solomon","year":"2006","unstructured":"Solomon, M. (2006). Groupthink versus the wisdom of crowds: The social epistemology of deliberation and dissent. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44, 28\u201342.","journal-title":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"2182_CR62","first-page":"113","volume-title":"Heuristic reasoning. Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics","author":"C Stra\u00dfer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stra\u00dfer, C., \u0160e\u0161elja, D., & Wieland, J. W. (2015). With-standing tensions: Scientific disagreement and epistemic tolerance. In E. Ippoliti (Ed.), Heuristic reasoning. Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics (pp. 113\u2013146). Berlin: Springer."},{"key":"2182_CR63","first-page":"371","volume":"66","author":"M Thicke","year":"2018","unstructured":"Thicke, M. (2018). Evaluating formal models of science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 66, 371.","journal-title":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"2182_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1016\/j.shpsa.2018.06.008","volume":"73","author":"P Verreault-Julien","year":"2019","unstructured":"Verreault-Julien, P. (2019). How could models possibly provide how-possibly explanations? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 73, 22\u201333.","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A"},{"key":"2182_CR65","first-page":"467","volume":"1","author":"LA Whitt","year":"1990","unstructured":"Whitt, L. A. (1990). Theory pursuit: Between discovery and acceptance. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1, 467\u2013483.","journal-title":"PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association"},{"key":"2182_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"612","DOI":"10.1086\/289698","volume":"59","author":"LA Whitt","year":"1992","unstructured":"Whitt, L. A. (1992). Indices of theory promise. Philosophy of Science, 59, 612\u2013634.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"issue":"5","key":"2182_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.1086\/525605","volume":"74","author":"KJS Zollman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Zollman, K. J. S. (2007). The communication structure of epistemic communities. Philosophy of Science, 74(5), 574\u2013587.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"2182_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/s10670-009-9194-6","volume":"72","author":"KJS Zollman","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zollman, K. J. S. (2010). The epistemic benefit of transient diversity. Erkenntnis, 72(1), 17\u201335.","journal-title":"Erkenntnis"}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02182-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02182-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02182-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,16]],"date-time":"2024-07-16T11:58:55Z","timestamp":1721131135000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02182-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,30]]},"references-count":68,"journal-issue":{"issue":"S25","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]}},"alternative-id":["2182"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02182-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0039-7857"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1573-0964"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,3,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"4 November 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 March 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 March 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}