{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T07:34:52Z","timestamp":1740123292903,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,11]],"date-time":"2020-02-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1581379200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,11]],"date-time":"2020-02-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1581379200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Morally supererogatory acts are those that go above and beyond the call of duty. More specifically: they are acts that, on any individual occasion, are good to do and also both permissible to do and permissible to refrain from doing. We challenge the way in which discussions of supererogation typically consider our choices and actions in isolation. Instead we consider sequences of supererogatory acts and omissions and show that some such sequences are themselves problematic. This gives rise to the following puzzle: what problem can we have with a sequences of actions if each individual act or omission is itself permissible? In this paper, we develop a response to this question, by exploring whether solutions analogous to those proposed in the rational choice literature are available in the case of supererogatory sequences. Our investigation leads us to the view that making sense of the supererogatory requires accepting that there are global moral norms that apply to sequences of acts alongside the local moral norms that apply to individual acts.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-020-02547-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,11]],"date-time":"2020-02-11T14:02:51Z","timestamp":1581429771000},"page":"7763-7780","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Supererogation and sequence"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"198","author":[{"given":"Adam","family":"Bales","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7072-2701","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Claire","family":"Benn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,11]]},"reference":[{"issue":"450","key":"2547_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/113.450.251","volume":"113","author":"F Arntzenius","year":"2004","unstructured":"Arntzenius, F., Elga, A., & Hawthorne, J. (2004). Bayesianism, infinite decisions, and binding. Mind, 113(450), 251\u2013283.","journal-title":"Mind"},{"issue":"4","key":"2547_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-013-0379-9","volume":"191","author":"P Bartha","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bartha, P., Barker, J., & Hajek, A. (2014). Satan, Saint Peter and Saint Petersburg: Decision theory and discontinuity at infinity. Synthese, 191(4), 629\u2013660.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"10","key":"2547_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2399","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-017-0965-7","volume":"175","author":"C Benn","year":"2017","unstructured":"Benn, C. (2017). Supererogation, optionality and cost. Philosophical Studies, 175(10), 2399\u20132417. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11098-017-0965-7.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"2547_CR4","volume-title":"A theory of the good and the right","author":"R Brandt","year":"1979","unstructured":"Brandt, R. (1979). A theory of the good and the right. Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"key":"2547_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00485086","volume":"16","author":"RM Chisholm","year":"1966","unstructured":"Chisholm, R. M., & Sosa, E. (1966). Intrinsic preferability and the problem of supererogation. Synthese, 16, 321\u2013331.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"issue":"2","key":"2547_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1086\/287412","volume":"22","author":"D Davidson","year":"1955","unstructured":"Davidson, D., McKinsey, J. C. C., & Suppes, P. (1955). Outlines of a formal theory of value, I. Philosophy of Science, 22(2), 140\u2013160.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"issue":"3","key":"2547_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1080\/00048409212345181","volume":"70","author":"J Driver","year":"1992","unstructured":"Driver, J. (1992). The suberogatory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 70(3), 286\u2013295.","journal-title":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"2547_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199290420.003.0008","volume-title":"The handbook of rational and social choice: An overview of new foundations and applications","author":"A Hajek","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hajek, A. (2009). Dutch book arguments. In P. Anand, P. K. Pattanaik, & C. Puppe (Eds.), The handbook of rational and social choice: An overview of new foundations and applications (pp. 173\u2013195). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"2547_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1017\/S0265052500004052","volume":"10","author":"J Hampton","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hampton, J. (1993). Selflessness and the loss of self. Social Philosophy and Policy, 10(1), 135\u2013165.","journal-title":"Social Philosophy and Policy"},{"issue":"2","key":"2547_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"237","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/anp174","volume":"70","author":"C Hare","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hare, C. (2010). Take the sugar. Analysis, 70(2), 237\u2013247.","journal-title":"Analysis"},{"key":"2547_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199691999.001.0001","volume-title":"The limits of kindness","author":"C Hare","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hare, C. (2013). The limits of kindness. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"2547_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780198732594.001.0001","volume-title":"Reasons without persons","author":"B Hedden","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hedden, B. (2015). Reasons without persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"2547_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1080\/00048407812341021","volume":"56","author":"D Heyd","year":"1978","unstructured":"Heyd, D. (1978). Ethical universalism, justice, and favouritism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 56(1), 25\u201331.","journal-title":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"2547_CR14","series-title":"Cambridge studies in philosophy","volume-title":"Supererogation: Its status in ethical theory","author":"D Heyd","year":"1982","unstructured":"Heyd, D. (1982). Supererogation: Its status in ethical theory., Cambridge studies in philosophy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"02","key":"2547_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1017\/S026505250999015X","volume":"27","author":"T Horgan","year":"2010","unstructured":"Horgan, T., & Timmons, M. (2010). Untying a knot from the inside out: Reflections on the \u2018paradox\u2019 of supererogation. Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation, 27(02), 29\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S026505250999015X.","journal-title":"Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation"},{"issue":"2","key":"2547_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.2307\/2185591","volume":"95","author":"F Jackson","year":"1986","unstructured":"Jackson, F., & Pargetter, R. (1986). Oughts, options, and actualism. Philosophical Review, 95(2), 233\u2013255.","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"issue":"3","key":"2547_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9833.00196","volume":"34","author":"J Kawall","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kawall, J. (2003). Self-regarding supererogatory actions. Journal of Social Philosophy, 34(3), 487\u2013498. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1467-9833.00196.","journal-title":"Journal of Social Philosophy"},{"key":"2547_CR18","unstructured":"Lazar, S., & Lee-Stronach. C. (n.d.). Axiological absolutism and risk. Nous (forthcoming)."},{"issue":"23","key":"2547_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1017\/S1477175609990030","volume":"8","author":"SC Lowe","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lowe, S. C. (2009). Ebenezer scrooge\u2014Man of principle. Think, 8(23), 27\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1477175609990030.","journal-title":"Think"},{"issue":"December","key":"2547_CR20","first-page":"1622","volume":"27","author":"MJ Machina","year":"1989","unstructured":"Machina, M. J. (1989). Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Literature, 27(December), 1622\u20131668.","journal-title":"Journal of Economic Literature"},{"issue":"1","key":"2547_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1086\/289657","volume":"59","author":"P Maher","year":"1992","unstructured":"Maher, P. (1992). Diachronic rationality. Philosophy of Science, 59(1), 120\u2013141.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"2547_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1093\/analys\/25.6.205","volume":"25","author":"DC Makinson","year":"1965","unstructured":"Makinson, D. C. (1965). The paradox of the preface. Analysis, 25, 205\u2013207.","journal-title":"Analysis"},{"key":"2547_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511983979","volume-title":"Rationality and dynamic choice: Foundational explorations","author":"EF McClennen","year":"1990","unstructured":"McClennen, E. F. (1990). Rationality and dynamic choice: Foundational explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"2547_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00054.x","volume":"26","author":"EF McClennen","year":"1997","unstructured":"McClennen, E. F. (1997). Pragmatic rationality and rules. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26(3), 210\u2013258.","journal-title":"Philosophy & Public Affairs"},{"key":"2547_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00354163","volume":"52","author":"G Mellema","year":"1987","unstructured":"Mellema, G. (1987). Quasi-supererogation. Philosophical Studies, 52, 141\u2013150.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"issue":"4","key":"2547_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1017\/S0953820807002774","volume":"19","author":"M Peterson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Peterson, M. (2007). Parity, clumpiness and rational choice. Utilitas, 19(4), 505\u2013513.","journal-title":"Utilitas"},{"issue":"8","key":"2547_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.5840\/jphil2013110818","volume":"110","author":"DW Portmore","year":"2013","unstructured":"Portmore, D. W. (2013). Perform your best option. Journal of Philosophy, 110(8), 436\u2013459.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"2547_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0953820816000364","author":"DW Portmore","year":"2016","unstructured":"Portmore, D. W. (2016). Transitivity, moral latitude and supererogation. Utilitas. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0953820816000364.","journal-title":"Utilitas"},{"issue":"1","key":"2547_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00368392","volume":"59","author":"WS Quinn","year":"1990","unstructured":"Quinn, W. S. (1990). The puzzle of the self-torturer. Philosophical Studies, 59(1), 79\u201390.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"issue":"11","key":"2547_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.2307\/2941089","volume":"92","author":"W Rabinowicz","year":"1995","unstructured":"Rabinowicz, W. (1995). To have one\u2019s cake and eat it, too: Sequential choice and expected-utility violations. Journal of Philosophy, 92(11), 586\u2013620.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"2547_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-011-4144-4_7","volume-title":"Imperfectible harms and benefits","author":"W Rabinowicz","year":"2000","unstructured":"Rabinowicz, W. (2000). Money pump with foresight. In M. J. Almeida (Ed.), Imperfectible harms and benefits (pp. 123\u2013154). Berlin: Kluwer Academic Publisher."},{"key":"2547_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674042582","volume-title":"A theory of justice","author":"J Rawls","year":"1999","unstructured":"Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev ed.). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.","edition":"Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"2547_CR33","first-page":"161","volume":"12","author":"J Raz","year":"1975","unstructured":"Raz, J. (1975). Permissions and supererogation. American Philosophical Quarterly, 12(2), 161\u2013168.","journal-title":"American Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"2547_CR34","first-page":"451","volume-title":"Logic, methodology and philosophy of science","author":"T Seidenfeld","year":"1994","unstructured":"Seidenfeld, T. (1994). When normal and extensive form decisions differ. In D. Prawitz, B. Skyrms, & D. Westerst\u00e5hl (Eds.), Logic, methodology and philosophy of science (pp. 451\u2013463). Amsterdam: Elsevier."},{"issue":"1","key":"2547_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1111\/0047-2786.t01-1-00013","volume":"30","author":"NA Stanlick","year":"1999","unstructured":"Stanlick, N. A. (1999). The nature and value of supererogatory actions. Journal of Social Philosophy, 30(1), 209\u2013222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/0047-2786.t01-1-00013.","journal-title":"Journal of Social Philosophy"},{"issue":"8","key":"2547_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"419","DOI":"10.2307\/2026228","volume":"79","author":"S Wolf","year":"1982","unstructured":"Wolf, S. (1982). Moral saints. The Journal of Philosophy, 79(8), 419\u2013439.","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophy"}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-020-02547-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-020-02547-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-020-02547-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,15]],"date-time":"2022-10-15T07:41:45Z","timestamp":1665819705000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-020-02547-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,11]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["2547"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-020-02547-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0039-7857"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1573-0964"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,2,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 February 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 November 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 February 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}