{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,24]],"date-time":"2026-02-24T18:19:55Z","timestamp":1771957195886,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":69,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,30]],"date-time":"2024-12-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735516800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,30]],"date-time":"2024-12-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735516800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>Disagreement is often perceived negatively, yet it can be beneficial for learning and scientific inquiry. However, students tend to avoid engaging in disagreement. Peer critique activities offer a promising way to encourage students to embrace disagreement, which supports learning as students articulate their ideas, making them available for discussion, revision, and refinement. This study aims to better understand how students express disagreement during peer critique within small groups and how that affects moving their inquiry forward. It explores 5th-grade students\u2019 management of disagreement within a computer-supported collaborative modeling environment. Using conversation analysis, we identified various forms of disagreements employed by students when engaging with different audiences. We observed a tendency for students to disagree softly; that is, disagreement was implied and\/or mitigated. Students\u2019 resolution of both direct and soft disagreements effectively promoted their collective knowledge advancement, including building shared scientific understanding and improving their models, while maintaining a positive socio-emotional climate. These findings have implications for designing CSCL environments with respect to supporting students in providing and responding to peer critiques at the group level.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11412-024-09438-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,30]],"date-time":"2024-12-30T13:03:27Z","timestamp":1735563807000},"page":"249-282","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Disagreeing softly: Supporting students in managing disagreement in peer critique"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"20","author":[{"given":"Jinzhi","family":"Zhou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Cindy E.","family":"Hmelo-Silver","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Zach","family":"Ryan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Christina","family":"Stiso","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Danielle","family":"Murphy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joshua","family":"Danish","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Clark A.","family":"Chinn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ravit Golan","family":"Duncan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,30]]},"reference":[{"key":"9438_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.3102\/0034654311404435","volume":"81","author":"SF Akkerman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132\u2013169.","journal-title":"Review of Educational Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"9438_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10648-023-09723-7","volume":"35","author":"M Alqassab","year":"2023","unstructured":"Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J. W., Panadero, E., Ruiz, J. F., Warrens, M., & To, J. (2023). A systematic review of peer assessment design elements. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 1\u201336.","journal-title":"Educational Psychology Review"},{"key":"9438_CR3","unstructured":"Andriessen, J. E., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentative design.\u00a0In\u00a0N. Muller Mirza\u00a0&\u00a0A.-N. Perret-Clermont\u00a0(Eds.),\u00a0Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 145\u2013174). Springer-Verlag."},{"issue":"12","key":"9438_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1549","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2012.06.011","volume":"44","author":"J Angouri","year":"2012","unstructured":"Angouri, J., & Locher, M. A. (2012). Theorising disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1549\u20131553.","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"2","key":"9438_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2016.1155458","volume":"51","author":"CS Asterhan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164\u2013187.","journal-title":"Educational Psychologist"},{"key":"9438_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baker, M. (2009). Argumentative interactions and the social construction of knowledge.\u00a0In\u00a0N. Muller Mirza\u00a0&\u00a0A.-N. Perret-Clermont\u00a0(Eds.),\u00a0Argumentation and education: Theoretical foundations and practices\u00a0(pp.\u00a0127\u2013144). Springer-Verlag.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98125-3_5"},{"issue":"3","key":"9438_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1207\/S15327809JLS1203_1","volume":"12","author":"B Barron","year":"2003","unstructured":"Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307\u2013359.","journal-title":"Journal of the Learning Sciences"},{"key":"9438_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101367","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2020.101367","volume":"69","author":"S Barzilai","year":"2020","unstructured":"Barzilai, S., Thomm, E., & Shlomi-Elooz, T. (2020). Dealing with disagreement: The roles of topic familiarity and disagreement explanation in evaluation of conflicting expert claims and sources. Learning and Instruction, 69, 101367.","journal-title":"Learning and Instruction"},{"issue":"10","key":"9438_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1590","DOI":"10.1080\/09500693.2015.1045958","volume":"37","author":"M Bathgate","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bathgate, M., Crowell, A., Schunn, C., Cannady, M., & Dorph, R. (2015). The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1590\u20131612.","journal-title":"International Journal of Science Education"},{"issue":"12","key":"9438_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1857","DOI":"10.1080\/09500693.2011.645086","volume":"34","author":"LK Berland","year":"2012","unstructured":"Berland, L. K., & Lee, V. R. (2012). In pursuit of consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1857\u20131882.","journal-title":"International Journal of Science Education"},{"issue":"3","key":"9438_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1080\/10508406.2022.2157725","volume":"32","author":"M Borge","year":"2023","unstructured":"Borge, M., & Xia, Y. (2023). Beyond the individual: The regulation and negotiation of socioemotional practices across a learning ecosystem. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 32(3), 325\u2013375.","journal-title":"Journal of the Learning Sciences"},{"key":"9438_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511813085"},{"issue":"6","key":"9438_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.3102\/0034654318791584","volume":"88","author":"J Chen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C.-C. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799\u2013843.","journal-title":"Review of Educational Research"},{"key":"9438_CR14","unstructured":"Chinn, C. A. (2006). Learning to argue. In A.M. O\u2019Donnell, C.E. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.). Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology, 355\u2013383."},{"issue":"7","key":"9438_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1002\/tea.20385","volume":"47","author":"C Chin","year":"2010","unstructured":"Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students\u2019 questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883\u2013908.","journal-title":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching"},{"key":"9438_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"425","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9737.003.0025","volume-title":"Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences","author":"CA Chinn","year":"2014","unstructured":"Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the AIR model of epistemic cognition. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 425\u2013453). MIT Press."},{"key":"9438_CR17","first-page":"314","volume-title":"International handbook of collaborative learning","author":"CA Chinn","year":"2013","unstructured":"Chinn, C. A., & Clark, D. B. (2013). Learning through collaborative argumentation. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. M. O\u2019Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 314\u2013332). Routledge."},{"issue":"3","key":"9438_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1080\/10508400802224830","volume":"17","author":"MM Chiu","year":"2008","unstructured":"Chiu, M. M. (2008a). Flowing toward correct contributions during group problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 415\u2013463.","journal-title":"Journal of the Learning Sciences"},{"issue":"3","key":"9438_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2008.05.001","volume":"33","author":"MM Chiu","year":"2008","unstructured":"Chiu, M. M. (2008b). Effects of argumentation on group micro-creativity: Statistical discourse analyses of algebra students\u2019 collaborative problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 382\u2013402.","journal-title":"Contemporary Educational Psychology"},{"key":"9438_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Danish, J. A., & Ma, J. Y. (2022). What is learning, for whom, and to what end? An overview. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Fourth Edition, pp. 1\u201311). Elsevier.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-818630-5.14001-1"},{"key":"9438_CR21","unstructured":"Danish, J., Vickery, M., Duncan, R., Ryan, Z., Stiso, C., Zhou, J., Murphy, D., Hmelo-Silver, C., Chinn, C. (2021). Scientific model evaluation during a gallery walk.\u00a0In de Vries, E., Hod, Y., & Ahn J. (Eds.). (2021). Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2021. Bochum, Germany: International Society of the Learning Sciences."},{"issue":"7","key":"9438_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"907","DOI":"10.1002\/tea.21468","volume":"55","author":"RG Duncan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A., & Barzilai, S. (2018). Grasp of evidence: Problematizing and expanding the next generation science standards\u2019 conceptualization of evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 907\u2013937.","journal-title":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching"},{"key":"9438_CR23","unstructured":"Engestr\u00f6m, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy."},{"key":"9438_CR24","unstructured":"Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., ... & Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28\u201345."},{"issue":"2","key":"9438_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1007\/s11191-006-9045-7","volume":"17","author":"M Ford","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ford, M. (2008). \u2018Grasp of practice\u2019 as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17(2), 147\u2013177.","journal-title":"Science & Education"},{"key":"9438_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gao, X., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J. T. M., Biemans, H. J., & Banihashem, S. K. (2023). A systematic review of the key components of online peer feedback practices in higher education.\u00a0Educational Research Review, 100588.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.edurev.2023.100588"},{"issue":"12","key":"9438_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1881","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(00)00034-5","volume":"33","author":"A Georgakopoulou","year":"2001","unstructured":"Georgakopoulou, A. (2001). Arguing about the future: On indirect disagreements in conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(12), 1881\u20131900.","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9438_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1007\/s11412-019-09298-y","volume":"14","author":"L Gerard","year":"2019","unstructured":"Gerard, L., Kidron, A., & Linn, M. C. (2019). Guiding collaborative revision of science explanations. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(3), 291\u2013324.","journal-title":"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning"},{"issue":"6","key":"9438_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"953","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.21592","volume":"104","author":"M Gonz\u00e1lez-Howard","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez-Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2020). Acting with epistemic agency: Characterizing student critique during argumentation discussions. Science Education, 104(6), 953\u2013982.","journal-title":"Science Education"},{"issue":"10","key":"9438_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1668","DOI":"10.1080\/09500693.2015.1043598","volume":"37","author":"JB Henderson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Henderson, J. B., MacPherson, A., Osborne, J., & Wild, A. (2015). Beyond Construction: Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1668\u20131697.","journal-title":"International Journal of Science Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"9438_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1207\/s1532690xci1604_3","volume":"16","author":"LR Herrenkohl","year":"1998","unstructured":"Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 431\u2013473.","journal-title":"Cognition and Instruction"},{"issue":"1","key":"9438_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1080\/07370000701798495","volume":"26","author":"CE Hmelo-Silver","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48\u201394.","journal-title":"Cognition and Instruction"},{"key":"9438_CR33","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Handbook of open, distance and digital education","author":"CE Hmelo-Silver","year":"2022","unstructured":"Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Jeong, H. (2022). Synergies among the pillars: Designing for computer-supported collaborative learning. In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1\u201316). Springer."},{"issue":"6","key":"9438_CR34","first-page":"1","volume":"52","author":"CE Hmelo-Silver","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Liu, L., Gray, S., & Jordan, R. (2015). Using representational tools to learn about complex systems: A tale of two classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 1\u201335.","journal-title":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching"},{"issue":"2","key":"9438_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1080\/19463014.2014.893897","volume":"5","author":"J H\u00fcttner","year":"2014","unstructured":"H\u00fcttner, J. (2014). Agreeing to disagree: \u2018Doing disagreement\u2019 in assessed oral L2 interactions. Classroom Discourse, 5(2), 194\u2013215.","journal-title":"Classroom Discourse"},{"key":"9438_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1075\/pbns.125.02jef","volume-title":"Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation","author":"G Jefferson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13\u201323). John Benjamins."},{"issue":"2","key":"9438_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"247","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2016.1158654","volume":"51","author":"H Jeong","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247\u2013265.","journal-title":"Educational Psychologist"},{"issue":"1","key":"9438_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1177\/14614456030050010301","volume":"5","author":"I Koshik","year":"2003","unstructured":"Koshik, I. (2003). Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies, 5(1), 51\u201377.","journal-title":"Discourse Studies"},{"issue":"2","key":"9438_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.1017\/S0047404500017103","volume":"22","author":"H Kotthoff","year":"1993","unstructured":"Kotthoff, H. (1993). Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society, 22(2), 193\u2013216.","journal-title":"Language in Society"},{"issue":"1","key":"9438_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.3102\/0013189X15569530","volume":"44","author":"D Kuhn","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 46\u201353.","journal-title":"Educational Researcher"},{"key":"9438_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lester, J. N., & O'Reilly, M. (2019). Applied conversation analysis: Social interaction in institutional settings. SAGE Publications.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781071802663"},{"key":"9438_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9780691187013","volume-title":"The fate of knowledge","author":"HE Longino","year":"2002","unstructured":"Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton University Press."},{"key":"9438_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2018.08.016","volume":"137","author":"R Lopez-Ozieblo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lopez-Ozieblo, R. (2018). Disagreeing without a \u2018no\u2019: How teachers indicate disagreement in a Hong Kong classroom. Journal of Pragmatics, 137, 1\u201318.","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9438_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(97)00048-9","volume":"29","author":"P Muntigl","year":"1998","unstructured":"Muntigl, P., & Turnbull, W. (1998). Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(3), 225\u2013256.","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9438_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1017\/S0047404500019734","volume":"27","author":"G Myers","year":"1998","unstructured":"Myers, G. (1998). Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreement in focus groups. Language in Society, 27(1), 85\u2013111.","journal-title":"Language in Society"},{"key":"9438_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2013.09.007","volume":"61","author":"H Netz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Netz, H. (2014). Disagreement patterns in gifted classes. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 142\u2013160.","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"9438_CR47","volume-title":"The power of peer learning: Fostering students\u2019 learning processes and outcomes","year":"2023","unstructured":"Noroozi, O., & De Wever, B. (Eds.). (2023). The power of peer learning: Fostering students\u2019 learning processes and outcomes. Springer International Publishing."},{"issue":"2","key":"9438_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.edurev.2011.11.006","volume":"7","author":"O Noroozi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79\u2013106.","journal-title":"Educational Research Review"},{"issue":"3","key":"9438_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2008.06.001","volume":"33","author":"EM Nussbaum","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345\u2013359.","journal-title":"Contemporary Educational Psychology"},{"issue":"4","key":"9438_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1016\/S0361-476X(02)00062-0","volume":"28","author":"EM Nussbaum","year":"2003","unstructured":"Nussbaum, E. M., & Bendixen, L. D. (2003). Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 573\u2013595.","journal-title":"Contemporary Educational Psychology"},{"key":"9438_CR51","unstructured":"Paulus, T., Warren, A., & Lester, J. (2018). Using conversation analysis to understand how agreements, personal experiences, and cognition verbs function in online discussions.\u00a0Language@ Internet,\u00a015(1)."},{"issue":"6","key":"9438_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.21314","volume":"101","author":"AE Pierson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pierson, A. E., Clark, D. B., & Sherard, M. K. (2017). Learning progressions in context: Tensions and insights from a semester-long middle school modeling curriculum. Science Education, 101(6), 1061\u20131088.","journal-title":"Science Education"},{"key":"9438_CR53","first-page":"57","volume-title":"Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis","author":"A Pomerantz","year":"1984","unstructured":"Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred\/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57\u2013101). Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9438_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell.","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118325001.ch11"},{"issue":"8","key":"9438_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1087","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(99)00088-0","volume":"32","author":"J Rees-Miller","year":"2000","unstructured":"Rees-Miller, J. (2000). Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(8), 1087\u20131111.","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"9438_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1159558","DOI":"10.3389\/feduc.2023.1159558","volume":"8","author":"Z Ryan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Ryan, Z., Danish, J., Zhou, J., Stiso, C., Murphy, D., Duncan, R., Chinn, C., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2023). Investigating students\u2019 development of mechanistic reasoning in modeling complex aquatic ecosystems. Frontiers Education, 8, 1159558.","journal-title":"Frontiers Education"},{"key":"9438_CR57","volume-title":"Lectures on conversation","author":"H Sacks","year":"1992","unstructured":"Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vol. I). Blackwell."},{"key":"9438_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1007\/s11165-009-9146-9","volume":"41","author":"V Sampson","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2011). A comparison of the collaborative scientific argumentation practices of two high and two low performing groups. Research in Science Education, 41, 63\u201397.","journal-title":"Research in Science Education"},{"issue":"13","key":"9438_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1848","DOI":"10.1080\/09500693.2019.1641856","volume":"41","author":"WA Sandoval","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sandoval, W. A., Enyedy, N., Redman, E. H., & Xiao, S. (2019). Organising a culture of argumentation in elementary science. International Journal of Science Education, 41(13), 1848\u20131869.","journal-title":"International Journal of Science Education"},{"key":"9438_CR60","first-page":"97","volume-title":"Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences","author":"M Scardamalia","year":"2006","unstructured":"Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97\u2013118). Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"9438_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1007\/s11412-023-09390-4","volume":"18","author":"JSH Tan","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tan, J. S. H., Chen, W., Su, J., & Su, G. (2023). The mechanism and effect of class-wide peer feedback on conceptual knowledge improvement: Does different feedback type matter? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(3), 393\u2013424.","journal-title":"International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning"},{"issue":"1","key":"9438_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1007\/s10972-016-9454-7","volume":"27","author":"TQ Tasker","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tasker, T. Q., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2016). Using peer feedback to improve students\u2019 scientific inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(1), 35\u201359.","journal-title":"Journal of Science Teacher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"9438_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1007\/s10212-017-0341-1","volume":"33","author":"OE Tsivitanidou","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tsivitanidou, O. E., Constantinou, C. P., Labudde, P., R\u00f6nnebeck, S., & Ropohl, M. (2018). Reciprocal peer assessment as a learning tool for secondary school students in modeling-based learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33(1), 51\u201373.","journal-title":"European Journal of Psychology of Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"9438_CR64","first-page":"37","volume":"42","author":"C Villarroel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Villarroel, C., Garcia-Mila, M., Felton, M., & Miralda-Banda, A. (2019). Effect of argumentative goals in the quality of argumentative dialogue and written argumentation. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 42(1), 37\u201386.","journal-title":"Journal for the Study of Education and Development"},{"issue":"2","key":"9438_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1080\/10508406.2011.528317","volume":"20","author":"J Zhang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262\u2013307.","journal-title":"Journal of the Learning Sciences"},{"key":"9438_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1007\/s11423-006-9019-0","volume":"55","author":"J Zhang","year":"2007","unstructured":"Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9-and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 117\u2013145.","journal-title":"Educational Technology Research and Development"},{"issue":"1","key":"9438_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1186\/s41239-024-00458-1","volume":"21","author":"Y Zhang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zhang, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2024). What does it mean to be good at peer reviewing? A multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis study of behavioral indicators of peer feedback literacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 26.","journal-title":"International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education"},{"key":"9438_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zheng, L., Chen, N. S., Cui, P., & Zhang, X. (2019). A systematic review of technology-supported peer assessment research: An activity theory approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 168\u2013191.","DOI":"10.19173\/irrodl.v20i5.4333"},{"key":"9438_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhou, J., Albert, L., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Danish, J., Ryan, Z., Stiso, C., Murphy, D., Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C.A., & Lin, Q. (2024). Scaffolding students\u2019 adoption of norms for peer critique. In Clarke-Midura, J., Kollar, I., Gu, X., & D'Angelo, C. (Eds.). (2024). Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning \u2013 CSCL 2024. Buffalo, USA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.","DOI":"10.22318\/cscl2024.518924"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11412-024-09438-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11412-024-09438-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11412-024-09438-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,3]],"date-time":"2025-07-03T08:32:38Z","timestamp":1751531558000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11412-024-09438-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,30]]},"references-count":69,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]}},"alternative-id":["9438"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11412-024-09438-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1556-1607","1556-1615"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1556-1607","type":"print"},{"value":"1556-1615","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,30]]},"assertion":[{"value":"28 March 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 October 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 December 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}