{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,25]],"date-time":"2026-06-25T05:57:00Z","timestamp":1782367020205,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,13]],"date-time":"2011-05-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1305244800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/2.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Med Biol Eng Comput"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11517-011-0783-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,12]],"date-time":"2011-05-12T15:10:49Z","timestamp":1305213049000},"source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":30,"title":["Differences in citation frequency of clinical and basic science papers in cardiovascular research"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"49","author":[{"given":"Tobias","family":"Opthof","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"783_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2010.04.004","volume":"4","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bornmann L (2010) Towards an ideal method of measuring research performance: some comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) paper. J Informetr 4:441\u2013443","journal-title":"J Informetr"},{"key":"783_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"830","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.20806","volume":"59","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel HD (2008) Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. JASIST 59:830\u2013837","journal-title":"JASIST"},{"key":"783_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.3354\/esep00084","volume":"8","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bornmann L, Mutz R, Neuhaus C, Daniel H-D (2008) Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results. Ethics Sci Environ Polit 8:93\u2013102","journal-title":"Ethics Sci Environ Polit"},{"key":"783_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1016\/0968-0004(89)90078-9","volume":"14","author":"S Cole","year":"1989","unstructured":"Cole S (1989) Citations and the evaluation of individual scientists. Trends Biochem Sci 14:9\u201313","journal-title":"Trends Biochem Sci"},{"key":"783_CR5","unstructured":"CWTS (2008) AMC-specifieke CWTS-analyse 1997\u20132006. CWTS, Leiden. Access via AMC intranet; unpublished, confidential; there is an update 1997\u20132008"},{"key":"783_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1016\/S0008-6363(02)00702-2","volume":"56","author":"J Dibbets","year":"2002","unstructured":"Dibbets J (2002) Interactions between science and arts. Cardiovasc Res 56:330\u2013331","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Res"},{"key":"783_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"226","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2010.10.005","volume":"5","author":"Y Gingras","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gingras Y, Larivi\u00e8re V (2011) There are neither \u201cking\u201d nor \u201ccrown\u201d in scientometrics: comments on a supposed \u201calternative\u201d method of normalization. J Informetr 5:226\u2013227","journal-title":"J Informetr"},{"key":"783_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16569","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.0507655102","volume":"102","author":"JE Hirsch","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual\u2019s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16569\u201316572","journal-title":"Proc Natl Acad Sci USA"},{"key":"783_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.3152\/147154404781776536","volume":"13","author":"L Langfeldt","year":"2004","unstructured":"Langfeldt L (2004) Judging quality. Expert panels evaluating research: decision-making and sources of bias. Research Eval 13:51\u201362","journal-title":"Research Eval"},{"key":"783_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1129","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.97.12.1129","volume":"97","author":"U Laufs","year":"1998","unstructured":"Laufs U, La Fata V, Plutzky J, Liao JK (1998) Upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by HMG CoA reductase inhibitors. Circulation 97:1129\u20131135","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"783_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.21450","volume":"62","author":"L Leydesdorff","year":"2011","unstructured":"Leydesdorff L, Bornmann L (2011) How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science. JASIST 62:217\u2013229","journal-title":"JASIST"},{"key":"783_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"644","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2010.05.003","volume":"4","author":"L Leydesdorff","year":"2010","unstructured":"Leydesdorff L, Opthof T (2010) Normalization, CWTS indicators, and the Leiden Rankings: differences in citation behavior at the level of fields. J Informetr 4:644\u2013646","journal-title":"J Informetr"},{"key":"783_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2365","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.21371","volume":"61","author":"L Leydesdorff","year":"2010","unstructured":"Leydesdorff L, Opthof T (2010) Scopus\u2019s Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) versus the Journal Impact Factor based on fractional counting of citations. JASIST 61:2365\u20132369","journal-title":"JASIST"},{"key":"783_CR14","first-page":"229","volume-title":"Citation analysis in research evaluation","author":"HF Moed","year":"2005","unstructured":"Moed HF (2005) Citation analysis in research evaluation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 229\u2013257"},{"key":"783_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02017338","volume":"33","author":"HF Moed","year":"1995","unstructured":"Moed HF, De Bruin RE, Van Leeuwen TN (1995) New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics 33:381\u2013422","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"783_CR16","first-page":"198","volume":"10","author":"T Opthof","year":"2002","unstructured":"Opthof T, Coronel R (2002) The impact factor of leading cardiovascular journals: where is your paper best cited? Neth Heart J 10:198\u2013202","journal-title":"Neth Heart J"},{"key":"783_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2010.02.003","volume":"4","author":"T Opthof","year":"2010","unstructured":"Opthof T, Leydesdorff L (2010) Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (\u201cLeiden\u201d) evaluations of research performance. J Informetr 4:423\u2013430","journal-title":"J Informetr"},{"key":"783_CR18","unstructured":"Opthof T, Leydesdorff L (2011) Citation analysis cannot legitimate the strategic selection of excellence. Scientometrics (in press)"},{"key":"783_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03086237","volume":"17","author":"T Opthof","year":"2009","unstructured":"Opthof T, Wilde AAM (2009) The Hirsch-index: a simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output of individual scientists. The case of Dutch professors in clinical cardiology. Neth Heart J 17:145\u2013154","journal-title":"Neth Heart J"},{"key":"783_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03086237","volume":"17","author":"T Opthof","year":"2009","unstructured":"Opthof T, Wilde AAM (2009) Comment: assessment of scientific quality is complicated. Neth Heart J 17:501\u2013502","journal-title":"Neth Heart J"},{"key":"783_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1007\/s12471-011-0128-y","volume":"19","author":"T Opthof","year":"2011","unstructured":"Opthof T, Wilde AAM (2011) Bibiometrical data data in clinical cardiology revisited. The case of 37 Dutch professors. Neth Heart J 19:246\u2013255","journal-title":"Neth Heart J"},{"key":"783_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/S0008-6363(02)00712-5","volume":"56","author":"T Opthof","year":"2002","unstructured":"Opthof T, Coronel R, Janse MJ (2002) The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias. Cardiovasc Res 56:339\u2013346","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Res"},{"key":"783_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1877","DOI":"10.1172\/JCI117177","volume":"93","author":"BF Scharschmidt","year":"1994","unstructured":"Scharschmidt BF, DeAmicis A, Bacchetti P, Held MJ (1994) Chance, concurrence, and clustering. Analysis of reviewer\u2019s recommendations on 1,000 submissions to The Journal of Clinical Investigation. J Clin Invest 93:1877\u20131880","journal-title":"J Clin Invest"},{"key":"783_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"637","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.178.3.1994394","volume":"178","author":"SS Siegelman","year":"1991","unstructured":"Siegelman SS (1991) Assassins and zealots: variations in peer review. Radiology 178:637\u2013642","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"783_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1219","DOI":"10.1007\/s11517-009-0546-9","volume":"47","author":"JAE Spaan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Spaan JAE (2009) Biomedical engineering and bibliometric indices for scientific quality. Med Biol Eng Comput 47:1219\u20131220","journal-title":"Med Biol Eng Comput"},{"key":"783_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"318","DOI":"10.1007\/BF03091783","volume":"18","author":"JAE Spaan","year":"2010","unstructured":"Spaan JAE (2010) Arrognance and ignorance in assessing scientific quality in a multidisciplinary academic centre. Neth Heart J 18:318\u2013321","journal-title":"Neth Heart J"},{"key":"783_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2010.03.010","volume":"4","author":"JAE Spaan","year":"2010","unstructured":"Spaan JAE (2010) The danger of pseudoscience in Informetrics. J Informetr 4:439\u2013440","journal-title":"J Informetr"},{"key":"783_CR28","unstructured":"Van den Besselaar P, Leydesdorff L (2007) Past performance of successful grant applications. The Hague. Rathenau Institute. SciSA Report 0704"},{"key":"783_CR29","first-page":"500","volume":"17","author":"J Kammen Van","year":"2009","unstructured":"Van Kammen J, Van Lier R, Gunning-Schepers L (2009) Assessing scientific quality in a multidisciplinary academic medical centre. Neth Heart J 17:500","journal-title":"Neth Heart J"},{"key":"783_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1556\/Scient.67.2006.3.10","volume":"67","author":"AJF Raan Van","year":"2006","unstructured":"Van Raan AJF (2006) Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics 67:491\u2013502","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"783_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2010.03.008","volume":"4","author":"AJF Raan Van","year":"2010","unstructured":"Van Raan AJF, Van Leeuwen TN, Visser MS, Van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010) Rivals for the crown: reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff. J Informetr 4:431\u2013435","journal-title":"J Informetr"},{"key":"783_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2010.08.001","volume":"5","author":"L Waltman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Waltman L, Van Eck NJ, Van Leeuwen TN, Visser MS, Van Raan AFJ (2011) Towards a new crown indicator: some theoretical considerations. J Informetr: 5:37\u201347","journal-title":"J Informetr:"},{"key":"783_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1161\/01.CIR.97.5.473","volume":"97","author":"K Wei","year":"1998","unstructured":"Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, Linka A, Skyba DM, Kaul S (1998) Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation 97:473\u2013483","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"783_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1038\/embor.2009.74","volume":"10","author":"CT Zhang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Zhang CT (2009) A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank. EMBO Rep 10:416\u2013417","journal-title":"EMBO Rep"}],"container-title":["Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11517-011-0783-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11517-011-0783-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11517-011-0783-6.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11517-011-0783-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,18]],"date-time":"2019-04-18T11:49:00Z","timestamp":1555588140000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11517-011-0783-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,13]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2011,6]]}},"alternative-id":["783"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11517-011-0783-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0140-0118","1741-0444"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0140-0118","type":"print"},{"value":"1741-0444","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2011,5,13]]},"article-number":"613"}}