{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]],"date-time":"2026-02-27T22:59:39Z","timestamp":1772233179505,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1-2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,7]],"date-time":"2021-05-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1620345600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,7]],"date-time":"2021-05-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1620345600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003006","name":"ETH Zurich","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003006","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Swarm Intell"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>We propose an agent-based model of collective opinion formation to study the wisdom of crowds under social influence. The opinion of an agent is a continuous positive value, denoting its subjective answer to a factual question. The wisdom of crowds states that the average of all opinions is close to the truth, i.e., the correct answer. But if agents have the chance to adjust their opinion in response to the opinions of others, this effect can be destroyed. Our model investigates this scenario by evaluating two competing effects: (1) agents tend to keep their own opinion (individual conviction), (2) they tend to adjust their opinion if they have information about the opinions of others (social influence). For the latter, two different regimes (full information vs. aggregated information) are compared. Our simulations show that social influence only in rare cases enhances the wisdom of crowds. Most often, we find that agents converge to a collective opinion that is even farther away from the true answer. Therefore,\u00a0under social influence the wisdom of crowds can be systematically wrong.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11721-021-00189-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,7]],"date-time":"2021-05-07T12:03:02Z","timestamp":1620388982000},"page":"31-46","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Enhanced or distorted wisdom of crowds? An agent-based model of opinion formation under social influence"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"Pavlin","family":"Mavrodiev","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1551-6491","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Frank","family":"Schweitzer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,7]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"189_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.1177\/000312240707200507","volume":"72","author":"D Baldassarri","year":"2007","unstructured":"Baldassarri, D., & Bearman, P. (2007). Dynamics of political polarization. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 784\u2013811.","journal-title":"American Sociological Review"},{"issue":"5","key":"189_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1450025","DOI":"10.1142\/S0219525914500258","volume":"17","author":"S Banisch","year":"2014","unstructured":"Banisch, S. (2014). From Microscopic heterogeneity to macroscopic complexity in the contrarian voter model. Advances in Complex Systems, 17(5), 1450025.","journal-title":"Advances in Complex Systems"},{"issue":"2","key":"189_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1080\/0022250X.2018.1517761","volume":"43","author":"S Banisch","year":"2019","unstructured":"Banisch, S., & Olbrich, E. (2019). Opinion polarization by learning from social feedback. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 43(2), 76\u2013103.","journal-title":"Journal of Mathematical Sociology"},{"issue":"4","key":"189_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.1111\/spsr.12180","volume":"21","author":"S Bornschier","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bornschier, S. (2015). The new cultural conflict, polarization, and representation in the swiss party system, 1975\u20132011. Swiss Political Science Review, 21(4), 680\u2013701.","journal-title":"Swiss Political Science Review"},{"key":"189_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cobeha.2017.03.004","volume":"16","author":"T Bose","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bose, T., Reina, A., & Marshall, J. A. (2017). Collective decision-making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 16, 30\u201334.","journal-title":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences"},{"issue":"2","key":"189_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"591","DOI":"10.1103\/RevModPhys.81.591","volume":"81","author":"C Castellano","year":"2009","unstructured":"Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009). Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2), 591.","journal-title":"Reviews of Modern Physics"},{"key":"189_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"87","DOI":"10.1142\/S0219525900000078","volume":"3","author":"G Deffuant","year":"2000","unstructured":"Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., & Weisbuch, G. (2000). Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. ACS - Advances in Complex Systems, 3, 87\u201398.","journal-title":"ACS - Advances in Complex Systems"},{"issue":"345","key":"189_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.1974.10480137","volume":"69","author":"MH Degroot","year":"1974","unstructured":"Degroot, M. H. (1974). Reaching a consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69(345), 118\u2013121.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Statistical Association"},{"issue":"4","key":"189_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"045701","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.87.045701","volume":"87","author":"I Dornic","year":"2001","unstructured":"Dornic, I., Chat\u00e9, H., Chave, J., & Hinrichsen, H. (2001). Critical coarsening without surface tension: The universality class of the voter model. Physical Review Letters, 87(4), 045701.","journal-title":"Physical Review Letters"},{"issue":"15","key":"189_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158701","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.112.158701","volume":"112","author":"J Fern\u00e1ndez-Gracia","year":"2014","unstructured":"Fern\u00e1ndez-Gracia, J., Suchecki, K., Ramasco, J. J., San Miguel, M., & Egu\u00edluz, V. M. (2014). Is the voter model a model for voters? Physical Review Letters, 112(15), 158701.","journal-title":"Physical Review Letters"},{"issue":"4","key":"189_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.18564\/jasss.3521","volume":"20","author":"A Flache","year":"2017","unstructured":"Flache, A., M\u00e4s, M., Feliciani, T., Chattoe-Brown, E., Deffuant, G., Huet, S., et al. (2017). Models of social influence: Towards the next frontiers. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20(4), 2.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation"},{"issue":"1949","key":"189_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1038\/075450a0","volume":"75","author":"F Galton","year":"1907","unstructured":"Galton, F. (1907). Vox Populi. Nature, 75(1949), 450\u2013451.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"189_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ganser, C., & Keuschnigg, M. (2018). Social influence strengthens crowd wisdom under voting. Advances in Complex Systems, 21(06n07):1850013.","DOI":"10.1142\/S0219525918500133"},{"key":"189_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garcia, D., Mendez, F., Serdult, U., & Schweitzer, F. (2012). Political polarization and popularity in online participatory media : An integrated approach. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Politics, Elections and Data - PLEAD \u201912, pp. 3\u201310.","DOI":"10.1145\/2389661.2389665"},{"key":"189_CR16","unstructured":"Groeber, P., Schweitzer, F., & Press, K. (2009). How groups can foster consensus: The case of local cultures. Journal of Aritificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(2):4 (1\u201322)."},{"key":"189_CR17","first-page":"3","volume":"5","author":"R Hegselmann","year":"2002","unstructured":"Hegselmann, R., & Krause, U. (2002). Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 5, 3.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation"},{"issue":"1","key":"189_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1016\/0030-5073(78)90037-5","volume":"21","author":"RM Hogarth","year":"1978","unstructured":"Hogarth, R. M. (1978). A note on aggregating opinions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21(1), 40\u201346.","journal-title":"Organizational Behavior and Human Performance"},{"key":"189_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1142\/9789812811578_0005","volume":"9","author":"J Holyst","year":"2001","unstructured":"Holyst, J., Kacperski, K., & Schweitzer, F. (2001). Social impact models of opinion dynamics. Annual Reviews of Computational Physics, 9, 253\u2013273.","journal-title":"Annual Reviews of Computational Physics"},{"key":"189_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20180130","DOI":"10.1098\/rsif.2018.0130","volume":"15","author":"AB Kao","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kao, A. B., Berdahl, A. M., Hartnett, A. T., Lutz, M. J., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Ioannou, C. C., et al. (2018). Counteracting estimation bias and social influence to improve the wisdom of crowds. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 15, 20180130.","journal-title":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface"},{"key":"189_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kittur, A. & Kraut, R.E. (2008). Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, CSCW \u201908, pp 37\u201346, New York, NY, USA. ACM.","DOI":"10.1145\/1460563.1460572"},{"issue":"4","key":"189_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.36.4.343","volume":"36","author":"B Latane","year":"1981","unstructured":"Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343\u2013356.","journal-title":"American Psychologist"},{"key":"189_CR23","first-page":"703","volume":"45","author":"M Lewenstein","year":"1992","unstructured":"Lewenstein, M., Nowak, A., & Latan\u00e9, B. (1992). Statistical mechanics of social impact. Physical Review A, 45, 703\u2013716.","journal-title":"Physical Review A"},{"issue":"12","key":"189_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1819","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183107011789","volume":"18","author":"J Lorenz","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lorenz, J. (2007). Continuous opinion dynamics under bounded confidence: A survey. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 18(12), 1819\u20131838.","journal-title":"International Journal of Modern Physics C"},{"issue":"22","key":"189_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9020","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1008636108","volume":"108","author":"J Lorenz","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F., & Helbing, D. (2011). How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(22), 9020\u20139025.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America"},{"issue":"8","key":"189_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.1090.1031","volume":"55","author":"AE Mannes","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mannes, A. E. (2009). Are we wise about the wisdom of crowds? The use of group judgments in belief revision. Management Science, 55(8), 1267\u20131279.","journal-title":"Management Science"},{"issue":"11","key":"189_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e74516","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0074516","volume":"8","author":"M M\u00e4s","year":"2013","unstructured":"M\u00e4s, M., & Flache, A. (2013). Differentiation without distancing explaining bi-polarization of opinions without negative influence. PloS ONE, 8(11), e74516.","journal-title":"PloS ONE"},{"key":"189_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125624","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2020.125624","volume":"567","author":"P Mavrodiev","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mavrodiev, P., & Schweitzer, F. (2021). The ambiguous role of social influence on the wisdom of crowds: An analytic approach. Physica A, 567, 125624.","journal-title":"Physica A"},{"key":"189_CR29","unstructured":"Mavrodiev, P., Tessone, C.J., & Schweitzer, F. (2012). Effects of social influence on the wisdom of crowds. In Proceedings of the Conference on Collective Intelligence CI-2012. arXiv:1204.2991."},{"key":"189_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1360","DOI":"10.1038\/srep01360","volume":"3","author":"P Mavrodiev","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mavrodiev, P., Tessone, C. J., & Schweitzer, F. (2013). Quantifying the effects of social influence. Scientific Reports, 3, 1360.","journal-title":"Scientific Reports"},{"issue":"2","key":"189_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"022312","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.97.022312","volume":"97","author":"XF Meng","year":"2018","unstructured":"Meng, X. F., Van Gorder, R. A., & Porter, M. A. (2018). Opinion formation and distribution in a bounded-confidence model on various networks. Physical Review E, 97(2), 022312.","journal-title":"Physical Review E"},{"issue":"1","key":"189_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-016-0028-x","volume":"7","author":"B Min","year":"2017","unstructured":"Min, B., & San Miguel, M. (2017). Fragmentation transitions in a coevolving nonlinear voter model. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1\u20139.","journal-title":"Scientific Reports"},{"key":"189_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"362","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.97.3.362","volume":"97","author":"A Nowak","year":"1990","unstructured":"Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latan\u00e9, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97, 362\u2013376.","journal-title":"Psychological Review"},{"issue":"06","key":"189_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1350020","DOI":"10.1142\/S0219525913500203","volume":"16","author":"N Perony","year":"2013","unstructured":"Perony, N., Pfitzner, R., Scholtes, I., Tessone, C. J., & Schweitzer, F. (2013). Enhancing consensus under opinion bias by means of hierarchical decision making. Advances in Complex Systems, 16(06), 1350020.","journal-title":"Advances in Complex Systems"},{"issue":"1","key":"189_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1207\/s15427579jpfm0701_1","volume":"7","author":"R Ray","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ray, R. (2006). Prediction markets and the financial \u201cwisdom of crowds\u201d. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 7(1), 2\u20134.","journal-title":"Journal of Behavioral Finance"},{"issue":"9","key":"189_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"093139","DOI":"10.1063\/5.0007523","volume":"30","author":"S Schweighofer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schweighofer, S., Garcia, D., & Schweitzer, F. (2020a). An agent-based model of multi-dimensional opinion dynamics and opinion alignment. Chaos, 30(9), 093139.","journal-title":"Chaos"},{"issue":"3","key":"189_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.18564\/jasss.4306","volume":"23","author":"S Schweighofer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schweighofer, S., Schweitzer, F., & Garcia, D. (2020b). A weighted balance model of opinion hyperpolarization. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 23(3), 5.","journal-title":"Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation"},{"key":"189_CR38","volume-title":"Brownian Agents and Active Particles. Collective Dynamics in the Natural and Social Sciences","author":"F Schweitzer","year":"2003","unstructured":"Schweitzer, F. (2003). Brownian Agents and Active Particles. Collective Dynamics in the Natural and Social Sciences. Berlin: Springer."},{"issue":"2","key":"189_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1063\/PT.3.3845","volume":"71","author":"F Schweitzer","year":"2018","unstructured":"Schweitzer, F. (2018). Sociophysics. Physics Today, 71(2), 40\u201346.","journal-title":"Physics Today"},{"issue":"1","key":"189_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"014003","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6404\/aaeb63","volume":"40","author":"F Schweitzer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schweitzer, F. (2019). An agent-based framework of active matter with applications in biological and social systems. European Journal of Physics, 40(1), 014003.","journal-title":"European Journal of Physics"},{"key":"189_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-15-4806-2_8","volume-title":"Complexity, Heterogeneity, and the Methods of Statistical Physics in Economics, chapter 8","author":"F Schweitzer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schweitzer, F. (2020). The law of proportionate growth and its siblings: Applications in agent-based modeling of socio-economic systems. In H. Aoyama, Y. Aruka, & H. Yoshikawa (Eds.), Complexity, Heterogeneity, and the Methods of Statistical Physics in Economics, chapter 8 (pp. 145\u2013176). Tokyo: Springer."},{"issue":"3","key":"189_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1140\/epjb\/e2009-00001-3","volume":"67","author":"F Schweitzer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Schweitzer, F., & Behera, L. (2009). Nonlinear voter models: The transition from invasion to coexistence. The European Physical Journal B, 67(3), 301\u2013318.","journal-title":"The European Physical Journal B"},{"key":"189_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5282035","DOI":"10.1155\/2020\/5282035","volume":"2020","author":"F Schweitzer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Schweitzer, F., Krivachy, T., & Garcia, D. (2020). An agent-based model of opinion polarization driven by emotions. Complexity, 2020, 5282035.","journal-title":"Complexity"},{"issue":"04","key":"189_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1142\/S0219525908001805","volume":"11","author":"HU Stark","year":"2008","unstructured":"Stark, H. U., Tessone, C. J., & Schweitzer, F. (2008). Slower is faster: Fostering consensus formation by heterogeneous inertia. Advances in Complex Systems, 11(04), 551\u2013563.","journal-title":"Advances in Complex Systems"},{"issue":"3","key":"189_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36132","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.72.036132","volume":"72","author":"K Suchecki","year":"2005","unstructured":"Suchecki, K., Egu\u00edluz, V., & San Miguel, M. (2005). Voter model dynamics in complex networks: Role of dimensionality, disorder, and degree distribution. Physical Review E, 72(3), 36132.","journal-title":"Physical Review E"},{"key":"189_CR46","unstructured":"Surowiecki, J. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds. Anchor."}],"container-title":["Swarm Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11721-021-00189-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11721-021-00189-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11721-021-00189-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,25]],"date-time":"2021-10-25T10:20:46Z","timestamp":1635157246000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11721-021-00189-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,7]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1-2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]}},"alternative-id":["189"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11721-021-00189-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1935-3812","1935-3820"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1935-3812","type":"print"},{"value":"1935-3820","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"24 August 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 April 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 May 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}