{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T14:13:14Z","timestamp":1740147194746,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,14]],"date-time":"2015-07-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1436832000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003169","name":"South China Normal University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["14KJ18"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["14KJ18"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003169","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"name":"the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China","award":["2013AA01A212"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2013AA01A212"]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Eng Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-015-9683-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,13]],"date-time":"2015-07-13T09:30:58Z","timestamp":1436779858000},"page":"1073-1094","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies via Simulation"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Jia","family":"Zhu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Gabriel","family":"Fung","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Wai Hung","family":"Wong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Zhixu","family":"Li","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Chuanhua","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"9683_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-997-0017-3","volume":"3","author":"JS Armstrong","year":"1997","unstructured":"Armstrong, J. S. (1997). Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 63\u201384.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"9683_CR2","volume-title":"Social choice and individual values","author":"KJ Arrow","year":"1964","unstructured":"Arrow, K. J. (1964). Social choice and individual values (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.","edition":"2"},{"issue":"2","key":"9683_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1300\/J123v45n02_04","volume":"45","author":"RG Bachand","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bachand, R. G., & Sawallis, P. P. (2003). Accuracy in the identification of scholarly and peer-reviewed journals and the peer-review process across disciplines. The Serials Librarian, 45(2), 39\u201359.","journal-title":"The Serials Librarian"},{"key":"9683_CR4","volume-title":"Rational man and irrational society?","author":"BM Barry","year":"1982","unstructured":"Barry, B. M., & Hardin, R. (1982). Rational man and irrational society?. Newbury Park, CA: Sage."},{"issue":"3","key":"9683_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"320","DOI":"10.1214\/ss\/1177010906","volume":"8","author":"L Billard","year":"1993","unstructured":"Billard, L. (1993). Comment. Statistical Science, 8(3), 320\u2013322.","journal-title":"Statistical Science"},{"issue":"5","key":"9683_CR6","first-page":"1041","volume":"81","author":"RM Blank","year":"1991","unstructured":"Blank, R. M. (1991). The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the american economic review. American Economic Review, 81(5), 1041\u20131067.","journal-title":"American Economic Review"},{"issue":"6","key":"9683_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1002\/j.2326-1951.1983.tb02662.x","volume":"23","author":"SJ Brams","year":"1983","unstructured":"Brams, S. J., & Fishburn, P. C. (1983). America\u2019s unfair elections. Sciences, 23(6), 28\u201334.","journal-title":"Sciences"},{"issue":"3","key":"9683_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1177\/1075547098019003002","volume":"19","author":"JM Campanario","year":"1998","unstructured":"Campanario, J. M. (1998). Peer review for journals at it stands today part 1. Science Communication, 19(3), 181\u2013211.","journal-title":"Science Communication"},{"key":"9683_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00872316","volume":"11","author":"JA Carland","year":"1992","unstructured":"Carland, J. A., Carland, J. W., & Aby, C. D. J. (1992). Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 95\u2013104.","journal-title":"Journal of Business Ethics"},{"key":"9683_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1491","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.39.12.1491","volume":"29","author":"SJ Ceci","year":"1984","unstructured":"Ceci, S. J., & Peters, D. P. (1984). How blind is blind review? American Psychologist, 29, 1491\u20131494.","journal-title":"American Psychologist"},{"issue":"3","key":"9683_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.280.3.243","volume":"280","author":"MK Cho","year":"1998","unstructured":"Cho, M. K., Justice, A. C., Winker, M. A., Berlin, J. A., & Waecklerle, J. F. (1998). Masking author identity in peer reviewat factors influence masking success? Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 243\u2013245.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"issue":"3","key":"9683_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"310","DOI":"10.1214\/ss\/1177010904","volume":"8","author":"D Cox","year":"1993","unstructured":"Cox, D., Gleser, L., Perlman, M., Reid, N., & Roeder, K. (1993). Report of the ad hoc committee of double-blind refereeing. Statistical Science, 8(3), 310\u2013317.","journal-title":"Statistical Science"},{"key":"9683_CR13","first-page":"213","volume":"30","author":"MS Dalton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dalton, M. S. (1995). Refereeing of scholarly works for primary publishing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 30, 213\u2013250.","journal-title":"Annual Review of Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"2","key":"9683_CR14","first-page":"1497","volume":"38","author":"AT Evans","year":"1990","unstructured":"Evans, A. T., McNutt, R. A., Fletcher, R. H., & Fletcher, S. W. (1990). The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. Clinical Research, 38(2), 1497\u20131525.","journal-title":"Clinical Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"9683_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1994.03520020069019","volume":"272","author":"M Fisher","year":"1994","unstructured":"Fisher, M., Friedman, S. B., & Strauss, B. (1994). The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 143\u2013146.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"issue":"1","key":"9683_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-997-0015-5","volume":"3","author":"RH Fletcher","year":"1997","unstructured":"Fletcher, R. H., & Fletcher, S. W. (1997). Evidence for the effectiveness of peer review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3(1), 35\u201350.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9683_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2011.05.001","volume":"65","author":"M Fogelholm","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fogelholm, M., Leppinen, S., Auvinen, A., Raitanen, J., & Nuutinen, A. (2012). Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant applications. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(1), 47\u201352.","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"key":"9683_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.42.1.104","volume":"42","author":"LR Franzini","year":"1987","unstructured":"Franzini, L. R. (1987). Editors are not blind. American Psychologist, 42, 104.","journal-title":"American Psychologist"},{"issue":"2","key":"9683_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1994.03520020063017","volume":"272","author":"JM Garfunkel","year":"1994","unstructured":"Garfunkel, J. M., Ulshen, M. H., Hamrick, H. J., & Lawon, E. E. (1994). Effect of institutional prestige on reviewers recommendations and editorial decisions. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 137\u2013138.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"issue":"3","key":"9683_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1214\/ss\/1177010908","volume":"8","author":"C Genest","year":"1993","unstructured":"Genest, C. (1993). Comment. Statistical Science, 8(3), 323\u2013327.","journal-title":"Statistical Science"},{"key":"9683_CR21","first-page":"28","volume":"5","author":"P Goldberg","year":"1968","unstructured":"Goldberg, P. (1968). Are some women prejudiced against women? Transaction, 5, 28\u201330.","journal-title":"Transaction"},{"issue":"2","key":"9683_CR22","first-page":"185","volume":"5","author":"S Harnad","year":"1982","unstructured":"Harnad, S. (1982). Peer commentary on peer review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 185\u2013186.","journal-title":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences"},{"issue":"5","key":"9683_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1145\/980972.981001","volume":"2","author":"S Hill","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hill, S., & Provost, F. (2003). The myth of the double-blind review. SIGKDD Explorations, 2(5), 179\u2013184.","journal-title":"SIGKDD Explorations"},{"issue":"3","key":"9683_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"240","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.280.3.240","volume":"280","author":"AC Justice","year":"1998","unstructured":"Justice, A. C., Cho, M. K., Winker, M. A., Berlin, J. A., & Rennie, D. (1998). Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 240\u2013242.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"key":"9683_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"282","DOI":"10.1038\/438282d","volume":"438","author":"A Korngreen","year":"2005","unstructured":"Korngreen, A. (2005). Peer-review system could gain from author feedback. Nature, 438, 282.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"1","key":"9683_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22784","volume":"64","author":"CJ Lee","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lee, C. J., Sugimoto, C. R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 2\u201317.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"9683_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.280.3.246","volume":"280","author":"AM Link","year":"1998","unstructured":"Link, A. M. (1998). Us and non-us submission: An analysis of review bias. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 246\u2013247.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"issue":"2","key":"9683_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1145\/1147376.1147381","volume":"35","author":"S Madden","year":"2006","unstructured":"Madden, S., & DeWitt, D. (2006). Impact of double-blind reviewing on SIGMOD publication rates. SIGMOD Record, 35(2), 29\u201332.","journal-title":"SIGMOD Record"},{"issue":"1","key":"9683_CR29","first-page":"43","volume":"20","author":"M McGiffert","year":"1988","unstructured":"McGiffert, M. (1988). Is justice blind? An inquiry into peer review. Scholarly Publishing, 20(1), 43\u201348.","journal-title":"Scholarly Publishing"},{"issue":"2","key":"9683_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X00011572","volume":"5","author":"D Perlman","year":"1982","unstructured":"Perlman, D. (1982). Reviewer bias: Do peters and ceci protest too much? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 231\u2013232.","journal-title":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences"},{"issue":"2","key":"9683_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1994.03520020017003","volume":"272","author":"D Rennie","year":"1994","unstructured":"Rennie, D., & Flanagin, A. (1994). The second international congress on peer review in biomedical publication. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 91.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"key":"9683_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Resnik, D. B., & Elmore, S. A. (2015). Ensuring the quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review: A possible role of editors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1\u201320. doi:\n                        10.1007\/s11948-015-9625-5\n                        \n                    .","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-015-9625-5"},{"issue":"4","key":"9683_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1145\/959060.959062","volume":"32","author":"RT Snodgrass","year":"2003","unstructured":"Snodgrass, R. T. (2003). Developments at TODS. SIGMOD Record, 32(4), 14\u201315.","journal-title":"SIGMOD Record"},{"issue":"3","key":"9683_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1145\/1168092.1168094","volume":"35","author":"RT Snodgrass","year":"2006","unstructured":"Snodgrass, R. T. (2006). Single- versus double-blind reviewing: An analysis of the literature. SIGMOD Record, 35(3), 8\u201321.","journal-title":"SIGMOD Record"},{"issue":"45","key":"9683_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5147","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2013.08.049","volume":"31","author":"RE Spier","year":"2013","unstructured":"Spier, R. E., & Poland, G. A. (2013). What is excellent science and how does it relate to what we publish in vaccine? Vaccine, 31(45), 5147\u20135148.","journal-title":"Vaccine"},{"issue":"3","key":"9683_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1145\/1168092.1168093","volume":"35","author":"AKH Tung","year":"2006","unstructured":"Tung, A. K. H. (2006). Impact of double blind reviewing on SIGMOD publication: A more detail analysis. SIGMOD Record, 35(3), 6\u20137.","journal-title":"SIGMOD Record"}],"container-title":["Science and Engineering Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-015-9683-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11948-015-9683-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-015-9683-8","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-015-9683-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,3]],"date-time":"2019-06-03T11:57:21Z","timestamp":1559563041000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11948-015-9683-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,14]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,8]]}},"alternative-id":["9683"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-015-9683-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1353-3452","1471-5546"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1353-3452"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1471-5546"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,7,14]]}}}