{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,13]],"date-time":"2026-08-13T05:00:20Z","timestamp":1786597220142,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,10]],"date-time":"2020-08-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1597017600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,10]],"date-time":"2020-08-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1597017600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100011730","name":"Templeton World Charity Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["#TWCF0163\/AB106"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["#TWCF0163\/AB106"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100011730","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001833","name":"Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001833","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"Amsterdam UMC"},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001827","name":"Universiteit van Amsterdam","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001827","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Eng Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The research climate plays a key role in fostering integrity in research. However, little is known about what constitutes a responsible research climate. We investigated academic researchers\u2019 perceptions on this through focus group interviews. We recruited researchers from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and the Amsterdam University Medical Center to participate in focus group discussions that consisted of researchers from similar academic ranks and disciplinary fields. We asked participants to reflect on the characteristics of a responsible research climate, the barriers they perceived and which interventions they thought fruitful to improve the research climate. Discussions were recorded and transcribed at verbatim. We used inductive content analysis to analyse the focus group transcripts. We conducted 12 focus groups with 61 researchers in total. We identified fair evaluation, openness, sufficient time, integrity, trust and freedom to be mentioned as important characteristics of a responsible research climate. Main perceived barriers were lack of support, unfair evaluation policies, normalization of overwork and insufficient supervision of early career researchers. Possible interventions suggested by the participants centered around improving support, discussing expectations and improving the quality of supervision. Some of the elements of a responsible research climate identified by participants are reflected in national and international codes of conduct, such as trust and openness. Although it may seem hard to change the research climate, we believe that the realisation that the research climate is suboptimal should provide the impetus for change informed by researchers\u2019 experiences and opinions.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00256-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,10]],"date-time":"2020-08-10T20:05:39Z","timestamp":1597089939000},"page":"3017-3036","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["Researchers\u2019 Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"26","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4702-2472","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tamarinde","family":"Haven","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H. Roeline","family":"Pasman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Guy","family":"Widdershoven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2659-5482","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lex","family":"Bouter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joeri","family":"Tijdink","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"256_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.2307\/2943971","volume":"65","author":"MS Anderson","year":"1994","unstructured":"Anderson, M. S., Louis, K. S., & Earle, J. (1994). Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(3), 331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2943971.","journal-title":"The Journal of Higher Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"256_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-007-9042-5","volume":"13","author":"MS Anderson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). The perverse effects of competition on scientists\u2019 work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 437\u2013461. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-007-9042-5.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"256_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-001-0002-1","volume":"7","author":"SJ Bird","year":"2001","unstructured":"Bird, S. J. (2001). Mentors, advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching responsible research conduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 455\u2013468. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-001-0002-1.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"256_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2014.950253","volume":"22","author":"LM Bouter","year":"2015","unstructured":"Bouter, L. M. (2015). Commentary: Perverse incentives or rotten apples? Accountability in Research, 22(3), 148\u2013161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2014.950253.","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"issue":"3","key":"256_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1080\/01587919.2014.899050","volume":"36","author":"L Boyd","year":"2014","unstructured":"Boyd, L. (2014). Exploring the utility of workload models in academe: A pilot study. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(3), 315\u2013326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01587919.2014.899050.","journal-title":"Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management"},{"issue":"3","key":"256_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1128\/IAI.06183-11","volume":"80","author":"A Casadevall","year":"2012","unstructured":"Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2012). Reforming science: Methodological and cultural reforms. Infection and Immunity, 80(3), 891\u2013896. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1128\/IAI.06183-11.","journal-title":"Infection and Immunity"},{"issue":"3","key":"256_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"835","DOI":"10.1038\/jid.2014.371","volume":"19","author":"LA Crain","year":"2013","unstructured":"Crain, L. A., Martinson, B. C., & Thrush, C. R. (2013). Relationships between the survey of organizational research climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 835\u2013850. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/jid.2014.371.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"256_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1525\/jer.2006.1.1.43","volume":"1","author":"R De Vries","year":"2006","unstructured":"De Vries, R., Anderson, M. S., & Martinson, B. C. (2006). Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 43\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/jer.2006.1.1.43.","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"256_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1089\/ees.2016.0223","volume":"34","author":"MA Edwards","year":"2017","unstructured":"Edwards, M. A., & Roy, S. (2017). Academic research in the 21st century: Maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science, 34(1), 51\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/ees.2016.0223.","journal-title":"Environmental Engineering Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"256_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x","volume":"62","author":"S Elo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Elo, S., & Kyng\u00e4s, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107\u2013115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.","journal-title":"Journal of Advanced Nursing"},{"issue":"1","key":"256_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.3390\/admsci8010004","volume":"8","author":"M Gorsira","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gorsira, M., Steg, L., Denkers, A., & Huisman, W. (2018). Corruption in organizations: Ethical climate and individual motives. Administrative Sciences, 8(1), 4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/admsci8010004.","journal-title":"Administrative Sciences"},{"key":"256_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412990127","volume-title":"Handbook of science and technology studies","author":"S Jasanoff","year":"1995","unstructured":"Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterson, J. C., & Pinch, T. (1995). Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications."},{"key":"256_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.6163.1","volume":"4","author":"C Joynson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Joynson, C., & Leyser, O. (2015). The culture of scientific research. F1000 Research, 4, 1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/f1000research.6163.1.","journal-title":"F1000 Research"},{"key":"256_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Knorr Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 140\u2013166).","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412990127.n7"},{"issue":"7","key":"256_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0b013e318257ee6a","volume":"87","author":"DS Kornfeld","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kornfeld, D. S. (2012). Perspective: Research misconduct: The search for a remedy. Academic Medicine, 87(7), 877\u2013882. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ACM.0b013e318257ee6a.","journal-title":"Academic Medicine"},{"key":"256_CR16","volume-title":"Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society","author":"B Latour","year":"1997","unstructured":"Latour, B. (1997). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society (7th ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.","edition":"7"},{"key":"256_CR17","unstructured":"Levelt Committee, Noort Committee, & Drenth Committee. (2012). Flawed science: The fraudulent research practices of social psychologist Diederik Stapel."},{"key":"256_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0147-1767(85)90062-8","volume-title":"Naturalistic inquiry","author":"YS Lincoln","year":"1985","unstructured":"Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications."},{"issue":"1","key":"256_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1525\/jer.2006.1.1.51","volume":"1","author":"BC Martinson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, A. L., & De Vries, R. (2006). Scientists\u2019 perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 51\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/jer.2006.1.1.51.","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"256_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1525\/jer.2010.5.3.67","volume":"5","author":"BC Martinson","year":"2010","unstructured":"Martinson, B. C., Crain, A. L., & Vries, De. (2010). The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 67\u201383.","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"256_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0151571","volume":"11","author":"BC Martinson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Martinson, B. C., Nelson, D., Hagel-Campbell, E., Mohr, D., Charns, M. P., Bangerter, A., et al. (2016). Initial results from the survey of organizational research climates (SOuRCe) in the U.S. department of veterans affairs healthcare system. PLoS ONE, 11(3), 1\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0151571.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"256_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.MR000038","author":"A Marusic","year":"2013","unstructured":"Marusic, A., Wager, E., Utrobicic, A., Sambunjak, D., Anderson, M. S., & Rothstein, H. R. (2013). Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.MR000038.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews"},{"key":"256_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Meadows, L. M., & Morse, J. M. (2001). Constructing evidence within the qualitative project. In J. M. Morse, J. M. Swanson, A. J. Kuzel (Eds.), The nature of qualitative evidence (pp. 188\u2013202). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781412986236.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412986236"},{"key":"256_CR24","volume-title":"The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations","author":"RK Merton","year":"1973","unstructured":"Merton, R. K., & Storer, N. W. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, SE: University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"256_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.31219\/osf.io\/m9abx","volume":"1","author":"D Moher","year":"2020","unstructured":"Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., et al. (2020). The Hong Kong principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 1, 1\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31219\/osf.io\/m9abx.","journal-title":"PLoS Biology"},{"issue":"1","key":"256_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-016-0021","volume":"1","author":"MR Munaf\u00f2","year":"2017","unstructured":"Munaf\u00f2, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie Du Sert, N., et al. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 1\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-016-0021.","journal-title":"Nature Human Behaviour"},{"issue":"4","key":"256_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1177\/016224398300800404","volume":"8","author":"W Schmaus","year":"1983","unstructured":"Schmaus, W. (1983). Fraud and the norms of science. Science, Technology and Human Values, 8(4), 12\u201322.","journal-title":"Science, Technology and Human Values"},{"issue":"1","key":"256_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-113011-143809","volume":"64","author":"B Schneider","year":"2013","unstructured":"Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 361\u2013388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-psych-113011-143809.","journal-title":"Annual Review of Psychology"},{"issue":"4","key":"256_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1353\/rhe.1995.0007","volume":"18","author":"K Seahsore Louis","year":"1995","unstructured":"Seahsore Louis, K., Anderson, M. S., & Rosenberg, L. (1995). Academic misconduct and values: The department\u2019s influence. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 393\u2013422.","journal-title":"The Review of Higher Education"},{"issue":"2","key":"256_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2017.1413940","volume":"25","author":"D Shaw","year":"2018","unstructured":"Shaw, D., & Satalkar, P. (2018). Researchers\u2019 interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study. Accountability in Research, 25(2), 79\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2017.1413940.","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"256_CR31","volume-title":"An introduction to science and technology studies","author":"S Sismondo","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sismondo, S. (2010). An introduction to science and technology studies (2nd ed.). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.","edition":"2"},{"issue":"4","key":"256_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-008-9113-6","volume":"5","author":"BK Sovacool","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sovacool, B. K. (2008). Exploring scientific misconduct: Isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of modern science? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 5(4), 271\u2013282. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11673-008-9113-6.","journal-title":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry"},{"issue":"4","key":"256_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1162\/152651602320957574","volume":"2","author":"NH Steneck","year":"2002","unstructured":"Steneck, N. H. (2002). Institutional and individual responsibilities for integrity in research. The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB, 2(4), 51\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/152651602320957574.","journal-title":"The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB"},{"key":"256_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008681","author":"JK Tijdink","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tijdink, J. K., Schipper, K., Bouter, L. M., Pont, P. M., De Jonge, J., & Smulders, Y. M. (2016). How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers. British Medical Journal Open. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2015-008681.","journal-title":"British Medical Journal Open"},{"key":"256_CR35","unstructured":"van der Boom, H., Klabbers, G., Putnik, K., Woolderink, M. (2013). It takes two to tango: A qualitative study amongst PhD candidates and supervisors to evaluate the process of PhD supervision in the Netherlands. Available via https:\/\/www.caphri.nl\/sites\/intranet.mumc.maastrichtuniversity.nl\/files\/caphri_mumc_maastrichtuniversity_nl\/booklet_it_takes_two_to_tango_-the_process_of_phd_supervision.pdf"},{"key":"256_CR36","unstructured":"Van der Molen, F., Consoli, L., Ludwig, D., & Magnaghten, P. (2018). Responsible research and innovation in practice: Report from national case study, The Netherlands."},{"issue":"5","key":"256_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1177\/1556264614552798","volume":"9","author":"JA Wells","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wells, J. A., Thrush, C. R., Martinson, B. C., May, T. A., Stickler, M., Callahan, E. C., et al. (2014). Survey of organizational research climates in three research intensive, doctoral granting universities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(5), 72\u201388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1556264614552798.","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"},{"key":"256_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.28945\/2276","volume":"10","author":"M Woolderink","year":"2015","unstructured":"Woolderink, M., Putnik, K., van der Boom, H., & Klabbers, G. (2015). The voice of PhD candidates and PhD supervisors. A qualitative exploratory study amongst PhD candidates and supervisors to evaluate the relational aspects of PhD supervision in the Netherlands. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 217\u2013235.","journal-title":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies"},{"key":"256_CR39","unstructured":"World-Conferences-on-Research-Integrity. (2020). Mission of the WCRIF. Retrieved May 11, 2020, from https:\/\/wcrif.org\/foundation\/mission."},{"key":"256_CR40","first-page":"89","volume-title":"Deviance and social control","author":"H Zuckerman","year":"1977","unstructured":"Zuckerman, H. (1977). Deviant behavior and social control in science. In E. Sagarin (Ed.), Deviance and social control (p. 89). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications."}],"container-title":["Science and Engineering Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00256-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00256-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00256-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,9]],"date-time":"2021-08-09T23:39:01Z","timestamp":1628552341000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00256-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,10]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,12]]}},"alternative-id":["256"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00256-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1353-3452","1471-5546"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1353-3452","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-5546","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 December 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 July 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 August 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with Ethical Standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Data cannot be shared publicly because of participants\u2019 privacy. Participants consented to participate in our focus groups interviews under the premise that transcripts of the focus group interviews will not be provided to third parties.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Availability of Data and Material"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Code Availability"}}]}}