{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,5]],"date-time":"2026-06-05T00:46:12Z","timestamp":1780620372002,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,16]],"date-time":"2021-06-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1623801600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,16]],"date-time":"2021-06-16T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1623801600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100008389","name":"Uddannelses-og Forskningsministeriet","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["6183-00001B"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["6183-00001B"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100008389","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Eng Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00310-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,16]],"date-time":"2021-06-16T16:08:02Z","timestamp":1623859682000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":46,"title":["Exploring the Gray Area: Similarities and Differences in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) Across Main Areas of Research"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"27","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8462-5686","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tine","family":"Ravn","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2455-2515","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mads P.","family":"S\u00f8rensen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,16]]},"reference":[{"key":"310_CR1","unstructured":"ALLEA (2017). The European code of conduct for research integrity. Revised Edition. https:\/\/allea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf"},{"issue":"4","key":"310_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1525\/jer.2007.2.4.3","volume":"2","author":"MS Anderson","year":"2007","unstructured":"Anderson, M. S., Martinson, B. C., & de Vries, R. (2007). Normative dissonance in science: Results from a national survey of U.S. scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(4), 3\u201314","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"310_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1080\/00221546.2010.11779057","volume":"81","author":"MS Anderson","year":"2010","unstructured":"Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., DeVries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists\u2019 subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366\u2013393","journal-title":"Journal of Higher Education"},{"key":"310_CR4","volume-title":"Higher education: Handbook of theory and research","author":"MS Anderson","year":"2013","unstructured":"Anderson, M. S., Shaw, M. A., Steneck, N. H., Konkle, E., & Kamata, T. (2013). Research integrity and misconduct in the academic profession. In M. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research.Springer."},{"issue":"1","key":"310_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1177\/0149206315619011","volume":"42","author":"GC Banks","year":"2016","unstructured":"Banks, G. C., O\u2019Boyle, E. H., Pollack, J. F., White, C. D., Batchelor, J. H., Whelpley, C. E., Abston, K. A., Bennett, A. A., & Adkins, C. L. (2016). Questions about questionable research practices in the field of management: A guest commentary. Journal of Management, 42(1), 5\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0149206315619011","journal-title":"Journal of Management"},{"key":"310_CR6","volume-title":"Liv, fort\u00e6lling og tekst: Strejftog i kvalitativ","author":"IG Bo","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bo, I. G. (2005). At s\u00e6tte tavsheder i tale: fortolkning og forst\u00e5else i det kvalitative forskningsinterview. In M. H. Jacobsen, S. Kristiansen, & A. Prieur (Eds.), Liv, fort\u00e6lling og tekst: Strejftog i kvalitativ sociologi. Aalborg University Press."},{"key":"310_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-016-0024-5","author":"LM Bouter","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bouter, L. M., et al. (2016). Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: Results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-016-0024-5","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"key":"310_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2363","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00178-5","volume":"26","author":"L Bouter","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bouter, L. (2020). What Research institutions can do to foster research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2363\u20132369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00178-5","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"310_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.5465\/amle.2015.0201","volume":"16","author":"N Butler","year":"2017","unstructured":"Butler, N., Delaney, H., & Spoelstra, S. (2017). The gray zone: Questionable research practices in the business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(1), 94\u2013109","journal-title":"Academy of Management Learning & Education"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"310_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/1747016119898400","volume":"16","author":"R Dal-R\u00e9et","year":"2020","unstructured":"Dal-R\u00e9et, R., Bouter, L. M., Cuijpers, P., Gluud, C., & Holm, S. (2020). Should research misconduct be criminalized? Research Ethics, 16(1\u20132), 1\u201312","journal-title":"Research Ethics"},{"key":"310_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1235","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-018-0064-y","volume":"25","author":"SR Davies","year":"2019","unstructured":"Davies, S. R. (2019). An ethics of the system: Talking to scientists about research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 1235\u20131253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-018-0064-y","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"5","key":"310_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e5738","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0005738","volume":"4","author":"D Fanelli","year":"2009","unstructured":"Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A Systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5738","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"310_CR13","unstructured":"Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. T. J. Trenn & R. K. Merton (Eds.). \u201cForeword\u201d by T. S. Kuhn. Chicago University Press"},{"key":"310_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1697","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-017-9957-4","volume":"24","author":"S Godecharle","year":"2018","unstructured":"Godecharle, S., Fieuws, S., Nemery, B., et al. (2018). Scientists still behaving badly? A survey within industry and universities. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 1697\u20131717. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-017-9957-4","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"310_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1177\/1556264614540594","volume":"9","author":"S Godecharle","year":"2014","unstructured":"Godecharle, S., Nemery, B., & Dierickx, K. (2014). Heterogeneity in European research integrity guidance: Relying on values or norms? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 79\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1556264614540594","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"},{"key":"310_CR16","volume-title":"Fokusgrupper","author":"B Halkier","year":"2016","unstructured":"Halkier, B. (2016). Fokusgrupper. (3rd ed.). Samfundslitteratur.","edition":"3"},{"issue":"2","key":"310_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2018.03.006","volume":"48","author":"J Hall","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hall, J., & Martin, B. R. (2019). Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school. Research Policy, 48(2), 414\u2013427","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"key":"310_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-019-0081-7","author":"T Haven","year":"2019","unstructured":"Haven, T., Tijdink, J., Pasman, H. R., et al. (2019). Researchers\u2019 perceptions of research misbehaviours: A mixed methods study among academic researchers in Amsterdam. Research Integrity and Peer Review. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-019-0081-7","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"key":"310_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"455","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-016-1849-x","volume":"107","author":"D Henriksen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Henriksen, D. (2016). The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980\u20132013). Scientometrics, 107, 455\u2013476. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-016-1849-x","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"310_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/1747016119880844","volume":"15","author":"B Hofmann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hofmann, B., & Holm, S. (2019). Research integrity: Environment, experience or ethos? Research Ethics, 15(3\u20134), 1\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1747016119880844","journal-title":"Research Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"310_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"492","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2017.09.004","volume":"48","author":"SPJM Horbach","year":"2019","unstructured":"Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2019). The extent and causes of academic text recycling or \u2018self-plagiarism.\u2019 Research Policy, 48(2), 492\u2013502","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"key":"310_CR22","unstructured":"Jensen, K. K. (2017). General introduction to responsible conduct of research. In: K. Klint Jensen, L. Whiteley, & P. Sand\u00f8e (Eds.), RCR: A Danish textbook for courses in Responsible Conduct of Research (pp. 12\u201324). Frederiksberg: Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen"},{"issue":"5","key":"310_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797611430953","volume":"23","author":"LK John","year":"2012","unstructured":"John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524\u2013532","journal-title":"Psychological Science"},{"key":"310_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Knorr Cetina, K. & Reichmann, W. (2015). Epistemic cultures. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 873\u2013880)","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-08-097086-8.10454-4"},{"key":"310_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674039681","volume-title":"Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge","author":"K Knorr-Cetina","year":"1999","unstructured":"Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press."},{"key":"310_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674054158","volume-title":"How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment","author":"M Lamont","year":"2009","unstructured":"Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think: Inside the curious world of academic judgment. Harvard University Press."},{"key":"310_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1038\/435737a","volume":"435","author":"B Martinson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Martinson, B., Anderson, M., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737\u2013738","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"310_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-020-02847-8","volume":"586","author":"N Mejlgaard","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mejlgaard, N., Bouter, L. M., Gaskell, G., Kavouras, P., Allum, A., Bendtsen, A.-K., Charitidis, C. A., Claesen, N., Dierickx, K., Domaradzka, A., Reyes Elizondo, A. E., Foeger, N., Hiney, M., Kaltenbrunner, W., Labib, K., Maru\u0161i\u0107, A., S\u00f8rensen, M. P., Ravn, T., \u0160\u010depanovi\u0107, R., \u2026 Veltri, G. A. (2020). Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk. Nature, 586, 358\u2013360","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"7","key":"310_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e3000737","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.3000737","volume":"18","author":"D Moher","year":"2020","unstructured":"Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., et al. (2020). The Hong Kong principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pbio.3000737","journal-title":"PLoS Biology"},{"key":"310_CR30","unstructured":"Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations. (2013). Developed as part of the 3rd World Conference on Research Integrity. https:\/\/wcrif.org\/montreal-statement\/file"},{"key":"310_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412984287","volume-title":"Focus groups as qualitative research","author":"DL Morgan","year":"1997","unstructured":"Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage Publications."},{"key":"310_CR32","volume-title":"Fostering integrity in research","author":"National Academies of Science","year":"2017","unstructured":"National Academies of Science. (2017). Fostering integrity in research. National Academies Press."},{"key":"310_CR33","volume-title":"Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process","author":"National Academy of Science","year":"1992","unstructured":"National Academy of Science. (1992). Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process. National Academy Press."},{"issue":"5","key":"310_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1007\/s10488-013-0528-y","volume":"42","author":"LA Palinkas","year":"2015","unstructured":"Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533\u2013544. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10488-013-0528-y","journal-title":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"310_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.endeavour.2009.07.001","volume":"33","author":"B Penders","year":"2009","unstructured":"Penders, B., Vos, R., & Horstman, K. (2009). A question of style: Method, integrity and the meaning of proper science. Endeavour, 33(3), 93\u201398","journal-title":"Endeavour"},{"key":"310_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226668208.001.0001","volume-title":"Science as practice and culture","author":"A Pickering","year":"1992","unstructured":"Pickering, A. (1992). From science as knowledge to science as practice. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture. (pp. 1\u201328). University of Chicago Press."},{"issue":"6","key":"310_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1177\/0162243911433057","volume":"37","author":"M Pickersgill","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pickersgill, M. (2012). The co-production of science, ethics, and emotion. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 37(6), 579\u2013603","journal-title":"Science, Technology, & Human Values"},{"issue":"2","key":"310_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2016.1257387","volume":"24","author":"DB Resnik","year":"2017","unstructured":"Resnik, D. B., & Shamoo, A. E. (2017). Reproducibility and research integrity. Accountability in Research, 24(2), 116\u2013123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2016.1257387","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"310_CR39","volume-title":"Interpretive research design: concepts and processes","author":"P Schwartz-Shea","year":"2012","unstructured":"Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive research design: concepts and processes. Routledge."},{"key":"310_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-015-9696-7","volume":"13","author":"D Shaw","year":"2016","unstructured":"Shaw, D. (2016). The trojan citation and the \u201caccidental\u201d plagiarist. Bioethical Inquiry, 13, 7\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11673-015-9696-7","journal-title":"Bioethical Inquiry"},{"key":"310_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1085","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-018-0052-2","volume":"25","author":"D Shaw","year":"2019","unstructured":"Shaw, D. (2019). The quest for clarity in research integrity: A conceptual schema. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 1085\u20131093. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-018-0052-2","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"310_CR42","unstructured":"Singapore Statement on research integrity. (2010). World Conference on Research Integrity (Drafting Committee: N. Steneck, T. Mayer, M. Anderson et al.). 2nd and 3rd World Conference on Research Integrity. https:\/\/wcrif.org\/statement"},{"issue":"1","key":"310_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-006-0006-y","volume":"12","author":"NH Steneck","year":"2006","unstructured":"Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53\u201374","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"5","key":"310_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1177\/1556264614552421","volume":"9","author":"JK Tijdink","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tijdink, J. K., Verbeke, R., & Smulders, Y. M. (2014). Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(5), 64\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1556264614552421","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"}],"container-title":["Science and Engineering Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00310-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00310-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00310-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,31]],"date-time":"2022-12-31T11:38:04Z","timestamp":1672486684000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00310-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,16]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["310"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00310-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1353-3452","1471-5546"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1353-3452","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-5546","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,16]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 November 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 May 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 June 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"40"}}