{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,11]],"date-time":"2026-05-11T21:26:05Z","timestamp":1778534765560,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]],"date-time":"2021-07-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625788800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]],"date-time":"2021-07-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625788800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100010685","name":"H2020 Science with and for Society","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["824481"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["824481"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100010685","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Eng Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>To foster research integrity (RI), it is necessary to address the institutional and system-of-science factors that influence researchers\u2019 behavior. Consequently, research performing and research funding organizations (RPOs and RFOs) could develop comprehensive RI policies outlining the concrete steps they will take to foster RI. So far, there is no consensus on which topics are important to address in RI policies. Therefore, we conducted a three round Delphi survey study to explore which RI topics to address in institutional RI policies by seeking consensus from research policy experts and institutional leaders. A total of 68 RPO and 52 RFO experts, representing different disciplines, countries and genders, completed one, two or all rounds of the study. There was consensus among the experts on the importance of 12 RI topics for RPOs and 11 for RFOs. The topics that ranked highest for RPOs concerned education and training, supervision and mentoring, dealing with RI breaches, and supporting a responsible research process (e.g. through quality assurance). The highest ranked RFO topics concerned dealing with breaches of RI, conflicts of interest, and setting expectations on RPOs (e.g. about educating researchers about RI). Together with the research policy experts and institutional leaders, we developed a comprehensive overview of topics important for inclusion in the\u00a0RI policies of RPOs and RFOs. The topics reflect preference for a preventative approach to RI, coupled with procedures for dealing with RI breaches. RPOs and RFOs should address each of these topics in order to support researchers in conducting responsible research.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00322-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]],"date-time":"2021-07-09T17:03:27Z","timestamp":1625850207000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":29,"title":["Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"27","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5305-8984","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Krishma","family":"Labib","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Rea","family":"Roje","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Lex","family":"Bouter","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Guy","family":"Widdershoven","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Natalie","family":"Evans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ana","family":"Maru\u0161i\u0107","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Lidwine","family":"Mokkink","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Joeri","family":"Tijdink","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"322_CR1","unstructured":"All European Academies (2017). The European code of conduct for research integrity, revised edition. Berlin."},{"key":"322_CR3","unstructured":"Boehme, O., F\u00f6ger, N., Hiney, M., Peatfiled, T., & Petiet, F. (2016). Research integrity practices in science Europe member organisations. Science Europe, July."},{"key":"322_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Boulkedid, R., Abdoul, H., Loustau, M., Sibony, O., & Alberti, C. (2011). Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: A systematic review. PloS one, 6(6). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0020476.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0020476"},{"issue":"4","key":"322_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2363","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00178-5","volume":"26","author":"L Bouter","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bouter, L. (2020). What research institutions can do to foster research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2363\u20132369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00178-5.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"322_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2017.12.016","volume":"96","author":"LM Bouter","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bouter, L. M. (2018). Fostering responsible research practices is a shared responsibility of multiple stakeholders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 96, 143\u2013146.","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"key":"322_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bouter, L. M., Tijdink, J., Axelsen, N., Martinson, B. C., & ter Riet, G. (2016). Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: Results from a survey among participants of four world conferences on research integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(17). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-016-0024-5.","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-016-0024-5"},{"issue":"3","key":"322_CR7","first-page":"400","volume":"13","author":"PG Boysen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Boysen, P. G. (2013). Just culture: A foundation for balanced accountability and patient safety. Ochsner Journal, 13(3), 400\u2013406.","journal-title":"Ochsner Journal"},{"key":"322_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Brady, S. R. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the Delphi method for use in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1609406915621381.","DOI":"10.1177\/1609406915621381"},{"issue":"2","key":"322_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1002\/cpt.962","volume":"104","author":"DJ Brinkman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Brinkman, D. J., Tichelaar, J., Mokkink, L. B., Christiaens, T., Likic, R., Maciulaitis, R., et al. (2018). Key learning outcomes for clinical pharmacology and therapeutics education in Europe: A modified Delphi study. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 104(2), 317\u2013325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/cpt.962.","journal-title":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics"},{"key":"322_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00182-9","author":"SV Bruton","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bruton, S. V., Medlin, M., Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2020). Personal motivations and systemic incentives: Scientists on questionable research practices. Science and Engineering Ethics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00182-9.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"322_CR11","unstructured":"Council of the European Union (2015). Draft council conclusions on research integrity. Brussels."},{"issue":"7","key":"322_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.1080\/13611260500069947","volume":"27","author":"MR De Villiers","year":"2005","unstructured":"De Villiers, M. R., De Villiers, P. J., & Kent, A. P. (2005). The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Medical Teacher, 27(7), 639\u2013643. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13611260500069947.","journal-title":"Medical Teacher"},{"issue":"4","key":"322_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"401","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002","volume":"67","author":"IR Diamond","year":"2014","unstructured":"Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., et al. (2014). Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 401\u2013409. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"issue":"6","key":"322_CR14","first-page":"136","volume":"1","author":"PJ Drenth","year":"2015","unstructured":"Drenth, P. J. (2015). Institutional dealing with scientific misconduct. Eruditio, 1(6), 136\u2013146.","journal-title":"Eruditio"},{"key":"322_CR15","unstructured":"Drenth, P., Ftacnikova, S., Hiney, M., & Puljak, L. (2010). Fostering research integrity in Europe. Strasbourg."},{"key":"322_CR16","unstructured":"EViR Funders' Forum Guiding Principles. https:\/\/sites.google.com\/view\/evir-funders-forum\/guiding-principles. Accessed April 4, 2020."},{"key":"322_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-018-0034-4","volume":"24","author":"E-M Forsberg","year":"2018","unstructured":"Forsberg, E.-M., Anthun, F. O., Bailey, S., Birchley, G., Bout, H., Casonato, C., et al. (2018). Working with research integrity\u2014Guidance for research performing organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 1023\u20131034. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-018-0034-4.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"8","key":"322_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1097\/ACM.0b013e3181e5f0e5","volume":"85","author":"G Geller","year":"2010","unstructured":"Geller, G., Boyce, A., Ford, D. E., & Sugarman, J. (2010). Beyond \u201ccompliance\u201d: The role of institutional culture in promoting research integrity. Academic Medicine, 85(8), 1296\u20131302. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ACM.0b013e3181e5f0e5.","journal-title":"Academic Medicine"},{"issue":"9872","key":"322_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1097","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(13)60759-X","volume":"381","author":"S Godecharle","year":"2013","unstructured":"Godecharle, S., Nemery, B., & Dierickx, K. (2013). Guidance on research integrity: No union in Europe. The Lancet, 381(9872), 1097\u20131098.","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"issue":"6","key":"322_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"821","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732306287599","volume":"16","author":"RJ Hamilton","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hamilton, R. J., & Bowers, B. J. (2006). Internet recruitment and e-mail interviews in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 16(6), 821\u2013835. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1049732306287599.","journal-title":"Qualitative Health Research"},{"key":"322_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Haven, T., Errington, T., Gleditsch, K., van Grootel, L., Jacobs, A. M., & Kern, F., et al. (2020). Preregistering qualitative research: A Delphi study.","DOI":"10.31235\/osf.io\/pz9jr"},{"key":"322_CR22","unstructured":"Hermeren, G., Zwart, H., Marusic, A., & Fannelli, D. (2019). Mutual Learning Exercise (MLE) on research integrity - Final report. European Commission."},{"issue":"1","key":"322_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.7196\/sajbl.256","volume":"6","author":"L Horn","year":"2013","unstructured":"Horn, L. (2013). Promoting responsible research conduct in a developing world academic context. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 6(1), 21\u201324.","journal-title":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law"},{"key":"322_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Iorns, E., & Chong, C. (2014). New forms of checks and balances are needed to improve research integrity. F1000Research, 3(119). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/f1000research.3714.1.","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.3714.1"},{"key":"322_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Joynson, C., & Leyser, O. (2015). The culture of scientific research. F1000Research, 4(66). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/f1000research.6163.1.","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.6163.1"},{"issue":"1","key":"322_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2013.822271","volume":"21","author":"M Kalichman","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kalichman, M. (2014). Rescuing responsible conduct of research (RCR) education. Accountability in Research, 21(1), 68\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2013.822271.","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"322_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7489(00)00044-4","volume":"38","author":"S Keeney","year":"2001","unstructured":"Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. P. (2001). A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38(2), 195\u2013200. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0020-7489(00)00044-4.","journal-title":"International Journal of Nursing Studies"},{"issue":"2","key":"322_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2006.03716.x","volume":"53","author":"S Keeney","year":"2006","unstructured":"Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. (2006). Consulting the oracle: Ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(2), 205\u2013212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2648.2006.03716.x.","journal-title":"Journal of Advanced Nursing"},{"issue":"2","key":"322_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621003641132","volume":"17","author":"MN Kumar","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kumar, M. N. (2010). A theoretical comparison of the models of prevention of research misconduct. Accountability in Research, 17(2), 51\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621003641132.","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"322_CR30","unstructured":"Lerouge, I., & Hol, T. (2020). Towards a research integrity culture at universities: From recommendations to implementation. League of European research universities."},{"issue":"7829","key":"322_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"358","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-020-02847-8","volume":"586","author":"N Mejlgaard","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mejlgaard, N., Bouter, L. M., Gaskell, G., Kavouras, P., Allum, N., Bendtsen, A.-K., et al. (2020). Research integrity: Nine ways to move from talk to walk. Nature, 586(7829), 358\u2013360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-020-02847-8.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"322_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mokkink, L. B., Boers, M., van der Vleuten, C., Bouter, L., Alonso, J., & Patrick, D. L., et al. (2020). COSMIN risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: A Delphi study.","DOI":"10.21203\/rs.3.rs-40864\/v1"},{"key":"322_CR33","volume-title":"Fostering integrity in research","author":"National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine","year":"2017","unstructured":"National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. (2017). Fostering integrity in research. The National Academies Press."},{"issue":"5","key":"322_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.im.2013.03.003","volume":"50","author":"G Pare","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pare, G., Cameron, A.-F., Poba-Nzaou, P., & Templier, M. (2013). A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Information & Management, 50(5), 207\u2013217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.im.2013.03.003.","journal-title":"Information & Management"},{"issue":"4","key":"322_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x","volume":"41","author":"C Powell","year":"2003","unstructured":"Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376\u2013382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x.","journal-title":"Journal of Advanced Nursing"},{"key":"322_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Research integrity is much more than misconduct (2019). Nature, 570(5). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-01727-0.","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-019-01727-0"},{"key":"322_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-011-9260-8","volume":"18","author":"V Richman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Richman, V., & Richman, A. (2012). A tale of two perspectives: Regulation versus self-regulation. A financial reporting approach (from Sarbanes\u2013Oxley) for research ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18, 241\u2013246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-011-9260-8.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"322_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1373\/clinchem.2018.298901","volume":"65","author":"N Rifai","year":"2019","unstructured":"Rifai, N., Annesley, T. M., Moore, S., Caplan, A. L., Sweet, D. J., Hornung, P., et al. (2019). Maintaining research and publication integrity. Clinical Chemistry, 65(2), 230\u2013235.","journal-title":"Clinical Chemistry"},{"issue":"1","key":"322_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-019-0410-x","volume":"20","author":"P Satalkar","year":"2019","unstructured":"Satalkar, P., & Shaw, D. (2019). How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland. BMC Medical Ethics, 20(1), 1\u201312.","journal-title":"BMC Medical Ethics"},{"key":"322_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1893","DOI":"10.1007\/s11135-017-0574-8","volume":"52","author":"B Saunders","year":"2018","unstructured":"Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., et al. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1893\u20131907. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11135-017-0574-8.","journal-title":"Quality & Quantity"},{"key":"322_CR51","unstructured":"\u0160\u010depanovi\u0107, R., Tomi\u0107, V., Buljan, I., & Maru\u0161i\u0107, A. (2019). D3. 3: Report on the results of explorative interviews. https:\/\/sops4ri.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/D3.3_Report-on-the-results-of-the-explorative-interviews-1.pdf."},{"key":"322_CR52","unstructured":"S\u00f8rensen, M. P., Ravn, T., Bendtsen, A. K., Reyes-Elizondo, A., Kaltenbrunner, W., \u0160\u010depanovi\u0107, R., et al. (2020). https:\/\/sops4ri.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/D5.2_Report-on-the-Results-of-the-Focus-Group-Interviews-1.pdf."},{"issue":"2","key":"322_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1128\/jmbe.v15i2.827","volume":"15","author":"JD Stemwedel","year":"2014","unstructured":"Stemwedel, J. D. (2014). Life after misconduct: Promoting Rehabilitation while minimizing damage. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 15(2), 177\u2013180. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1128\/jmbe.v15i2.827.","journal-title":"Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"322_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1007\/PL00022268","volume":"12","author":"NH Steneck","year":"2006","unstructured":"Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions current knowledge and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/PL00022268.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"322_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2012.700884","volume":"19","author":"P Tereskerz","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tereskerz, P., & Mills, A. (2012). COI policies: Tax dollars should not be used to fund US institutions not making the grade. Accountability in Research, 19(4), 243\u2013246. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2012.700884.","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"322_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1159","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-018-1829-0","volume":"27","author":"CB Terwee","year":"2018","unstructured":"Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A., Chiarotto, A., Westerman, M., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., et al. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: A Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1159\u20131170. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-018-1829-0.","journal-title":"Quality of Life Research"},{"key":"322_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"436","DOI":"10.1038\/466436a","volume":"466","author":"S Titus","year":"2010","unstructured":"Titus, S., & Bosch, X. (2010). Tie funding to research integrity. Nature, 466, 436\u2013437. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/466436a","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"8","key":"322_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1525","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2012.04.013","volume":"79","author":"H von der Gracht","year":"2012","unstructured":"von der Gracht, H. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525\u20131536. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.techfore.2012.04.013.","journal-title":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change"},{"key":"322_CR46","unstructured":"VSNU (2018). The Netherlands code of conduct on research integrity."},{"issue":"2","key":"322_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1547-5069.2002.00159.x","volume":"34","author":"JM Youngblut","year":"2002","unstructured":"Youngblut, J. M., & Brooten, D. (2002). Institutional research responsibilities and needed infrastructure. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 34(2), 159\u2013164. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1547-5069.2002.00159.x.","journal-title":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship"},{"key":"322_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zwart, H., & ter Meulen, R. (2019). Addressing research integrity challenges: From penalising individual perpetrators to fostering research ecosystem quality care. Life Sciences, Society & Policy, 15(5). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40504-019-0093-6.","DOI":"10.1186\/s40504-019-0093-6"}],"container-title":["Science and Engineering Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00322-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00322-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00322-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,20]],"date-time":"2021-08-20T10:31:30Z","timestamp":1629455490000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00322-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["322"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00322-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["1353-3452","1471-5546"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1353-3452","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-5546","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"17 February 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 June 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 July 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"The study protocol was sent to the Institutional Review Board of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location VUmc), which decided that the study does not fall under the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (Wet medische-wetenschappelijke onderzoek met mensen). Additionally, ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Review Board of the Vrije Universiteit Faculty of Movement and Behavioral Sciences (approval number: VCWE-2019-029).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Participants were provided with an information leaflet, including details on our privacy policy, prior to commencing the study. We assumed informed consent when participants took part in the survey.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}],"article-number":"47"}}