{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T04:11:05Z","timestamp":1776831065569,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,4]],"date-time":"2023-07-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1688428800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,4]],"date-time":"2023-07-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1688428800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Eng Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-023-00446-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,4]],"date-time":"2023-07-04T12:45:03Z","timestamp":1688474703000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Retractions and Rewards in Science: An Open Question for Reviewers and Funders"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Mariana D.","family":"Ribeiro","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Michael W.","family":"Kalichman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6315-6510","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sonia M. R.","family":"Vasconcelos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"446_CR1","unstructured":"All European Academies (ALLEA). (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/research\/participants\/data\/ref\/h2020\/other\/hi\/h2020-ethics_code-ofconduct_en.pdf"},{"issue":"5","key":"446_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1093\/scipol\/scab031","volume":"48","author":"C Ayoubi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ayoubi, C., Pezzoni, M., & Visentin, F. (2021). Does it pay to do novel science the selectivity patterns in science funding. Science and Public Policy, 48(5), 635\u2013648. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/scipol\/scab031","journal-title":"Science and Public Policy."},{"issue":"9","key":"446_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1552","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2017.07.003","volume":"46","author":"P Azoulay","year":"2017","unstructured":"Azoulay, P., Bonatti, A., & Krieger, J. (2017). The career effects of scandal: Evidence from scientific retractions. Research Policy, 46(9), 1552\u20131569.","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"issue":"12","key":"446_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49472","DOI":"10.15252\/embr.201949472","volume":"20","author":"S Bendiscioli","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bendiscioli, S. (2019). The troubles with peer review for allocating research funding. EMBO Reports, 20(12), e49472. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15252\/embr.201949472","journal-title":"EMBO Reports"},{"key":"446_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Breaking the stigma of retraction. (2021). Nature Human Behavior, 5(1591). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-021-01266-7.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-021-01266-7"},{"issue":"8","key":"446_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"512","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2021.1952870","volume":"29","author":"S BrianXu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Brian Xu, S., & Hu, G. (2022). A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction. Accountability in Research, 29(8), 512\u2013536. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2021.1952870","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"446_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-019-01032-w","author":"A Casadevall","year":"2019","unstructured":"Casadevall, A. (2019). Duke University\u2019s huge misconduct fine is a reminder to reward rigour. Nature,\u00a0568, 7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-01032-w","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"446_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Curry, S., de Rijcke, S., Hatch, A., Pillay, D.G., van der Weijden, I., Wilsdon, J. (2020). The changing role of funders in responsible research assessment: Progress, obstacles and the way ahead. Research on Research Institute. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6084\/m9.figshare.13227914.v1","DOI":"10.6084\/m9.figshare.13227914.v1"},{"key":"446_CR12","unstructured":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). (2018). Rules of procedure for dealing with scientific misconduct. Retrieved from https:\/\/www.dfg.de\/formulare\/80_01\/80_01_en.pdf"},{"key":"446_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.1002460","author":"CR Ebersole","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ebersole, C. R., Axt, J. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Scientists\u2019 reputations are based on getting it right not being right. PLOS Biology, 14(5): e1002460. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pbio.1002460","journal-title":"PLOS Biology"},{"issue":"2","key":"446_CR9","first-page":"79","volume":"46","author":"HJ Falk-Krzesinski","year":"2015","unstructured":"Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., & Tobin, S. C. (2015). How do I review thee? Let me count the ways: A comparison of research grant proposal review criteria across US federal funding agencies. The Journal of Research Administration, 46(2), 79\u201394.","journal-title":"The Journal of Research Administration"},{"key":"446_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1038\/531415a","volume":"531","author":"D Fanelli","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fanelli, D. (2016). Set up a \u2018self-retraction\u2019 system for honest errors. Nature, 531, 415. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/531415a","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"42","key":"446_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17028","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1212247109","volume":"109","author":"FC Fang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 17028\u201317033. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1212247109","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"key":"446_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.11334.1","volume":"6","author":"LP Freedman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Freedman, L. P., Venugopalan, G., & Wisman, R. (2017). Reproducibility 2020: Progress and priorities. F1000Research, 6, 604. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/f1000research.11334.1","journal-title":"Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"446_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2011.11.001","volume":"41","author":"JL Furman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Furman, J. L., Jensen, K., & Murray, F. (2012). Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine. Research Policy, 41(2), 276290.","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"key":"446_CR16","unstructured":"Global Research Council (GRC). (2020). Responsible research assessment. Retrieved from https:\/\/www.globalresearchcouncil.org\/news\/responsible-research-assessment\/"},{"key":"446_CR17","unstructured":"Hatch, A., & Fritch, R. (2022). Cross-funder action to improve the assessment of researchers for grant funding. Retrieved from https:\/\/sfdora.org\/2022\/01\/19\/cross-funder-action-to-improve-theassessment-of-researchers-for-grant-funding\/"},{"key":"446_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Janke, C. (2018) A unified reviewing format for grant applications and evaluations. EMBO Reports, 19(2), 187-188. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15252\/embr.201745611","DOI":"10.15252\/embr.201745611"},{"key":"446_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"572","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-023-00740-8","volume":"615","author":"M Kozlov","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kozlov, M., et al. (2023). Biden calls for boosts in science spending to keep US competitive. Nature, 615, 572\u2013573. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-023-00740-8","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"446_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/srep03146","author":"SF Lu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lu, S. F., Jin, G. Z., Uzzi, B., & Jones, B. (2013). The retraction penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science. Science Reports,\u00a03, 3146. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep03146","journal-title":"Science Reports"},{"issue":"3","key":"446_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23421","volume":"67","author":"P Mongeon","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mongeon, P., & Larivi\u00e8re, V. (2016). Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co-authors\u2019 careers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 535\u2013542.","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"10","key":"446_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e48509","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0048509","volume":"7","author":"R Mutz","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mutz, R., Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H-D. (2012). Heterogeneity of inter-rater reliabilities of grant peer reviews and its determinants: A general estimating equations approach. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e48509. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0048509","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"446_CR410","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ribeiro, M. D., Kalichman, M., & Vasconcelos, S. M. (2022). Retractions and rewards in science: An open question for reviewers and funders. bioRxiv, 2022-05. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2022.05.31.494225","DOI":"10.1101\/2022.05.31.494225"},{"issue":"2","key":"446_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2621-6","volume":"114","author":"MD Ribeiro","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ribeiro, M. D., & Vasconcelos, S. M. R. (2018). Retractions covered by retraction watch in the 2013\u20132015 period: Prevalence for the most productive countries. Scientometrics, 114(2), 719\u2013734. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2621-6","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"446_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ribeiro, M.D., & Vasconcelos, S. (2020). Should corrections of the literature influence grant review? https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/49vpa","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/49vpa"},{"key":"446_CR27","unstructured":"S\u00e3o Paulo Research Foundation (FAFESP) (2012). Code for good scientific practices. Retrieved from http:\/\/fapesp.br\/boaspraticas\/FAPESP-Code_of_Good_Scientific_Practice_jun2012.pdf"},{"key":"446_CR24","unstructured":"Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR). (2019). Retrieved from https:\/\/www.scimagojr.com\/countryrank.php"},{"key":"446_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-021-01142-4","volume":"5","author":"CK Soderberg","year":"2021","unstructured":"Soderberg, C. K., Errington, T. M., Schiavone, S. R., et al. (2021). Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model. Nature Human Behavior, 5, 990\u2013997. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-021-01142-4","journal-title":"Nature Human Behavior"},{"key":"446_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-018-0040-6","volume":"25","author":"T Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang, T., King, Q. R., Wang, H., & Chen, W. (2019). Retracted publications in the biomedical literature from open access journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(3), 855\u2013868. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-018-0040-6","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"}],"container-title":["Science and Engineering Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-023-00446-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11948-023-00446-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-023-00446-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,21]],"date-time":"2023-08-21T10:22:06Z","timestamp":1692613326000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11948-023-00446-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,4]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,8]]}},"alternative-id":["446"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-023-00446-0","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1101\/2022.05.31.494225","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1353-3452","1471-5546"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1353-3452","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-5546","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 August 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 May 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 July 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"26"}}