{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,12]],"date-time":"2026-06-12T06:26:54Z","timestamp":1781245614814,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,1]],"date-time":"2024-02-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1706745600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,13]],"date-time":"2024-02-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1707782400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":12,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001826","name":"ZonMw","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["445001004"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["445001004"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001826","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Eng Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>In the research integrity literature, funding plays two different roles: it is thought to elevate questionable research practices (QRPs) due to perverse incentives, and it is a potential actor to incentivize research integrity standards. Recent studies, asking funders, have emphasized the importance of the latter. However, the perspective of active researchers on the impact of competitive research funding on science has not been explored yet. Here, I address this issue by conducting a series of group sessions with researchers in two different countries with different degrees of competition for funding, from three scientific fields (medical sciences, natural sciences, humanities), and in two different career stages (permanent versus temporary employment). Researchers across all groups experienced that competition for funding shapes science, with many unintended negative consequences. Intriguingly, these consequences had little to do with the type of QRPs typically being presented in the research integrity literature. Instead, the researchers pointed out that funding could result in predictable, fashionable, short-sighted, and overpromising science. This was seen as highly problematic: scientists experienced that the \u2018projectification\u2019 of science makes it more and more difficult to do any science of real importance: plunging into the unknown or addressing big issues that need a long-term horizon to mature. They also problematized unintended negative effects from collaboration and strategizing. I suggest it may be time to move away from a focus on QRPs in connection with funding, and rather address the real problems. Such a shift may then call for entirely different types of policy actions.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-024-00465-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,13]],"date-time":"2024-02-13T16:21:18Z","timestamp":1707841278000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["How Competition for Funding Impacts Scientific Practice: Building Pre-fab Houses but no Cathedrals"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6509-1212","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stephanie","family":"Meirmans","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,2,13]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"465_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1093\/scipol\/scab031","volume":"48","author":"C Ayoubi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ayoubi, C., Pezzoni, M., & Visentin, F. (2021). Does it pay to do novel science? The selectivity patterns in science funding. Science and Public Policy, 48(5), 635\u2013648. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/scipol\/scab031.","journal-title":"Science and Public Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"465_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1177\/1556264619858534","volume":"14","author":"NA Bonn","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bonn, N. A., & Pinxten, W. (2019). A decade of empirical research on research integrity: What have we (not) looked at? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(4), 338\u2013352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1556264619858534.","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"465_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.3152\/147154406781775850","volume":"15","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2006","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2006). Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: Effects of university prestige and field of study. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 209\u2013219. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3152\/147154406781775850.","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"key":"465_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2363","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00178-5","volume":"26","author":"L Bouter","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bouter, L. (2020). What research institutions can do to foster research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2363\u20132369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00178-5.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"465_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bouter, L. M., Tijdink, J., Axelsen, N., Martinson, B. C., & ter Riet, G. (2016). Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: Results from a survey among participants of four world conferences on research integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1, 17. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-016-0024-5.","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-016-0024-5"},{"issue":"2","key":"465_CR6","first-page":"171","volume":"107","author":"H Brooks","year":"1978","unstructured":"Brooks, H. (1978). The problem of research priorities. Daedalus, 107(2), 171\u2013190. http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/20024552.","journal-title":"Daedalus"},{"key":"465_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1531","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00182-9","volume":"26","author":"SV Bruton","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bruton, S. V., Medlin, M., Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2020). Personal motivations and systemic incentives: Scientists on questionable research practices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1531\u20131547. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00182-9.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"465_CR8","unstructured":"Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications."},{"key":"465_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1126","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.73893.2","volume":"10","author":"S Conix","year":"2021","unstructured":"Conix, S., de Block, A., & Vaesen, K. (2021). Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices. F1000Research, 10, 1126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/f1000research.73893.2.","journal-title":"F1000Research"},{"issue":"4","key":"465_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1235","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-018-0064-y","volume":"25","author":"SR Davies","year":"2019","unstructured":"Davies, S. R. (2019). An ethics of the system: Talking to scientists about research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(4), 1235\u20131253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-018-0064-y.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"465_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"444","DOI":"10.1080\/19460171.2021.1879660","volume":"15","author":"SR Davies","year":"2021","unstructured":"Davies, S. R., & Lindvig, K. (2021). Assembling research integrity: Negotiating a policy object in scientific governance. Critical Policy Studies, 15(4), 444\u2013461. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/19460171.2021.1879660.","journal-title":"Critical Policy Studies"},{"issue":"1","key":"465_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1093\/scipol\/scv023","volume":"43","author":"SPL de Jong","year":"2016","unstructured":"de Jong, S. P. L., Smit, J., & van Drooge, L. (2016). Scientists\u2019 response to societal impact policies: A policy paradox? Science and Public Policy, 43(1), 102\u2013114. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/scipol\/scv023.","journal-title":"Science and Public Policy"},{"issue":"5","key":"465_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e5738","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0005738","volume":"4","author":"D Fanelli","year":"2009","unstructured":"Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. Plos One, 4(5), e5738.","journal-title":"Plos One"},{"issue":"4","key":"465_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e10271","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0010271","volume":"5","author":"D Fanelli","year":"2010","unstructured":"Fanelli, D. (2010). Do pressures to publish increase scientists\u2019 bias? An empirical support from US States data. Plos One, 5(4), e10271.","journal-title":"Plos One"},{"issue":"6","key":"465_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0127556","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0127556","volume":"10","author":"D Fanelli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Larivi\u00e8re, V. (2015). Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. Plos One, 10(6), e0127556.","journal-title":"Plos One"},{"key":"465_CR16","unstructured":"Felt, U. (2021a). Making and taking time: Work, funding and assessment infrastructures in inter- and trans-disciplinary research. In B. Vienni Baptista, & J. Thompson Klein (Eds.), Dynamics of inter- and trans-disciplinarity within institutions: Cultures and communities, spaces, and timeframes"},{"key":"465_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Felt, U. (2021b). In conclusion: The temporal fabric of academic lives: Of weaving, repairing, and resisting. In F. Vostal (Ed.), Inquiring into academic timescapes (pp. 267\u2013280). Emerald Publishing Limited. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/978-1-78973-911-420211022.","DOI":"10.1108\/978-1-78973-911-420211022"},{"issue":"2","key":"465_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0263023","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0263023","volume":"17","author":"G Gopalakrishna","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gopalakrishna, G., ter Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J. M., & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in the Netherlands. Plos One, 17(2), e0263023. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0263023.","journal-title":"Plos One"},{"key":"465_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.19156.1","volume":"8","author":"S Guthrie","year":"2019","unstructured":"Guthrie, S., Rodriguez Rincon, D., McInroy, G., et al. (2019). Measuring bias, burden and conservatism in research funding processes. F1000Research, 8, 851. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/f1000research.19156.1. version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations.","journal-title":"F1000Research"},{"key":"465_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10805-021-09442-0","author":"G Helgesson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Helgesson, G., & B\u00fclow, W. (2021). Research integrity and hidden value conflicts. Journal of Academic Ethics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10805-021-09442-0.","journal-title":"Journal of Academic Ethics"},{"key":"465_CR21","unstructured":"Jerak-Zuiderent, S., Brenninkmeijer, J., M\u2019charek, A., & Pols, J. (2021). Good science: A view from within. Amsterdam UMC, report, 36 p."},{"key":"465_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00351-4","volume":"28","author":"M Kaiser","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kaiser, M., Drivdal, L., Hjellbrekke, J., et al. (2022). Questionable research practices and misconduct among Norwegian researchers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28, 2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00351-4.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"465_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00322-9","volume":"27","author":"K Labib","year":"2021","unstructured":"Labib, K., Roje, R., Bouters, L., Widdershoven, G., Evans, N., Maru\u0161i\u0107, A., Mokkink, L., & Tijdink, J. (2021). Important topics for fostering research integrity by research performing and research funding organizations: A Delphi consensus study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, 47. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00322-9.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"465_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.3152\/147154406781776039","volume":"15","author":"L Langfeldt","year":"2006","unstructured":"Langfeldt, L. (2006). The policy challenges of peer review: Managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessments. Research Evaluation, 15(1), 31\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3152\/147154406781776039.","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"issue":"6","key":"465_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.3152\/030234207X234578","volume":"34","author":"B Lepori","year":"2007","unstructured":"Lepori, B., van den Besselaar, P., Dinges, M., Pot\u00ec, B., Reale, E., Slipers\u00e6ter, S., Th\u00e8ves, J., & van der Meulen, B. (2007). Comparing the evolution of national research policies: What patterns of change? Science and Public Policy, 34(6), 372\u2013388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3152\/030234207X234578.","journal-title":"Science and Public Policy"},{"issue":"7043","key":"465_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1038\/435737a","volume":"435","author":"BC Martinson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737\u2013738. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/435737a.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"465_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1525\/jer.2006.1.1.51","volume":"1","author":"BC Martinson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, A. L., & de Vries, R. (2006). Scientists\u2019 perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1, 51\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/jer.2006.1.1.51.","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"},{"key":"465_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mejlgaard, N., Bouter, L. M., Gaskell, G., Kavouras, P., Allum, N., Bendtsen, A. K., et al. (2020). Research integrity: Nine ways to move from talk to walk. Nature, 586, 358\u2013360.https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-020-02847-","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-020-02847-"},{"key":"465_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1038\/s41586-022-05543-x","volume":"613","author":"M Park","year":"2023","unstructured":"Park, M., Leahey, E., & Funk, R. J. (2023). Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature, 613, 138\u2013144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-022-05543-x.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"465_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00310-z","volume":"27","author":"T Ravn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ravn, T., & S\u00f8rensen, M. P. (2021). Exploring the gray area: Similarities and differences in questionable research practices (QRPs) across main areas of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, 40. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00310-z.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"465_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-022-00120-2","volume":"7","author":"A Recio-Saucedo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Recio-Saucedo, A., Crane, K., Meadmore, K., Fackrell, K., Church, H., Fraser, S., & Blatch-Jones, A. (2022). What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: A realist synthesis. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 7, 2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-022-00120-2.","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"key":"465_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2021.1989676","author":"R Roje","year":"2021","unstructured":"Roje, R., Tomi\u0107, V., Buljan, I., & Maru\u0161i\u0107, A. (2021). Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts. Accountability in Research. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2021.1989676.","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"465_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1057\/s41599-021-00874-y","volume":"8","author":"MP S\u00f8rensen","year":"2021","unstructured":"S\u00f8rensen, M. P., Ravn, T., Maru\u0161i\u0107, A., Reyes Elizondo, A., Kavouras, P., Tijdink, J. K., & Bendtsen, A. K. (2021). Strengthening research integrity: Which topic areas should organisations focus on? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 198. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1057\/s41599-021-00874-y.","journal-title":"Humanities and Social Sciences Communications"},{"key":"465_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-006-0006-y","volume":"12","author":"NH Steneck","year":"2006","unstructured":"Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 53\u201374.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"465_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.3152\/095820209X475360","volume":"18","author":"P van den Besselaar","year":"2009","unstructured":"van den Besselaar, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Past performance, peer review and project selection: A case study in the social and behavioral sciences. Research Evaluation, 18(4), 273\u2013288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3152\/095820209X475360.","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"key":"465_CR36","unstructured":"Veugelers, R., Wang, J., & Stephan, P. (2019). Do funding agencies select and enable risky research: Evidence from ERC using novelty as a proxy of risk taking. Extended abstract submitted for the NBER SI SSF Workshop, July 2019."},{"key":"465_CR37","unstructured":"Wallace, M. L., & Rafols, I. (2015). Research portfolios in science policy: Moving from financial returns to societal benefits. SPRU Working Paper Series (SWPS), 2015-10: 1\u201330. ISSN 2057\u20136668. Available at www.sussex.ac.uk\/spru\/swps2015-10."},{"key":"465_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1832","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2016.01832","volume":"7","author":"JM Wicherts","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L. S., Augusteijn, H. E. M., Bakker, M., van Aert, R. C., M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers of Psychology, 7, 1832. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2016.01832.","journal-title":"Frontiers of Psychology"},{"key":"465_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00314-9","volume":"27","author":"Y Xie","year":"2021","unstructured":"Xie, Y., Wang, K., & Kong, Y. (2021). Prevalence of research misconduct and questionable research practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, 41. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00314-9.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"465_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1186\/s40504-019-0093-6","volume":"15","author":"H Zwart","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zwart, H., & ter Meulen, R. (2019). Addressing research integrity challenges: From penalising individual perpetrators to fostering research ecosystem quality care. Life Sciences Society and Policy, 15, 5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40504-019-0093-6.","journal-title":"Life Sciences Society and Policy"}],"container-title":["Science and Engineering Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-024-00465-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11948-024-00465-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-024-00465-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,8]],"date-time":"2024-03-08T20:09:37Z","timestamp":1709928577000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11948-024-00465-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]}},"alternative-id":["465"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-024-00465-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1353-3452","1471-5546"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1353-3452","type":"print"},{"value":"1471-5546","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 July 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"30 November 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 February 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The Institutional Review Board of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers does not consider approval necessary for studies involving interviews with non-patients; such types of study do not fall under the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}},{"value":"Written informed consent for participation and publication was gathered from all participants involved in this study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to Participate and Publish"}},{"value":"There are no financial or non-financial interests to report for this study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}},{"value":"All persons meriting authorship have been listed.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Authorship Details"}}],"article-number":"6"}}