{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,17]],"date-time":"2026-02-17T05:49:16Z","timestamp":1771307356502,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,11]],"date-time":"2024-09-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1726012800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,11]],"date-time":"2024-09-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1726012800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100008375","name":"University of Basel","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100008375","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Eng Ethics"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The 3Rs framework in animal experimentation\u2013 \u201creplace, reduce, refine\u201d \u2013 has been alleged to be expressive of anthropocentrism, the view that only humans are directly morally relevant. After all, the 3Rs safeguard animal welfare only as far as given human research objectives permit, effectively prioritizing human use interests over animal interests. This article acknowledges this prioritization, but argues that the characterization as anthropocentric is inaccurate. In fact, the 3Rs prioritize research purposes even more strongly than an ethical anthropocentrist would. Drawing on the writings of Universities Federation for Animal Welfare (UFAW) founder Charles W. Hume, who employed Russell and Burch, it is argued that the 3Rs originally arose from an animal-centered ethic which was however restricted by an organizational strategy aiming at the voluntary cooperation of animal researchers. Research purposes thus had to be accepted as given. While this explains why the 3Rs focus narrowly on humane method selection, not on encouraging animal-free question selection in the first place, it suggests that governments should (also) focus on the latter if they recognize animals as deserving protection for their own sake.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-024-00504-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,11]],"date-time":"2024-09-11T16:02:20Z","timestamp":1726070540000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Beyond Anthropocentrism: The Moral and Strategic Philosophy behind Russell and Burch\u2019s 3Rs in Animal Experimentation"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0866-8235","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nico Dario","family":"M\u00fcller","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,11]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"504_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2979\/ETE.2007.12.1.1","volume":"12","author":"R Abbey","year":"2007","unstructured":"Abbey, R. (2007). Rawlsian resources for animal ethics. Ethics and the Environment, 12(1), 1\u201322.","journal-title":"Ethics and the Environment"},{"key":"504_CR2","first-page":"255","volume":"37","author":"M Balls","year":"2009","unstructured":"Balls, M. (2009). The origins and early days of the three Rs concept. ATLA, 37, 255\u2013265.","journal-title":"ATLA"},{"key":"504_CR3","first-page":"1","volume":"41","author":"M Balls","year":"2013","unstructured":"Balls, M. (2013). UFAW and Major Charles Hume. ATLA, 41, 1\u20133.","journal-title":"ATLA"},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"504_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1177\/0261192919896352","volume":"47","author":"M Balls","year":"2019","unstructured":"Balls, M., & Parascandola, J. (2019). The emergence and early fate of the three Rs concept. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 47(5\u20136), 214\u2013220.","journal-title":"Alternatives to Laboratory Animals"},{"key":"504_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beauchamp, T. L., & DeGrazia, D. (2020). Principles of animal research ethics. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/med\/9780190939120.001.0001"},{"key":"504_CR6","unstructured":"Brennan, A., & Lo, N. Y. S. (2022). Environmental ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2022). https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/sum2022\/entries\/ethics-environmental\/"},{"key":"504_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Callanan, J. J., & Allais, L. (Eds.). (2020). Kant and animals. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198859918.001.0001"},{"key":"504_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.7120\/09627286.31.4.002","volume":"31","author":"S Camenzind","year":"2022","unstructured":"Camenzind, S., & Eggel, M. (2022). The 3Rs principles and genetic pain disenhancement. Animal Welfare, 31, 495\u2013503.","journal-title":"Animal Welfare"},{"key":"504_CR9","unstructured":"Carruthers, P. (2002). The animals issue: Moral theory in practice. Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"4","key":"504_CR10","first-page":"405","volume":"17","author":"L Denis","year":"2000","unstructured":"Denis, L. (2000). Kant\u2019s conception of duties regarding animals: Reconstruction and reconsideration. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 17(4), 405\u2013423.","journal-title":"History of Philosophy Quarterly"},{"issue":"4","key":"504_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1004295530520","volume":"31","author":"D Egonsson","year":"1997","unstructured":"Egonsson, D. (1997). Kant\u2019s vegetarianism. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 31(4), 473\u2013483. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1004295530520","journal-title":"The Journal of Value Inquiry"},{"key":"504_CR12","unstructured":"ETPLAS (2021). EU-52: Searching for (existing) non-animal alternatives. Education and Training Platform for Laboratory Animal Science. https:\/\/learn.etplas.eu\/courses\/eu-52\/"},{"key":"504_CR13","unstructured":"Fox, M. A. (1998). Anthropocentrism. In M. Bekoff (Ed.), Encyclopedia of animal rights and animal welfare (pp. 66\u201368). Greenwood."},{"key":"504_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hay, C. (2020). What do we owe to animals? Kant on non-intrinsic value. In J. J. Callanan, & L. Allais (Eds.), Kant and animals (pp. 176\u2013190). Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198859918.003.0010"},{"key":"504_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.3197\/096327197776679185","volume":"6","author":"T Hayward","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hayward, T. (1997). Anthropocentrism: A misunderstood problem. Environmental Values, 6, 49\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3197\/096327197776679185","journal-title":"Environmental Values"},{"issue":"2","key":"504_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1177\/026119290903702S11","volume":"37","author":"P Hobson-West","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hobson-West, P. (2009). What kind of animal is the \u2018Three Rs\u2019? Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 37(2), 95\u201399.","journal-title":"Alternatives to Laboratory Animals"},{"key":"504_CR17","unstructured":"Hume, C. W. (1956). The status of animals in the Christian religion. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare."},{"key":"504_CR18","unstructured":"Hume, C. W. (1962). Man and beast. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare."},{"key":"504_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jaworska, A., & Tannenbaum, J. (2018). The grounds of moral status. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/spr2018\/entries\/grounds-moral-status\/","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780190634384.003.0014"},{"key":"504_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kagan, S. (2019). How to count animals, more or less. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198829676.001.0001"},{"key":"504_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kasperbauer, T. J., & Sand\u00f8e, P. (2016). Killing as a welfare issue. In The ethics of killing animals (pp. 17\u201331). Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199396078.003.0002"},{"issue":"2","key":"504_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1093\/ojls\/gqad003","volume":"43","author":"J Kotzmann","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kotzmann, J. (2023). Sentience and intrinsic worth as a pluralist foundation for fundamental animal rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 43(2), 405\u2013428. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ojls\/gqad003","journal-title":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies"},{"issue":"1","key":"504_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1017\/S0963180123000300","volume":"33","author":"K Kramer","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kramer, K. (2023). When is something an alternative? A general account applied to animal-free alternatives to animal research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 33(1), 89\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0963180123000300","journal-title":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"504_CR24","first-page":"224","volume":"54","author":"MS Landi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Landi, M. S., Shriver, A. J., & Mueller, A. (2015). Consideration and checkboxes: Incorporating ethics and science into the 3Rs. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 54(2), 224\u2013230.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science"},{"key":"504_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lauwereyns, J. (2018). Rethinking the three R\u2019s in animal research. Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-89300-6"},{"issue":"1","key":"504_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.5840\/acpq2020124214","volume":"95","author":"PA Macdonald","year":"2021","unstructured":"Macdonald, P. A. (2021). Acknowleding animal rights: A thomistic perspective. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 95(1), 95\u2013116.","journal-title":"American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"504_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1017\/S0963180119000793","volume":"29","author":"L Marino","year":"2020","unstructured":"Marino, L. (2020). Commentary: A Belmont report for animals? Rights or welfare? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 29, 67\u201370.","journal-title":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics"},{"key":"504_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"M\u00fcller, N. D. (2022). Kantianism for animals: A radical Kantian animal ethic. Palgrave Macmillan.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-01930-2"},{"issue":"2","key":"504_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.14573\/altex.2312041","volume":"41","author":"ND M\u00fcller","year":"2024","unstructured":"M\u00fcller, N. D. (2024). Phase-out planning for animal experimentation: A definition, an argument, and seven action points. ALTEX, 41(2), 260\u2013272. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14573\/altex.2312041","journal-title":"ALTEX"},{"key":"504_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"862","DOI":"10.1038\/176862a0","volume":"176","author":"Nature","year":"1955","unstructured":"Nature. (1955). Humane killing of animals. Nature, 176, 862. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/176862a0","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"2","key":"504_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1177\/02611929221099165","volume":"50","author":"W Neuhaus","year":"2022","unstructured":"Neuhaus, W., Reininger-Gutmann, B., Rinner, B., Plasenzotti, R., Wilflingseder, D., De Kock, J., Vanhaecke, T., Rogiers, V., J\u00edrov\u00e1, D., Kejlov\u00e1, K., Knudsen, L. E., Nielsen, R. N., Kleuser, B., Kral, V., Th\u00f6ne-Reineke, C., Hartung, T., Pallocca, G., Leist, M., Hippenstiel, S., & Spielmann, H. (2022). The rise of three Rs centres and platforms in Europe*. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 50(2), 90\u2013120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/02611929221099165","journal-title":"Alternatives to Laboratory Animals"},{"key":"504_CR32","unstructured":"Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights. University of California Press."},{"key":"504_CR33","unstructured":"Russell, W. M. S., & Burch, R. L. (1959). The principles of humane experimental technique. Methuen."},{"key":"504_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salt, H. S. (1894). Animals\u2019 rights considered in relation to social progress. Macmillan & Co.","DOI":"10.2307\/1914789"},{"key":"504_CR35","first-page":"525","volume":"32","author":"CA Schuppli","year":"2004","unstructured":"Schuppli, C. A., Fraser, D., & McDonald, M. (2004). Expanding the three Rs to meet new challenges in humane animal experimentation. ATLA, 32, 525\u2013532.","journal-title":"ATLA"},{"issue":"3","key":"504_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1080\/02580136.2015.1055450","volume":"34","author":"CD Scott","year":"2015","unstructured":"Scott, C. D., & Coetser, Y. M. (2015). Rewriting Aquinas\u2019 animal ethics: The primacy of reason in the determination of moral status. South African Journal of Philosophy, 34(3), 289\u2013303.","journal-title":"South African Journal of Philosophy"},{"issue":"2","key":"504_CR37","first-page":"120","volume":"54","author":"J Tannenbaum","year":"2015","unstructured":"Tannenbaum, J., & Bennett, B. T. (2015). Russell and Burch\u2019s 3Rs then and now: The need for clarify in definition and purpose. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 54(2), 120\u2013132.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science"},{"key":"504_CR38","unstructured":"UFAW. (1950). Kind killing. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare."},{"key":"504_CR39","unstructured":"UFAW. (1952). The Universities Federation for Animal Welfare. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare."},{"key":"504_CR40","unstructured":"UFAW (1958). Advertisement. South African Journal of Medical Laboratory Technology, 4(2). https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/sim_south-african-journal-of-medical-laboratory-technology_1958-06_4_2\/page\/n5\/mode\/2up?q=kind+killing"},{"key":"504_CR41","unstructured":"UFAW. (1967). Humane killing of animals. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare."},{"key":"504_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1017\/S0962728600029675","volume":"14","author":"JMG Vorstenbosch","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vorstenbosch, J. M. G. (2005). The ethics of the three Rs principle: A reconsideration. Animal Welfare, 14, 339\u2013345.","journal-title":"Animal Welfare"},{"key":"504_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Walker, R. L., & Eggel, M. (2020). From mice to monkeys? Beyond orthodox approaches to the ethics of animal model choice. Animals, 10(77). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ani10010077","DOI":"10.3390\/ani10010077"},{"key":"504_CR44","unstructured":"Warren, M. A. (1997). Moral status: Obligations to persons and other living things. Clarendon."}],"container-title":["Science and Engineering Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-024-00504-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11948-024-00504-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-024-00504-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,21]],"date-time":"2024-10-21T15:19:37Z","timestamp":1729523977000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11948-024-00504-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,11]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]}},"alternative-id":["504"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-024-00504-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-5546"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-5546","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 March 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 July 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 September 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The author declares none.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}}],"article-number":"44"}}