{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T17:50:29Z","timestamp":1776880229235,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":93,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,5]],"date-time":"2026-03-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772668800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,30]],"date-time":"2026-03-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774828800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":25,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007605","name":"Aarhus Universitet","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007605","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Eng Ethics"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-026-00587-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,5]],"date-time":"2026-03-05T15:34:05Z","timestamp":1772724845000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Shaping the Field: A Review of the Use of Theory in Research on Research Integrity"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"32","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3109-6178","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marina","family":"Lambert","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6571-9743","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lise","family":"Degn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,5]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"587_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.3354\/esep00156","volume":"15","author":"K. Akrivou","year":"2015","unstructured":"Akrivou, K. (2015). Towards (more) integrity in academia, encouraging long-term knowledge creation and academic freedom. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics ESEP, 15(1), 49\u201354.","journal-title":"Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics ESEP"},{"key":"587_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Allen, K. A., Reardon, J., Walsh, L., Waters, L. E., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2022). The ecology of peer review: Person-centred, strength-based, and self-determination perspectives. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 19(5).","DOI":"10.53761\/1.19.5.2"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.3923\/sscience.2012.283.288","volume":"7","author":"L. Amin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Amin, L., Zainal, S. Z., Hassan, Z., & Ibrahim, M. H. (2012). Factors contributing to research misconducts. Social Sciences, 7(2), 283\u2013288.","journal-title":"Social Sciences"},{"issue":"9","key":"587_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"914","DOI":"10.15252\/embr.201439016","volume":"15","author":"H. Andersen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Andersen, H. (2014). Co-author responsibility: Distinguishing between the moral and epistemic aspects of trust. EMBO Reports, 15(9), 914\u2013918.","journal-title":"EMBO Reports"},{"key":"587_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Armond, A. C. V., & Kakuk, P. (2022). Perceptions of research integrity climate in Hungarian universities: Results from a survey among academic researchers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(4).","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-022-00382-5"},{"issue":"4","key":"587_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1177\/1556264619858534","volume":"14","author":"N. Aubert Bonn","year":"2019","unstructured":"Aubert Bonn, N., & Pinxten W. A. (2019). Decade of empirical research on research integrity: What have we (not) looked at? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(4), 338\u2013352","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"},{"key":"587_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B\u00fclow, & Helgesson, G. (2019). Criminalization of scientific misconduct. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 22(2), 245\u2013252","DOI":"10.1007\/s11019-018-9865-7"},{"issue":"4","key":"587_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1353\/ken.2014.0029","volume":"24","author":"K. Borgerson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Borgerson, K. (2014). Redundant, secretive, and isolated: When are clinical trials scientifically valid? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 24(4), 385\u2013411","journal-title":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal"},{"key":"587_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2363","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00178-5","volume":"26","author":"L. Bouter","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bouter, L. (2020). What research institutions can do to foster research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2363\u20132369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00178-5","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"587_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bozeman, B., & Youtie, J. (2016). Trouble in paradise: Problems in academic research co-authoring. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(6), 1717\u20131743.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-015-9722-5"},{"key":"587_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Burghardt, J., & Bodansky, A. N. (2021). Why psychology needs to stop striving for novelty and how to move towards theory-driven research. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 609802. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.609802","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.609802"},{"key":"587_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carcausto-Calla, W., Zapata, A., Cueva, N., Morales, F., & Rios, S. A. (2023). Mapping of empirical studies on research integrity in university institutions. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(9).","DOI":"10.36941\/ajis-2023-0122"},{"issue":"3","key":"587_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1007\/s10734-021-00786-5","volume":"84","author":"MWT Cheng","year":"2019","unstructured":"Cheng, M. W. T., & Leung, M. L. (2019). \u201cI\u2019m not the only victim horizontal ellipsis\u201d student perceptions of exploitative supervision relation in doctoral degree. Higher Education, 84(3), 523\u2013540","journal-title":"Higher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"587_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1186\/s12917-022-03167-x","volume":"18","author":"MM Christopher","year":"2022","unstructured":"Christopher M. M. (2022). Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health. BMC Veterinary Research, 18(1), 73. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12917-022-03167-x","journal-title":"BMC Veterinary Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"587_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1086\/227835","volume":"89","author":"S. Cole","year":"1983","unstructured":"Cole, S. (1983). The hierarchy of the sciences? The American Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 111\u2013139","journal-title":"The American Journal of Sociology"},{"key":"587_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Collins, C. S., & Stockton, C. M. (2018). The central role of theory in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1609406918797475","DOI":"10.1177\/1609406918797475"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR15","first-page":"121","volume":"25","author":"MJ Colloff","year":"2021","unstructured":"Colloff, M. J., Grafton, R. Q., & Williams, J. (2021). Scientific integrity, public policy and water governance in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Australian Journal of Water Resources, 25(2), 121\u2013140","journal-title":"Australian Journal of Water Resources"},{"issue":"5","key":"587_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2018.02.016","volume":"47","author":"A. Cox","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cox, A., Craig, R., & Tourish, D. (2022). Retraction statements and research malpractice in economics. Research Policy, 47(5), 924\u2013935","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"587_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1177\/0170840609102282","volume":"30","author":"B. Czarniawska","year":"2009","unstructured":"Czarniawska, B. (2009). Emerging institutions: Pyramids or anthills? Organization Studies, 30(4), 423\u2013441","journal-title":"Organization Studies"},{"key":"587_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dahal, B., & Rijal, S. (2022). Research integrity: Learning from collective action in Nepal. Facets (Ottawa), 7, 236\u2013246","DOI":"10.1139\/facets-2021-0044"},{"issue":"4","key":"587_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1235","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-018-0064-y","volume":"25","author":"SR Davies","year":"2019","unstructured":"Davies, S. R. (2019). An ethics of the system: Talking to scientists about research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(4), 1235\u20131253","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"6","key":"587_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3167","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00262-w","volume":"26","author":"L. Degn","year":"2020","unstructured":"Degn, L. (2020). Integrating integrity: The organizational translation of policies on research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3167\u20133182","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"587_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ellis, R. J. (2022). Questionable research practices, low statistical power, and other obstacles to replicability: Why preclinical neuroscience research would benefit from registered reports. eNeuro, 9(4).","DOI":"10.1523\/ENEURO.0017-22.2022"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"218","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2008.12.006","volume":"38","author":"J. Fagerberg","year":"2009","unstructured":"Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies - The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38(2), 218\u2013233","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"key":"587_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fang, F. C., Bennett, J. W., & Casadevall, A. (2013). Males are overrepresented among life science researchers committing scientific misconduct. MBio, 4(1), e00640\u2013e00612","DOI":"10.1128\/mBio.00640-12"},{"key":"587_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G\u00f3mez-Ferri, Gonz\u00e1lez-Alcaide, & Llopis-Goig, R. (2019). Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers\u2019 perception. Journal of Informetrics, 13(4).","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2019.100980"},{"issue":"3","key":"587_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1080\/10508422.2013.830573","volume":"24","author":"AM Gordon","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gordon, A. M. (2014). Rational choice and moral decision making in research. Ethics & Behavior, 24(3), 175\u2013194","journal-title":"Ethics & Behavior"},{"issue":"4","key":"587_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1177\/0162243909345840","volume":"35","author":"H. Gottweis","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gottweis, H., & Kim, B. (2010). Explaining Hwang-gate: South Korean identity politics between bionationalism and globalization. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 35(4), 501\u2013524","journal-title":"Science, Technology, and Human Values"},{"key":"587_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grant, D. B., Kov\u00e1cs, G., & Spens, K. (2018). Questionable research practices in academia: Antecedents and consequences. European Business Review, 30(2), 101\u2013127","DOI":"10.1108\/EBR-12-2016-0155"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-013-0500-6","volume":"21","author":"T. Greitemeyer","year":"2014","unstructured":"Greitemeyer, T. (2014). Article retracted, but the message lives on. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21(2), 557\u2013561","journal-title":"Psychonomic Bulletin and Review"},{"key":"587_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-122414-033437","volume":"67","author":"C. Gross","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gross, C. (2016). Scientific misconduct. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 693\u2013711","journal-title":"Annual Review of Psychology"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"414","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2018.03.006","volume":"48","author":"J. Hall","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hall, J., & Martin, B. R. (2019). Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research. Research Policy, 48(2), 414\u2013427","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"587_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1007\/s10838-021-09555-5","volume":"52","author":"T. Haven","year":"2021","unstructured":"Haven, T., & van Woudenberg, R. (2021). Explanations of research misconduct, and how they hang together. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 52(4), 543\u2013561","journal-title":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"587_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hesselmann, F. (2019a). Science and its others: Examining the discourse about scientific misconduct through a postcolonial lens. Identities 26(4), 393\u2013411.","DOI":"10.1080\/1070289X.2018.1538065"},{"key":"587_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hesselmann, F. (2019b). Punishing crimes of the mind: Sanctions for scientific misconduct as a case for the cultural theory of punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 23(4), 527\u2013544","DOI":"10.1177\/1362480618756365"},{"issue":"3","key":"587_CR34","first-page":"414","volume":"51","author":"F. Hesselmann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hesselmann, F. (2021). Cycles of invisibility: The limits of transparency in dealing with scientific misconduct social studies of. Science, 51(3), 414\u2013438","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"5","key":"587_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"552","DOI":"10.1177\/1075547019860848","volume":"41","author":"F. Hesselmann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hesselmann, F., & Reinhart, M. (2019). Science means never having to say you\u2019re sorry? Apologies for scientific misconduct. Science Communication, 41(5), 552\u2013579","journal-title":"Science Communication"},{"key":"587_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heuritsch, J. (2021). Reflexive behaviour: How publication pressure affects research quality in astronomy. Publications (Basel), 9(4), 52","DOI":"10.3390\/publications9040052"},{"key":"587_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M. D., Pratt, T. C., & Mays, R. D. (2019). The perceived causes of research misconduct among faculty members in the natural, social, and applied sciences. Studies in Higher Education (Dorchester-On-Thames), 45(11), 2162\u20132174","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2019.1593352"},{"issue":"3","key":"587_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1595","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00202-8","volume":"26","author":"SPJM Horbach","year":"2020","unstructured":"Horbach, S. P. J. M., Breit, E., Halffman, W., & S.-E, M. (2020). On the willingness to report and the consequences of reporting research misconduct: The role of power relations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 1595\u20131623","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"587_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1093\/scipol\/scy068","volume":"6","author":"SPJM Horbach","year":"2019","unstructured":"Horbach, S. P. J. M., Breit, E., & Mamelund S.-E (2019). Organisational responses to alleged scientific misconduct: Sensemaking, sensegiving, and sensehiding. Science & Public Policy, 6(3), 415\u2013429","journal-title":"Science & Public Policy"},{"issue":"1","key":"587_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-018-2969-2","volume":"118","author":"SPJM Horbach","year":"2019","unstructured":"Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2019). The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications. Scientometrics, 118(1), 339\u2013373","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"587_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Horton, J., Kumar, K., D., & Wood, A. (2020). Detecting academic fraud using Benford law: The case of Professor James Hunton. Research Policy, 49(8).","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2020.104084"},{"issue":"1","key":"587_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1007\/s10805-020-09389-8","volume":"20","author":"P. Huistra","year":"2022","unstructured":"Huistra, P., & Paul, H. (2022). Systemic explanations of scientific misconduct: Provoked by spectacular cases ofnorm violation? Journal of Academic Ethics, 20(1), 51\u201365","journal-title":"Journal of Academic Ethics"},{"key":"587_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hussinger, K., & Pellens, M. (2019). Guilt by association: How scientific misconduct harms prior collaborators. Research Policy, 48(2), 516\u2013530","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2018.01.012"},{"issue":"6","key":"587_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1177\/1948550618790227","volume":"10","author":"S. Janke","year":"2019","unstructured":"Janke, S., Daumiller, M., & Rudert, S. C. (2019). Dark pathways to achievement in science: Researchers\u2019 achievement goals predict engagement in questionable research practices. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 10(6), 783\u2013791","journal-title":"Social Psychological & Personality Science"},{"key":"587_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kaatz, A., Vogelman, P. N., & Carnes, M. (2013). Are men more likely than women to commit scientific misconduct? Maybe. Maybe Not mBio, 4(2).","DOI":"10.1128\/mBio.00156-13"},{"key":"587_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kafaee, M., Marhamati, H., & Gharibzadeh, S. (2020). Choice-supportive bias in science: Explanation and mitigation accountability in research. 28(8), 528\u2013543.","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2021.1872377"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bpg.2014.03.003","volume":"28","author":"M. Kaiser","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kaiser, M. (2014). The integrity of science - lost in translation? Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology, 28(2), 339\u2013347","journal-title":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology"},{"issue":"1","key":"587_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1186\/s12939-022-01738-w","volume":"21","author":"M. Kennedy","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kennedy, M., Maddox, R., Booth, K., Maidment, S., Chamberlain, C., & Bessarab, D. (2022). Decolonising qualitative research with respectful, reciprocal, and responsible research practice: A narrative review of the application of yarning method in qualitative aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research. International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(1), 134\u2013134","journal-title":"International Journal for Equity in Health"},{"key":"587_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kepes, S., Keener, S. K., McDaniel, M. A., & Hartman, N. S. (2022). Questionable research practices among researchers in the most research-productive management programs. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(7), 1190\u20131208","DOI":"10.1002\/job.2623"},{"issue":"1","key":"587_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1177\/030631282012001005","volume":"12","author":"K. Knorr-Cetina","year":"1982","unstructured":"Knorr-Cetina, K. (1982). Scientific communities or Transepistemic arenas of research? A critique of quasi-economic models of science. Social Studies of Science, 12(1), 101\u2013130","journal-title":"Social Studies of Science"},{"issue":"3","key":"587_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1093\/jleo\/ewp031","volume":"27","author":"N. Lacetera","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lacetera, N., & Zirulia, L. (2011). The economics of scientific misconduct. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 27(3), 568\u2013603","journal-title":"Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization"},{"key":"587_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leistedt, S. J., & Linkowski, P. (2016). Fraud, individuals, and networks: A biopsychosocial model of scientific frauds. Science & Justice, 56(2), 109\u2013112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scijus.2016.01.002"},{"issue":"4","key":"587_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691616687745","volume":"12","author":"SO Lilienfeld","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lilienfeld, S. O. (2017). Psychology\u2019s replication crisis and the grant culture: Righting the ship. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 660\u2013664","journal-title":"Perspectives on Psychological Science"},{"issue":"3","key":"587_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1525\/jer.2010.5.3.67","volume":"5","author":"BC Martinson","year":"2010","unstructured":"Martinson, B. C., Crain, L. A., De Vries, R., & Anderson, M. S. (2010). The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 67\u201383","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-010-9247-x","volume":"18","author":"G. Meyer","year":"2012","unstructured":"Meyer, G., & Sand\u00f8e, P. (2012). Going public: Good scientific conduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(2), 173\u2013197","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"587_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"369","DOI":"10.1177\/0073275320952257","volume":"58","author":"CCM Mody","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mody, C. C. M., Sibum, H. O., & Roberts, L. L. (2020). Integrating research integrity into the history of science. History of Science, 58(4), 369\u2013385","journal-title":"History of Science"},{"issue":"3","key":"587_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23421","volume":"67","author":"P Mongeon.","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mongeon. P & Larivi\u00e8re, V. (2016). Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co-authors\u2019 careers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 535\u2013542","journal-title":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"587_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nelson, N. C., Ichikawa, K., Chung, J., & Malik, M. (2020). Mapping the discursive dimensions of the reproducibility crisis: A mixed methods analysis. MetaArxiv.","DOI":"10.31222\/osf.io\/sbv3q"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1177\/0149206314527133","volume":"43","author":"EH O\u2019Boyle Jr","year":"2017","unstructured":"O\u2019Boyle, E. H.Jr, Banks, G. C., & Gonzalez-Mul\u00e9, E. (2017). The chrysalis effect: How ugly initial Results metamorphosize into beautiful articles. Journal of Management, 43(2), 376\u2013399","journal-title":"Journal of Management"},{"issue":"8","key":"587_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2017.1399358","volume":"24","author":"AP Olesen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Olesen, A. P., Amin, L., & Mahadi, Z. (2017). Malaysian researchers talk about the influence of culture on research misconduct in higher learning institutions. Accountability in Research, 24(8), 469\u2013482","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"587_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.1007\/s11024-021-09440-x","volume":"59","author":"C. Paradeise","year":"2021","unstructured":"Paradeise, C., & Filliatreau, G. (2021). Scientific integrity matters. Minerva, 59, 289\u2013309. https:\/\/doi-org.ez.statsbiblioteket.dk\/10.1007\/s11024-021-09440-x","journal-title":"Minerva"},{"key":"587_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2022.07.006","volume":"151","author":"L. Parker","year":"2022","unstructured":"Parker, L., Boughton, S., Lawrence, R., & Bero, L. (2022). Experts identified warning signs of fraudulent research: A qualitative study to inform a screening tool. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 151, 1\u201317","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"587_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1177\/1747016120980562","volume":"17","author":"M. Paruzel-Czachura","year":"2021","unstructured":"Paruzel-Czachura, M., Baran, L., & Spendel, Z. (2021). Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research. Research Ethics Review, 17(3), 375\u2013397","journal-title":"Research Ethics Review"},{"key":"587_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rabelo, A. L. A., Farias, J. E. M., Sarmet, M. M., Joaquim, T. C. R., Hoersting, R. C., Victorino, L., Modesto, J. G. N., & Pilati, R. (2020). Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison. International Journal of Psychology: Journal International de Psychologie, 55, 674\u2013683.","DOI":"10.1002\/ijop.12632"},{"issue":"5","key":"587_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2022.2115888","volume":"30","author":"H. Radder","year":"2023","unstructured":"Radder, H. (2023). How (not) to be held accountable in research: The case of the Dutch integrity code. Accountability in Research, 30(5), 261\u2013275. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2022.2115888","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"587_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ravn, T., & S\u00f8rensen, M. P. (2021). Exploring the Gray area: Similarities and differences in Questionable research practices (QRPs) across main areas of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(4), 40\u201340","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00310-z"},{"key":"587_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ripley, E., Markowitz, M., Nichols-Casebolt, A., Williams, L., & Macrina, F. (2012). Guiding the next generation of NIH investigators in responsible conduct of research: The role of the mentor. Accountability in Research, 19(4), 209\u2013219. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2012.700880","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2012.700880"},{"issue":"4","key":"587_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"354","DOI":"10.1177\/0073275320952268","volume":"58","author":"LL Roberts","year":"2020","unstructured":"Roberts, L. L., Sibum, H. O., & Mody, C. C. M. (2020). Integrating the history of science into broader discussions of research integrity and fraud. History of Science, 58(4), 354\u2013368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0073275320952268","journal-title":"History of Science"},{"key":"587_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rule, P., & John, V. M. (2015). A necessary dialogue: Theory in case study research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(11).","DOI":"10.1177\/1609406915611575"},{"key":"587_CR72","volume-title":"Developing theory through qualitative inquiry","author":"J. Salda\u00f1a","year":"2024","unstructured":"Salda\u00f1a, J. (2024). Developing theory through qualitative inquiry. Sage"},{"key":"587_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Satalkar, P., & Shaw, D. (2019). How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland. Bmc Medical Ethics, 20(72). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12910-019-0410-x","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-019-0410-x"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR74","first-page":"291","volume":"21","author":"JK Sax","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sax, J. K. (2012). Financial conflicts of interest in science. Annals of Health Law, 21(2), 291\u2013327","journal-title":"Annals of Health Law"},{"key":"587_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"877","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2015.00877","volume":"6","author":"JR Schoenherr","year":"2015","unstructured":"Schoenherr, J. R. (2015). Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorship. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 877\u2013877","journal-title":"Frontiers in Psychology"},{"issue":"3","key":"587_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621003791986","volume":"17","author":"JI Seeman","year":"2010","unstructured":"Seeman, J. I., & House, M. C. (2010). Influences on authorship issues: An evaluation of giving credit. Accountability in Research, 17(3), 146\u2013169","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"587_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1085","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-018-0052-2","volume":"25","author":"D. Shaw","year":"2019","unstructured":"Shaw, D. (2019). The quest for clarity in research integrity: A conceptual schema. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 1085\u20131093. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-018-0052-2","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"587_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/s11673-008-9113-6","volume":"5,","author":"BK Sovacool","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sovacool, B. K. (2008). Exploring scientific misconduct: Isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of modern science? Bioethical Inquiry, 5, 271\u2013282","journal-title":"Bioethical Inquiry"},{"issue":"9","key":"587_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1458","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socscimed.2010.01.013","volume":"70","author":"JM Street","year":"2010","unstructured":"Street, J. M., Rogers, W. A., Israel, M., & Braunack-Mayer, A. J. (2010). Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences. Social Science and Medicine (1982), 70(9), 1458\u20131465","journal-title":"Social Science and Medicine (1982)"},{"issue":"6","key":"587_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1027\/1864-9335\/a000324","volume":"48","author":"S. St\u00fcrmer","year":"2017","unstructured":"St\u00fcrmer, S., Oeberst, A., Tr\u00f6tschel, R., & Decker, O. (2017). Early-career researchers\u2019 perceptions of the prevalence of questionable research practices, potential causes, and open science. Social Psychology, 48(6), 365\u2013371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1864-9335\/a000324","journal-title":"Social Psychology"},{"key":"587_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tijdink, J. K., Bouter, L. M., Veldkamp, C. L. S., van de Ven, P. M., Wicherts, J. M., & Smulders, Y. M. (2016). Personality traits are associated with research misbehavior in Dutch scientists: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One, 11(9).","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0163251"},{"issue":"3","key":"587_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"167","DOI":"10.1177\/0735275112457914","volume":"30","author":"S. Timmermans","year":"2012","unstructured":"Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167\u2013186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0735275112457914","journal-title":"Sociological Theory"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2021.1900739","volume":"29","author":"V. Tomi\u0107","year":"2022","unstructured":"Tomi\u0107 V., Buljan, I., & A, M. (2022). Perspectives of key stakeholders on essential virtues for good scientific practice in research areas. Accountability in Research, 29(2), 77\u2013108","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR84","first-page":"174","volume":"29","author":"D. Tourish","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tourish, D., & Craig, R. (2020). Research misconduct in business and management studies: Causes. Consequences, and Possible Remedies Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(2), 174\u2013187","journal-title":"Consequences, and Possible Remedies Journal of Management Inquiry"},{"issue":"1","key":"587_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"Article10","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00291-z","volume":"27","author":"G. Valkenburg","year":"2021","unstructured":"Valkenburg, G., Dix, G., Tijdink, J., & de Rijcke, S. (2021). Expanding research integrity: A cultural-practice perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(1), Article10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00291-z","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"587_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.18310.1","volume":"8","author":"JT van der Steen","year":"2019","unstructured":"van der Steen, J. T., Riet G, T., van den Bogert, C. A., & Bouter, L. M. (2019). Causes of reporting bias: A theoretical framework. F1000 Research, 8, 280","journal-title":"F1000 Research"},{"issue":"7","key":"587_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2021.1937603","volume":"29","author":"KJ Vie","year":"2022","unstructured":"Vie, K. J. (2022). Can research integrity prevail in the market? Lessons from commissioned research organizations. Accountability in Research, 29(7), 415\u2013441","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"587_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1111\/puar.13273","volume":"81","author":"D. Vogel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vogel, D., & Homberg, F. (2021). P-Hacking, P-Curves, and the PSM-Performance relationship: Is There evidential value? Public Administration Review, 81(2), 191\u2013204","journal-title":"Public Administration Review"},{"key":"587_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780199240531.001.0001"},{"key":"587_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u015awi\u0105tkowski, W., & Dompnier, B. (2017). Replicability crisis in social psychology: Looking at the past to find new pathways for the future. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 30(1).","DOI":"10.5334\/irsp.66"},{"issue":"4","key":"587_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00314-9","volume":"27","author":"Y. Xie","year":"2021","unstructured":"Xie, Y., Wang, K., & Kong, Y. (2021). Prevalence of research misconduct and Questionable research practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(4), 41. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00314-9","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"587_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yeo-Teh, N. S. L., & Tang, B. L. (2022). Perceived publication pressure and research misconduct: Should we be too bothered with a causal relationship? Ethic Research, 18(4), 329\u2013338.","DOI":"10.1177\/17470161221125097"},{"key":"587_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zwart, H. (2017). Tainted texts: Plagiarism and self-exploitation in Perlmann\u2019s silence. In Tales of research misconduct. Library of ethics and applied philosophy (Vol. 36) Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-65554-3_8","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-65554-3_8"}],"container-title":["Science and Engineering Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11948-026-00587-y","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-026-00587-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-026-00587-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T17:02:02Z","timestamp":1776877322000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11948-026-00587-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,5]]},"references-count":93,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]}},"alternative-id":["587"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-026-00587-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-5546"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-5546","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 December 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 February 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 March 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"19"}}