{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T16:00:34Z","timestamp":1776873634074,"version":"3.51.2"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]],"date-time":"2026-02-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772150400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,23]],"date-time":"2026-03-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774224000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":24,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007605","name":"Aarhus Universitet","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007605","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Eng Ethics"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-026-00588-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]],"date-time":"2026-02-27T06:54:35Z","timestamp":1772175275000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Time, Quality, and Integrity: Temporal Autonomy as a Missing Link in Research Assessment Reform"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"32","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2455-2515","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mads P.","family":"S\u00f8rensen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3109-6178","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marina","family":"Lambert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8462-5686","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Tine","family":"Ravn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4628-9180","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Filip","family":"Vostal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"588_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andersen, J. P., Degn, L., Fishberg, R., Graversen, E. K., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Schmidt, E. K., Schneider, J. W., & S\u00f8rensen, M. P. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process \u2013 A survey of researchers\u2019 practices and perceptions. Technology in Society, 81, 1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.techsoc.2025.102813","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techsoc.2025.102813"},{"key":"588_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Anderson, M. S., Shaw, M. A., Steneck, N. H., Konkle, E., & Kamata, T. (2013). Research integrity and misconduct in the academic profession. In M. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research.  (Vol. 28). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-007-5836-0_5","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5836-0_5"},{"issue":"2","key":"588_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0243664","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0243664","volume":"16","author":"N Aubert Bonn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Aubert Bonn, N., & Pinxten, W. (2021). Advancing science or advancing careers? Researchers\u2019 opinions on success indicators. PLOS ONE, 16(2), e0243664. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0243664","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"key":"588_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"452","DOI":"10.1038\/533452a","volume":"533","author":"M Baker","year":"2016","unstructured":"Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Survey sheds light on the crisis rocking research. Nature, 533, 452\u2013454.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"588_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bouter, L. M. (2016). Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: Results from a survey among participants of four world conferences on research integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1(17).","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-016-0024-5"},{"key":"588_CR6","unstructured":"CoARA (2024). Agreement on reforming research assessment. https:\/\/coara.eu\/app\/uploads\/2022\/09\/2022_07_19_rra_agreement_final.pdf"},{"key":"588_CR7","unstructured":"CoARA (2025). https:\/\/coara.eu\/agreement\/signatories\/"},{"key":"588_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Curry, S., de Rijcke, S., Hatch, A., Pillay, D., van der Weijden, I., & Wilsdon, J. (2020). The changing role of funders in responsible research assessment: Progress, obstacles & the way ahead. RoRI. Working Paper No. 3., November 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6084\/m9.figshare.13227914","DOI":"10.6084\/m9.figshare.13227914"},{"key":"588_CR9","unstructured":"DORA (2024). The Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) https:\/\/sfdora.org\/read\/"},{"key":"588_CR10","unstructured":"DORA (2025). https:\/\/sfdora.org\/signers\/"},{"key":"588_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edwards, M. A., & Roy, S. (2017). Academic research in the 21st century: Maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science, 2017, 34(1), 51\u201361.","DOI":"10.1089\/ees.2016.0223"},{"key":"588_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. Plos One, 4(5).","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0005738"},{"key":"588_CR13","unstructured":"Felt, U. (2017). Of time-scapes and knowledge-scapes: Re-timing research and higher education. In P. Scott, J. Gallacher, & G. Parry (Eds.), New landscapes and languages of higher education (pp. 129\u2013148). Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"588_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0263023","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0263023","volume":"17","author":"G Gopalakrishna","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gopalakrishna, G., ter Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J. M., & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. Plos One, 17(2), e0263023. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0263023","journal-title":"Plos One"},{"key":"588_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1038\/520429a","volume":"520","author":"D Hicks","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., et al. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429\u2013431. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/520429a","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"8","key":"588_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e124","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020124","volume":"2","author":"JPA Ioannidis","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoSMed, 2(8), e124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020124","journal-title":"PLoSMed"},{"issue":"5","key":"588_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797611430953","volume":"23","author":"LK John","year":"2012","unstructured":"John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524\u2013532.","journal-title":"Psychological Science"},{"key":"588_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"M\u00fcller, R. (2014). Racing for what? Anticipation and acceleration in the work and career practices of academic life science postdocs. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 15(3). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17169\/fqs-15.3.2245","DOI":"10.17169\/fqs-15.3.2245"},{"issue":"7","key":"588_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e3000737","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.3000737","volume":"18","author":"D Moher","year":"2020","unstructured":"Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., et al. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. Plos Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pbio.3000737","journal-title":"Plos Biology"},{"key":"588_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pels, D. (2003). Unhastening science. Liverpool University.","DOI":"10.5949\/UPO9781846314322"},{"key":"588_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ravn,T., & S\u00f8rensen, M. P. (2021). Exploring the gray area: Similarities and differences in questionable research practices (QRPs) across main areas of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27, 40. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-021-00310-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-021-00310-z"},{"issue":"2","key":"588_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2016.1257387","volume":"24","author":"DB Resnik","year":"2017","unstructured":"Resnik, D. B., & Shamoo, A. E. (2017). Reproducibility and research integrity. Accountability in Research, 24(2), 116\u2013123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2016.1257387","journal-title":"Accountability in Research"},{"key":"588_CR22","unstructured":"Rosa, H. (2010). Alienation and acceleration: Towards a critical theory of late-modern temporality. NSU."},{"key":"588_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity (Translated by J Trejo-Mathys). Columbia University Press.","DOI":"10.7312\/rosa14834"},{"key":"588_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rushforth,A., & Hammarfelt, B. (2024). The rise of responsible metrics as a professional reform movement: A collective action frames account. Quantitative Science Studie, 4(4), 879\u2013897. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00280","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00280"},{"key":"588_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schneider, J. W., Allum, N., Andersen, J. P., Petersen, M., Mejlgaard, N., & Zachariae, R. (2023, September 13). Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research. MetaArXiv Preprints https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31222\/osf.io\/r6j3z","DOI":"10.31222\/osf.io\/r6j3z"},{"key":"588_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S\u00f8rensen, M. P., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Dorofeeva, O., & Sch\u00e4fer Bak, M. (2024). Using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) across different research phases \u2013 cases, potential and risks. Report to the Danish Council for Research and Innovation Policy (DFiR), September 2024 https:\/\/ufm.dk\/publikationer\/2024\/filer\/rapport.pdf","DOI":"10.7146\/cfasr.v15i3.157222"},{"key":"588_CR37","unstructured":"S\u00f8rensen M.P., Ravn T., Bendtsen A-K., ReyesElizondo, A., Kaltenbrunner, W., \u0160\u010depanovi\u0107, R., Maru\u0161i\u0107, A., Kavouras, P.,Labib, K., Tijdink, J., Veltri, G-A., Bergmans, J. (2020) D5.2 : Report on the results of the focus group interviews SOPs4RI. https:\/\/sops4ri.eu\/deliverables\/"},{"key":"588_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"S\u00f8rensen, M.P., Ravn, T., Maru\u0161i\u0107, A., Reyes Elizondo, A., Kavouras, P., Tijdink, J. K., & Bendtsen, A.-K. (2021). Strengthening research integrity: Which topic areas should organisations focus on? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 198. https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41599-021-00874-y","DOI":"10.1057\/s41599-021-00874-y"},{"issue":"1","key":"588_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1007\/PL00022268","volume":"12","author":"NH Steneck","year":"2006","unstructured":"Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53\u201374.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"588_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1177\/0961463X13517537","volume":"24","author":"F Vostal","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vostal, F. (2015a). Academic life in the fast lane: The experience of time and speed in British academia. Time & Society, 24(1), 71\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0961463X13517537","journal-title":"Time & Society"},{"key":"588_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vostal,F. (2015b). Speed kills, speed thrills: Constraining and enabling accelerations in academic work- life. Globalisation Societies and Education, 13(3), 295\u2013314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767724.2014.959895","DOI":"10.1080\/14767724.2014.959895"},{"key":"588_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vostal, F. (2016). Accelerating academia: The changing structure of academic time. Palgrave.","DOI":"10.1057\/9781137473608"},{"issue":"2","key":"588_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1177\/0961463X17752281","volume":"28","author":"F Vostal","year":"2019","unstructured":"Vostal, F., Benda, L., & Virtov\u00e1, T. (2019). Against reductionism: On the complexity of scientific temporality. Time & Society, 28(2), 783\u2013803. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0961463X17752281","journal-title":"Time & Society"},{"issue":"2","key":"588_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2011.577524","volume":"38","author":"O-H Ylijoki","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ylijoki, O-H. (2013). Boundary-work between work and life in the high-speed university. Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 242\u2013255.","journal-title":"Studies in Higher Education"},{"key":"588_CR34","unstructured":"Ylijoki, O-H. (2015). Conquered by project time? Conflicting temporalities in university research. In P. Gibbs, O. H. Ylijoki, & C. Guzm\u00e1n-Valenzuela (Eds.), Universities in the flux of time. An exploration of time and temporality in university life (pp. 94\u2013107). Routledge."},{"issue":"1","key":"588_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1177\/0961463X03012001364","volume":"12","author":"O-H Ylijoki","year":"2003","unstructured":"Ylijoki, O-H., & M\u00e4ntyl\u00e4, H. (2003). Conflicting time perspectives in academic work. Time & Society, 12(1), 55\u201378.","journal-title":"Time & Society"}],"container-title":["Science and Engineering Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11948-026-00588-x","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-026-00588-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-026-00588-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,22]],"date-time":"2026-04-22T15:15:43Z","timestamp":1776870943000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11948-026-00588-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]}},"alternative-id":["588"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-026-00588-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1471-5546"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1471-5546","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"16 February 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 February 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Ethical approval for the focus group interviews in the SOPs4RI project was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee at Aarhus University (ref. no 2019-0015957). In addition, a national approval was obtained in Croatia. There is no ethical approval of the focus group study in the PRINT project (this is in accordance with Danish standards. In Denmark, it is not mandatory to have ethical approvals of social science studies with adults like e.g. researchers).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}},{"value":"For the SOPs4RI study, written informed consent forms were signed by all interviewees before the interviews. For the PRINT project, oral consent was given and recorded on tape and video at the beginning of the interviews by all interviewees.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed Consent"}},{"value":"No competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}}],"article-number":"16"}}