{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,13]],"date-time":"2026-04-13T17:54:25Z","timestamp":1776102865626,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":66,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,21]],"date-time":"2021-01-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1611187200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,21]],"date-time":"2021-01-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1611187200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000181","name":"Air Force Office of Scientific Research","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["FA9550-18-1-0182"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["FA9550-18-1-0182"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000181","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Multimodal User Interfaces"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Recent research shows that how we respond to other social actors depends on what sort of mind we ascribe to them. In a comparative manner, we observed how perceived minds of agents shape people\u2019s behavior in the dictator game, ultimatum game, and negotiation against artificial agents. To do so, we varied agents\u2019 minds on two dimensions of the mind perception theory:<jats:italic>agency<\/jats:italic>(cognitive aptitude) and<jats:italic>patiency<\/jats:italic>(affective aptitude) via descriptions and dialogs. In our first study, agents with emotional capacity garnered more allocations in the dictator game, but in the ultimatum game, agents\u2019 described agency and affective capacity, both led to greater offers. In the second study on negotiation, agents ascribed with low-agency traits earned more points than those with high-agency traits, though the negotiation tactic was the same for all agents. Although patiency did not impact game points, participants sent more happy and surprise emojis and emotionally valenced messages to agents that demonstrated emotional capacity during negotiations. Further, our exploratory analyses indicate that people related only to agents with perceived affective aptitude across all games. Both perceived agency and affective capacity contributed to moral standing after dictator and ultimatum games. But after negotiations, only agents with perceived affective capacity were granted moral standing. Manipulating mind dimensions of machines has differing effects on how people react to them in dictator and ultimatum games, compared to a more complex economic exchange like negotiation. We discuss these results, which show that agents are perceived not only as social actors, but as intentional actors through negotiations, in contrast with simple economic games.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12193-020-00356-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,21]],"date-time":"2021-01-21T09:03:06Z","timestamp":1611219786000},"page":"201-214","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["Comparing mind perception in strategic exchanges: human-agent negotiation, dictator and ultimatum games"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7990-9035","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Minha","family":"Lee","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Gale","family":"Lucas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jonathan","family":"Gratch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"356_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.114.4.864","volume":"114","author":"N Epley","year":"2007","unstructured":"Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114(4):864","journal-title":"Psychol Rev"},{"key":"356_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.00450","volume":"10","author":"S Marchesi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Marchesi S, Ghiglino D, Ciardo F, Perez-Osorio J, Baykara E, Wykowska A (2019) Do we adopt the intentional stance toward humanoid robots? Frontiers in psychology 10:450","journal-title":"Frontiers in psychology"},{"key":"356_CR3","volume-title":"The intentional stance","author":"D Dennett","year":"1989","unstructured":"Dennett D (1989) The intentional stance. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"5812","key":"356_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1134475","volume":"315","author":"HM Gray","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gray HM, Gray K, Wegner DM (2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315(5812):619","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"356_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kr\u00e4mer NC, von der P\u00fctten A, Eimler S (2012) Human-agent and human-robot interaction theory: similarities to and differences from human-human interaction. In: Human-computer interaction: the agency perspective. Springer, Berlin, pp 215\u2013240","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-25691-2_9"},{"key":"356_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Melo CM, Gratch J, Carnevale PJ (2014) The importance of cognition and affect for artificially intelligent decision makers. In: Twenty-eighth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pp 336\u2013342","DOI":"10.1609\/aaai.v28i1.8748"},{"issue":"2","key":"356_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1080\/1047840X.2012.651387","volume":"23","author":"K Gray","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gray K, Young L, Waytz A (2012) Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychol Inq 23(2):101","journal-title":"Psychol Inq"},{"issue":"2","key":"356_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1007\/s10458-015-9317-1","volume":"31","author":"H de Weerd","year":"2017","unstructured":"de Weerd H, Verbrugge R, Verheij B (2017) Negotiating with other minds: the role of recursive theory of mind in negotiation with incomplete information. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 31(2):250","journal-title":"Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst"},{"key":"356_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gratch J, DeVault D, Lucas GM, Marsella S (2015) Negotiation as a challenge problem for virtual humans. In: International conference on intelligent virtual agents. Springer, Berlin, pp 201\u2013215","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-21996-7_21"},{"issue":"5626","key":"356_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1755","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1082976","volume":"300","author":"AG Sanfey","year":"2003","unstructured":"Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300(5626):1755","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"4","key":"356_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X00076512","volume":"1","author":"D Premack","year":"1978","unstructured":"Premack D, Woodruff G (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci 1(4):515","journal-title":"Behav Brain Sci"},{"key":"356_CR12","volume-title":"Kinds of minds: toward an understanding of consciousness","author":"D Dennett","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dennett D (2008) Kinds of minds: toward an understanding of consciousness. Basic Books, New York"},{"key":"356_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kr\u00e4mer NC (2008) Theory of mind as a theoretical prerequisite to model communication with virtual humans. In: Modeling communication with robots and virtual humans. Springer, Berlin, pp 222\u2013240","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-79037-2_12"},{"issue":"1","key":"356_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/s12193-018-0287-x","volume":"13","author":"K Veltman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Veltman K, de Weerd H, Verbrugge R (2019) Training the use of theory of mind using artificial agents. J Multimodal User Interfaces 13(1):3","journal-title":"J Multimodal User Interfaces"},{"issue":"1","key":"356_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2013.12.013","volume":"131","author":"J Piazza","year":"2014","unstructured":"Piazza J, Landy JF, Goodwin GP (2014) Cruel nature: harmfulness as an important, overlooked dimension in judgments of moral standing. Cognition 131(1):108","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"key":"356_CR16","volume-title":"Descartes\u2019 error","author":"AR Damasio","year":"2006","unstructured":"Damasio AR (2006) Descartes\u2019 error. Random House, New York"},{"key":"356_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199641321.001.0001","volume-title":"The ethics of information","author":"L Floridi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Floridi L (2013) The ethics of information. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"issue":"4","key":"356_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1600","DOI":"10.1037\/a0036149","volume":"143","author":"K Gray","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gray K, Schein C, Ward AF (2014) The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering. J Exp Psychol Gen 143(4):1600","journal-title":"J Exp Psychol Gen"},{"key":"356_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2015.09.009","volume":"146","author":"M Khamitov","year":"2016","unstructured":"Khamitov M, Rotman JD, Piazza J (2016) Perceiving the agency of harmful agents: a test of dehumanization versus moral typecasting accounts. Cognition 146:33","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"issue":"4","key":"356_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.63.4.596","volume":"63","author":"A Aron","year":"1992","unstructured":"Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J Pers Soc Psychol 63(4):596","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"8","key":"356_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2010.05.006","volume":"14","author":"A Waytz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Waytz A, Gray K, Epley N, Wegner DM (2010) Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in cognitive sciences 14(8):383","journal-title":"Trends in cognitive sciences"},{"key":"356_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nass C, Steuer J, Tauber ER (1994) Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, Cambridge, pp 72\u201378","DOI":"10.1145\/259963.260288"},{"issue":"2","key":"356_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1207\/S15327965PLI1302_01","volume":"13","author":"J Blascovich","year":"2002","unstructured":"Blascovich J, Loomis J, Beall AC, Swinth KR, Hoyt CL, Bailenson JN (2002) Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychol Inq 13(2):103","journal-title":"Psychol Inq"},{"key":"356_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fogg B, Nass C (1997) How users reciprocate to computers: an experiment that demonstrates behavior change. In: CHI\u201997 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (CHI EA \u201997). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 331\u2013332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1120212.1120419","DOI":"10.1145\/1120212.1120419"},{"key":"356_CR25","unstructured":"Mell J, Lucas GM, Gratch J (2015) An effective conversation tactic for creating value over repeated negotiations. In: International conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. pp 1567\u20131576. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems"},{"issue":"6","key":"356_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1177\/009365096023006002","volume":"23","author":"Y Moon","year":"1996","unstructured":"Moon Y, Nass C (1996) How \u201creal\u201d are computer personalities? Psychological responses to personality types in human-computer interaction. Commun Res 23(6):651. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/009365096023006002","journal-title":"Commun Res"},{"key":"356_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2014.04.043","volume":"37","author":"GM Lucas","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lucas GM, Gratch J, King A, Morency LP (2014) It\u2019s only a computer: virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Comput Hum Behav 37:94","journal-title":"Comput Hum Behav"},{"key":"356_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mell J, Lucas GM, Gratch J (2017) Prestige questions, online agents, and gender-driven differences in disclosure. In: International conference on intelligent virtual agents. Springer, Berlin, pp 273\u2014282","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-67401-8_36"},{"issue":"7","key":"356_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167203029007002","volume":"29","author":"JN Bailenson","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bailenson JN, Blascovich J, Beall AC, Loomis JM (2003) Interpersonal distance in immersive virtual environments. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29(7):819","journal-title":"Pers Soc Psychol Bull"},{"issue":"4","key":"356_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1194","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2008.03.003","volume":"44","author":"R Dotsch","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dotsch R, Wigboldus DH (2008) Virtual prejudice. J Exp Soc Psychol 44(4):1194","journal-title":"J Exp Soc Psychol"},{"key":"356_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Siegel M, Breazeal C, Norton MI (2009) Persuasive robotics: the influence of robot gender on human behavior. In: 2009 IEEE\/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 2563\u20132568. IEEE","DOI":"10.1109\/IROS.2009.5354116"},{"issue":"1","key":"356_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2012.06.007","volume":"125","author":"K Gray","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gray K, Wegner DM (2012) Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition 125(1):125","journal-title":"Cognition"},{"issue":"2","key":"356_CR33","first-page":"161","volume":"28","author":"DT Levin","year":"2013","unstructured":"Levin DT, Killingsworth SS, Saylor MM, Gordon SM, Kawamura K (2013) Tests of concepts about different kinds of minds: predictions about the behavior of computers, robots, and people. Hum\u2013Comput Interact 28(2):161","journal-title":"Hum\u2013Comput Interact"},{"issue":"2","key":"356_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"366","DOI":"10.1037\/a0021847","volume":"101","author":"J Graham","year":"2011","unstructured":"Graham J, Nosek BA, Haidt J, Iyer R, Koleva S, Ditto PH (2011) Mapping the moral domain. J Pers Soc Psychol 101(2):366","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"4","key":"356_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1016\/0167-2681(82)90011-7","volume":"3","author":"W G\u00fcth","year":"1982","unstructured":"G\u00fcth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Org 3(4):367","journal-title":"J Econ Behav Org"},{"issue":"2","key":"356_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1023\/B:EXEC.0000026978.14316.74","volume":"7","author":"H Oosterbeek","year":"2004","unstructured":"Oosterbeek H, Sloof R, Van De Kuilen G (2004) Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Exp Econ 7(2):171","journal-title":"Exp Econ"},{"issue":"4","key":"356_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1007\/s10683-011-9283-7","volume":"14","author":"C Engel","year":"2011","unstructured":"Engel C (2011) Dictator games: a meta study. Exp Econ 14(4):583","journal-title":"Exp Econ"},{"issue":"3","key":"356_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"347","DOI":"10.1006\/game.1994.1021","volume":"6","author":"R Forsythe","year":"1994","unstructured":"Forsythe R, Horowitz JL, Savin NE, Sefton M (1994) Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games Econ Behav 6(3):347","journal-title":"Games Econ Behav"},{"issue":"1","key":"356_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1257\/aer.89.1.335","volume":"89","author":"I Bohnet","year":"1999","unstructured":"Bohnet I, Frey BS (1999) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: comment. Am Econ Rev 89(1):335","journal-title":"Am Econ Rev"},{"key":"356_CR40","first-page":"114","volume-title":"Moral psychology: the evolution of morality: adaptations and innateness","author":"J Tooby","year":"2008","unstructured":"Tooby J, Cosmides L (2008) Can a general deontic logic capture the facts of human moral reasoning? How the mind interprets social exchange rules and detects cheaters. In: Sinnott-Armstrong Walter, Miller Christian B (eds) Moral psychology: the evolution of morality: adaptations and innateness. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 114\u2013137"},{"issue":"1","key":"356_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.ps.43.020192.002531","volume":"43","author":"PJ Carnevale","year":"1992","unstructured":"Carnevale PJ, Pruitt DG (1992) Negotiation and mediation. Annu Rev Psychol 43(1):531","journal-title":"Annu Rev Psychol"},{"key":"356_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.093008.100458","volume":"61","author":"LL Thompson","year":"2010","unstructured":"Thompson LL, Wang J, Gunia BC (2010) Negotiation. Annu Rev Psychol 61:491","journal-title":"Annu Rev Psychol"},{"key":"356_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Graham J, Haidt J, Koleva S, Motyl M, Iyer R, Wojcik SP, Ditto PH (2013) Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In: Advances in experimental social psychology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, vol 47, pp 55\u2013130","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4"},{"issue":"3","key":"356_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.108.3.515","volume":"108","author":"L Thompson","year":"1990","unstructured":"Thompson L (1990) Negotiation behavior and outcomes: empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychol Bull 108(3):515","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"issue":"1","key":"356_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1037\/a0034251","volume":"106","author":"CM de Melo","year":"2014","unstructured":"de Melo CM, Carnevale PJ, Read SJ, Gratch J (2014) Reading people\u2019s minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol 106(1):73","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"key":"356_CR46","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Research in organizational behavior","author":"MW Morris","year":"1999","unstructured":"Morris MW, Keltner D (1999) How emotions work: an analysis of the social functions of emotional expression in negotiation. In: Staw BM, Sutton RI (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 11. JAI, Amsterdam, pp 1\u201350"},{"key":"356_CR47","first-page":"71","volume-title":"The handbook of negotiation and culture","author":"B Barry","year":"2004","unstructured":"Barry B, Fulmer IS, Van Kleef GA et al (2004) I laughed, I cried, I settled: the role of emotion in negotiation. In: Gelfand MJ, Brett JM (eds) The handbook of negotiation and culture. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 71\u201394"},{"key":"356_CR48","unstructured":"de Melo CM, Khooshabeh P, Amir O, Gratch J, (2018) Shaping cooperation between humans and agents with emotion expressions and framing. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp 2224\u20132226"},{"issue":"1p1","key":"356_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1037\/h0024914","volume":"7","author":"DG Pruitt","year":"1967","unstructured":"Pruitt DG (1967) Reward structure and cooperation: the decomposed Prisoner\u2019s Dilemma game. J Pers Soc Psychol 7(1p1):21","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"key":"356_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baarslag T, Kaisers M, Gerding E, Jonker CM, Gratch J (2017) When will negotiation agents be able to represent us? The challenges and opportunities for autonomous negotiators.. In: International joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 4684\u20134690","DOI":"10.24963\/ijcai.2017\/653"},{"issue":"2","key":"356_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1109\/TAFFC.2014.2332471","volume":"6","author":"CM de Melo","year":"2015","unstructured":"de Melo CM, Gratch J, Carnevale PJ (2015) Humans versus computers: impact of emotion expressions on people\u2019s decision making. IEEE Trans Affect Comput 6(2):127","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Affect Comput"},{"issue":"6","key":"356_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"878","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.82.6.878","volume":"82","author":"ST Fiske","year":"2002","unstructured":"Fiske ST, Cuddy AJ, Glick P, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J Pers Soc Psychol 82(6):878","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"2","key":"356_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1080\/1047840X.2012.655236","volume":"23","author":"N Haslam","year":"2012","unstructured":"Haslam N (2012) Morality, mind, and humanness. Psychol Inq 23(2):172","journal-title":"Psychol Inq"},{"key":"356_CR54","unstructured":"Lee M, Lucas G, Mell J, Johnson E, Gratch J, What\u2019s on your virtual mind? Mind perception in human-agent negotiations. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on intelligent virtual agents. pp 38\u201345"},{"issue":"2003","key":"356_CR55","first-page":"852","volume":"11","author":"J Haidt","year":"2003","unstructured":"Haidt J et al (2003) The moral emotions. Handb Affect Sci 11(2003):852","journal-title":"Handb Affect Sci"},{"issue":"7","key":"356_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"962","DOI":"10.1177\/014616720202800709","volume":"28","author":"EE Skoe","year":"2002","unstructured":"Skoe EE, Eisenberg N, Cumberland A (2002) The role of reported emotion in real-life and hypothetical moral dilemmas. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 28(7):962","journal-title":"Pers Soc Psychol Bull"},{"key":"356_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"de Melo CM, Gratch J (2015) People show envy, not guilt, when making decisions with machines. In: 2015 International conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (ACII). IEEE, pp 315\u2013321","DOI":"10.1109\/ACII.2015.7344589"},{"key":"356_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.paid.2016.03.041","volume":"97","author":"JE Black","year":"2016","unstructured":"Black JE, Reynolds WM (2016) Development, reliability, and validity of the moral identity questionnaire. Pers Individ Differ 97:120","journal-title":"Pers Individ Differ"},{"key":"356_CR59","unstructured":"Mell J, Gratch J (2017) Grumpy & Pinocchio: answering human-agent negotiation questions through realistic agent design. In: Proceedings of the 16th conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp 401\u2013409. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems"},{"issue":"1","key":"356_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.ps.28.020177.002051","volume":"28","author":"DG Pruitt","year":"1977","unstructured":"Pruitt DG, Kimmel MJ (1977) Twenty years of experimental gaming: critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annu Rev Psychol 28(1):363","journal-title":"Annu Rev Psychol"},{"issue":"4","key":"356_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"510","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.87.4.510","volume":"87","author":"GA Van Kleef","year":"2004","unstructured":"Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CK, Manstead AS (2004) The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 87(4):510","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"4","key":"356_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-006-0346-5","volume":"169","author":"M Van\u00e2\u0102\u0179t Wout","year":"2006","unstructured":"Van\u00e2\u0102\u0179t Wout M, Kahn RS, Sanfey AG, Aleman A (2006) Affective state and decision-making in the ultimatum game. Exp Brain Res 169(4):564","journal-title":"Exp Brain Res"},{"issue":"9","key":"356_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cortex.2007.07.006","volume":"44","author":"J Hewig","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hewig J, Trippe RH, Hecht H, Coles MG, Holroyd CB, Miltner WH (2008) An electrophysiological analysis of coaching in Blackjack. cortex 44(9):1197","journal-title":"cortex"},{"key":"356_CR64","volume-title":"Against empathy: the case for rational compassion","author":"P Bloom","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bloom P (2017) Against empathy: the case for rational compassion. Random House, New York"},{"issue":"2","key":"356_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuron.2004.09.027","volume":"44","author":"JD Greene","year":"2004","unstructured":"Greene JD, Nystrom LE, Engell AD, Darley JM, Cohen JD (2004) The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron 44(2):389","journal-title":"Neuron"},{"issue":"12","key":"356_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"517","DOI":"10.1016\/S1364-6613(02)02011-9","volume":"6","author":"J Greene","year":"2002","unstructured":"Greene J, Haidt J (2002) How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cognit Sci 6(12):517","journal-title":"Trends Cognit Sci"}],"container-title":["Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12193-020-00356-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12193-020-00356-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12193-020-00356-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,12]],"date-time":"2022-12-12T14:30:37Z","timestamp":1670855437000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12193-020-00356-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,21]]},"references-count":66,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]}},"alternative-id":["356"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12193-020-00356-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["1783-7677","1783-8738"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1783-7677","type":"print"},{"value":"1783-8738","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"30 October 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 November 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 January 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}