{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]],"date-time":"2026-05-18T05:11:04Z","timestamp":1779081064983,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":69,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,31]],"date-time":"2019-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1559260800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,31]],"date-time":"2019-05-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1559260800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Oper Res Int J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s12351-019-00498-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,31]],"date-time":"2019-05-31T11:02:35Z","timestamp":1559300555000},"page":"2181-2201","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["A bargaining approach to determine common weights in DEA"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"21","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3259-5697","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"I.","family":"Contreras","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"S.","family":"Lozano","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"M. A.","family":"Hinojosa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,31]]},"reference":[{"key":"498_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cie.2006.10.003","volume":"52","author":"GR Amin","year":"2007","unstructured":"Amin GR, Toloo M (2007) Finding the most efficient DMUs in DEA: an improved integrated model. Comput Ind Eng 52:71\u201377","journal-title":"Comput Ind Eng"},{"key":"498_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1015012121760","volume":"17","author":"TR Anderson","year":"2002","unstructured":"Anderson TR, Hollingsworth K, Inman L (2002) The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model. J Product Anal 17:249\u2013255","journal-title":"J Product Anal"},{"key":"498_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"398","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apm.2012.02.038","volume":"37","author":"MZ Angiz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Angiz MZ, Mustafa A, Kamali MJ (2013) Cross-ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Model 37:398\u2013405","journal-title":"Appl Math Model"},{"issue":"9","key":"498_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1078","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.30.9.1078","volume":"30","author":"RD Banker","year":"1984","unstructured":"Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(9):1078\u20131092","journal-title":"Manag Sci"},{"key":"498_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/282939","volume":"2014","author":"A Barzegarinegad","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barzegarinegad A, Jahanshahloo G, Rostamy-Malkhalifeh M (2014) A full ranking for decision making units using ideal and anti-ideal points in DEA. Sci World J 2014:1\u20139","journal-title":"Sci World J"},{"issue":"9","key":"498_CR6","first-page":"883","volume":"44","author":"V Belton","year":"1993","unstructured":"Belton V, Vickers SP (1993) Demystifying DEA: a visual interactive approach based on multiple criteria analysis. J Op Res Soc 44(9):883\u2013896","journal-title":"J Op Res Soc"},{"key":"498_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2015.12.022","volume":"50","author":"M Carrillo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Carrillo M, Jorge JM (2016) A multiobjective DEA approach to ranking alternatives. Exp Syst Appl 50:130\u2013139","journal-title":"Exp Syst Appl"},{"issue":"6","key":"498_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-2217(78)90138-8","volume":"2","author":"A Charnes","year":"1978","unstructured":"Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Op Res 2(6):429\u2013444","journal-title":"Eur J Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR9","first-page":"270","volume-title":"New frontiers of decision making for the information technology era (2000)","author":"CI Chiang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chiang CI, Tzeng GH (2011) A multiple objective programming approach to Data Envelopment Analysis. In: Shi Y, Zeleny M (eds) New frontiers of decision making for the information technology era (2000). World Scientific, Singapore, pp 270\u2013285"},{"key":"498_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2010.07.002","volume":"38","author":"I Contreras","year":"2011","unstructured":"Contreras I (2011) A DEA-inspired procedure for the aggregation of preferences. Exp Syst Appl 38:564\u2013570","journal-title":"Exp Syst Appl"},{"issue":"11","key":"498_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1302","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.36.11.1302","volume":"36","author":"WD Cook","year":"1990","unstructured":"Cook WD, Kress M (1990) A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings. Manag Sci 36(11):1302\u20131310","journal-title":"Manag Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"498_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-2217(91)90297-9","volume":"54","author":"WD Cook","year":"1991","unstructured":"Cook WD, Kress M (1991) A multiple criteria decision model with ordinal preference data. Eur J Op Res 54(2):191\u2013198","journal-title":"Eur J Op Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"498_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1057\/palgrave.jors.2601253","volume":"53","author":"DK Despotis","year":"2002","unstructured":"Despotis DK (2002) Improving the discriminating power of DEA: focus on globally efficient units. J Op Res Soc 53(3):314\u2013323","journal-title":"J Op Res Soc"},{"issue":"2012","key":"498_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1016\/j.econlet.2011.10.028","volume":"114","author":"B Driessen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Driessen B (2012) Proportional concessions and the leximin solution. Econo Lett 114(2012):288\u2013291","journal-title":"Econo Lett"},{"key":"498_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12351-017-0370-1","author":"D Ferreira","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ferreira D, Marques R (2017) A step forward on order-$$\\alpha$$ robust nonparametric method. Inclusion of weight restrictions, convexity and non-variable returns of scale. Op Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12351-017-0370-1","journal-title":"Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2018.07.010","author":"D Ferreira","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ferreira D, Marques R (2018) Do quality and access to hospital services impact on their technical efficiency? Omega Int J Manag Sci. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.omega.2018.07.010","journal-title":"Omega Int J Manag Sci"},{"key":"498_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.healthpol.2018.06.009","author":"D Ferreira","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ferreira D, Nunes A, Marques R (2018) Doctors, nurses and the optimal scale size in the Portuguese public hospitals. Health Policy. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.healthpol.2018.06.009","journal-title":"Health Policy"},{"key":"498_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(97)84108-2","volume":"100","author":"L Friedman","year":"1997","unstructured":"Friedman L, Sinuany-Stern Z (1997) Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context. Eur J Op Res 100:629\u2013637","journal-title":"Eur J Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/512351-018-0416-z","author":"E Guti\u00e9rrez","year":"2018","unstructured":"Guti\u00e9rrez E, Lozano S (2018) Benchmarking formula one auto racing circuits: a two stage DEA approach. Oper Res Int J. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12351-018-0416-z","journal-title":"Oper Res Int J"},{"issue":"2","key":"498_CR20","first-page":"73","volume":"47","author":"A Hashimoto","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hashimoto A, Wu DA (2004) A DEA\u2014compromise programming model for comprehensive ranking. J Op Res 47(2):73\u201381","journal-title":"J Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cie.2014.10.024","volume":"79","author":"A Hatami-Marbini","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Agrell PJ, Lotfi FH, Beigi ZG (2015) A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting. Comput Ind Eng 79:195\u2013203","journal-title":"Comput Ind Eng"},{"issue":"2016","key":"498_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"480","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2016.02.039","volume":"55","author":"MA Hinojosa","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hinojosa MA, Lozano S, Marmol AM (2016) Nash decomposition for process efficiency in multistage production systems. Exp Syst Appl 55(2016):480\u2013492","journal-title":"Exp Syst Appl"},{"issue":"2","key":"498_CR23","first-page":"389","volume":"51","author":"H Imai","year":"1983","unstructured":"Imai H (1983) Individual monotonicity and lexicographic maxmin solution. Econo J Econo Soc 51(2):389\u2013401","journal-title":"Econo J Econo Soc"},{"key":"498_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1796","DOI":"10.1057\/jors.2010.156","volume":"62","author":"GR Jahanshahloo","year":"2011","unstructured":"Jahanshahloo GR, Zohrehbandian M, Alinezhad A, Abbasian Naghneh S, Abbasian H, Kiani Mavi R (2011) Finding common weights based on the DM\u2019s preference information. J Op Res Soc 62:1796\u20131800","journal-title":"J Op Res Soc"},{"key":"498_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1007\/s00186-016-0563-z","volume":"85","author":"G Jahanshahloo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jahanshahloo G, Hadeghi J, Khodabakhshi M (2017) Proposing a method for fixed cost allocation using DEA based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles. Math Methods Op Res 85:223\u2013240","journal-title":"Math Methods Op Res"},{"issue":"7","key":"498_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1623","DOI":"10.2307\/1913954","volume":"45","author":"E Kalai","year":"1977","unstructured":"Kalai E (1977) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: interpersonal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45(7):1623\u20131630","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"3","key":"498_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"513","DOI":"10.2307\/1914280","volume":"43","author":"E Kalai","year":"1975","unstructured":"Kalai E, Smorodinsky M (1975) Other solutions to Nash\u2019s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43(3):513\u2013518","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"498_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1196","DOI":"10.1057\/palgrave.jors.2601924","volume":"56","author":"C Kao","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kao C, Hung HT (2005) Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach. J Op Res Soc 56:1196\u20131203","journal-title":"J Op Res Soc"},{"issue":"24","key":"498_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6933","DOI":"10.1080\/00207540701419364","volume":"46","author":"EE Karsak","year":"2008","unstructured":"Karsak EE, Ahiska SS (2008) Improved common weight MCDM model for technology selection. Int J Prod Res 46(24):6933\u20136944","journal-title":"Int J Prod Res"},{"issue":"9","key":"498_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.18178\/joebm.2016.4.9.448","volume":"4","author":"KF Lam","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lam KF (2016) Finding a common set of weights for ranking decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. J Econo Bus Manag 4(9):534\u2013537","journal-title":"J Econo Bus Manag"},{"key":"498_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(98)00130-1","volume":"115","author":"XB Li","year":"1999","unstructured":"Li XB, Reeves GR (1999) A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis. Eur J Op Res 115:507\u2013517","journal-title":"Eur J Op Res"},{"issue":"17","key":"498_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4982","DOI":"10.1080\/00207543.2017.1287450","volume":"55","author":"F Li","year":"2017","unstructured":"Li F, Song J, Dolgui A, Liang L (2017) Using common weights and efficiency invariance principles for resource allocation and target setting. Int J Prod Res 55(17):4982\u20134997","journal-title":"Int J Prod Res"},{"key":"498_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1012","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cor.2007.12.003","volume":"36","author":"FHF Liu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Liu FHF, Peng HH (2009) A systematic procedure to obtain a preferable and robust ranking of units. Comput Op Res 36:1012\u20131025","journal-title":"Comput Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR34","first-page":"44","volume":"1","author":"FH Lotfi","year":"2000","unstructured":"Lotfi FH, Jahanshahloo GR, Memariani A (2000) A method for finding common set of weights by multiple objective programming in data envelopment analysis. Southwest J Pure Appl Math 1:44\u201354","journal-title":"Southwest J Pure Appl Math"},{"key":"498_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cie.2012.12.006","volume":"64","author":"FH Lotfi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lotfi FH, Hatami Marbini A, Agrell PJ, Aghayi N, Gholami K (2013) Allocating fixed resources and setting targets using a common-weights DEA approach. Comput Ind Eng 64:631\u2013640","journal-title":"Comput Ind Eng"},{"key":"498_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2015.02.012","volume":"60","author":"S Lozano","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lozano S (2016) Slacks-based inefficiency approach for general networks with bad outputs: an application to the banking sector. Omega 60:73\u201384","journal-title":"Omega"},{"issue":"7","key":"498_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"623","DOI":"10.1080\/03081060.2014.935569","volume":"37","author":"S Lozano","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lozano S, Gutierrez E (2014) A slacks-based network DEA efficiency analysis of European airlines. Trans Plan Technol 37(7):623\u2013637","journal-title":"Trans Plan Technol"},{"key":"498_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2018.05.015","author":"S Lozano","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lozano S, Hinojosa MA, M\u00e1rmol AM (2018) Extending the bargaining approach to DEA target setting. Omega. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.omega.2018.05.015","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"498_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4899-7705-2_9","volume-title":"Handbook of operations analytics using data envelopment analysis","author":"S Lozano","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lozano S, Hinojosa M\u00c1, M\u00e1rmol AM, Borrero DV (2016) DEA and cooperative game theory. In: Hwang SN, Lee HS, Zhu J (eds) Handbook of operations analytics using data envelopment analysis. Springer, New York, pp 215\u2013239"},{"issue":"4","key":"498_CR40","first-page":"293","volume":"1","author":"A Makui","year":"2008","unstructured":"Makui A, Alinezhad A, Mavi RK, Zohrehbandian M (2008) A goal programming method for finding common weights in DEA with an improved discriminating power for efficiency. J Ind Syst Eng 1(4):293\u2013303","journal-title":"J Ind Syst Eng"},{"key":"498_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2004.08.003","volume":"34","author":"K Nakabayashi","year":"2006","unstructured":"Nakabayashi K, Tone K (2006) Egoist\u2019s dilemma: a DEA game. Omega 34:135\u2013148","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"498_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.2307\/1907266","volume":"28","author":"JF Nash","year":"1950","unstructured":"Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 28:155\u2013162","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"key":"498_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1163","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cie.2013.07.023","volume":"66","author":"H Omrani","year":"2013","unstructured":"Omrani H (2013) Common weights data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: a robust optimization approach. Comput Ind Eng 66:1163\u20131170","journal-title":"Comput Ind Eng"},{"key":"498_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.3233\/IFS-151586","volume":"29","author":"A Payan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Payan A (2015) Common set of weights approach in fuzzy DEA with an application. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29:187\u2013194","journal-title":"J Intell Fuzzy Syst"},{"key":"498_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1007\/s10479-017-2540-1","volume":"259","author":"J Puri","year":"2017","unstructured":"Puri J, Yadav SP, Garg H (2017) A new multi-component DEA approach using common set of weights methodology and imprecise data: an application to public sector banks in India with undesirable and shared resources. Ann Op Res 259:351\u2013388","journal-title":"Ann Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6394","DOI":"10.3390\/e16126394","volume":"16","author":"XG Qi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Qi XG, Guo B (2014) Determining common weights in data envelopment analysis with Shannon\u2019s entropy. Entropy 16:6394\u20136414","journal-title":"Entropy"},{"key":"498_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4882","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2011.10.004","volume":"39","author":"N Ram\u00f3n","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ram\u00f3n N, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2012) Common sets of weights as summaries of DEA profiles of weights: with an application to the ranking of professional tennis players. Exp Syst Appl 39:4882\u20134889","journal-title":"Exp Syst Appl"},{"key":"498_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/346763","volume":"2014","author":"V Rezaie","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rezaie V, Ahmad T, Awang SR, Khanmohammadi M, Maan N (2014) Ranking DMUs by calculating the interval efficiency with a common set of weights in DEA. J Appl Math 2014:1\u20139","journal-title":"J Appl Math"},{"issue":"4","key":"498_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1016\/0305-0548(95)00041-0","volume":"23","author":"DL Retzlaff-Roberts","year":"1996","unstructured":"Retzlaff-Roberts DL (1996) Relating discriminant analysis and data envelopment analysis to one another. Comput Op Res 23(4):311\u2013322","journal-title":"Comput Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1080\/07408179108963835","volume":"23","author":"Y Roll","year":"1991","unstructured":"Roll Y, Cook WD, Golany B (1991) Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis. IIE Trans 23:2\u20139","journal-title":"IIE Trans"},{"issue":"1","key":"498_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/0305-0483(93)90042-J","volume":"21","author":"Y Roll","year":"1993","unstructured":"Roll Y, Golany B (1993) Alternate methods for treating factor weights in DEA. Omega 21(1):99\u2013109","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"498_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.2307\/1910423","volume":"47","author":"AE Roth","year":"1979","unstructured":"Roth AE (1979) Proportional solutions to the bargaining problem. Econometrica 47:775\u2013778","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"3","key":"498_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.41.3.435","volume":"41","author":"JJ Rousseau","year":"1995","unstructured":"Rousseau JJ, Semple JH (1995) Two-person ratio efficiency games. Manag Sci 41(3):435\u2013441","journal-title":"Manag Sci"},{"key":"498_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(96)00068-9","volume":"96","author":"J Semple","year":"1996","unstructured":"Semple J (1996) Constrained games for evaluating organizational performance. Eur J Op Res 96:103\u2013112","journal-title":"Eur J Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(97)00313-5","volume":"111","author":"Z Sinuany-Stern","year":"1998","unstructured":"Sinuany-Stern Z, Friedman L (1998) DEA and the discriminat analysis of ratios for ranking units. Eur J Op Res 111:470\u2013478","journal-title":"Eur J Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(00)00054-0","volume":"131","author":"T Sueyoshi","year":"2001","unstructured":"Sueyoshi T (2001) Extended DEA-discriminant analysis. Eur J Op Res 131:324\u2013351","journal-title":"Eur J Op Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"498_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.11114\/set.v1i1.277","volume":"1","author":"M Sugiyama","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sugiyama M, Sueyoshi T (2014) Finding a common weight vector of data envelopment analysis based upon bargaining game. Stud Eng Technol 1(1):13\u201321","journal-title":"Stud Eng Technol"},{"key":"498_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6301","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apm.2013.01.010","volume":"37","author":"J Sun","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sun J, Wu J, Guo D (2013) Performance ranking of units considering ideal and anti-ideal DMU with common weights. Appl Math Model 37:6301\u20136310","journal-title":"Appl Math Model"},{"key":"498_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(01)00277-6","volume":"141","author":"S Talluri","year":"2002","unstructured":"Talluri S, Baker RC (2002) A multi-phase mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design. Eur J Op Res 141:544\u2013558","journal-title":"Eur J Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-2217(92)90294-J","volume":"56","author":"E Thanassoulis","year":"1992","unstructured":"Thanassoulis E, Dyson RG (1992) Estimating preferred target input\u2013output levels using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Op Res 56:80\u201397","journal-title":"Eur J Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4337\/9781785362149","volume-title":"Bargaining and the theory of cooperative games: John Nash and beyond","author":"W Thomson","year":"2010","unstructured":"Thomson W (2010) Bargaining and the theory of cooperative games: John Nash and beyond. Edward Elgar Publishing, Norhampton"},{"key":"498_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Toloo M, Tavana M, Santos-Arteaga FJ (2017) An integrated data envelopment analysis and mixed integer non-linear programming model for linearizing the common set of weights. Central European Journal of Operations Research, In press","DOI":"10.1007\/s10100-017-0510-y"},{"key":"498_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1018989414181","volume":"73","author":"MD Troutt","year":"1997","unstructured":"Troutt MD (1997) Derivation of the maximin efficiency ratio model from the maximum decisional efficiency principle. Ann Op Res 73:323\u2013338","journal-title":"Ann Op Res"},{"key":"498_CR64","volume-title":"Theory of games and economic behavior","author":"J Von Neumann","year":"1953","unstructured":"Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton","edition":"3"},{"key":"498_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2013.12.044","volume":"41","author":"M Wang","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wang M, Li Y (2014) Supplier evaluation based on Nash bargaining game model. Exp Syst Appl 41:4181\u20134185","journal-title":"Exp Syst Appl"},{"key":"498_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cam.2008.01.022","volume":"223","author":"M Wang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wang M, Luo Y, Liang L (2009) Ranking decision making units by imposing a minimum weight restriction in the data envelopment analysis. J Comput Appl Math 223:469\u2013484","journal-title":"J Comput Appl Math"},{"key":"498_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9122","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2011.01.004","volume":"38","author":"YM Wang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wang YM, Luo Y, Lan YX (2011) Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis. Exp Syst Appl 38:9122\u20139128","journal-title":"Exp Syst Appl"},{"key":"498_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4357","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2008.05.001","volume":"36","author":"J Wu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wu J, Liang L, Yang F, Yan H (2009) Bargaining game model in the evaluation of decision making units. Exp Syst Appl 36:4357\u20134362","journal-title":"Exp Syst Appl"},{"key":"498_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1446","DOI":"10.1057\/jors.2016.35","volume":"67","author":"J Wu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wu J, Chu J, Zhu Q, Li Y, Liang L (2016) Determining common weights in data envelopment analysis based on the satisfaction degree. J Op Res Soc 67:1446\u20131458","journal-title":"J Op Res Soc"}],"container-title":["Operational Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12351-019-00498-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12351-019-00498-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12351-019-00498-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,4]],"date-time":"2021-09-04T01:11:48Z","timestamp":1630717908000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12351-019-00498-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,31]]},"references-count":69,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]}},"alternative-id":["498"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12351-019-00498-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1109-2858","1866-1505"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1109-2858","type":"print"},{"value":"1866-1505","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 December 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 May 2019","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 May 2019","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 May 2019","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}