{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,27]],"date-time":"2026-04-27T19:29:04Z","timestamp":1777318144547,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":74,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]],"date-time":"2020-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599436800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]],"date-time":"2020-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1599436800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Bundeswehr University Munich"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J of Soc Robotics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The \u201cComputers are social actors\u201d (CASA) assumption (Nass and Moon in J Soc Issues 56:81\u2013103, 2000.<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xlink\" ext-link-type=\"uri\" xlink:href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/0022-4537.00153\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/0022-4537.00153<\/jats:ext-link>) states that humans apply social norms and expectations to technical devices. One such norm is to distort one\u2019s own response in a socially desirable direction during interviews. However, findings for such an effect are mixed in the literature. Therefore, a new study on the effect of social desirability bias in human\u2013robot evaluation was conducted, aiming for a conceptual replication of previous findings. In a between-subject laboratory experiment,<jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$$N = 107$$<\/jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1998\/Math\/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N<\/mml:mi><mml:mo>=<\/mml:mo><mml:mn>107<\/mml:mn><\/mml:mrow><\/mml:math><\/jats:alternatives><\/jats:inline-formula>participants had to evaluate the robot and the interaction quality after a short conversation in three different groups: In one group, the evaluation was conducted using (1) the same robot of the former interaction, (2) a different robot, (3) a tablet computer. According to the CASA assumption, it was expected, that evaluations on likability and quality of interaction, are higher in the condition with the same robot conducting the evaluation, compared to a different robot or a tablet computer because robots are treated as social actors and hence humans distort ratings in a socially desirable direction. Based on previous findings, we expected robots to evoke higher anthropomorphism and feelings of social presence compared to the tablet computer as potential explanation. However, the data did not support the hypotheses. Low sample size, low statistical power, lack of measurement validation and other problems that could lead to an overestimation of effect sizes\u2014in this study and the literature in general\u2014are discussed in light of the replicability crisis.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-020-00688-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]],"date-time":"2020-09-07T09:04:13Z","timestamp":1599469453000},"page":"1013-1031","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":23,"title":["Is the Social Desirability Effect in Human\u2013Robot Interaction overestimated? A Conceptual Replication Study Indicates Less Robust Effects"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"13","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9062-0996","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Benedikt","family":"Leichtmann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Verena","family":"Nitsch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"688_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2012\/324694","volume":"2","author":"J Appel","year":"2012","unstructured":"Appel J, von der P\u00fctten A, Kr\u00e4mer NC, Gratch J (2012) Does humanity matter? analyzing the importance of social cues and perceived agency of a computer system for the emergence of social reactions during human-computer interaction. Adv Hum Comput Interact 2:1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2012\/324694","journal-title":"Adv Hum Comput Interact"},{"key":"688_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Behrendt S (2014) lm.beta: add standardized regression coefficients to lm-objects. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=lm.beta","DOI":"10.32614\/CRAN.package.lm.beta"},{"key":"688_CR3","unstructured":"Belhassein K, Buisan G, Clodic A, Alami R (2019) Towards methodological principles for user studies in human\u2013robot interaction. In: Test methods and metrics for effective HRI in collaborative human\u2013robot teams workshop, ACM\/IEEE international conference on human\u2013robot interaction, Daegu"},{"issue":"5","key":"688_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1162\/105474603322761270","volume":"12","author":"F Biocca","year":"2003","unstructured":"Biocca F, Harms C, Burgoon JK (2003) Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 12(5):456\u2013480. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/105474603322761270","journal-title":"Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"688_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1080\/15366360802035497","volume":"6","author":"D Borsboom","year":"2008","unstructured":"Borsboom D (2008) Latent variable theory. Meas Interdiscip Res Perspect 6(1\u20132):25\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15366360802035497","journal-title":"Meas Interdiscip Res Perspect"},{"issue":"4","key":"688_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1061","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.111.4.1061","volume":"111","author":"D Borsboom","year":"2004","unstructured":"Borsboom D, Mellenbergh GJ, van Heerden J (2004) The concept of validity. Psychol Rev 111(4):1061\u20131071. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-295X.111.4.1061","journal-title":"Psychol Rev"},{"issue":"1","key":"688_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1521-4036(200001)42:1<17::AID-BIMJ17>3.0.CO;2-U","volume":"42","author":"E Brunner","year":"2000","unstructured":"Brunner E, Munzel U (2000) The nonparametric behrens-fisher problem: asymptotic theory and a small-sample approximation. Biomet J 42(1):17\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(SICI)1521-4036(200001)42:1<17::AID-BIMJ17>3.0.CO;2-U","journal-title":"Biomet J"},{"issue":"5","key":"688_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1038\/nrn3475","volume":"14","author":"KS Button","year":"2013","unstructured":"Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, Munaf\u00f2 MR (2013) Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 14(5):365\u2013376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nrn3475","journal-title":"Nat Rev Neurosci"},{"key":"688_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carolus A, Schmidt C, Schneider F, Mayr J, Muench R (2018) Are people polite to smartphones? In: Kurosu M (ed) Human\u2013computer interaction. Interaction in context. HCI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10902, Springer, Cham, pp 500\u2013511. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-91244-8_39","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-91244-8_39"},{"key":"688_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carpinella CM, Wyman AB, Perez MA, Stroessner SJ (2017) The robotic social attributes scale (rosas). In: HRI \u201917: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM\/IEEE international conference on human\u2013robot interaction. HRI\u201917, IEEE, Piscataway, pp 254\u2013262. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2909824.3020208","DOI":"10.1145\/2909824.3020208"},{"key":"688_CR11","first-page":"151","volume-title":"The handbook of social psychology","author":"RB Cialdini","year":"1998","unstructured":"Cialdini RB, Trost MR (1998) Social influence: social norms, conformity and compliance. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G (eds) The handbook of social psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 151\u2013192"},{"issue":"4","key":"688_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1037\/h0040957","volume":"52","author":"LJ Cronbach","year":"1955","unstructured":"Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE (1955) Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 52(4):281\u2013302. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0040957","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"issue":"5","key":"688_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"736","DOI":"10.1521\/soco.2007.25.5.736","volume":"25","author":"WA Cunningham","year":"2007","unstructured":"Cunningham WA, Zelazo PD, Packer DJ, van Bavel JJ (2007) The iterative reprocessing model: a multilevel framework for attitudes and evaluation. Soc Cognit 25(5):736\u2013760. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1521\/soco.2007.25.5.736","journal-title":"Soc Cognit"},{"key":"688_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.00468","author":"L Damiano","year":"2018","unstructured":"Damiano L, Dumouchel P (2018) Anthropomorphism in human-robot co-evolution. Front Psychol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.00468","journal-title":"Front Psychol"},{"issue":"4","key":"688_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.114.4.864","volume":"114","author":"N Epley","year":"2007","unstructured":"Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114(4):864\u2013886. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-295X.114.4.864","journal-title":"Psychol Rev"},{"issue":"2","key":"688_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1521\/soco.2008.26.2.143","volume":"26","author":"N Epley","year":"2008","unstructured":"Epley N, Waytz A, Akalis S, Cacioppo JT (2008) When we need a human: motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Soc Cognit 26(2):143\u2013155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1521\/soco.2008.26.2.143","journal-title":"Soc Cognit"},{"issue":"4","key":"688_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"724","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2044-8309.2011.02082.x","volume":"51","author":"F Eyssel","year":"2012","unstructured":"Eyssel F, Kuchenbrandt D (2012) Social categorization of social robots: anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. Br J Soc Psychol 51(4):724\u2013731. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.2044-8309.2011.02082.x","journal-title":"Br J Soc Psychol"},{"key":"688_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Eyssel F, Reich N (2013) Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots)\u2014on the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In: 8th ACM\/IEEE international conference on human\u2013robot interaction (HRI), pp 121\u2013122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/HRI.2013.6483531","DOI":"10.1109\/HRI.2013.6483531"},{"key":"688_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Eyssel F, Kuchenbrandt D, Bobinger S, de\u00a0Ruiter L, Hegel F (2012) \u2019If you sound like me, you must be more human\u2019: on the interplay of robot and user features on human\u2013robot acceptance and anthropomorphism. In: 2012 7th ACM\/IEEE international conference on human\u2013robot interaction (HRI), Boston, pp 125\u2013126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2157689.2157717","DOI":"10.1145\/2157689.2157717"},{"issue":"2","key":"688_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03193146","volume":"39","author":"F Faul","year":"2007","unstructured":"Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39(2):175\u2013191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/BF03193146","journal-title":"Behav Res Methods"},{"key":"688_CR21","unstructured":"Gastwirth JL, Gel YR, Hui W, Lyubchich V, Miao W, Noguchi K (2017) lawstat: tools for biostatistics, public policy, and law. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=lawstat"},{"issue":"5","key":"688_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1521\/soco.2007.25.5.687","volume":"25","author":"B Gawronski","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gawronski B, Bodenhausen GV (2007) Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation: attitudes from the perspective of the ape model. Soc Cognit 25(5):687\u2013717. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1521\/soco.2007.25.5.687","journal-title":"Soc Cognit"},{"key":"688_CR23","first-page":"282","volume-title":"Carlston D","author":"B Gawronski","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gawronski B, Creighton LA (2013) Dual process theories. In: The Oxford (ed) Carlston D. Oxford University Press, Handbook of social cognition, pp 282\u2013312"},{"issue":"4","key":"688_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1494","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2007.05.007","volume":"24","author":"L Gong","year":"2008","unstructured":"Gong L (2008) How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Comput Hum Behav 24(4):1494\u20131509. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2007.05.007","journal-title":"Comput Hum Behav"},{"issue":"5812","key":"688_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1134475","volume":"315","author":"HM Gray","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gray HM, Gray K, Wegner DM (2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315(5812):619. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.1134475","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"688_CR26","first-page":"41","volume-title":"Syntax and semantics","author":"HP Grice","year":"1975","unstructured":"Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JJ (eds) Syntax and semantics. Academic Press, New York, pp 41\u201358"},{"key":"688_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hegel F, Lohse M, Wrede B (2009) Effects of visual appearance on the attribution of applications in social robotics. In: RO-MAN 2009\u2014the 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 64\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2009.5326340","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2009.5326340"},{"key":"688_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hoffmann L, Kr\u00e4mer NC, Lam-chi A, Kopp S (2009) Media equation revisited: do users show polite reactions towards an embodied agent? In: Ruttkay Z, Kipp M, Nijholt A, Vilhj\u00e1lmsson HH (eds) Intelligent virtual agents, lecture notes in computer science, vol 5773, Springer, Berlin, pp 159\u2013165. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-04380-2_19","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-04380-2_19"},{"key":"688_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hussey I, Hughes S (2018) Hidden invalidity among fifteen commonly used measures in social and personality psychology. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/7rbfp","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/7rbfp"},{"issue":"8","key":"688_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e124","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020124","volume":"2","author":"JPA Ioannidis","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ioannidis JPA (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2(8):e124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020124","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"688_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Irfan B, Kennedy J, Lemaignan S, Papadopoulos F, Senft E, Belpaeme T (2018) Social psychology and human\u2013robot interaction: an uneasy marriage. In: HRI \u201918 companion of the 2018 ACM\/IEEE international conference on human\u2013robot interaction, pp 13\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3173386.3173389","DOI":"10.1145\/3173386.3173389"},{"key":"688_CR32","unstructured":"Jung Y, Lee KM (2004) Effects of physical embodiment on social presence of social robots. In: Proceedings of presence, pp 80\u201387"},{"issue":"6","key":"688_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1761","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2010.07.003","volume":"26","author":"P Karr-Wisniewski","year":"2010","unstructured":"Karr-Wisniewski P, Prietula M (2010) Casa, wasa, and the dimensions of us. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1761\u20131771. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2010.07.003","journal-title":"Comput Hum Behav"},{"key":"688_CR34","first-page":"196","volume":"8","author":"K Karrer","year":"2009","unstructured":"Karrer K, Glaser C, Clemens C, Bruder C (2009) Technikaffinit\u00e4t erfassen\u2013der fragebogen ta-eg. Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt technischer Systeme 8:196\u2013201","journal-title":"Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt technischer Systeme"},{"issue":"1","key":"688_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2011.09.006","volume":"28","author":"Y Kim","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kim Y, Sundar SS (2012) Anthropomorphism of computers: is it mindful or mindless? Comput Hum Behav 28(1):241\u2013250. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2011.09.006","journal-title":"Comput Hum Behav"},{"key":"688_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Klein RA, Ratliff KA, Vianello M, Adams RB, Bahn\u00edk \u0160, Bernstein MJ, Bocian K, Brandt MJ, Brooks B, Brumbaugh CC, Cemalcilar Z, Chandler J, Cheong W, Davis WE, Devos T, Eisner M, Frankowska N, Furrow D, Galliani EM, Hasselman F, Hicks JA, Hovermale JF, Hunt SJ, Huntsinger JR, IJzerman H, John MS, Joy-Gaba JA, Barry Kappes H, Krueger LE, Kurtz J, Levitan CA, Mallett RK, Morris WL, Nelson AJ, Nier JA, Packard G, Pilati R, Rutchick AM, Schmidt K, Skorinko JL, Smith R, Steiner TG, Storbeck J, van Swol LM, Thompson D, van \u2018t Veer AE, Ann Vaughn L, Vranka M, Wichman AL, Woodzicka JA, Nosek BA, (2014) Investigating variation in replicability. Soc Psychol 45(3):142\u2013152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1864-9335\/a000178","DOI":"10.1027\/1864-9335\/a000178"},{"key":"688_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lakatos I (1976) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Harding SG (ed) Can theories be refuted? vol\u00a03, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 205\u2013259. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-010-1863-0_14","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-1863-0_14"},{"issue":"3","key":"688_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691614528520","volume":"9","author":"D Lakens","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lakens D, Evers ERK (2014) Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability: practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies. Perspect Psychol Sci 9(3):278\u2013292. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691614528520","journal-title":"Perspect Psychol Sci"},{"key":"688_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jenvp.2019.101386","author":"B Leichtmann","year":"2020","unstructured":"Leichtmann B, Nitsch V (2020) How much distance do humans keep toward robots? Literature review, meta-analysis, and theoretical considerations on personal space in human-robot interaction. J Environ Psychol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jenvp.2019.101386","journal-title":"J Environ Psychol"},{"key":"688_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001","volume":"77","author":"J Li","year":"2015","unstructured":"Li J (2015) The benefit of being physically present: a survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int J Hum Comput Stud 77:23\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001","journal-title":"Int J Hum Comput Stud"},{"key":"688_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Martini MC, Buzzell GA, Wiese E (2015) Agent appearance modulates mind attribution and social attention in human\u2013robot interaction. In: Tapus A, Andr\u00e9 E, Martin JC, Ferland F, Ammi M (eds) Social robotics. ICSR 2015, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9388, Springer, Cham, pp 431\u2013439. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-25554-5_43","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-25554-5_43"},{"issue":"2","key":"688_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.9.2.147","volume":"9","author":"SE Maxwell","year":"2004","unstructured":"Maxwell SE (2004) The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychol Methods 9(2):147\u2013163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/1082-989X.9.2.147","journal-title":"Psychol Methods"},{"issue":"4","key":"688_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"445","DOI":"10.1016\/0092-6566(80)90003-3","volume":"14","author":"J Millham","year":"1980","unstructured":"Millham J, Kellogg RW (1980) Need for social approval: impression management or self-deception? J Res Personal 14(4):445\u2013457. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0092-6566(80)90003-3","journal-title":"J Res Personal"},{"issue":"1","key":"688_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.93.1.1","volume":"93","author":"CK Morewedge","year":"2007","unstructured":"Morewedge CK, Preston J, Wegner DM (2007) Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. J Personal Soc Psychol 93(1):1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.93.1.1","journal-title":"J Personal Soc Psychol"},{"key":"688_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mumm J, Mutlu B (2011) Human\u2013robot proxemics: physical and psychological distancing in human\u2013robot interaction. In: HRI \u201911 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human\u2013robot interaction, pp 331\u2013338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1957656.1957786","DOI":"10.1145\/1957656.1957786"},{"issue":"3","key":"688_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-018-0522-1","volume":"3","author":"M Muthukrishna","year":"2019","unstructured":"Muthukrishna M, Henrich J (2019) A problem in theory. Nat Hum Behav 3(3):221\u2013229. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-018-0522-1","journal-title":"Nat Hum Behav"},{"key":"688_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1111\/0022-4537.00153","volume":"56","author":"C Nass","year":"2000","unstructured":"Nass C, Moon Y (2000) Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. J Soc Issues 56:81\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/0022-4537.00153","journal-title":"J Soc Issues"},{"issue":"5","key":"688_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00142.x","volume":"29","author":"C Nass","year":"1999","unstructured":"Nass C, Moon Y, Carney P (1999) Are people polite to computers? Responses to computer-based interviewing systems1. J Appl Soc Psychol 29(5):1093\u20131109. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00142.x","journal-title":"J Appl Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"3","key":"688_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1002\/ejsp.2420150303","volume":"15","author":"AJ Nederhof","year":"1985","unstructured":"Nederhof AJ (1985) Methods of coping with social desirability bias: a review. Eur J Soc Psychol 15(3):263\u2013280. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ejsp.2420150303","journal-title":"Eur J Soc Psychol"},{"key":"688_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science (New York, NY) 349(6251):aac4716. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aac4716","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aac4716"},{"key":"688_CR51","volume-title":"The media equation: how people treat computers, televisions, and new media like real people and places","author":"B Reeves","year":"1997","unstructured":"Reeves B, Nass CI (1997) The media equation: how people treat computers, televisions, and new media like real people and places, 2nd edn. CSLI Publ, Stanford, Calif","edition":"2"},{"key":"688_CR52","unstructured":"Revelle W (2018) Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=psych"},{"issue":"2","key":"688_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.2224\/sbp.2005.33.2.201","volume":"33","author":"S Reysen","year":"2005","unstructured":"Reysen S (2005) Construction of a new scale: the reysen likability scale. Soc Behav Personal Int J 33(2):201\u2013208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2224\/sbp.2005.33.2.201","journal-title":"Soc Behav Personal Int J"},{"issue":"4","key":"688_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1037\/1089-2680.7.4.331","volume":"7","author":"FD Richard","year":"2003","unstructured":"Richard FD, Bond CF, Stokes-Zoota JJ (2003) One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Rev Gen Psychol 7(4):331\u2013363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/1089-2680.7.4.331","journal-title":"Rev Gen Psychol"},{"issue":"5","key":"688_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"754","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.84.5.754","volume":"84","author":"WL Richman","year":"1999","unstructured":"Richman WL, Kiesler S, Weisband S, Drasgow F (1999) A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. J Appl Psychol 84(5):754\u2013775. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0021-9010.84.5.754","journal-title":"J Appl Psychol"},{"key":"688_CR56","unstructured":"RStudio Team (2016) Rstudio: integrated development environment for r. http:\/\/www.rstudio.com\/"},{"issue":"3","key":"688_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"477","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-019-00516-z","volume":"11","author":"PAM Ruijten","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ruijten PAM, Haans A, Ham J, Midden CJH (2019) Perceived human-likeness of social robots: testing the rasch model as a method for measuring anthropomorphism. International Journal of Social Robotics 11(3):477\u2013494. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-019-00516-z","journal-title":"International Journal of Social Robotics"},{"key":"688_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.00813","volume":"10","author":"T Sch\u00e4fer","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sch\u00e4fer T, Schwarz MA (2019) The meaningfulness of effect sizes in psychological research: Differences between sub-disciplines and the impact of potential biases. Front Psychol 10:813. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2019.00813","journal-title":"Front Psychol"},{"key":"688_CR59","unstructured":"Schmidt-Catran AW, H\u00f6rstermann K (2013) Soziale pr\u00e4senz in onlineumfragen: 36 pages \/ methods, data, no 3 (2013) \/ methods, data, analyses, vol 7, no 3 (2013). methoden, daten, analyse 7(3):397\u2013432, 10.12758\/mda.2013.019"},{"issue":"11","key":"688_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1359","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797611417632","volume":"22","author":"JP Simmons","year":"2011","unstructured":"Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U (2011) False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological science 22(11):1359\u20131366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797611417632","journal-title":"Psychological science"},{"issue":"4","key":"688_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1026\/\/0012-1924.45.4.173","volume":"45","author":"J St\u00f6ber","year":"1999","unstructured":"St\u00f6ber J (1999) Die soziale-erw\u00fcnschtheits-skala-17 (ses-17): Entwicklung und erste befunde zu reliabilit\u00e4t und validit\u00e4t. Diagnostica 45(4):173\u2013177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1026\/\/0012-1924.45.4.173","journal-title":"Diagnostica"},{"issue":"2","key":"688_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-018-0502-7","volume":"11","author":"SJ Stroessner","year":"2019","unstructured":"Stroessner SJ, Benitez J (2019) The social perception of humanoid and non-humanoid robots: Effects of gendered and machinelike features. Int J Soc Robot 11(2):305\u2013315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-018-0502-7","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"issue":"1","key":"688_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.5334\/irsp.66","volume":"30","author":"W \u015awi\u0105tkowski","year":"2017","unstructured":"\u015awi\u0105tkowski W, Dompnier B (2017) Replicability crisis in social psychology: looking at the past to find new pathways for the future. Int Rev Soc Psychol 30(1):111\u2013124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/irsp.66","journal-title":"Int Rev Soc Psychol"},{"key":"688_CR64","unstructured":"Torchiano M (2019) effsize: efficient effect size computation. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=effsize"},{"issue":"1","key":"688_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0747-5632(02)00032-8","volume":"19","author":"R Tourangeau","year":"2003","unstructured":"Tourangeau R, Couper MP, Steiger DM (2003) Humanizing self-administered surveys: experiments on social presence in web and ivr surveys. Comput Hum Behav 19(1):1\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0747-5632(02)00032-8","journal-title":"Comput Hum Behav"},{"key":"688_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with s. http:\/\/www.stats.ox.ac.uk\/pub\/MASS4","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-21706-2"},{"key":"688_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.metip.2019.100002","author":"M Ward","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ward M, Kemp S (2019) The probability of conceptual replication and the variability of effect size. Methods Psychol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.metip.2019.100002","journal-title":"Methods Psychol"},{"issue":"3","key":"688_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691610369336","volume":"5","author":"A Waytz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Waytz A, Cacioppo J, Epley N (2010) Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect Psychol Sci 5(3):219\u2013232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691610369336","journal-title":"Perspect Psychol Sci"},{"issue":"8","key":"688_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2010.05.006","volume":"14","author":"A Waytz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Waytz A, Gray K, Epley N, Wegner DM (2010) Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends Cognit Sci 14(8):383\u2013388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2010.05.006","journal-title":"Trends Cognit Sci"},{"key":"688_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2014.01.005","volume":"52","author":"A Waytz","year":"2014","unstructured":"Waytz A, Heafner J, Epley N (2014) The mind in the machine: anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. J Exp Soc Psychol 52:113\u2013117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jesp.2014.01.005","journal-title":"J Exp Soc Psychol"},{"key":"688_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2016.01832","author":"JM Wicherts","year":"1832","unstructured":"Wicherts JM, Veldkamp CLS, Augusteijn HEM, Bakker M, van Aert RCM (1832) van Assen MALM (2016) Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: a checklist to avoid p-hacking. Front Psychol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2016.01832","journal-title":"Front Psychol"},{"key":"688_CR72","unstructured":"Wullenkord R (2017) Messung und ver\u00e4nderung von einstellungen gegen\u00fcber robotern\u2014untersuchung des einflusses von imaginiertem kontakt auf implizite und explizite einstellungen [measurement and change of robot-related attitudes\u2014investigation of the impact of imagined contact on implicit and explicit attitudes]. Ph.d. dissertation, Bielefeld Univ., Bielefeld"},{"key":"688_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wullenkord R, Eyssel F, Nitsch V (2017) The role of self-disclosure in human\u2013robot interaction. In: 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 922\u2013927. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2017.8172413","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2017.8172413"},{"issue":"5","key":"688_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-018-0476-5","volume":"10","author":"J Z\u0142otowski","year":"2018","unstructured":"Z\u0142otowski J, Sumioka H, Eyssel F, Nishio S, Bartneck C, Ishiguro H (2018) Model of dual anthropomorphism: the relationship between the media equation effect and implicit anthropomorphism. Int J Soc Robot 10(5):701\u2013714. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-018-0476-5","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Social Robotics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12369-020-00688-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12369-020-00688-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12369-020-00688-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,13]],"date-time":"2024-08-13T08:19:20Z","timestamp":1723537160000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12369-020-00688-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]]},"references-count":74,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["688"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-020-00688-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1875-4791","1875-4805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1875-4791","type":"print"},{"value":"1875-4805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,7]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 July 2020","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 September 2020","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"We did not seek ethical approval from the ethics committee, as our study does not fulfill criteria where ethical approval is required in Germany. The reported study is non-invasive and non-clinical research on human subjects and subjects were informed about the purpose, aim, and risks of the studies and that risks are reasonably low. A coverstory was used, whereby participants were told before the experiment started that the purpose of the study was to test a conversation algorithm. Immediately after the experiment, participants were fully debriefed and informed of the actual focus of the study (social desirability bias), as well as the Wizard-of-Oz design. Participants were informed before the experiment that they are free to quit participation and data collection at any time during the experiment without any negative consequences\u2014participation was thus voluntary. Our institute holds high data protection standards conforming to the current EU data privacy regulations. All data were collected in strictly pseudonymous form during the experiment and anonymized for data analysis later. Participants cannot be identified based on the data, since no personal data such as names and no pictures, videos or sound were stored. Every participant gave informed consent and agreed on being able and willing to participate in the experiment and data collection process voluntarily. Participant privacy is a key value that our university has committed itself to uphold.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Upon request.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Availability of data and material"}},{"value":"For data analysis, the open-source software RStudio was used. The R-code used for data analysis is available.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Code availability"}}]}}