{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,15]],"date-time":"2026-05-15T15:34:35Z","timestamp":1778859275698,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":109,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,27]],"date-time":"2023-06-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1687824000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,27]],"date-time":"2023-06-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1687824000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002808","name":"Carlsbergfondet","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["CF16-0004"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["CF16-0004"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002808","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004182","name":"Nordisk Ministerr\u00e5d","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["105081"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["105081"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004182","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J of Soc Robotics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Anthropomorphism represents a central theoretical term in social robotics and human robot interaction (HRI) research. However, the research into anthropomorphism displays several conceptual problems that translate into methodological shortcomings. Here we report the results of a scoping review, which we conducted in order to explore (i) how the notion of \u2018anthropomorphism\u2019 is understood in HRI and social robotics research, and (ii) which assessment tools are used to assess anthropomorphism. Three electronic databases were searched; two independent reviewers were involved in the screening and data extraction process; a total of 57 studies were included in the final review which encompassed 43 different robots and 2947 participants. Across studies, researchers used seven different definitions of anthropomorphism and most commonly assessed the phenomenon by use of amended versions of existing questionnaires (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200926 studies). Alternatively, idiosyncratic questionnaires were developed (<jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u200917 studies) which, as a qualitative thematic analysis of the individual questionnaire items revealed, addressed nine distinct themes (such as attribution of shared intentionality, attribution of personality etc.). We discuss these results relative to common standards of methodological maturity and arrive at the conclusion that the scope and heterogeneity of definitions and assessment tools of anthropomorphism in HRI hinders cross-study comparisons, while the lack of validated assessment tools might also affect the quality of results. To nurture reflection on these methodological challenges and increase comparability within the field we conclude by offering a set of reporting guidelines for research on anthropomorphism, as a first constructive effort to facilitate a coherent theory of anthropomorphism.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-023-01014-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,27]],"date-time":"2023-06-27T15:18:36Z","timestamp":1687879116000},"page":"1203-1226","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":31,"title":["A Scoping Review of HRI Research on \u2018Anthropomorphism\u2019: Contributions to the Method Debate in HRI"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"15","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9352-6703","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Malene Flensborg","family":"Damholdt","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Oliver Santiago","family":"Quick","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Johanna","family":"Seibt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Christina","family":"Vestergaard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mads","family":"Hansen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"1014_CR1","unstructured":"Premack D, Premack AJ (1995) Origins of human social competence. In: The cognitive neurosciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 205\u2013218"},{"key":"1014_CR2","volume-title":"The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people","author":"B Reeves","year":"1996","unstructured":"Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"1014_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/2376.001.0001","volume-title":"Designing sociable robots","author":"C Breazeal","year":"2002","unstructured":"Breazeal C (2002) Designing sociable robots. The MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"1014_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"KFischer K (2021) Tracking anthropomorphizing behavior in human-robot interaction. ACM Trans Hum-Robot Interact 11(1), pp 4:1\u20134:28. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3442677","DOI":"10.1145\/3442677"},{"key":"1014_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Trovato G et al (2015) Designing a receptionist robot: effect of voice and appearance on anthropomorphism. In: 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2015, August 31, 2015\u2013September 4, 2015, Kobe, Japan, 2015, vol 2015-November, pp 235\u2013240. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2015.7333573","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2015.7333573"},{"key":"1014_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nomura T, Sasa M (2009) Investigation of differences on impressions of and behaviors toward real and virtual robots between elder people and university students. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, ICORR 2009, June 23, 2009\u2013June 26, 2009, Kyoto, Japan, 2009, pp 934\u2013939. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICORR.2009.5209626","DOI":"10.1109\/ICORR.2009.5209626"},{"key":"1014_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Verdejo C, Tapia-Benavente L, Schuller-Mart\u00ednez B, Vergara-Merino L, Vargas-Peirano M, Silva-Dreyer AM (2021) What you need to know about scoping reviews. Medwave, 21(02). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5867\/medwave.2021.02.8144","DOI":"10.5867\/medwave.2021.02.8144"},{"issue":"4","key":"1014_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-020-00666-5","volume":"13","author":"L Onnasch","year":"2021","unstructured":"Onnasch L, Roesler E (2021) A taxonomy to structure and analyze human-robot interaction. Int J Soc Robot 13(4):833\u2013849. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-020-00666-5","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1014_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Roesler E, Manzey D, Onnasch L (2021) A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction. Sci Robot 6(58), p eabj5425. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/scirobotics.abj5425","DOI":"10.1126\/scirobotics.abj5425"},{"issue":"5","key":"1014_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1149","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-020-00701-5","volume":"13","author":"N Spatola","year":"2021","unstructured":"Spatola N, Wudarczyk OA (2021) Implicit attitudes towards robots predict explicit attitudes, semantic distance between robots and humans, anthropomorphism, and prosocial behavior: From attitudes to human\u2013robot interaction. Int J Soc Robot 13(5):1149\u20131159","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1014_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Li M, Suh A (2021) Machinelike or Humanlike? A literature review of anthropomorphism in AI-enabled technology, presented at the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24251\/HICSS.2021.493","DOI":"10.24251\/HICSS.2021.493"},{"key":"1014_CR12","unstructured":"Bhatti SC, Robert LP What does it mean to anthropomorphize robots? Food For thought for HRI research"},{"issue":"10","key":"1014_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1435","DOI":"10.1177\/1049732312452938","volume":"22","author":"A Cooke","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A (2012) Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res 22(10):1435\u20131443. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1049732312452938","journal-title":"Qual Health Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"1014_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1186\/s12874-018-0611-x","volume":"18","author":"Z Munn","year":"2018","unstructured":"Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E (2018) Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 18(1):143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12874-018-0611-x","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"1014_CR15","unstructured":"Brice R, CASP CHECKLISTS,\u201d CASP\u2014Critical appraisal skills programme. https:\/\/casp-uk.net\/casp-tools-checklists\/. Accessed Jul 01 2021"},{"key":"1014_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Agrawal S, Williams M-A (2018) Would you obey an aggressive robot: a human-robot interaction field study. In: 27th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2018, August 27, 2018\u2013August 31, 2018, 307 Zhongshan East Road, Nanjing, China, 2018, pp. 240\u2013246.https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2018.8525615","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2018.8525615"},{"key":"1014_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Baddoura R, Venture G, Matsukata R (2012) The familiar as a key-concept in regulating the social and affective dimensions of HRI. In: 2012 12th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, humanoids 2012, November 29, 2012\u2013December 1, 2012, Osaka, Japan, pp 234\u2013241. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/HUMANOIDS.2012.6651526","DOI":"10.1109\/HUMANOIDS.2012.6651526"},{"key":"1014_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) My robotic doppelganger: a critical look at the uncanny valley. In: 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive, RO-MAN 2009, September 27, 2009\u2013October 2, 2009, Toyama, Japan, pp 269\u2013276. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2009.5326351.","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2009.5326351"},{"key":"1014_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Castro-Gonzalez A, Admoni H, Scassellati B (2016) Effects of form and motion on judgments of social robots\u2019 animacy, likability, trustworthiness and unpleasantness. Int J Hum Comput Stud, vol 90, p. 27\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2016.02.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2016.02.004"},{"key":"1014_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chun B, Knight H (2020) The robot makers. ACM Trans Hum-Robot Interact, 9(3). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3377343","DOI":"10.1145\/3377343"},{"key":"1014_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2018.09.008","volume":"122","author":"R de Kleijn","year":"2019","unstructured":"de Kleijn R, van Es L, Kachergis G, Hommel B (2019) Anthropomorphization of artificial agents leads to fair and strategic, but not altruistic behavior. Int J Hum Comput Stud 122:168\u2013173. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2018.09.008","journal-title":"Int J Hum Comput Stud"},{"key":"1014_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Deshmukh A, Craenen B, Vinciarelli A, Foster ME (2018) Shaping robot gestures to shape users perception: The effect of amplitude and speed on godspeed ratings. In: 6th international conference on human-agent interaction, HAI 2018, December 15, 2018\u2013December 18, 2018, Southampton, United kingdom, 2018, pp 293\u2013300. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3284432.3284445","DOI":"10.1145\/3284432.3284445"},{"key":"1014_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Deshmukh A, Craenen B, Foster ME, Vinciarelli A (2018) The more i understand it, the less i like it: the relationship between understandability and godspeed scores for robotic gestures. In: 27th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN (2018) August 27, 2018\u2013August 31, 2018, 307 Zhongshan East Road. Nanjing, China 2018:216\u2013221. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2018.8525585","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2018.8525585"},{"key":"1014_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Destephe M, Brandao M, Kishi T, Zecca M, Hashimoto K, Takanishi A (2014) Emotional gait: effects on humans\u2019 perception of humanoid robots. In: 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, IEEE RO-MAN (2014) August 25, 2014\u2013August 29, 2014. Edinburgh, United kingdom 2014:261\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2014.6926263","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2014.6926263"},{"key":"1014_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eyssel FA, Pfundmair M (2015) Predictors of psychological anthropomorphization, mind perception, and the fulfillment of social needs: a case study with a zoomorphic robot. In: 2015 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 827\u2013832","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2015.7333647"},{"key":"1014_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Faria M, Costigliola A, Alves-Oliveira P, Paiva A (2016) Follow me: communicating intentions with a spherical robot. In: 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN (2016) August 26, 2016\u2013August 31, 2016. New York, NY, United states 2016:664\u2013669. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2016.7745189","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2016.7745189"},{"key":"1014_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fraune MR, Nishiwaki Y, Sabanovi\u0107 S, Smith ER, Okada M (2017) threatening flocks and mindful snowflakes: how group entitativity affects perceptions of robots. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, New York, NY, USA, 2017, pp. 205\u2013213. doi: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2909824.3020248","DOI":"10.1145\/2909824.3020248"},{"key":"1014_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fraune MR, Oisted BC, Sembrowski CE, Gates KA, Krupp MM, Abanovi S (2020) Effects of robot-human versus robot-robot behavior and entitativity on anthropomorphism and willingness to interact. Comput Hum Behav, vol 105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2019.106220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2019.106220"},{"key":"1014_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fraune MR, Sabanovic S, Smith ER (2017) Teammates first: Favoring ingroup robots over outgroup humans. In: 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2017, August 28, 2017\u2013September 1, 2017, Lisbon, Portugal, 2017, vol. 2017-January, pp 1432\u20131437. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2017.8172492","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2017.8172492"},{"key":"1014_CR30","unstructured":"Haring KS, Matsumoto Y, Watanabe K (2013) How do people perceive and trust a lifelike robot. In: 2013 World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, WCECS 2013, October 23, 2013\u2013October 25, 2013. San Francisco, CA, United states 1:425\u2013430"},{"key":"1014_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"H\u00e4ring M, Kuchenbrandt D, Andr\u00e9 E (2014) Would you like to play with me? How robots\u2019 group membership and task features influence human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, New York, NY, USA, 2014, pp 9\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2559636.2559673","DOI":"10.1145\/2559636.2559673"},{"key":"1014_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Haring KS, Silvera-Tawil D, Takahashi T, Velonaki M, Watanabe K (2015) Perception of a humanoid robot: a cross-cultural comparison. In: 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2015, August 31, 2015\u2013September 4, 2015, Kobe, Japan, 2015, vol. 2015-November, pp. 821\u2013826. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2015.7333613","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2015.7333613"},{"key":"1014_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Haring KS, Watanabe K, Silvera-Tawil D, Velonaki M, Takahashi T (2015) Changes in perception of a small humanoid robot. In: 6th international conference on automation, robotics and applications, ICARA 2015, February 17, 2015\u2013February 19, 2015, Queenstown, New zealand, pp 83\u201389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICARA.2015.7081129","DOI":"10.1109\/ICARA.2015.7081129"},{"key":"1014_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hasegawa R, Harada ET, Kayano W, Osawa H (2015) Animacy perception of agents: Their effects on users behavior and variability between age groups. In: 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2015, August 31, 2015\u2013September 4, 2015, Kobe, Japan, 2015, vol 2015-November, pp 106\u2013111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2015.7333631","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2015.7333631"},{"key":"1014_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hegel F, Krach S, Kircher T, Wrede B, Sagerer G (2008) Understanding social robots: a user study on anthropomorphism. In: 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN, August 1 (2008) August 3, 2008. Munich, Germany 2008:574\u2013579. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2008.4600728","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2008.4600728"},{"key":"1014_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hegel F, Krach S, Kircher T, Wrede B, Sagerer G (2008) Theory of mind (ToM) on robots: a functional neuroimaging study. In: 3rd ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, HRI 2008, March 12, 2008\u2013March 15, 2008, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 335\u2013342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1349822.1349866","DOI":"10.1145\/1349822.1349866"},{"key":"1014_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hoffman G, Birnbaum GE, Vanunu K, Sass O, Reis HT (2014) Robot responsiveness to human disclosure affects social impression and appeal. In: 9th Annual ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, HRI 2014, March 3, 2014\u2013March 6, Bielefeld, Germany, 2014, pp 1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2559636.2559660","DOI":"10.1145\/2559636.2559660"},{"key":"1014_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kasuga H, Ikeda Y (2020) Gap between Owner\u2019s Perceptions and Dog\u2019s Behaviors toward the same physical agents: using a dog-like speaker and a humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on human-agent interaction, New York, NY, USA, 2020, pp 96\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3406499.3415068","DOI":"10.1145\/3406499.3415068"},{"key":"1014_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ko S et al (2020) The effects of robot appearances, voice types, and emotions on emotion perception accuracy and subjective perception on robots. In: 22nd international conference on human computer interaction, HCII 2020, July 19, 2020\u2013July 24, 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, vol 12424 LNCS, pp 174\u2013193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-60117-1_13","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-60117-1_13"},{"issue":"4","key":"1014_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-013-0182-2","volume":"5","author":"B Kuhnlenz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kuhnlenz B, Sosnowski S, Buc M, Wollherr D, Kuhnlenz K, Buss M (2013) Increasing helpfulness towards a robot by emotional adaption to the user. Int J Soc Robot 5(4):457\u2013476. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-013-0182-2","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1014_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kuhnlenz B, Kuhnlenz K (2020) Social bonding increases unsolicited helpfulness towards a bullied robot. In: 29th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2020, August 31, 2020\u2013September 4, 2020, Virtual, Naples, Italy, pp 833\u2013838. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223454","DOI":"10.1109\/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223454"},{"key":"1014_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kuhnlenz B, Kuhnlenz K, Busse F, Fortsch P, Wolf M (2018) Effect of explicit emotional adaptation on prosocial behavior of humans towards robots depends on prior robot experience. In: 27th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN (2018) August 27, 2018\u2013August 31, 2018, 307 Zhongshan East Road. Nanjing, China 2018:275\u2013281. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2018.8525515","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2018.8525515"},{"key":"1014_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kuhnlenz B, Wang Z-Q, Kuhnlenz K (2017) Impact of continuous eye contact of a humanoid robot on user experience and interactions with professional user background. In: 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2017, August 28, 2017\u2013September 1, 2017, Lisbon, Portugal, 2017, vol. 2017-January, pp 1037\u20131042. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2017.8172431","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2017.8172431"},{"key":"1014_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kuzminykh A, Sun J, Govindaraju N, Avery J, Lank E (2020) Genie in the bottle: anthropomorphized perceptions of conversational agents. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, pp 1\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3313831.3376665.","DOI":"10.1145\/3313831.3376665"},{"key":"1014_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Li S, Xu L, Yu F, Peng K (2020) Does trait loneliness predict rejection of social robots? The role of reduced attributions of unique humanness (Exploring the effect of trait loneliness on anthropomorphism and acceptance of social robots). In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, New York, NY, USA, 2020, pp 271\u2013280. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3319502.3374777","DOI":"10.1145\/3319502.3374777"},{"key":"1014_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Marin AL, Lee S (2013) Interaction design for robotic avatars does avatar\u2019s aging cue affect the user\u2019s impressions of a robot?. In: 7th international conference on universal access in human-computer interaction: design methods, tools, and interaction techniques for einclusion, UAHCI 2013, held as part of 15th international conference on human-computer interaction, HCI 2013, July 21, 2013\u2013July 26, 2013, Las Vegas, NV, United states, 2013, vol 8010 LNCS, no. PART 2, pp 373\u2013382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-39191-0_42","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-39191-0_42"},{"key":"1014_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mead R, Mataric MJ (2015) Proxemics and performance: subjective human evaluations of autonomous sociable robot distance and social signal understanding. In: IEEE\/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS 2015, September 28, 2015\u2013October 2, 2015, Messeplatz 1, Hamburg, Germany, 2015, vol 2015-December, pp 5984\u20135991. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/IROS.2015.7354229","DOI":"10.1109\/IROS.2015.7354229"},{"issue":"14","key":"1014_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1796","DOI":"10.1177\/0278364920903792","volume":"39","author":"D Mura","year":"2020","unstructured":"Mura D, Knoop E, Catalano MG, Grioli G, Bacher M, Bicchi A (2020) On the role of stiffness and synchronization in humanrobot handshaking. Int J Robot Res 39(14):1796\u20131811. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0278364920903792","journal-title":"Int J Robot Res"},{"key":"1014_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Oistad BC, Sembroski CE, Gates KA, Krupp MM, Fraune MR, Abanovi S (2016) Colleague or tool? Interactivity increases positive perceptions of and willingness to interact with a robotic co-worker. In: 8th international conference on social robotics, ICSR 2016, November 1, 2016\u2013November 3, 2016, Kansas City, MO, United states, vol 9979 LNAI, pp 774\u2013785. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-47437-3_76","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-47437-3_76"},{"key":"1014_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ono T, Imai M, Ishiguro H (2000) Anthropomorphic communications in the emerging relationship between humans and robots. In: Proceedings 9th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication. IEEE RO-MAN 2000 (Cat. No.00TH8499), , pp 334\u2013339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2000.892519","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2000.892519"},{"key":"1014_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pan MKXJ, Knoop E, Bacher M, Niemeyer G (2019) Fast handovers with a robot character: small sensorimotor delays improve perceived qualities In: 2019 IEEE\/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, IROS 2019, November 3, 2019\u2013November 8, 2019, Macau, China, pp 6735\u20136741. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/IROS40897.2019.8967614","DOI":"10.1109\/IROS40897.2019.8967614"},{"key":"1014_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pradhan A, Findlater L, Lazar A (2019) Phantom friend\u2019 or \u2018just a box with information\u2019: personification and ontological categorization of smart speaker-based voice assistants by older adults. In: Proc ACM hum-comput interact, vol 3, no. CSCW. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3359316","DOI":"10.1145\/3359316"},{"key":"1014_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Salem M, Ziadee M, Sakr M (2014) Marhaba, how may I help you? Effects of politeness and culture on robot acceptance and anthropomorphization. In: 9th Annual ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, HRI 2014, March 3, 2014\u2013March 6, 2014, Bielefeld, Germany, pp 74\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2559636.2559683","DOI":"10.1145\/2559636.2559683"},{"issue":"3","key":"1014_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-013-0196-9","volume":"5","author":"M Salem","year":"2013","unstructured":"Salem M, Eyssel F, Rohlfing K, Kopp S, Joublin F (2013) To err is human (-like): effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. Int J Soc Robot 5(3):313\u2013323","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1014_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sato D, Sasagawa M, Niijima A (2020) Affective touch robots with changing textures and movements. In: 29th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2020, August 31, 2020\u2013September 4, 2020, Virtual, Naples, Italy, pp 1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223481","DOI":"10.1109\/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223481"},{"key":"1014_CR56","unstructured":"Saunders R, Gemeinboeck P (2018) Performative body mapping for designing expressive robots. In: 9th International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC 2018, June 25, 2018\u2013June 29, 2018, Salamanca, Spain, 2018, pp 280\u2013287"},{"key":"1014_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Scheunemann MM, Cuijpers RH, Salge C (2020) Warmth and competence to predict human preference of robot behavior in physical human-robot interaction. In: 29th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2020, August 31, 2020\u2013September 4, 2020, Virtual, Naples, Italy, 2020, pp 1340\u20131347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223478","DOI":"10.1109\/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223478"},{"key":"1014_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sirkin D, Mok B, Yang S, Ju W (2015) Mechanical ottoman: how robotic furniture offers and withdraws support. In: 10th annual ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, HRI 2015, March 2, 2015\u2013March 5, 2015, Portland, OR, United states, 2015, vol 2015-March, pp 11\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2696454.2696461","DOI":"10.1145\/2696454.2696461"},{"key":"1014_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Spatola N (2020) Would you turn off a robot because it confronts you with your own mortality?. In: 15th Annual ACM\/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction, HRI 2020, March 23, 2020\u2014March 26, 2020, Cambridge, United kingdom, 2020, pp 61\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3371382.3380736","DOI":"10.1145\/3371382.3380736"},{"issue":"3","key":"1014_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-018-00511-w","volume":"11","author":"N Spatola","year":"2019","unstructured":"Spatola N et al (2019) Improved cognitive control in presence of anthropomorphized robots. Int J Soc Robot 11(3):463\u2013476. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-018-00511-w","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"issue":"3","key":"1014_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1109\/MRA.2019.2928823","volume":"27","author":"N Spatola","year":"2020","unstructured":"Spatola N, Monceau S, Ferrand L (2020) Cognitive impact of social robots: how anthropomorphism boosts performance. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 27(3):73\u201383","journal-title":"IEEE Robot Autom Mag"},{"key":"1014_CR62","unstructured":"Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Walters ML, Koay KL (2008) Sharing spaces with robots in a home scenario\u2014anthropomorphic attributions and their effect on proxemic expectations and evaluations in a live HRI trial. In: 2008 AAAI Fall Symposium, November 7, 2008\u2013November 9, 2008, Arlington, VA, United states, vol FS-08\u201302, pp 116\u2013123"},{"issue":"20","key":"1014_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1324","DOI":"10.1080\/01691864.2020.1831699","volume":"34","author":"H Tan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tan H et al (2020) Relationship between social robot proactive behavior and the human perception of anthropomorphic attributes. Adv Robot 34(20):1324\u20131336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01691864.2020.1831699","journal-title":"Adv Robot"},{"key":"1014_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ueno A, Hayashi K, Mizuuchi I (2019) Impression change on nonverbal non-humanoid robot by interaction with humanoid robot. In: 28th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2019, October 14, 2019\u2013October 18, 2019, New Delhi, India. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956240","DOI":"10.1109\/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956240"},{"issue":"2","key":"1014_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"878","DOI":"10.1109\/LRA.2019.2893402","volume":"4","author":"F Vigni","year":"2019","unstructured":"Vigni F, Knoop E, Prattichizzo D, Malvezzi M (2019) The Role of Closed-Loop Hand Control in Handshaking Interactions. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 4(2):878\u2013885. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/LRA.2019.2893402","journal-title":"IEEE Robot Autom Lett"},{"key":"1014_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wallk\u00f6tter S, Stower R, Kappas A, Castellano G (2020) A robot by any other frame: framing and behaviour influence mind perception in virtual but not real-world environments. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM\/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction, New York, NY, USA, pp 609\u2013618. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3319502.3374800","DOI":"10.1145\/3319502.3374800"},{"key":"1014_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang Y, Guimbreti\u00e8re F, Green KE (2020) Are space-making robots, agents? Investigations on user perception of an embedded robotic surface. In: 2020 29th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 1230\u20131235","DOI":"10.1109\/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223532"},{"issue":"1","key":"1014_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-019-00549-4","volume":"12","author":"D Zanatto","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zanatto D, Patacchiola M, Cangelosi A, Goslin J (2020) Generalisation of anthropomorphic stereotype. int J Soc Robot 12(1):163\u2013172. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-019-00549-4","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1014_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zlotowski J, Sumioka H, Bartneck C, Nishio S, Ishiguro H (2017) Understanding anthropomorphism: anthropomorphism is not a reverse process of dehumanization. In: 9th international conference on social robotics, ICSR 2017, November 22, 2017\u2013November 24, 2017, Tsukuba, Japan, 2017, vol 10652 LNAI, pp 618\u2013627. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-70022-9_61","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-70022-9_61"},{"issue":"5","key":"1014_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-018-0476-5","volume":"10","author":"J Zlotowski","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zlotowski J, Sumioka H, Eyssel F, Nishio S, Bartneck C, Ishiguro H (2018) Model of dual anthropomorphism: the relationship between the media equation effect and implicit anthropomorphism. Int J Soc Robot 10(5):701\u2013714. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-018-0476-5","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1014_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zlotowski J, Strasser E, Bartneck C (2014) Dimensions of anthropomorphism: from humanness to humanlikeness. In: 9th annual ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, HRI 2014, March 3, 2014\u2013March 6, 2014, Bielefeld, Germany, 2014, pp 66\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2559636.2559679.","DOI":"10.1145\/2559636.2559679"},{"issue":"4","key":"1014_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.114.4.864","volume":"114","author":"N Epley","year":"2007","unstructured":"Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114(4):864","journal-title":"Psychol Rev"},{"key":"1014_CR73","volume-title":"The intentional stance","author":"DC Dennett","year":"1987","unstructured":"Dennett DC (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"1014_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106220","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2019.106220","volume":"105","author":"MR Fraune","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fraune MR, Oisted BC, Sembrowski CE, Gates KA, Krupp MM, \u0160abanovi\u0107 S (2020) Effects of robot-human versus robot-robot behavior and entitativity on anthropomorphism and willingness to interact. Comput Hum Behav 105:106220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2019.106220","journal-title":"Comput Hum Behav"},{"issue":"1","key":"1014_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-008-0001-3","volume":"1","author":"C Bartneck","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bartneck C, Kuli D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):71\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-008-0001-3","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"issue":"2","key":"1014_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9280.2007.01858.x","volume":"18","author":"S Loughnan","year":"2007","unstructured":"Loughnan S, Haslam N (2007) Animals and androids: implicit associations between social categories and nonhumans. Psychol Sci 18(2):116\u2013121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9280.2007.01858.x","journal-title":"Psychol Sci"},{"key":"1014_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1080\/10463280801981645","volume":"19","author":"N Haslam","year":"2008","unstructured":"Haslam N, Loughnan S, Kashima Y, Bain P (2008) Attributing and denying humanness to others. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 19:55\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10463280801981645","journal-title":"Eur Rev Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1014_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"252","DOI":"10.1207\/s15327957pspr1003_4","volume":"10","author":"N Haslam","year":"2006","unstructured":"Haslam N (2006) Dehumanization: an integrative review. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 10(3):252\u2013264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15327957pspr1003_4","journal-title":"Personal Soc Psychol Rev"},{"key":"1014_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-010213-115045","volume":"65","author":"N Haslam","year":"2014","unstructured":"Haslam N, Loughnan S (2014) Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annu Rev Psychol 65:399\u2013423","journal-title":"Annu Rev Psychol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1014_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691610369336","volume":"5","author":"A Waytz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Waytz A, Cacioppo J, Epley N (2010) Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect Psychol Sci 5(3):219\u2013232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691610369336","journal-title":"Perspect Psychol Sci"},{"key":"1014_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carpinella CM, Wyman AB, Perez MA, Stroessner SJ (2017) The robotic social attributes scale (RoSAS): development and validation. In: 2017 12th ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI, Mar. 2017, pp 254\u2013262","DOI":"10.1145\/2909824.3020208"},{"issue":"5812","key":"1014_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1134475","volume":"315","author":"HM Gray","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gray HM, Gray K, Wegner DM (2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315(5812):619. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.1134475","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"1014_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-016-0380-9","volume":"9","author":"C-C Ho","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ho C-C, MacDorman KF (2017) Measuring the uncanny valley effect: refinements to indices for perceived humanness, attractiveness, and eeriness. Int J Soc Robot 9(1):129\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-016-0380-9","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1014_CR84","unstructured":"Index of Scale Labels (2021) https:\/\/ipip.ori.org\/newIndexofScaleLabels.htm. Accessed Jun. 22"},{"issue":"4","key":"1014_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.63.4.596","volume":"63","author":"A Aron","year":"1992","unstructured":"Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J Pers Soc Psychol 63(4):596\u2013612. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.63.4.596","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"4","key":"1014_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"543","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.90.4.543","volume":"90","author":"MN Kozak","year":"2006","unstructured":"Kozak MN, Marsh AA, Wegner DM (2006) What do I think you\u2019re doing? Action identification and mind attribution. J Pers Soc Psychol 90(4):543","journal-title":"J Pers Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1014_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1007\/s11336-008-9101-0","volume":"74","author":"K Sijtsma","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sijtsma K (2009) On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach\u2019s Alpha. Psychometrika 74(1):107\u2013120. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11336-008-9101-0","journal-title":"Psychometrika"},{"issue":"6","key":"1014_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1273","DOI":"10.1007\/s11165-016-9602-2","volume":"48","author":"KS Taber","year":"2018","unstructured":"Taber KS (2018) The use of Cronbach\u2019s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ 48(6):1273\u20131296. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11165-016-9602-2","journal-title":"Res Sci Educ"},{"key":"1014_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weiss A, Bartneck C (2015) Meta analysis of the usage of the Godspeed questionnaire series. In: 24th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2015, August 31, 2015\u2013September 4, 2015, Kobe, Japan, 2015, vol. 2015\u2013November, pp 381\u2013388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2015.7333568","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2015.7333568"},{"key":"1014_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Damholdt MF, Vestergaard C, Seibt J (2020) Testing for \u2018Anthropomorphization\u2019: a case for mixed methods in human-robot interaction. In: Jost C, Le P\u00e9v\u00e9dic B, Belpaeme T, Bethel C, Chrysostomou D, Crook N, Grandgeorge M, Mirnig N (eds) Human-robot interaction: evaluation methods and their standardization. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 203\u2013227. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-42307-0_8","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-42307-0_8"},{"key":"1014_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1016\/j.paid.2014.08.041","volume":"72","author":"N Neave","year":"2015","unstructured":"Neave N, Jackson R, Saxton T, H\u00f6nekopp J (2015) The influence of anthropomorphic tendencies on human hoarding behaviours. Personal Individ Differ 72:214\u2013219","journal-title":"Personal Individ Differ"},{"issue":"2","key":"1014_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","volume":"3","author":"V Braun","year":"2006","unstructured":"Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","journal-title":"Qual Res Psychol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1014_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-8-45","volume":"8","author":"J Thomas","year":"2008","unstructured":"Thomas J, Harden A (2008) Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 8(1):45. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-8-45","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"1014_CR94","first-page":"51","volume":"2020","author":"J Seibt","year":"2020","unstructured":"Seibt J, Vestergaard C, Damholdt MF (2020) Sociomorphing, not anthropomorphizing: towards a typology of experienced sociality. Cult Sustain Soc Robot Robophilos 2020:51\u201367","journal-title":"Cult Sustain Soc Robot Robophilos"},{"issue":"1","key":"1014_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.5840\/philtopics199927122","volume":"27","author":"FB De Waal","year":"1999","unstructured":"De Waal FB (1999) Anthropomorphism and anthropodenial: consistency in our thinking about humans and other animals. Philos Top 27(1):255\u2013280","journal-title":"Philos Top"},{"key":"1014_CR96","first-page":"650","volume":"58","author":"B Tondu","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tondu B, Bardou N (2009) Aesthetics and robotics: Which form to give to the human-like robot? World Acad Sci Eng Technol 58:650\u2013657","journal-title":"World Acad Sci Eng Technol"},{"key":"1014_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Syrdal DS, Lee Koay K, Walters ML, Dautenhahn K (2007) A personalized robot companion? - The role of individual differences on spatial preferences in HRI scenarios. In: RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 1143\u20131148. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2007.4415252","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2007.4415252"},{"key":"1014_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cordero JR, Groechel TR, Matari\u0107 MJ (2022) What and how are we reporting in HRI? A review and recommendations for reporting recruitment, compensation, and gender. arXiv, Mar. 03, 2022. Accessed: Jun. 14, 2022. [Online]. http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2201.09114","DOI":"10.1109\/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900744"},{"key":"1014_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aac4716","author":"OS Collaboration","year":"2015","unstructured":"Collaboration OS (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aac4716","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"1014_CR100","volume-title":"Research method: a tool for life","author":"BC Beins","year":"2017","unstructured":"Beins BC (2017) Research method: a tool for life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"1014_CR101","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Evers V, Maldonado HC, Brodecki TL, Hinds PJ (208) Relational vs. group self-construal: untangling the role of national culture in HRI. In: 3rd ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, HRI 2008, March 12, 2008\u2013March 15, 2008, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 255\u2013262. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1349822.1349856","DOI":"10.1145\/1349822.1349856"},{"key":"1014_CR102","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang L, Rau P-LP, Evers V, Robinson BK, Hinds P (2010) When in Rome: the role of culture context in adherence to robot recommendations. In: 2010 5th ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI), 2010, pp 359\u2013366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/HRI.2010.5453165","DOI":"10.1109\/HRI.2010.5453165"},{"issue":"6","key":"1014_CR103","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1508","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2010.05.015","volume":"26","author":"C-C Ho","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ho C-C, MacDorman KF (2010) Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices. Comput Hum Behav 26(6):1508\u20131518. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2010.05.015","journal-title":"Comput Hum Behav"},{"key":"1014_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-020-00740-y","author":"AD Kaplan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kaplan AD, Sanders TL, Hancock PA (2021) Likert or not? How using likert rather than biposlar ratings reveal individual difference scores using the Godspeed scales. Int J Soc Robot. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-020-00740-y","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1014_CR105","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hox JJ (1997) From theoretical concept to survey question. In: Survey measurement and process quality. Wiley, pp 47\u201369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9781118490013.ch2.","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118490013.ch2"},{"key":"1014_CR106","unstructured":"Quick O, Sympathizing and empathizing with the robotic other"},{"key":"1014_CR107","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001","volume":"77","author":"J Li","year":"2015","unstructured":"Li J (2015) The benefit of being physically present: a survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 77:23\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001","journal-title":"Int J Hum-Comput Stud"},{"issue":"1","key":"1014_CR108","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-010-0082-7","volume":"3","author":"WA Bainbridge","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bainbridge WA, Hart JW, Kim ES, Scassellati B (2011) The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. Int J Soc Robot 3(1):41\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-010-0082-7","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1014_CR109","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bainbridge WA, Hart J, Kim ES, Scassellati B (2008) The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In: RO-MAN 2008\u2014The 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 2008, pp 701\u2013706. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ROMAN.2008.4600749","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2008.4600749"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Social Robotics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12369-023-01014-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12369-023-01014-z\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12369-023-01014-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,23]],"date-time":"2024-10-23T04:40:55Z","timestamp":1729658455000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12369-023-01014-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,27]]},"references-count":109,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,7]]}},"alternative-id":["1014"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-023-01014-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1875-4791","1875-4805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1875-4791","type":"print"},{"value":"1875-4805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 May 2023","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 June 2023","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}