{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,18]],"date-time":"2025-12-18T14:29:01Z","timestamp":1766068141302,"version":"3.37.0"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,1]],"date-time":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1735689600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,9]],"date-time":"2025-01-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1736380800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":8,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100007601","name":"Horizon 2020","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["101004594"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["101004594"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100007601","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J of Soc Robotics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>In standard clinical protocols, the result of neuromotor rehabilitation programs is evaluated through validated clinical scales and tests able to measure the motor performance of the patients and monitor their improvements over time. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is one of the most common assessments used to evaluate patients\u2019 dynamic balance, as well as their mobility. However, in its traditional version, the TUG test does not provide quantitative information on gait performances\u2014only subjectively observed by the clinician\u2014and does not measure the timing of the different phases involved in its execution. The availability of additional quantitative information would indeed be useful for the clinicians to formulate a more accurate assessment of patient performance and define a personalized treatment plan. In this sense, the use of Socially Assistive Robots (SARs) could help improving the assessment of patient performance, relieving at the same time the physiotherapists from time consuming tasks. The goal of this feasibility study is twofold: (1) to assess the quality of the TUG functionality implemented on the robot from a technical standpoint and (2) to evaluate the perception of the \u201cR1-TUG\u201d solution from its potential end-users point of view, in terms of usability and acceptability. A set of tests involving a sample of healthy volunteers revealed that the adoption of a SAR as an assessment tool, could improve the ability of the physiotherapist to objectively assess the subject\u2019s movement performance while ensuring an adequate level of usability and acceptability from the participants. This work represents a promising result for the future use of the robotic solutions within a rehabilitation context.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-024-01204-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,9]],"date-time":"2025-01-09T07:14:05Z","timestamp":1736406845000},"page":"133-146","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Socially Assistive Robot to Administer and Assess the Timed Up and Go Test: A Feasibility Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"17","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1760-501X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Carmela","family":"Calabrese","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Valerio","family":"Gower","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mattia","family":"Randazzo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marco","family":"Randazzo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Francesco","family":"Brand","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fabiola Giovanna Mestanza","family":"Mattos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Federico","family":"Spinelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mattia","family":"Fussi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ettore","family":"Landini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Stefano","family":"Bernagozzi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lorenzo","family":"Natale","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"1204_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x","volume":"39","author":"D Podsiadlo","year":"1991","unstructured":"Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed \u201cup & go\u2019\u2019: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142\u2013148","journal-title":"J Am Geriatr Soc"},{"key":"1204_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1136\/jnnp.2009.173740","volume":"81","author":"C Zampieri","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zampieri C et al (2010) The instrumented timed up and go test: potential outcome measure for disease modifying therapies in Parkinson\u2019s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81:171\u2013176","journal-title":"J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry"},{"key":"1204_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1417","DOI":"10.3390\/s150101417","volume":"15","author":"E Cippitelli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cippitelli E, Gasparrini S, Spinsante S, Gambi E (2015) Kinect as a tool for gait analysis: validation of a real-time joint extraction algorithm working in side view. Sensors 15:1417\u20131434","journal-title":"Sensors"},{"key":"1204_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"424","DOI":"10.3390\/s17020424","volume":"17","author":"F-\u00c1 Moreno","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moreno F-\u00c1, Merch\u00e1n-Baeza JA, Gonz\u00e1lez-S\u00e1nchez M, Gonz\u00e1lez-Jim\u00e9nez J, Cuesta-Vargas AI (2017) Experimental validation of depth cameras for the parameterization of functional balance of patients in clinical tests. Sensors 17:424","journal-title":"Sensors"},{"key":"1204_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fnagi.2022.916971","volume":"14","author":"Y Guo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Guo Y, Yang J, Liu Y, Chen X, Yang G-Z (2022) Detection and assessment of Parkinson\u2019s disease based on gait analysis: a survey. Front Aging Neurosci 14:916971","journal-title":"Front Aging Neurosci"},{"key":"1204_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6786","DOI":"10.3390\/s21206786","volume":"21","author":"D Guffanti","year":"2021","unstructured":"Guffanti D, Brunete A, Hernando M, Rueda J, Navarro E (2021) ROBGgait: a mobile robotic platform for human gait analysis in clinical environments. Sensors 21:6786","journal-title":"Sensors"},{"key":"1204_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1186\/s12984-021-00915-2","volume":"18","author":"R Feingold-Polak","year":"2021","unstructured":"Feingold-Polak R, Barzel O, Levy-Tzedek S (2021) A robot goes to rehab: a novel gamified system for long-term stroke rehabilitation using a socially assistive robot\u2014methodology and usability testing. J Neuroeng Rehabil 18:122","journal-title":"J Neuroeng Rehabil"},{"key":"1204_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vasco V et al (2019) Train with me: a study comparing a socially assistive robot and a virtual agent for a rehabilitation task. In: Social robotics, ICSR 2019, lecture notes in computer science, 11876","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-35888-4_42"},{"key":"1204_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parmiggiani A et al (2017) The design and validation of the r1 personal humanoid. In: 2017 IEEE\/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 674\u2013680","DOI":"10.1109\/IROS.2017.8202224"},{"key":"1204_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/frobt.2022.813843","volume":"9","author":"V Vasco","year":"2022","unstructured":"Vasco V et al (2022) HR1 robot: an assistant for healthcare applications. Front Robot AI 9:813843","journal-title":"Front Robot AI"},{"key":"1204_CR11","first-page":"4","volume":"189","author":"J Brooke","year":"1996","unstructured":"Brooke J (1996) SUS: a \u2018quick and dirty\u2019 usability scale. Usab Eval Ind 189:4\u20137","journal-title":"Usab Eval Ind"},{"key":"1204_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2018.1455307","volume":"34","author":"JR Lewis","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lewis JR (2018) The system usability scale: past, present, and future. Int J Hum Comput Interact 34:577\u2013590","journal-title":"Int J Hum Comput Interact"},{"key":"1204_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-008-0001-3","volume":"1","author":"C Bartneck","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bartneck C, Kuli\u0107 D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1:71\u201381","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1204_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weiss A, Bartneck C (2015) Meta analysis of the usage of the Godspeed questionnaire series, IEEE, pp 381\u2013388","DOI":"10.1109\/ROMAN.2015.7333568"},{"key":"1204_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7251","DOI":"10.3390\/s23167251","volume":"23","author":"S Tobis","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tobis S, Piasek-Skupna J, Suwalska A (2023) The Godspeed questionnaire series in the assessment of the social robot Tiago by older individuals. Sensors 23:7251","journal-title":"Sensors"},{"key":"1204_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bartneck C (2023) In: Godspeed questionnaire series: translations and usage, pp 1\u201335. Springer","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-89738-3_24-1"},{"key":"1204_CR17","unstructured":"YARP-Yet another robot platform. https:\/\/yarp.it\/latest\/"},{"key":"1204_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cao Z, Simon T, Wei S-E, Sheikh Y (2017) Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR), pp 7291\u20137299","DOI":"10.1109\/CVPR.2017.143"},{"key":"1204_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1561\/0600000023","volume":"6","author":"P Sturm","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sturm P et al (2011) Camera models and fundamental concepts used in geometric computer vision. Found Trends Comput Graph Vis 6:1\u2013183","journal-title":"Found Trends Comput Graph Vis"},{"key":"1204_CR20","unstructured":"OpenCV-detection of ArUco markers. https:\/\/docs.opencv.org\/4.x\/d5\/dae\/tutorial_aruco_detection.html"},{"key":"1204_CR21","unstructured":"Google-cloud services. https:\/\/cloud.google.com\/?hl=it"},{"key":"1204_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"931","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001","volume":"47","author":"JM Bland","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bland JM, Altman DG (2010) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Int J Nurs Stud 47:931\u2013936","journal-title":"Int J Nurs Stud"},{"key":"1204_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jbmt.2017.07.006","volume":"22","author":"AFR Kleiner","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kleiner AFR et al (2018) Timed Up and Go evaluation with wearable devices: validation in Parkinson\u2019s disease. J Bodyw Mov Ther 22:390\u2013395","journal-title":"J Bodyw Mov Ther"},{"key":"1204_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.86.2.420","volume":"86","author":"PE Shrout","year":"1979","unstructured":"Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420\u2013428","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"1204_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012","volume":"15","author":"TK Koo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15:155\u2013163","journal-title":"J Chiropr Med"},{"key":"1204_CR26","first-page":"155","volume":"4","author":"M Galli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Galli M et al (2015) Timed Up and Go test and wearable inertial sensor: a new combining tool to assess change in subject with Parkinson\u2019s disease after automated mechanical peripheral stimulation treatment. Int J Eng Innov Technol 4:155\u2013163","journal-title":"Int J Eng Innov Technol"},{"key":"1204_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"574","DOI":"10.1080\/10447310802205776","volume":"24","author":"PTK Aaron Bangor","year":"2008","unstructured":"Aaron Bangor PTK, Miller JT (2008) An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int J Hum Comput Interact 24:574\u2013594","journal-title":"Int J Hum Comput Interact"},{"key":"1204_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2011","DOI":"10.3390\/s22052011","volume":"22","author":"M Moro","year":"2022","unstructured":"Moro M, Marchesi G, Hesse F, Odone F, Casadio M (2022) Markerless vs. marker-based gait analysis: a proof of concept study. Sensors 22:2011","journal-title":"Sensors"},{"key":"1204_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Winkle K, Caleb-Solly P, Turton A, Bremner P (2018) Social robots for engagement in rehabilitative therapies: design implications from a study with therapists, pp 289\u2013297","DOI":"10.1145\/3171221.3171273"},{"key":"1204_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim CY, Lee CP, Mutlu B (2024) Understanding large-language model (LLM)-powered human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM\/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pp 371\u2014-380","DOI":"10.1145\/3610977.3634966"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Social Robotics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12369-024-01204-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12369-024-01204-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12369-024-01204-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,5]],"date-time":"2025-02-05T12:43:45Z","timestamp":1738759425000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12369-024-01204-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]}},"alternative-id":["1204"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-024-01204-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1875-4791","1875-4805"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1875-4791"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1875-4805"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"12 December 2024","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 January 2025","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors have no Conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval for the study with healthy volunteers was granted by the \u201cComitato Etico Regionale della Liguria\u201d (Date 04\/04\/2023 \/No. 515\/2022 - DB id 12680).","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Participants signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}