{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T20:00:08Z","timestamp":1781640008146,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,1]],"date-time":"2026-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772323200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1773100800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":9,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J of Soc Robotics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>While extensive research has examined human-human interactions in dictator games, studies exploring human-robot dictator games remain scarce. Here, we conducted multiple studies in India and The Netherlands to explore how participants allocate money to robot recipients. Using various versions of the dictator game paradigm with both hypothetical and real stakes, we measured offers toward 18 different robots while also assessing participants\u2019 perceptions of these robots. Overall, our findings reveal that participants allocated money to robot recipients in dictator games, with offers varying significantly for hypothetical versus real monetary outcomes, mirroring patterns observed in the existing human-human dictator game literature. Factor analyses identified three key characteristics \u2013 perceived likeability, anthropomorphism, and social functionality of the robots \u2013 as consistent predictors of offers made in the dictator games. Results were broadly consistent across participants from the two countries. We discuss similarities and differences observed across dictator game variations, key predictors of offers made to robots, and cross-country differences in robot perception, along with study limitations. Our results offer empirical insights into the dynamics of human-robot economic interactions that could inform the design of socially interactive robots.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-026-01385-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]],"date-time":"2026-03-10T10:12:25Z","timestamp":1773137545000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Dictator Game Decisions with Robot Recipients"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"18","author":[{"given":"Avantika","family":"Dev","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1759-3960","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Roy","family":"de Kleijn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sumitava","family":"Mukherjee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,10]]},"reference":[{"issue":"19","key":"1385_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1804","DOI":"10.1080\/10447318.2020.1801172","volume":"36","author":"A Lambert","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lambert A, Norouzi N, Bruder G, Welch G (2020) A systematic review of ten years of research on human interaction with social robots. Int J Hum-Comput Interact 36(19):1804\u20131817. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10447318.2020.1801172","journal-title":"Int J Hum-Comput Interact"},{"key":"1385_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chang W-L, \u0160abanovi\u0107 S (2015) Interaction expands Function: social shaping of the therapeutic robot PARO in a nursing home. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM\/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ACM, Portland Oregon USA, p 343\u2013350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2696454.2696472","DOI":"10.1145\/2696454.2696472"},{"key":"1385_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mongile S et al (2023) What if a social robot excluded you?: using a conversational game to study social exclusion in teen-robot mixed groups. In: Companion of the 2023 ACM\/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ACM, Stockholm Sweden, p 208\u2013212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3568294.3580073","DOI":"10.1145\/3568294.3580073"},{"key":"1385_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1016\/j.newideapsych.2017.11.001","volume":"54","author":"S van der Woerdt","year":"2019","unstructured":"van der Woerdt S, Haselager P (2019) When robots appear to have a mind: the human perception of machine agency and responsibility. New Ideas Psychol 54:93\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.newideapsych.2017.11.001","journal-title":"New Ideas Psychol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1385_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1162\/003355302760193904","volume":"117","author":"G Charness","year":"2002","unstructured":"Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests*. Q J Econ 117(3):817\u2013869. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/003355302760193904","journal-title":"Q J Econ"},{"issue":"1","key":"1385_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"627","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-010416-043958","volume":"68","author":"E Broadbent","year":"2017","unstructured":"Broadbent E (2017) Interactions with robots: the truths we reveal about ourselves. Annu Rev Psychol 68(1):627\u2013652. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-psych-010416-043958","journal-title":"Annu Rev Psychol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1385_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2020.11.009","volume":"25","author":"ES Cross","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cross ES, Ramsey R (2021) Mind meets machine: towards a cognitive science of human-machine interactions. Trends Cogn Sci 25(3):200\u2013212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2020.11.009","journal-title":"Trends Cogn Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"1385_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-081420-110718","volume":"72","author":"E van Dijk","year":"2021","unstructured":"van Dijk E, De Dreu CKW (2021) Experimental games and social decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 72(1):415\u2013438. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-psych-081420-110718","journal-title":"Annu Rev Psychol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1385_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"482","DOI":"10.1086\/519249","volume":"115","author":"JA List","year":"2007","unstructured":"List JA (2007) On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. J Polit Econ 115(3):482\u2013493. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/519249","journal-title":"J Polit Econ"},{"issue":"1","key":"1385_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19004","DOI":"10.1525\/collabra.19004","volume":"7","author":"I Thielmann","year":"2021","unstructured":"Thielmann I, B\u00f6hm R, Ott M, Hilbig BE (2021) Economic games: an introduction and guide for research. Collabra Psychol 7(1):19004. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/collabra.19004","journal-title":"Collabra Psychol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1385_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"578","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socec.2009.05.007","volume":"39","author":"F Guala","year":"2010","unstructured":"Guala F, Mittone L (2010) Paradigmatic experiments: the dictator game. J Socio-Econ 39(5):578\u2013584","journal-title":"The J Socio-Econ"},{"issue":"2","key":"1385_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1006\/game.1996.0081","volume":"16","author":"CC Eckel","year":"1996","unstructured":"Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (1996) Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games Econ Behav 16(2):181\u2013191","journal-title":"Games Econ Behav"},{"key":"1385_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lindif.2012.12.020","volume":"24","author":"A Edele","year":"2013","unstructured":"Edele A, Dziobek I, Keller M (2013) Explaining altruistic sharing in the dictator game: the role of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and justice sensitivity. Learn Individ Differ 24:96\u2013102","journal-title":"Learn Individ Differ"},{"issue":"4","key":"1385_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1007\/s10683-011-9283-7","volume":"14","author":"C Engel","year":"2011","unstructured":"Engel C (2011) Dictator games: a meta study. Exp Econ 14(4):583\u2013610. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10683-011-9283-7","journal-title":"Exp Econ"},{"key":"1385_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jebo.2022.03.031","volume":"198","author":"A Do\u00f1ate-Buend\u00eda","year":"2022","unstructured":"Do\u00f1ate-Buend\u00eda A, Garc\u00eda-Gallego A, Petrovi\u0107 M (2022 Jun) Gender and other moderators of giving in the dictator game: a meta-analysis. J Econ Behav Organ 198:280\u2013301. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jebo.2022.03.031","journal-title":"J Econ Behav Organ"},{"key":"1385_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"168","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2018.09.008","volume":"122","author":"R de Kleijn","year":"2019","unstructured":"de Kleijn R, van Es L, Kachergis G, Hommel B (2019) Anthropomorphization of artificial agents leads to fair and strategic, but not altruistic behavior. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 122:168\u2013173. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2018.09.008","journal-title":"Int J Hum-Comput Stud"},{"issue":"2","key":"1385_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1007\/s12193-020-00356-6","volume":"15","author":"M Lee","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lee M, Lucas G, Gratch J (2021) Comparing mind perception in strategic exchanges: human-agent negotiation, dictator and ultimatum games. J Multimodal User Interface 15(2):201\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12193-020-00356-6","journal-title":"J Multimodal User Interface"},{"key":"1385_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"541756","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2020.541756","volume":"11","author":"M Wei\u00df","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wei\u00df M, Rodrigues J, Paelecke M, Hewig J (2020) We, them, and it: Dictator game offers depend on hierarchical social status, artificial intelligence, and social dominance. Front Psychol 11:541756","journal-title":"Front Psychol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1385_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12410","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-63360-w","volume":"14","author":"M Oudah","year":"2024","unstructured":"Oudah M, Makovi K, Gray K, Battu B, Rahwan T (2024) Perception of experience influences altruism and perception of agency influences trust in human-machine interactions. Sci Rep 14(1):12410. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-024-63360-w","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"1385_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100319","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcci.2021.100319","volume":"30","author":"SRR Nijssen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nijssen SRR, M\u00fcller BCN, Bosse T, Paulus M (2021) You, robot? The role of anthropomorphic emotion attributions in children\u2019s sharing with a robot. Int J Child-Comput Interact 30:100319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijcci.2021.100319","journal-title":"Int J Child-Comput Interact"},{"issue":"4","key":"1385_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.114.4.864","volume":"114","author":"N Epley","year":"2007","unstructured":"Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psycho. Rev 114(4):864","journal-title":"Psycho. Rev"},{"key":"1385_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Heijnen S, de Kleijn R, Hommel B (2019) The impact of human-robot synchronization on anthropomorphization. Front Psychol 9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.02607","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.02607"},{"key":"1385_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Onnasch L, Roesler E (2019) Anthropomorphizing robots: the effect of framing in human-robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, SAGE Publications Sage CA, Los Angeles, CA, p 1311\u20131315","DOI":"10.1177\/1071181319631209"},{"issue":"5","key":"1385_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"752","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.39.5.752","volume":"39","author":"S Chaiken","year":"1980","unstructured":"Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Personality Soc Phychol 39(5):752","journal-title":"J Personality Soc Phychol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1385_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-008-0001-3","volume":"1","author":"C Bartneck","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bartneck C, Kuli\u0107 D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2009) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(1):71\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-008-0001-3","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1385_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1007\/s12369-020-00658-5","volume":"13","author":"EB Sandoval","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sandoval EB, Brandstatter J, Yalcin U, Bartneck C (2021) Robot likeability and reciprocity in human robot interaction: using ultimatum game to determinate reciprocal likeable robot strategies. Int J Soc Robot 13:851\u2013862","journal-title":"Int J Soc Robot"},{"key":"1385_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhong VJ, M\u00fcrset N, J\u00e4ger J, Schmiedel T (2022) Exploring variables that affect robot likeability. In: 2022 17th ACM\/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), IEEE, p 1140\u20131145","DOI":"10.1109\/HRI53351.2022.9889602"},{"issue":"5812","key":"1385_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1134475","volume":"315","author":"HM Gray","year":"2007","unstructured":"Gray HM, Gray K, Wegner DM (2007) Dimensions of Mind Perception. Science 315(5812):619\u2013619. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.1134475","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"1385_CR29","unstructured":"Schaefer K (2013) The perception and measurement of human-robot trust. Electron. Theses Diss. [Online]. https:\/\/stars.library.ucf.edu\/etd\/2688"},{"key":"1385_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang L, Rau P-LP, Evers V, Robinson BK, Hinds P (2010) When in Rome: the role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations. In: 2010 5th ACM\/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), IEEE, p 359\u2013366","DOI":"10.1109\/HRI.2010.5453165"},{"key":"1385_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"de Kleijn R, Dev A, Mukherjee S (2024) Behavioral-economic games with commercially available robots. In: Companion of the 2024 ACM\/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ACM, Boulder, CO, USA. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3610978.3640575","DOI":"10.1145\/3610978.3640575"},{"issue":"5","key":"1385_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1775","DOI":"10.1016\/j.socec.2007.11.004","volume":"37","author":"A Ben-Ner","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ben-Ner A, Kramer A, Levy O (2008 Oct) Economic and hypothetical dictator game experiments: incentive effects at the individual level. J Socio-Econ 37(5):1775\u20131784. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.socec.2007.11.004","journal-title":"The J Socio-Econ"},{"issue":"4","key":"1385_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1002\/bdm.697","volume":"24","author":"S Dickert","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dickert S, Sagara N, Slovic P (2011) Affective motivations to help others: a two-stage model of donation decisions. J Behav Decis Mak 24(4):361\u2013376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bdm.697","journal-title":"J Behav Decis Mak"},{"key":"1385_CR34","unstructured":"Kelly D The Uncanny Valley: the original essay by Masahiro Mori - IEEE spectrum. IEEE Spectr"},{"issue":"1","key":"1385_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1111\/0022-4537.00153","volume":"56","author":"C Nass","year":"2000","unstructured":"Nass C, Moon Y (2000) Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. J Soc Issues 56(1):81\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/0022-4537.00153","journal-title":"J Soc Issues"},{"key":"1385_CR36","unstructured":"Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Camb UK 10(10). [Online]. https:\/\/www.academia.edu\/download\/50585912\/The_Media_Equation_How_People_Treat_Comp20161127-17472-1s43e41.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2023"},{"key":"1385_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"260","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2021.08.004","volume":"43","author":"YA Nielsen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Nielsen YA, Pfattheicher S, Keijsers M (2022) Prosocial behavior toward machines. Curr Opin Psychol 43:260\u2013265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2021.08.004","journal-title":"Curr Opin Psychol"},{"key":"1385_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Buchanan K, Rolison JJ, Jinga I, Thompson J, Russo R (2021) Who tugs at our heart strings? The effect of avatar images on player generosity in the dictator game. Q J Exp Psychol 174702182110503. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/17470218211050359","DOI":"10.1177\/17470218211050359"},{"issue":"2","key":"1385_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.134.2.207","volume":"134","author":"AK Shah","year":"2008","unstructured":"Shah AK, Oppenheimer DM (2008) Heuristics made easy: an effort-reduction framework. Psychol Bull 134(2):207","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"issue":"2","key":"1385_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2009.12.002","volume":"46","author":"CY Olivola","year":"2010","unstructured":"Olivola CY, Todorov A (2010) Fooled by first impressions? Reexamining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences. J Exp Soc Psychol 46(2):315\u2013324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jesp.2009.12.002","journal-title":"J Exp Soc Psychol"},{"issue":"9","key":"1385_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1192","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797616654455","volume":"27","author":"DG Rand","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rand DG (2016) Cooperation, fast and slow: meta-analytic evidence for a theory of social heuristics and self-interested deliberation. Psychol Sci 27(9):1192\u20131206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797616654455","journal-title":"Psychol Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"1385_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1007\/s10683-007-9172-2","volume":"11","author":"N Bardsley","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bardsley N (2008) Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact? Exp Econ 11(2):122\u2013133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10683-007-9172-2","journal-title":"Exp Econ"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Social Robotics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12369-026-01385-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12369-026-01385-z","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12369-026-01385-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T19:44:50Z","timestamp":1781639090000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12369-026-01385-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]}},"alternative-id":["1385"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12369-026-01385-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["1875-4791","1875-4805"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1875-4791","type":"print"},{"value":"1875-4805","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 March 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 February 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 February 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 March 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The current study was approved by the Psychology Research Ethics Committee, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Leiden University under code 2021\u201307-06-V2-3336.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants who participated in the study. No identifying information was recorded.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed Consent and Confidentiality"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of Interest"}}],"article-number":"49"}}