{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T07:00:38Z","timestamp":1771570838152,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":119,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1771545600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1771545600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Electron Markets"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Open data intermediaries are critical for enhancing value generation from open data. However, empirical research on their business model archetypes remains limited. This gap constrains our understanding of the conditions and potential innovations required to perform the roles of open data intermediaries sustainably. To address this gap, we developed a taxonomy and empirically derived business model archetypes based on 190 open data intermediaries. We identified nine archetypes: collaborative open data platforms, premium self-service data delivery, personalized open data services, interactive apps with other complementary products, open data repositories funded by sponsorship, one-stop packages around an (augmented) open data platform\/repository, single-purpose apps, interactive apps without complementary products, and open data advocacy. We also described each archetype\u2019s value proposition, value creation, and value capture dimensions. Our findings support further research into the conditions that contribute to the success of open data intermediaries\u2019 business models and the design of new, innovative ones. They also provide business model inspiration for existing and potential open data intermediaries, thereby encouraging greater exploitation of open data value.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12525-026-00882-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T06:06:04Z","timestamp":1771567564000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Business model archetypes of open data intermediaries: Empirical insights from practice"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"36","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8640-6420","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ashraf","family":"Shaharudin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bastiaan","family":"van Loenen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Marijn","family":"Janssen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"882_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.technovation.2023.102713","volume":"123","author":"C Acciarini","year":"2023","unstructured":"Acciarini, C., Cappa, F., Boccardelli, P., & Oriani, R. (2023). How can organizations leverage big data to innovate their business models? A systematic literature review. Technovation, 123, Article 102713. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.technovation.2023.102713","journal-title":"Technovation"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR2","first-page":"3","volume":"16","author":"RL Ackoff","year":"1989","unstructured":"Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16(1), 3\u20139.","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Systems Analysis"},{"key":"882_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780429446481","volume-title":"Business model innovation: Concepts, analysis, and cases","author":"A Afuah","year":"2018","unstructured":"Afuah, A. (2018). Business model innovation: Concepts, analysis, and cases. Routledge."},{"issue":"3","key":"882_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2016.01.008","volume":"33","author":"F Ahmadi Zeleti","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ahmadi Zeleti, F., Ojo, A., & Curry, E. (2016). Exploring the economic value of open government data. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 535\u2013551. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.giq.2016.01.008","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"3","key":"882_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1057\/ejis.2010.21","volume":"19","author":"MM Al-Debei","year":"2010","unstructured":"Al-Debei, M. M., & Avison, D. (2010). Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(3), 359\u2013376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1057\/ejis.2010.21","journal-title":"European Journal of Information Systems"},{"key":"882_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Andrason, A., & van Schalkwyk, F. (2017). Opportune niches in data ecosystems: Open data intermediaries in the agriculture sector in Ghana (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2949722). Social Science Research Network. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.2949722","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.2949722"},{"key":"882_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-53351-3","author":"D Andreini","year":"2017","unstructured":"Andreini, D., & Bettinelli, C. (2017). Business model innovation: From systematic literature review to future research directions. Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-53351-3","journal-title":"Springer International Publishing"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.5194\/nhess-15-335-2015","volume":"15","author":"AC Aydinoglu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aydinoglu, A. C., & Bilgin, M. S. (2015). Developing an open geographic data model and analysis tools for disaster management: Landslide case. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15(2), 335\u2013347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5194\/nhess-15-335-2015","journal-title":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"747","DOI":"10.1007\/s12525-022-00547-x","volume":"32","author":"R Bergman","year":"2022","unstructured":"Bergman, R., Abbas, A. E., Jung, S., Werker, C., & de Reuver, M. (2022). Business model archetypes for data marketplaces in the automotive industry. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 747\u2013765. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12525-022-00547-x","journal-title":"Electronic Markets"},{"issue":"6","key":"882_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1233","DOI":"10.1177\/0899764020925912","volume":"49","author":"R Bocquet","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bocquet, R., Cotterlaz-Rannard, G., & Ferrary, M. (2020). How do NPOs get funding? A business model perspective based on the conversion of symbolic capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(6), 1233\u20131258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0899764020925912","journal-title":"Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly"},{"key":"882_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1109\/CeDEM.2016.18","volume":"2016","author":"J Brugger","year":"2016","unstructured":"Brugger, J., Fraefel, M., Riedl, R., Fehr, H., Sch\u00f6eneck, D., & Weissbrod, C. S. (2016). Current barriers to open government data use and visualization by political intermediaries. Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM), 2016, 219\u2013229. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/CeDEM.2016.18","journal-title":"Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)"},{"key":"882_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15309576.2019.1657914","author":"T Cahlikova","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cahlikova, T., & Mabillard, V. (2020). Open data and transparency: Opportunities and challenges in the Swiss context. Public Performance & Management Review. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15309576.2019.1657914","journal-title":"Public Performance & Management Review"},{"key":"882_CR13","unstructured":"Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). Archetype. Retrieved April 10, 2024, from https:\/\/dictionary.cambridge.org\/dictionary\/english\/archetype"},{"key":"882_CR14","volume-title":"Open data, transparency and accountability: Topic guide","author":"L Carolan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Carolan, L. (2016). Open data, transparency and accountability: Topic guide. University of Birmingham."},{"key":"882_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A., Alexopoulos, C., Janssen, M., Lampoltshammer, T., & Ferro, E. (2018). Open Data Value and Business Models. In Y. Charalabidis, A. Zuiderwijk, C. Alexopoulos, M. Janssen, T. Lampoltshammer, & E. Ferro (Eds.), The world of open data: Concepts, methods, tools and experiences (pp. 115\u2013136). Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-90850-2_7","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-90850-2_7"},{"key":"882_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chattapadhyay, S. (2014). Access and use of government data by research and advocacy organisations in India: A survey of (potential) open data ecosystem. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 361\u2013364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2691195.2691262","DOI":"10.1145\/2691195.2691262"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/ijgi9020090","volume":"9","author":"S Coetzee","year":"2020","unstructured":"Coetzee, S., Iv\u00e1nov\u00e1, I., Mitasova, H., & Brovelli, M. A. (2020). Open geospatial software and data: A review of the current state and a perspective into the future. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), Article 2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijgi9020090","journal-title":"ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information"},{"key":"882_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cs\u00e1ki, C. (2019). Open data ecosystems: A comparison of visual models. In A. K\u0151, E. Francesconi, G. Anderst-Kotsis, A. M. Tjoa, & I. Khalil (Eds.), Electronic government and the information systems perspective (pp. 16\u201330). Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-27523-5_2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-27523-5_2"},{"issue":"6","key":"882_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lrp.2013.08.004","volume":"47","author":"CM DaSilva","year":"2014","unstructured":"DaSilva, C. M., & Trkman, P. (2014). Business model: What it is and what it is not. Long Range Planning, 47(6), 379\u2013389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lrp.2013.08.004","journal-title":"Long Range Planning"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.15353\/joci.v12i2.3246","volume":"12","author":"T Davies","year":"2016","unstructured":"Davies, T., & Perini, F. (2016). Researching the emerging impacts of open data: Revisiting the ODDC conceptual framework. The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(2), Article 2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15353\/joci.v12i2.3246","journal-title":"The Journal of Community Informatics"},{"key":"882_CR21","unstructured":"Davies, T. (2011). Open data: Infrastructures and ecosystems. ACM Web Science Conference, Evanston, Illinois. https:\/\/www.emergentworks.net\/sites\/default\/files\/ikmemergent_archive\/Social_Life_of_Data_-_Infrastructure_and_Ecosystem_Paper.pdf"},{"issue":"3","key":"882_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1504\/IJEB.2009.026530","volume":"7","author":"M de Reuver","year":"2009","unstructured":"de Reuver, M., Bouwman, H., & MacInnes, I. (2009). Business models dynamics for start-ups and innovating e-businesses. International Journal of Electronic Business, 7(3), 269. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1504\/IJEB.2009.026530","journal-title":"International Journal of Electronic Business"},{"key":"882_CR23","unstructured":"Di Valentin, C., Burkhart, T., Vanderhaeghen, D., Werth, D., & Loos, P. (2012). Towards a framework for transforming business models into business processes. AMCIS 2012 Proceedings. https:\/\/aisel.aisnet.org\/amcis2012\/proceedings\/EnterpriseSystems\/10"},{"issue":"CSCW1","key":"882_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3579511","volume":"7","author":"G Dove","year":"2023","unstructured":"Dove, G., Shanley, J., Matuk, C., & Nov, O. (2023). Open data intermediaries: Motivations, barriers and facilitators to engagement. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW1), Article 78:1-78:22. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3579511","journal-title":"Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1002\/tie.1036","volume":"44","author":"M Dubosson-Torbay","year":"2002","unstructured":"Dubosson-Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). E-business model design, classification, and measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(1), 5\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/tie.1036","journal-title":"Thunderbird International Business Review"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"727","DOI":"10.1007\/s12525-022-00557-9","volume":"32","author":"E Duparc","year":"2022","unstructured":"Duparc, E., M\u00f6ller, F., Jussen, I., Stachon, M., Algac, S., & Otto, B. (2022). Archetypes of open-source business models. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 727\u2013745. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12525-022-00557-9","journal-title":"Electronic Markets"},{"key":"882_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Enaholo, P., & Dina, D. (2020). Journalists and the intermediation of open data: A Nigerian perspective. Situating open data: Global trends in local contexts (pp. 31\u201349). African Minds.","DOI":"10.47622\/978-1-928502-12-8_2"},{"key":"882_CR28","unstructured":"Enaholo, P. (2017). Beyond mere advocacy: CSOs and the role of intermediaries in Nigeria\u2019s open data ecosystem. In F. van Schalkwyk, S. Verhulst, G. Magalhaes, J. Pane, & J. Walker (Eds.), The Social Dynamics of Open Data (pp. 89\u2013108). African Minds."},{"key":"882_CR29","unstructured":"Ferro, E., & Pizzamiglio, A. (2023). New business models for data-driven services [Discussion paper]. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved March 27, 2024 from https:\/\/data.europa.eu\/sites\/default\/files\/report\/New%20Business%20Models%20for%20Data-Driven%20Services_ENG.pdf"},{"key":"882_CR30","unstructured":"Garatzogianni, A., Orlandi, F., Fawcett, J., & Chauvet, L. (2017). ODINE D6.3 Business models, lessons learned and success stories (Open Data Incubator for Europe). Retrieved March 28, 2024, from https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/research\/participants\/documents\/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5b42e545f&appId=PPGMS"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7213\/rebrae.09.001.AO05","volume":"9","author":"EC Germano","year":"2016","unstructured":"Germano, E. C., Souza, C., & Sun, V. (2016). Business models adopted by intermediaries in the use of open government data. REBRAE, 9(1), Article 1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7213\/rebrae.09.001.AO05","journal-title":"REBRAE"},{"key":"882_CR32","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez-Zapata, F., & Heeks, R. (2015). Understanding multiple roles of intermediaries in open government data [Conference presentation]. 13th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Negombo, Sri Lanka. Retrieved February 11, 2022, from https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/profile\/Felipe-Gonzalez-Zapata\/publication\/290446084_Understanding_Multiple_Roles_of_Intermediaries_in_Open_Government_Data\/links\/569918f408aea147694324c5\/Understanding-Multiple-Roles-of-Intermediaries-in-Open-Government-Data.pdf"},{"key":"882_CR33","unstructured":"Gurin, J. (2014). Driving innovation with open data [Text]. U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation. Retrieved March 3, 2023, from https:\/\/www.uschamberfoundation.org\/driving-innovation-open-data"},{"issue":"0","key":"882_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/10630732.2021.1939626","volume":"0","author":"M Gutierrez","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gutierrez, M., & Landa, M. (2021). From available to actionable data: An exploration of expert and re-users views of open data. Journal of Urban Technology, 0(0), 1\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10630732.2021.1939626","journal-title":"Journal of Urban Technology"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.29379\/jedem.v6i2.330","volume":"6","author":"M Heimst\u00e4dt","year":"2014","unstructured":"Heimst\u00e4dt, M., Saunderson, F., & Heath, T. (2014). From toddler to teen: Growth of an open data ecosystem. JeDEM\u202f: E-Journal of E-Democracy and Open Government, 6(2), Article 2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.29379\/jedem.v6i2.330","journal-title":"JeDEM : E-Journal of E-Democracy and Open Government"},{"issue":"6","key":"882_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1281","DOI":"10.1108\/JMTM-09-2018-0313","volume":"31","author":"P Holzmann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Holzmann, P., Breitenecker, R. J., & Schwarz, E. J. (2019). Business model patterns for 3D printer manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(6), 1281\u20131300. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/JMTM-09-2018-0313","journal-title":"Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"882_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1080\/10919392.2015.1124007","volume":"26","author":"MA Hossain","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hossain, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2016). State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1\u20132), 14\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10919392.2015.1124007","journal-title":"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce"},{"issue":"5","key":"882_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"694","DOI":"10.1177\/0894439314525902","volume":"32","author":"M Janssen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Janssen, M., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2014). Infomediary business models for connecting open data providers and users. Social Science Computer Review, 32(5), 694\u2013711. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0894439314525902","journal-title":"Social Science Computer Review"},{"issue":"4","key":"882_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1080\/10580530.2012.716740","volume":"29","author":"M Janssen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258\u2013268. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10580530.2012.716740","journal-title":"Information Systems Management"},{"key":"882_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jetzek, T., Avital, M., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (2019). The sustainable value of open government data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(6). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17705\/1jais.00549","DOI":"10.17705\/1jais.00549"},{"key":"882_CR41","unstructured":"Jetzek, T. (2015). The sustainable value of open government data: Uncovering the generative mechanisms of open data through a mixed methods approach [Doctoral thesis]. Copenhagen Business School."},{"key":"882_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Johannesson, P. (2007). The role of business models in enterprise modelling. In J. Krogstie, A. L. Opdahl, & S. Brinkkemper (Eds.), Conceptual Modelling in Information Systems Engineering (pp. 123\u2013140). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-540-72677-7_8","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-72677-7_8"},{"key":"882_CR43","first-page":"10","volume":"28","author":"PA Johnson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Johnson, P. A., & Greene, S. (2017). Who are government OpenData infomediaries? A preliminary scan and classification of open data users and products. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 28, 10.","journal-title":"Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association"},{"issue":"3","key":"882_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.1111\/tgis.12283","volume":"21","author":"PA Johnson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Johnson, P. A., Sieber, R., Scassa, T., Stephens, M., & Robinson, P. (2017). The cost(s) of geospatial open data. Transactions in GIS, 21(3), 434\u2013445. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/tgis.12283","journal-title":"Transactions in GIS"},{"issue":"5","key":"882_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/fi14050127","volume":"14","author":"M Kamariotou","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kamariotou, M., & Kitsios, F. (2022). Bringing digital innovation strategies and entrepreneurship: The business model canvas in open data ecosystem and startups. Future Internet, 14(5), Article 5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/fi14050127","journal-title":"Future Internet"},{"issue":"3","key":"882_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bushor.2015.01.002","volume":"58","author":"P Kesting","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kesting, P., & G\u00fcnzel-Jensen, F. (2015). SMEs and new ventures need business model sophistication. Business Horizons, 58(3), 285\u2013293. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.bushor.2015.01.002","journal-title":"Business Horizons"},{"issue":"5","key":"882_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.1108\/OIR-01-2015-0031","volume":"39","author":"R Kitchin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kitchin, R., Collins, S., & Frost, D. (2015). Funding models for open access digital data repositories. Online Information Review, 39(5), 664\u2013681. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/OIR-01-2015-0031","journal-title":"Online Information Review"},{"issue":"6","key":"882_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.1016\/j.emj.2012.07.007","volume":"31","author":"SC Lambert","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lambert, S. C., & Davidson, R. A. (2013). Applications of the business model in studies of enterprise success, innovation and classification: An analysis of empirical research from 1996 to 2010. European Management Journal, 31(6), 668\u2013681. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.emj.2012.07.007","journal-title":"European Management Journal"},{"issue":"5","key":"882_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2015.25","volume":"33","author":"J Lindman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lindman, J., Kinnari, T., & Rossi, M. (2016). Business roles in the emerging open-data ecosystem. IEEE Software, 33(5), 54\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/MS.2015.25","journal-title":"IEEE Software"},{"key":"882_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lindman, J., Kinnari, T., & Rossi, M. (2014). Industrial open data: Case studies of early open data entrepreneurs. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 739\u2013748. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/HICSS.2014.99","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2014.99"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1111\/jiec.12763","volume":"23","author":"F L\u00fcdeke-Freund","year":"2019","unstructured":"L\u00fcdeke-Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2019). A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 36\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jiec.12763","journal-title":"Journal of Industrial Ecology"},{"key":"882_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cities.2019.03.009","volume":"92","author":"R Ma","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ma, R., & Lam, P. T. I. (2019). Investigating the barriers faced by stakeholders in open data development: A study on Hong Kong as a \u201csmart city.\u201d Cities, 92, 36\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cities.2019.03.009","journal-title":"Cities"},{"key":"882_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Magalhaes, G., Roseira, C., & Manley, L. (2014). Business models for open government data. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 365\u2013370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2691195.2691273","DOI":"10.1145\/2691195.2691273"},{"issue":"3","key":"882_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2017.08.004","volume":"37","author":"G Magalhaes","year":"2020","unstructured":"Magalhaes, G., & Roseira, C. (2020). Open government data and the private sector: An empirical view on business models and value creation. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.giq.2017.08.004","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"882_CR55","unstructured":"Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved March 27, 2024, from https:\/\/hbr.org\/2002\/05\/why-business-models-matter"},{"issue":"3","key":"882_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1080\/08997760903129333","volume":"22","author":"M Maguire","year":"2009","unstructured":"Maguire, M. (2009). The nonprofit business model: Empirical evidence from the magazine industry. Journal of Media Economics, 22(3), 119\u2013133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08997760903129333","journal-title":"Journal of Media Economics"},{"key":"882_CR57","unstructured":"Mayer-Sch\u00f6nberger, V., & Zappia, Z. (2011). Participation and power: Intermediaries of open data. 1st Berlin Symposium on Internet and Society, Berlin, Germany. Retrieved January 28, 2022, from https:\/\/www.hiig.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/participation_and_power.pdf"},{"key":"882_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Meijer, A., de Hoog, J., van Twist, M., van der Steen, M., & Scherpenisse, J. (2014). Understanding the dynamics of open data: From sweeping statements to complex contextual interactions. In M. Gasc\u00f3-Hern\u00e1ndez (Ed.), Open Government: Opportunities and Challenges for Public Governance (pp. 101\u2013114). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-4614-9563-5_7","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4614-9563-5_7"},{"issue":"4","key":"882_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"613","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2018.10.004","volume":"35","author":"A Meijer","year":"2018","unstructured":"Meijer, A., & Potjer, S. (2018). Citizen-generated open data: An explorative analysis of 25 cases. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 613\u2013621. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.giq.2018.10.004","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"issue":"4","key":"882_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1080\/01972243.2019.1613464","volume":"35","author":"A Meng","year":"2019","unstructured":"Meng, A., DiSalvo, C., Tsui, L., & Best, M. (2019). The social impact of open government data in Hong Kong: Umbrella Movement protests and adversarial politics. Information Society, 35(4), 216\u2013228. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01972243.2019.1613464","journal-title":"Information Society"},{"key":"882_CR61","unstructured":"Meng, A. (2016). The social impact of open government data [PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology]. Retrieved June 28, 2022, from https:\/\/smartech.gatech.edu\/handle\/1853\/56292"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2053951720948087","volume":"7","author":"M Micheli","year":"2020","unstructured":"Micheli, M., Ponti, M., Craglia, M., & Berti Suman, A. (2020). Emerging models of data governance in the age of datafication. Big Data & Society, 7(2), Article 2053951720948087. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2053951720948087","journal-title":"Big Data & Society"},{"key":"882_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2760\/261724","author":"M Micheli","year":"2023","unstructured":"Micheli, M., Farrell, E., Carballa-Smichowski, B., Posada-S\u00e1nchez, M., Signorelli, S., & Vespe, M. (2023). Mapping the landscape of data intermediaries\u2014Emerging models for more inclusive data governance (JRC Science for Policy Report). Publications Office of the European Union. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2760\/261724","journal-title":"Publications Office of the European Union"},{"key":"882_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cities.2020.102860","volume":"106","author":"FT Neves","year":"2020","unstructured":"Neves, F. T., de Castro Neto, M., & Aparicio, M. (2020). The impacts of open data initiatives on smart cities: A framework for evaluation and monitoring. Cities, 106, 1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cities.2020.102860","journal-title":"Cities"},{"key":"882_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nikiforova, A., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2022). Barriers to openly sharing government data: Towards an open data-adapted innovation resistance theory. 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2022), October 04\u201307, 2022, Guimar\u00e3es, Portugal, 215\u2013220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3560107.3560143","DOI":"10.1145\/3560107.3560143"},{"key":"882_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19475683.2025.2457396","author":"H Ochoa-Ortiz","year":"2025","unstructured":"Ochoa-Ortiz, H., & Re, B. (2025). Exploring why and how commercial organizations contribute to OpenStreetMap. Annals of GIS. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/19475683.2025.2457396","journal-title":"Annals of GIS"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR67","first-page":"1","volume":"13","author":"K Okamoto","year":"2016","unstructured":"Okamoto, K. (2016). What is being done with open government data? An exploratory analysis of public uses of New York City open data. Webology, 13(1), 1\u201312.","journal-title":"Webology"},{"key":"882_CR68","unstructured":"OKF. (2013). Defining open data \u2013 Open knowledge foundation blog. Retrieved June 28, 2022, from https:\/\/blog.okfn.org\/2013\/10\/03\/defining-open-data\/"},{"key":"882_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Oliveira, M. I. S., & L\u00f3scio, B. F. (2018). What is a data ecosystem? Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, 1\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3209281.3209335","DOI":"10.1145\/3209281.3209335"},{"key":"882_CR70","volume-title":"Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers","author":"A Osterwalder","year":"2010","unstructured":"Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons."},{"issue":"3","key":"882_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1177\/2158244017733516","volume":"7","author":"M Peric","year":"2017","unstructured":"Peric, M., Durkin, J., & Vitezic, V. (2017). The constructs of a business model redefined: A half-century journey. SAGE Open, 7(3), 1\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2158244017733516","journal-title":"SAGE Open"},{"key":"882_CR72","unstructured":"Pollock, R. (2011). Building the (open) data ecosystem. Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. Retrieved May 12, 2022, from https:\/\/blog.okfn.org\/2011\/03\/31\/building-the-open-data-ecosystem\/"},{"key":"882_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Publications Office of the European Union. (2023). Rethinking the impact of open data: A first step towards a European impact assessment for open data. Publications Office. https:\/\/data.europa.eu\/doi\/https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2830\/911822","DOI":"10.2830\/911822"},{"key":"882_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Reggi, L., & Dawes, S. (2016). Open government data ecosystems: Linking transparency for innovation with transparency for participation and accountability. In H. J. Scholl, O. Glassey, M. Janssen, B. Klievink, I. Lindgren, P. Parycek, E. Tambouris, M. A. Wimmer, T. Janowski, & D. S\u00e1 Soares (Eds.), Electronic Government (pp. 74\u201386). Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-44421-5_6","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-44421-5_6"},{"key":"882_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Robinson, P., & Mather, L. W. (2022). Reflections on the future of open data. In P. Robinson & T. Scassa (Eds.), The Future of Open Data.","DOI":"10.2307\/jj.17610837"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR76","first-page":"31","volume":"28","author":"P Robinson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Robinson, P., & Mather, L. W. (2017). Open data community maturity: Libraries as civic infomediaries. URISA Journal, 28(1), 31\u201339.","journal-title":"URISA Journal"},{"issue":"3","key":"882_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x","volume":"37","author":"J-C Rochet","year":"2006","unstructured":"Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: A progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645\u2013667. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x","journal-title":"The RAND Journal of Economics"},{"key":"882_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-0427(87)90125-7","volume":"20","author":"PJ Rousseeuw","year":"1987","unstructured":"Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0377-0427(87)90125-7","journal-title":"Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1177\/0165551506070706","volume":"33","author":"J Rowley","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163\u2013180. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0165551506070706","journal-title":"Journal of Information Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1016\/j.giq.2017.01.001","volume":"34","author":"E Ruijer","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ruijer, E., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. (2017). Open data for democracy: Developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 45\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.giq.2017.01.001","journal-title":"Government Information Quarterly"},{"key":"882_CR81","unstructured":"Sangiambut, S., & Sieber, R. (2017). The civic open data and crowdsourcing app ecosystem: actors, materials, and interventions. Journal of the Urban & Regional Information Systems Association, 28(1), 49-62. https:\/\/link.gale.com\/apps\/doc\/A559830505\/AONE?u=anon~d09cf4d6&sid=googleScholar&xid=30e3f3b2"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2053951717690750","volume":"4","author":"A Schrock","year":"2017","unstructured":"Schrock, A., & Shaffer, G. (2017). Data ideologies of an interested public: A study of grassroots open government data intermediaries. Big Data & Society, 4(1), Article 2053951717690750. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2053951717690750","journal-title":"Big Data & Society"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/23311886.2016.1166924","volume":"2","author":"R Schroeder","year":"2016","unstructured":"Schroeder, R. (2016). Big data business models: Challenges and opportunities. Cogent Social Sciences, 2(1), Article 1166924. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23311886.2016.1166924","journal-title":"Cogent Social Sciences"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12525-024-00729-9","volume":"34","author":"J Schweihoff","year":"2024","unstructured":"Schweihoff, J., Lipovetskaja, A., Jussen-Lengersdorf, I., & M\u00f6ller, F. (2024). Stuck in the middle with you: Conceptualizing data intermediaries and data intermediation services. Electronic Markets, 34, Article 48. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12525-024-00729-9","journal-title":"Electronic Markets"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3585537","volume":"4","author":"A Shaharudin","year":"2023","unstructured":"Shaharudin, A., van Loenen, B., & Janssen, M. (2023a). Towards a common definition of open data intermediaries. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 4(2), Article 6:1-6:21. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3585537","journal-title":"Digital Government: Research and Practice"},{"key":"882_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/dap.2024.63","volume":"6","author":"A Shaharudin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Shaharudin, A., van Loenen, B., & Janssen, M. (2024). Exploring the contributions of open data intermediaries for a sustainable open data ecosystem. Data & Policy, 6, Article e56. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/dap.2024.63","journal-title":"Data & Policy"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/tgis.13304","volume":"29","author":"A Shaharudin","year":"2025","unstructured":"Shaharudin, A., van Loenen, B., & Janssen, M. (2025). Developing an open data intermediation business model: Insights from the case of Esri. Transactions in GIS, 29(1), Article e13304. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/tgis.13304","journal-title":"Transactions in GIS"},{"key":"882_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shaharudin, A., van Loenen, B., & Janssen, M. (2023b). Identifying business models of open data intermediaries: A review. International Conference on Open Data: Open Data Challenges and Opportunities in Times of Crisis and Growth (ICOD 2022), Zagreb. Croatia. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.8063619","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.8063619"},{"key":"882_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2021.121372","volume":"175","author":"T \u015eim\u015fek","year":"2022","unstructured":"\u015eim\u015fek, T., \u00d6ner, M. A., Kunday, \u00d6., & Olcay, G. A. (2022). A journey towards a digital platform business model: A case study in a global tech-company. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, Article 121372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.techfore.2021.121372","journal-title":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change"},{"key":"882_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Smith, G., Ofe, H. A., & Sandberg, J. (2016). Digital service innovation from open data: Exploring the value proposition of an open data marketplace. 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 1277\u20131286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/HICSS.2016.162","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2016.162"},{"issue":"8","key":"882_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1","DOI":"10.1111\/joms.12928","volume":"60","author":"Y Snihur","year":"2023","unstructured":"Snihur, Y., & Markman, G. (2023). Business model research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Management Studies, 60(8), e1\u2013e14. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/joms.12928","journal-title":"Journal of Management Studies"},{"key":"882_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4128\/9781606494875","volume-title":"Business model design and learning: A strategic guide","author":"B Spencer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Spencer, B. (2013). Business model design and learning: A strategic guide. Business Expert Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1348\/000711005X48266","volume":"59","author":"D Steinley","year":"2006","unstructured":"Steinley, D. (2006). K-means clustering: A half-century synthesis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59(1), 1\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1348\/000711005X48266","journal-title":"British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s12525-024-00692-5","volume":"34","author":"F Sterk","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sterk, F., Stocker, A., Heinz, D., & Weinhardt, C. (2024). Unlocking the value from car data: A taxonomy and archetypes of connected car business models. Electronic Markets, 34, Article 13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12525-024-00692-5","journal-title":"Electronic Markets"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/wat2.1564","volume":"9","author":"Z Sugg","year":"2022","unstructured":"Sugg, Z. (2022). Social barriers to open (water) data. WIREs Water, 9(1), Article e1564. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/wat2.1564","journal-title":"WIREs Water"},{"key":"882_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Susha, I., Flipsen, M., Agahari, W., & de Reuver, M. (2020). Towards generic business models of intermediaries in data collaboratives: From gatekeeping to data control. In G. Viale Pereira, M. Janssen, H. Lee, I. Lindgren, M. P. Rodr\u00edguez Bol\u00edvar, H. J. Scholl, & A. Zuiderwijk (Eds.), Electronic Government (pp. 304\u2013315). Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-57599-1_23","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-57599-1_23"},{"issue":"3","key":"882_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1016\/j.emj.2017.06.005","volume":"36","author":"K T\u00e4uscher","year":"2018","unstructured":"T\u00e4uscher, K., & Laudien, S. M. (2018). Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces. European Management Journal, 36(3), 319\u2013329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.emj.2017.06.005","journal-title":"European Management Journal"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lrp.2009.07.003","volume":"43","author":"DJ Teece","year":"2010","unstructured":"Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 172\u2013194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lrp.2009.07.003","journal-title":"Long Range Planning"},{"key":"882_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.technovation.2022.102535","volume":"114","author":"S Temiz","year":"2022","unstructured":"Temiz, S., Holgersson, M., Bj\u00f6rkdahl, J., & Wallin, M. W. (2022). Open data: Lost opportunity or unrealized potential? Technovation, 114, Article 102535. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.technovation.2022.102535","journal-title":"Technovation"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1080\/10196789800000016","volume":"8","author":"P Timmers","year":"1998","unstructured":"Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8(2), 3\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10196789800000016","journal-title":"Electronic Markets"},{"key":"882_CR101","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jairtraman.2018.04.005","volume":"71","author":"M Urban","year":"2018","unstructured":"Urban, M., Klemm, M., Ploetner, K. O., & Hornung, M. (2018). Airline categorisation by applying the business model canvas and clustering algorithms. Journal of Air Transport Management, 71, 175\u2013192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jairtraman.2018.04.005","journal-title":"Journal of Air Transport Management"},{"key":"882_CR102","unstructured":"Van Alstyne, M. W., Geoffrey G. Parker, & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved September 20, 2023, from https:\/\/hbr.org\/2016\/04\/pipelines-platforms-and-the-new-rules-of-strategy"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR103","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.29379\/jedem.v13i2.644","volume":"13","author":"B van Loenen","year":"2021","unstructured":"van Loenen, B., Zuiderwijk, A., Vancauwenberghe, G., Lopez-Pellicer, F. J., Mulder, I., Alexopoulos, C., Magnussen, R., Saddiqa, M., de Dulong Rosnay, M., Crompvoets, J., Polini, A., Re, B., & Flores, C. C. (2021). Towards value-creating and sustainable open data ecosystems: A comparative case study and a research agenda. JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 13(2), Article 2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.29379\/jedem.v13i2.644","journal-title":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.15353\/joci.v12i2.3219","volume":"12","author":"F van Schalkwyk","year":"2016","unstructured":"van Schalkwyk, F., Ca\u00f1ares, M., Chattapdhyay, S., & Andrason, A. (2016). Open data intermediaries in developing countries. The Journal of Community Informatics, 12(2), Article 2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15353\/joci.v12i2.3219","journal-title":"The Journal of Community Informatics"},{"key":"882_CR105","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"van Veenstra, A. F., & van den Broek, T. A. (2013). Opening moves \u2013 Drivers, enablers and barriers of open data in a semi-public organization. In M. A. Wimmer, M. Janssen, & H. J. Scholl (Eds.), Electronic Government (pp. 50\u201361). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-40358-3_5","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-40358-3_5"},{"key":"882_CR106","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"van Veenstra, A. F., & van den Broek, T. (2015). A community-driven open data lifecycle model based on literature and practice. In I. Boughzala, M. Janssen, & S. Assar (Eds.), Case Studies in e-Government 2.0: Changing Citizen Relationships (pp. 183\u2013198). Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-08081-9_11","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-08081-9_11"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR107","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/s12599-013-0308-y","volume":"6","author":"D Veit","year":"2014","unstructured":"Veit, D., Clemons, E., Benlian, A., Buxmann, P., Hess, T., Kundisch, D., Leimeister, J. M., Loos, P., & Spann, M. (2014). Business models. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(1), 45\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12599-013-0308-y","journal-title":"Business & Information Systems Engineering"},{"key":"882_CR108","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-38845-8","volume-title":"Business model pioneers","author":"K-I Voigt","year":"2017","unstructured":"Voigt, K.-I., Buliga, O., & Michl, K. (2017). Business model pioneers. Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-38845-8"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR109","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/s12525-019-00386-3","volume":"30","author":"J Weking","year":"2020","unstructured":"Weking, J., Mandalenakis, M., Hein, A., Hermes, S., B\u00f6hm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). The impact of blockchain technology on business models \u2013 A taxonomy and archetypal patterns. Electronic Markets, 30(2), 285\u2013305. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12525-019-00386-3","journal-title":"Electronic Markets"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR110","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.29379\/jedem.v8i1.390","volume":"8","author":"F Welle Donker","year":"2016","unstructured":"Welle Donker, F., & van Loenen, B. (2016). Sustainable business models for public sector open data providers. JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 8(1), Article 1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.29379\/jedem.v8i1.390","journal-title":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government"},{"issue":"6","key":"882_CR111","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"925","DOI":"10.1007\/s11747-017-0531-z","volume":"45","author":"H Wieland","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wieland, H., Hartmann, N. N., & Vargo, S. L. (2017). Business models as service strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(6), 925\u2013943. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11747-017-0531-z","journal-title":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR112","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1177\/0268396219896811","volume":"35","author":"M Wiener","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wiener, M., Saunders, C., & Marabelli, M. (2020). Big-data business models: A critical literature review and multiperspective research framework. Journal of Information Technology, 35(1), 66\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0268396219896811","journal-title":"Journal of Information Technology"},{"key":"882_CR113","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wixom, B. H., & Ross, J. W. (2017). How to monetize your data. MIT Sloan Management Review. Retrieved January 9, 2025, from https:\/\/sloanreview.mit.edu\/article\/how-to-monetize-your-data\/","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/11633.003.0009"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR114","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1177\/0739456X17723971","volume":"39","author":"Y Xiao","year":"2019","unstructured":"Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0739456X17723971","journal-title":"Journal of Planning Education and Research"},{"issue":"1","key":"882_CR115","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583","DOI":"10.1002\/pra2.2018.14505501063","volume":"55","author":"A Yoon","year":"2018","unstructured":"Yoon, A., Copeland, A., & McNally, P. J. (2018). Empowering communities with data: Role of data intermediaries for communities\u2019 data utilization. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 583\u2013592. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pra2.2018.14505501063","journal-title":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"882_CR116","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1080\/10919392.2015.1125175","volume":"26","author":"C-C Yu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Yu, C.-C. (2016). A value-centric business model framework for managing open data applications. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1\u20132), 80\u2013115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10919392.2015.1125175","journal-title":"Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce"},{"key":"882_CR117","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rse.2019.02.016","volume":"224","author":"Z Zhu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhu, Z., Wulder, M. A., Roy, D. P., Woodcock, C. E., Hansen, M. C., Radeloff, V. C., Healey, S. P., Schaaf, C., Hostert, P., Strobl, P., Pekel, J.-F., Lymburner, L., Pahlevan, N., & Scambos, T. A. (2019). Benefits of the free and open Landsat data policy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 224, 382\u2013385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rse.2019.02.016","journal-title":"Remote Sensing of Environment"},{"issue":"2","key":"882_CR118","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lrp.2009.07.004","volume":"43","author":"C Zott","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 216\u2013226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lrp.2009.07.004","journal-title":"Long Range Planning"},{"issue":"4","key":"882_CR119","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1108\/TG-09-2020-0271","volume":"15","author":"A Zuiderwijk","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zuiderwijk, A., & de Reuver, M. (2021). Why open government data initiatives fail to achieve their objectives: Categorizing and prioritizing barriers through a global survey. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 15(4), 377\u2013395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/TG-09-2020-0271","journal-title":"Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy"}],"container-title":["Electronic Markets"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12525-026-00882-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12525-026-00882-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12525-026-00882-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T06:06:10Z","timestamp":1771567570000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12525-026-00882-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]]},"references-count":119,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["882"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12525-026-00882-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1019-6781","1422-8890"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1019-6781","type":"print"},{"value":"1422-8890","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 September 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 January 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 February 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}],"article-number":"19"}}