{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,28]],"date-time":"2025-09-28T04:14:05Z","timestamp":1759032845693},"reference-count":59,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,5,1]],"date-time":"2010-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1272672000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2010,5,6]],"date-time":"2010-05-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1273104000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":5,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Braz Comput Soc"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>Requirements Engineering (RE) is a relatively young discipline, and still many advances have been achieved during the last decades. In particular, numerous RE approaches are proposed in the literature with the aim of understanding a certain problem (e.g. information systems development) and establishing a knowledge base that is shared between domain experts and developers (i.e. a requirements specification). However, there is a growing concern for empirical validations that assess RE proposals and statements. This paper is related to the assessment of the quality of functional requirements specifications, using the Method Evaluation Model (MEM) as a theoretical framework. The MEM distinguishes the actual efficacy and the perceived efficacy of a method. In order to assess the actual efficacy or RE methods, the conceptual model quality framework by Lindland et al. can be applied; in this paper, we focus on the completeness and granularity of requirements models and extend this framework by defining four new metrics (e.g. degree of functional encapsulations completeness with respect to a reference model, number of functional fragmentation errors). In order to assess the perceived efficacy, conventional questionnaires can be used. A laboratory experiment with master students has been carried out, in order to compare (using the proposed metrics) two RE methods; namely, Use Cases and Communication Analysis. With respect to actual efficacy, results indicate greater model quality (in terms of completeness and granularity) when Communication Analysis guidelines are followed. With respect to perceived efficacy, we found that Use Cases was perceived to be slightly easier to use than Communication Analysis. However, Communication Analysis was perceived to be more useful in terms of determining the proper business processes granularity. The paper discusses these results and highlights some key issues for future research in this area.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s13173-010-0003-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2010,5,24]],"date-time":"2010-05-24T23:51:12Z","timestamp":1274745072000},"page":"3-19","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":19,"title":["An empirical comparative evaluation of requirements engineering methods"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"Sergio","family":"Espa\u00f1a","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nelly","family":"Condori-Fernandez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Arturo","family":"Gonz\u00e1lez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"\u00d3scar","family":"Pastor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2010,5,6]]},"reference":[{"key":"3_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2009.33","volume-title":"17th IEEE international requirements engineering conference (RE\u201909)","author":"S Espa\u00f1a","year":"2009","unstructured":"Espa\u00f1a S, Condori-Fern\u00e1ndez N, Gonz\u00e1lez A, Pastor \u00d3 (2009) Evaluating the completeness and granularity of functional requirements specifications: a controlled experiment. In: 17th IEEE international requirements engineering conference (RE\u201909), Atlanta, GA, USA. IEEE, New York, pp\u00a0161\u2013170"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.1975.6312826","volume":"1","author":"B Boehm","year":"1975","unstructured":"Boehm B, McClean RK, Ufrig DB (1975) Some experience with automated aids to the design of large-scale reliable software. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 1(1):125\u2013133","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Softw Eng"},{"key":"3_CR3","first-page":"41","volume-title":"2nd international workshop in comparative evaluation of requirements engineering","author":"RJ Wieringa","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wieringa RJ, Heerkens JMG (2004) Evaluating the structure of research papers: a case study. In: 2nd international workshop in comparative evaluation of requirements engineering, Kyoto, Japan. IEEE Press, New York, pp\u00a041\u201350"},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-006-0037-6","volume":"11","author":"RJ Wieringa","year":"2006","unstructured":"Wieringa RJ, Heerkens JMG (2006) The methodological soundness of requirements engineering papers: a conceptual framework and two case studies. Requir Eng 11(4):295\u2013307","journal-title":"Requir Eng"},{"key":"3_CR5","series-title":"LNCS","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-71301-2_3","volume-title":"Empirical software engineering issues. Critical assessment and future directions","author":"A H\u00f6fer","year":"2007","unstructured":"H\u00f6fer A, Tichy WF (2007) Status of empirical research in software engineering. In: Empirical software engineering issues. Critical assessment and future directions. LNCS, vol\u00a04336. Springer, Berlin, pp\u00a010\u201319"},{"key":"3_CR6","first-page":"87","volume-title":"Information systems methodologies: a feature analysis","author":"J Iivari","year":"1983","unstructured":"Iivari J, Kerola P (1983) A sociocybernetic framework for the feature analysis of information systems development methodologies. In: Olle TW, Sol HG, Tully CJ (eds) Information systems methodologies: a feature analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp\u00a087\u2013139"},{"key":"3_CR7","unstructured":"Dieste O, Lopez M, Ramos F (2008) Updating a systematic review about selection of software requirements specification techniques. In: 11th workshop on requirements engineering (WER 2008), Barcelona, Spain"},{"key":"3_CR8","first-page":"314","volume-title":"31st Hawaii international conference on systems science (HICSS 1998)","author":"K Siau","year":"1998","unstructured":"Siau K, Rossi M (1998) Evaluation of information modeling methods\u2014a review. In: 31st Hawaii international conference on systems science (HICSS 1998), Kohala Coast, USA, vol\u00a05. IEEE, New York, pp\u00a0314\u2013322"},{"key":"3_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4615-4625-2","volume-title":"Experimentation in Software Engineering: an introduction","author":"C Wohlin","year":"2000","unstructured":"Wohlin C, Runeson P, H\u00f6st M, Ohlsson MC, Regnell B, Wessl\u00e9n A (2000) Experimentation in Software Engineering: an introduction. Kluwer, Dordrecht"},{"key":"3_CR10","volume-title":"Writing effective use cases","author":"A Cockburn","year":"2000","unstructured":"Cockburn A (2000) Writing effective use cases. Addison-Wesley, Reading"},{"key":"3_CR11","series-title":"LNCS","volume-title":"21st international conference on advanced information systems","author":"S Espa\u00f1a","year":"2009","unstructured":"Espa\u00f1a S, Gonz\u00e1lez A, Pastor \u00d3 (2009) Communication Analysis: a requirements elicitation approach for information systems. In: 21st international conference on advanced information systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. LNCS. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"3_CR12","volume-title":"Requirements engineering: frameworks for understanding","author":"RJ Wieringa","year":"1996","unstructured":"Wieringa RJ (1996) Requirements engineering: frameworks for understanding. Wiley, New York"},{"issue":"5","key":"3_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1145\/1125944.1125949","volume":"49","author":"B Dobing","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dobing B, Parsons J (2006) How UML is used. Commun ACM 49(5):109\u2013113","journal-title":"Commun ACM"},{"key":"3_CR14","first-page":"194","volume-title":"Technology of object-oriented languages and systems","author":"AJH Simons","year":"1999","unstructured":"Simons AJH (1999) Use cases considered harmful. In: Technology of object-oriented languages and systems, Nancy, France. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, pp\u00a0194\u2013203"},{"key":"3_CR15","volume-title":"Third IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering (RE\u201997)","author":"B Dano","year":"1997","unstructured":"Dano B, Briand H, Barbier F (1997) A use case driven requirements engineering process. In: Third IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering (RE\u201997), Antapolis, MD. IEEE, New York"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"3_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1016\/S0169-023X(97)86223-4","volume":"25","author":"C Rolland","year":"1998","unstructured":"Rolland C, Achour CB (1998) Guiding the construction of textual use case specifications. Data Knowl Eng J 25(1\u20132):125\u2013160","journal-title":"Data Knowl Eng J"},{"key":"3_CR17","volume-title":"Software for use: a practical guide to the models and methods of usage-centered design","author":"LL Constantine","year":"1999","unstructured":"Constantine LL, Lockwood LAD (1999) Software for use: a practical guide to the models and methods of usage-centered design. Addison-Wesley, Reading"},{"key":"3_CR18","unstructured":"Cockburn A (1997) Structuring use cases with goals. J Object-Oriented Program"},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1007\/s11219-007-9023-6","volume":"15","author":"KT Phalp","year":"2007","unstructured":"Phalp KT, Jonathan V, Cox K (2007) Improving the quality of use case descriptions: empirical assessment of writing guidelines. Softw Qual Control 15(4):383\u2013399","journal-title":"Softw Qual Control"},{"key":"3_CR20","unstructured":"Cox K, Phalp K, Shepperd M (2001) Comparing use case writing guidelines. In: 7th international workshop on requirements engineering: foundations for software quality (REFSQ\u20192001), Interlaken, Switzerland"},{"key":"3_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-72677-7_13","volume-title":"Conceptual modelling in information systems engineering","author":"O Pastor","year":"2007","unstructured":"Pastor O, Gonz\u00e1lez A, Espa\u00f1a S (2007) Conceptual alignment of software production methods. In: Conceptual modelling in information systems engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp\u00a0209\u2013228"},{"key":"3_CR22","series-title":"LNBIP","volume-title":"IFIP WG 8.1 working conference on the practice of enterprise modeling","author":"A Gonz\u00e1lez","year":"2008","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez A, Espa\u00f1a S, Pastor O (2008) Towards a communicational perspective for enterprise information systems modelling. In: IFIP WG 8.1 working conference on the practice of enterprise modeling, Stockholm, Sweden. LNBIP. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"3_CR23","volume-title":"3rd international conference on research challenges in information science (RCIS 2009)","author":"A Gonz\u00e1lez","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez A, Espa\u00f1a S, Pastor O (2009) Unity criteria for business process modelling: a\u00a0theoretical argumentation for a software engineering recurrent problem. In: 3rd international conference on research challenges in information science (RCIS 2009), Fes, Morocco. IEEE, New York"},{"key":"3_CR24","unstructured":"Moody DL (2003) The Method Evaluation Model: a theoretical model for validating information systems design methods. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on information systems (ECIS 2003), Naples, Italy, 16\u201321 June 2003"},{"issue":"9","key":"3_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1090","DOI":"10.1145\/48529.48533","volume":"31","author":"SB Yadav","year":"1988","unstructured":"Yadav SB, Bravoco RR, Chatfield AT, Rajkumar TM (1988) Comparison of analysis techniques for information requirement determination. Commun ACM 31(9):1090\u20131097","journal-title":"Commun ACM"},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1109\/52.268955","volume":"11","author":"OI Lindland","year":"1994","unstructured":"Lindland OI, Sindre G, S\u00f8lvberg A (1994) Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Softw 11(2):42\u201349","journal-title":"IEEE Softw"},{"key":"3_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moody DL, Sindre G, Brasethvik T, Solvberg A (2003) Evaluating the quality of information models: empirical testing of a conceptual model quality framework. In: 25th international conference on software engineering (ICSE 2003), Portland, USA, pp\u00a0295\u2013305","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSE.2003.1201209"},{"key":"3_CR28","volume-title":"21st international conference on conceptual modeling","author":"DL Moody","year":"2002","unstructured":"Moody DL, Sindre G, Brasethvik T, Solvberg A (2002) Evaluating the quality of process models: empirical testing of a quality framework. In: 21st international conference on conceptual modeling. Springer, Berlin"},{"key":"3_CR29","volume-title":"Applying UML and patterns","author":"C Larman","year":"1997","unstructured":"Larman C (1997) Applying UML and patterns. Prentice Hall, New York (see p\u00a053)"},{"key":"3_CR30","volume-title":"Use Cases: patterns and blueprints","author":"G \u00d6vergaard","year":"2004","unstructured":"\u00d6vergaard G, Palmkvist K (2004) Use Cases: patterns and blueprints. Addison-Wesley, Reading (see Part\u00a0V)"},{"key":"3_CR31","first-page":"94","volume-title":"Use cases: requirements in context","author":"D Kulak","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kulak D, Guiney E (2000) Use cases: requirements in context. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp\u00a094\u201395"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-2681(02)00056-2","volume":"49","author":"RN Langlois","year":"2002","unstructured":"Langlois RN (2002) Modularity in technology and organization. J\u00a0Econ Behav Organ 49(1):19\u201337","journal-title":"J\u00a0Econ Behav Organ"},{"key":"3_CR33","series-title":"LNCS","first-page":"20","volume-title":"6th international conference on business process management (BPM 2008)","author":"H Reijers","year":"2008","unstructured":"Reijers H, Mendling J (2008) Modularity in process models: review and effects. In: 6th international conference on business process management (BPM 2008), Milan, Italy. LNCS, vol\u00a05240. Springer, Berlin, pp\u00a020\u201335"},{"key":"3_CR34","volume-title":"Methodological pragmatism: systems-theoretic approach to the theory of knowledge","author":"N Rescher","year":"1977","unstructured":"Rescher N (1977) Methodological pragmatism: systems-theoretic approach to the theory of knowledge. Basil Blackwell, Oxford"},{"issue":"8","key":"3_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"982","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.35.8.982","volume":"35","author":"FD Davis","year":"1989","unstructured":"Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982\u20131003","journal-title":"Manag Sci"},{"key":"3_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis AM, Overmyer S, Jordan K, Caruso J, Dandashi F, Dinh A, Kincaid G, Ledeboer G, Reynolds P, Sitaram P, Ta A, Theofanos M (1993) Identifying and measuring quality in a software requirements specification. In: 1st international software metrics symposium, pp\u00a0141\u2013152","DOI":"10.1109\/METRIC.1993.263792"},{"key":"3_CR37","volume-title":"5th international conference on advanced information systems engineering","author":"K Pohl","year":"1994","unstructured":"Pohl K (1994) The three dimensions of requirements engineering: a framework and its applications. In: 5th international conference on advanced information systems engineering, Paris, France. Pergamon, New York"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1057\/palgrave.ejis.3000598","volume":"15","author":"J Krogstie","year":"2006","unstructured":"Krogstie J, Sindre G, Jorgensen H (2006) Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Eur J Inf Syst 15(1):91\u2013102","journal-title":"Eur J Inf Syst"},{"key":"3_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Falkenberg E, Hesse W, Lindgreeen P, Nilsson B, Oei JLH, Rolland C, Stamper RK, VanAssche F, Verrijn-Stuart A, Voss K (1998) FRISCO. A\u00a0framework of information systems concepts. IFIP WG 8.1 report","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-35500-9_30"},{"key":"3_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"82","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-59498-1_239","volume-title":"7th international conference on advanced information systems engineering","author":"J Krogstie","year":"1995","unstructured":"Krogstie J, Lindland OI, Sindre G (1995) Towards a deeper understanding of quality in requirements engineering. In: 7th international conference on advanced information systems engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp\u00a082\u201395"},{"key":"3_CR41","first-page":"94","volume-title":"13th international conference on the entity-relationship approach","author":"DL Moody","year":"1994","unstructured":"Moody DL, Shanks GG (1994) What makes a good data model? Evaluating the quality of entity relationship models. In: 13th international conference on the entity-relationship approach, Manchester, UK. Springer, Berlin, pp\u00a094\u2013111"},{"key":"3_CR42","series-title":"LNCS","first-page":"240","volume-title":"Conceptual modeling (ER\u201998)","author":"R Schuette","year":"1998","unstructured":"Schuette R, Rotthowe T (1998) The guidelines of modeling\u2014an approach to enhance the quality in information models. In: Conceptual modeling (ER\u201998), Singapore. LNCS, vol 1507. Springer, Berlin, pp\u00a0240\u2013254"},{"key":"3_CR43","first-page":"490","volume-title":"18th international conference on conceptual modeling (RE 1999)","author":"R Schuette","year":"1999","unstructured":"Schuette R (1999) Architectures for evaluating the quality of information models\u2014a meta and an object level comparison. In: 18th international conference on conceptual modeling (RE 1999). Springer, Berlin, pp\u00a0490\u2013505"},{"key":"3_CR44","unstructured":"Shanks GG, Darke P (1997) Quality in conceptual modelling: linking theory and practice. Asia-Pacific conference on information systems (PACIS 1007), Brisbane, pp\u00a0805\u2013814"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1016\/j.datak.2004.12.005","volume":"55","author":"DL Moody","year":"2005","unstructured":"Moody DL (2005) Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data Knowl Eng 55(3):243\u2013276","journal-title":"Data Knowl Eng"},{"key":"3_CR46","series-title":"Information processing","volume-title":"Information system design: techniques and software support","author":"PC Lockemann","year":"1986","unstructured":"Lockemann PC, Mayr HC (1986) Information system design: techniques and software support. Information processing, vol\u00a086. North-Holland, Amsterdam"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/237432.237434","volume":"6","author":"P Zave","year":"1997","unstructured":"Zave P, Jackson M (1997) Four dark corners of requirements engineering. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 6(1):1\u201330","journal-title":"ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1007\/s10270-004-0060-3","volume":"3","author":"I Jacobson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Jacobson I (2004) Use cases\u2014yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Softw Syst Model 3(3):210\u2013220","journal-title":"Softw Syst Model"},{"key":"3_CR49","unstructured":"Kroll P (2004) Dr\u00a0Process how many use cases should you have in a system? IBM Rational developerWorks documentation. Accessed 02-2009"},{"key":"3_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-3304-4","volume-title":"Basics of software engineering experimentation","author":"N Juristo","year":"2001","unstructured":"Juristo N, Moreno A (2001) Basics of software engineering experimentation. Kluwer, Boston"},{"key":"3_CR51","volume-title":"IEEE symposium on requirements engineering","author":"CB Achour","year":"1999","unstructured":"Achour CB, Rolland C, Maiden NAM, Souveyet C (1999) Guiding use case authoring: results of an empirical study. In: IEEE symposium on requirements engineering. IEEE, Los Alamitos"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1026542700033","volume":"5","author":"K Cox","year":"2000","unstructured":"Cox K, Phalp K (2000) Replicating the CREWS use case authoring guidelines experiment. Empir Softw Eng 5(3):245\u2013267","journal-title":"Empir Softw Eng"},{"key":"3_CR53","series-title":"LNCS","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-45337-7_21","volume-title":"15th European conference on object-oriented programming (ECOOP 2001)","author":"B Anda","year":"2001","unstructured":"Anda B, Sj\u00f8berg DIK, J\u00f8rgensen M (2001) Quality and understandability of use case models. In: 15th European conference on object-oriented programming (ECOOP 2001). LNCS, vol\u00a02072. Springer, Berlin, pp\u00a0402\u2013428"},{"key":"3_CR54","unstructured":"Fortuna M, Werner C, Borges M (2007) Um modelo integrado de\u00a0requisitos com casos de\u00a0uso. In: Workshop de ingenier\u00eda de requisitos y ambientes software IDEAS 2007"},{"key":"3_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1145\/38765.38824","volume-title":"Conference on object-oriented programming systems, languages and applications","author":"I Jacobson","year":"1987","unstructured":"Jacobson I (1987) Object-oriented development in an industrial environment. In: Conference on object-oriented programming systems, languages and applications, Orlando, FL, USA. ACM, New York, pp\u00a0183\u2013191"},{"key":"3_CR56","unstructured":"OMG (2009) OMG unified modeling language (OMG UML), superstructure, V2.2. http:\/\/www.omg.org\/cgi-bin\/doc?formal\/09-02-02. Accessed 02-2010"},{"issue":"6","key":"3_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"758","DOI":"10.1109\/32.6156","volume":"14","author":"V Basili","year":"1988","unstructured":"Basili V, Rombach HD (1988) The TAME project: towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 14(6):758\u2013773","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Softw Eng"},{"key":"3_CR58","unstructured":"Garson D (1998) Scales and standard measures. North Carolina State University. Updated September 2008. http:\/\/www2.chass.ncsu.edu\/garson\/pa765\/standard.htm"},{"key":"3_CR59","unstructured":"Runeson P (2003) Using students as experiment subjects\u2014an analysis on graduate and freshmen student data. In: 7th international conference on empirical assessment in software engineering, pp\u00a095\u2013102"}],"container-title":["Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s13173-010-0003-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s13173-010-0003-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s13173-010-0003-5","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s13173-010-0003-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,31]],"date-time":"2021-08-31T21:04:53Z","timestamp":1630443893000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journal-bcs.springeropen.com\/articles\/10.1007\/s13173-010-0003-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]},"references-count":59,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]}},"alternative-id":["3"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13173-010-0003-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0104-6500","1678-4804"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0104-6500","type":"print"},{"value":"1678-4804","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,5]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 February 2010","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 May 2010","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}