{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,27]],"date-time":"2025-10-27T16:23:50Z","timestamp":1761582230096,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]],"date-time":"2022-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1665360000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]],"date-time":"2022-10-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1665360000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100012476","name":"Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["2019B69314"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2019B69314"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100012476","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Complex Intell. Syst."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This paper mainly solves the individual consistency and group consensus in the decision-making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs). The worst consistency index (WCI) is used to measure the individual consistency level. The envelop of an HFPR called envelop of HFPR (EHFRP) is proposed in the consensus reaching process (CRP). Two algorithms are proposed: one is to improve the WCI, in which only one pair of elements are revised in the consistency improving process each time, which aims to preserve the decision makers\u2019 (DMs\u2019) original information as much as possible. Another algorithm is proposed to improve the consensus in the CRP. To aggregate individual EHFPRs into one group HFPR, a new induced ordered weighted averaging (IOWA) operator is presented, called envelope HFPR-IOWA (EHFPR-IOWA), which allows the experts' preference to be aggregated in such a way that the most consistent ones are given more weight. Finally, an illustrative example and comparisons with the existing methods are provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s40747-022-00863-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]],"date-time":"2022-10-10T12:14:39Z","timestamp":1665404079000},"page":"1753-1771","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["A consensus algorithm based on the worst consistency index of hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision-making"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"9","author":[{"given":"Qiujie","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Gaofeng","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tianming","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3213-3484","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Yejun","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"863_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-0114(78)90001-5","volume":"1","author":"SA Orlovsky","year":"1978","unstructured":"Orlovsky SA (1978) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:155\u2013157","journal-title":"Fuzzy Sets Syst"},{"key":"863_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2012.10.035","volume":"224","author":"YJ Xu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Xu YJ, Patnayakuni R, Wang HM (2013) The ordinal consistency of a fuzzy preference relation. Inf Sci 224:152\u2013164","journal-title":"Inf Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"863_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(02)00725-7","volume":"154","author":"E Herrera-Viedma","year":"2004","unstructured":"Herrera-Viedma E et al (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154(1):98\u2013109","journal-title":"Eur J Oper Res"},{"key":"863_CR4","volume-title":"The analytic hierarchy process","author":"TL Saaty","year":"1980","unstructured":"Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York"},{"key":"863_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2013.08.029","volume":"253","author":"YJ Xu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Xu YJ, Li KW, Wang HM (2013) Distance-based consensus models for fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Inf Sci 253:56\u201373","journal-title":"Inf Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"863_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.3969\/j.issn.1004-4132.2010.02.012","volume":"21","author":"YJ Xu","year":"2010","unstructured":"Xu YJ, Da QL, Liu XW (2010) Some properties of linguistic preference relation and its ranking in group decision making. J Syst Eng Electron 21(2):244\u2013249","journal-title":"J Syst Eng Electron"},{"issue":"3","key":"863_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2004.04.008","volume":"33","author":"ZS Xu","year":"2005","unstructured":"Xu ZS (2005) Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega 33(3):249\u2013254","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"863_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knosys.2013.10.002","volume":"58","author":"E Barrenechea","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barrenechea E et al (2014) Construction of interval-valued fuzzy preference relations from ignorance functions and fuzzy preference relations. Application to decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 58:33\u201344","journal-title":"Knowl-Based Syst"},{"key":"863_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kumar PS (2022) Computationally simple and efficient method for solving real-life mixed intuitionistic fuzzy 3D assignment problems. Int J Softw Sci Comput Intell 9(3)","DOI":"10.4018\/IJSSCI.291715"},{"issue":"1","key":"863_CR10","first-page":"1","volume":"9","author":"PS Kumar","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kumar PS (2020) Developing a new approach to solve solid assignment problems under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst Appl 9(1):1\u201334","journal-title":"Int J Fuzzy Syst Appl"},{"key":"863_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knosys.2012.03.009","volume":"33","author":"ZS Xu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Xu ZS (2012) An error-analysis-based method for the priority of an intuitionistic preference relation in decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 33:173\u2013179","journal-title":"Knowl-Based Syst"},{"issue":"4","key":"863_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.5391\/IJFIS.2016.16.4.225","volume":"16","author":"PS Kumar","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kumar PS (2016) A simple method for solving Type-2 and Type-4 fuzzy transportation problems. Int J Fuzzy Logic Intell Syst 16(4):225\u2013237","journal-title":"Int J Fuzzy Logic Intell Syst"},{"key":"863_CR13","first-page":"529","volume":"25","author":"V Torra","year":"2010","unstructured":"Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25:529\u2013539","journal-title":"Int J Intell Syst"},{"issue":"2","key":"863_CR14","first-page":"1167","volume":"8","author":"PD Liu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Liu PD, Mahmood T, Ali Z (2021) The cross-entropy and improved distance measures for complex q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making. Complex Intell Syst 8(2):1167\u20131186","journal-title":"Complex Intell Syst"},{"issue":"5","key":"863_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2281","DOI":"10.1007\/s40747-021-00387-w","volume":"7","author":"R Krishankumar","year":"2021","unstructured":"Krishankumar R et al (2021) An integrated decision-making COPRAS approach to probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set information. Complex Intell Syst 7(5):2281\u20132298","journal-title":"Complex Intell Syst"},{"issue":"06","key":"863_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"865","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218488513500402","volume":"21","author":"MM Xia","year":"2013","unstructured":"Xia MM, Xu ZS (2013) Managing hesitant information in Gdm problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 21(06):865\u2013897","journal-title":"Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst"},{"key":"863_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TSMC.2021.3099862","author":"YJ Xu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Xu YJ et al (2021) Multiplicative consistency ascertaining, inconsistency repairing, and weights derivation of hesitant multiplicative preference relations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TSMC.2021.3099862","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst"},{"issue":"6","key":"863_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3498","DOI":"10.1109\/TSMC.2019.2931536","volume":"51","author":"YJ Xu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Xu YJ et al (2021) Algorithms to detect and rectify multiplicative and ordinal inconsistencies of fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 51(6):3498\u20133511","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst"},{"key":"863_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2021.12.002","volume":"586","author":"YJ Xu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Xu YJ et al (2022) Some models to manage additive consistency and derive priority weights from hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 586:450\u2013467","journal-title":"Inf Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"863_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1109\/TFUZZ.2013.2245136","volume":"22","author":"B Zhu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Zhu B, Xu ZS (2014) Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(1):35\u201345","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst"},{"key":"863_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knosys.2015.05.023","volume":"86","author":"ZM Zhang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zhang ZM, Wang C, Tian XD (2015) A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowl-Based Syst 86:77\u2013101","journal-title":"Knowl-Based Syst"},{"issue":"8","key":"863_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1328","DOI":"10.1109\/TCYB.2013.2283021","volume":"44","author":"B Zhu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Zhu B, Xu Z, Xu J (2014) Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under group decision making. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(8):1328\u20131337","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Cybern"},{"key":"863_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2013.05.059","volume":"17","author":"B Zhu","year":"2013","unstructured":"Zhu B (2013) Studies on consistency measure of hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Procedia Comput Sci 17:457\u2013464","journal-title":"Procedia Comput Sci"},{"key":"863_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2017.04.068","volume":"58","author":"YJ Xu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Xu YJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) A consensus model for hesitant fuzzy preference relations and its application in water allocation management. Appl Soft Comput 58:265\u2013284","journal-title":"Appl Soft Comput"},{"key":"863_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2015.12.005","volume":"65","author":"ZB Wu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wu ZB, Xu JP (2016) Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Omega 65:28\u201340","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"863_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen Z-S et al (2021) Expertise-based bid evaluation for construction-contractor selection with generalized comparative linguistic ELECTRE III. Autom Constr 125","DOI":"10.1016\/j.autcon.2021.103578"},{"key":"863_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108373","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2021.108373","volume":"117","author":"YL Lu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lu YL et al (2022) Social network clustering and consensus-based distrust behaviors management for large-scale group decision-making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 117:108373","journal-title":"Appl Soft Comput"},{"key":"863_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"910","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2020.08.022","volume":"547","author":"YL Lu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lu YL et al (2021) Consensus of large-scale group decision making in social network: the minimum cost model based on robust optimization. Inf Sci 547:910\u2013930","journal-title":"Inf Sci"},{"issue":"7","key":"863_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2216","DOI":"10.1007\/s40815-017-0438-3","volume":"20","author":"YJ Xu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Xu YJ et al (2018) Consistency and consensus models with local adjustment strategy for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(7):2216\u20132233","journal-title":"Int J Fuzzy Syst"},{"key":"863_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/TCYB.2022.3159866","author":"MQ Li","year":"2022","unstructured":"Li MQ et al (2022) A trust risk dynamic management mechanism based on third-party monitoring for the conflict-eliminating process of social network group decision making. IEEE Trans Cybern. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TCYB.2022.3159866","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Cybern"},{"issue":"2","key":"863_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1007\/s13748-016-0108-y","volume":"6","author":"\u00c1 Labella","year":"2017","unstructured":"Labella \u00c1, Estrella FJ, Mart\u00ednez L (2017) AFRYCA 20: an improved analysis framework for consensus reaching processes. Prog Artif Intell 6(2):181\u2013194","journal-title":"Prog Artif Intell"},{"key":"863_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apm.2019.02.042","volume":"71","author":"Z-S Chen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Chen Z-S et al (2019) An enhanced ordered weighted averaging operators generation algorithm with applications for multicriteria decision making. Appl Math Model 71:467\u2013490","journal-title":"Appl Math Model"},{"issue":"5","key":"863_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2367","DOI":"10.1002\/int.22382","volume":"36","author":"L Jin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jin L et al (2021) GnIOWA operators and some weights allocation methods with their properties. Int J Intell Syst 36(5):2367\u20132386","journal-title":"Int J Intell Syst"},{"key":"863_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1016\/j.inffus.2020.11.010","volume":"69","author":"Z-S Chen","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chen Z-S et al (2021) Online-review analysis based large-scale group decision-making for determining passenger demands and evaluating passenger satisfaction: case study of high-speed rail system in China. Inf Fusion 69:22\u201339","journal-title":"Inf Fusion"},{"key":"863_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knosys.2017.08.007","volume":"135","author":"Y He","year":"2017","unstructured":"He Y, Xu ZS (2017) A consensus reaching model for hesitant information with different preference structures. Knowl-Based Syst 135:99\u2013112","journal-title":"Knowl-Based Syst"},{"key":"863_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cie.2018.12.051","volume":"128","author":"J Li","year":"2019","unstructured":"Li J, Wang JQ, Hu JH (2019) Consensus building for hesitant fuzzy preference relations with multiplicative consistency. Comput Ind Eng 128:387\u2013400","journal-title":"Comput Ind Eng"},{"issue":"6","key":"863_CR37","first-page":"4693","volume":"24","author":"YJ Xu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Xu YJ, Liu X, Xu LZ (2019) A dynamic expert contribution-based consensus model for hesitant fuzzy group decision making with an application to water resources allocation selection. Soft Comput 24(6):4693\u20134708","journal-title":"Soft Comput"},{"key":"863_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"58","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fss.2012.03.016","volume":"206","author":"ZB Wu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) A concise consensus support model for group decision making with reciprocal preference relations based on deviation measures. Fuzzy Sets Syst 206:58\u201373","journal-title":"Fuzzy Sets Syst"},{"key":"863_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2018.01.016","volume":"98","author":"Z Zhang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zhang Z, Kou X, Dong Q (2018) Additive consistency analysis and improvement for hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 98:118\u2013128","journal-title":"Expert Syst Appl"},{"issue":"1","key":"863_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1007\/s13198-019-00941-3","volume":"11","author":"PS Kumar","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kumar PS (2020) Algorithms for solving the optimization problems using fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy set. Int J Syst Assurance Eng Manag 11(1):189\u2013222","journal-title":"Int J Syst Assurance Eng Manag"},{"issue":"4","key":"863_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1007\/s13198-019-00794-w","volume":"10","author":"PS Kumar","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kumar PS (2019) Intuitionistic fuzzy solid assignment problems: a software-based approach. Int J Syst Assurance Eng Manag 10(4):661\u2013675","journal-title":"Int J Syst Assurance Eng Manag"},{"issue":"2","key":"863_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1016\/0165-0114(84)90032-0","volume":"12","author":"T Tanino","year":"1984","unstructured":"Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12(2):117\u2013131","journal-title":"Fuzzy Sets Syst"},{"key":"863_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"691","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2017.06.011","volume":"67","author":"ZB Wu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wu ZB, Jin BM, Xu JP (2018) Local feedback strategy for consensus building with probability-hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 67:691\u2013705","journal-title":"Appl Soft Comput"},{"issue":"3","key":"863_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2010.09.002","volume":"52","author":"MM Xia","year":"2011","unstructured":"Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):395\u2013407","journal-title":"Int J Approx Reason"},{"key":"863_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/j.engappai.2014.12.012","volume":"40","author":"DQ Li","year":"2015","unstructured":"Li DQ, Zeng WY, Li JJ (2015) New distance and similarity measures on hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in multiple criteria decision making. Eng Appl Artif Intell 40:11\u201316","journal-title":"Eng Appl Artif Intell"},{"issue":"1","key":"863_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1109\/TFUZZ.2011.2170076","volume":"20","author":"RM Rodriguez","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rodriguez RM, Martinez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(1):109\u2013119","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst"},{"issue":"6","key":"863_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1002\/int.10038","volume":"17","author":"ZS Xu","year":"2002","unstructured":"Xu ZS, Da QL (2002) The uncertain OWA operator. Int J Intell Syst 17(6):569\u2013575","journal-title":"Int J Intell Syst"},{"key":"863_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1098-111X(199601)11:1<49::AID-INT3>3.0.CO;2-Z","volume":"11","author":"RR Yager","year":"1996","unstructured":"Yager RR (1996) Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. Int J Intell Syst 11:49\u201373","journal-title":"Int J Intell Syst"},{"key":"863_CR49","unstructured":"Yager RR, Filev DP (1998) Operations for granular computing: Mixing words and numbers. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems at the World Congress on Computational Intelligence (WCCI 98), 123\u2013128"},{"issue":"1","key":"863_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/S0165-0114(02)00432-3","volume":"137","author":"RR Yager","year":"2003","unstructured":"Yager RR (2003) Induced aggregation operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 137(1):59\u201369","journal-title":"Fuzzy Sets Syst"},{"issue":"2","key":"863_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1109\/3477.752789","volume":"29","author":"RR Yager","year":"1999","unstructured":"Yager RR, Filev DP (1999) Induced ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part B Cybern 29(2):141\u2013150","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part B Cybern"},{"key":"863_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"S214","DOI":"10.3846\/20294913.2014.881430","volume":"19","author":"B Zhu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zhu B, Xu ZS (2012) Regression methods for hesitant fuzzy preference relation. Technol Econ Dev Econ 19:S214\u2013S227","journal-title":"Technol Econ Dev Econ"}],"container-title":["Complex &amp; Intelligent Systems"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s40747-022-00863-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s40747-022-00863-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s40747-022-00863-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,18]],"date-time":"2023-04-18T09:35:30Z","timestamp":1681810530000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s40747-022-00863-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]]},"references-count":52,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]}},"alternative-id":["863"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40747-022-00863-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["2199-4536","2198-6053"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2199-4536"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2198-6053"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 May 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 August 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 October 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}