{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]],"date-time":"2026-06-01T12:18:33Z","timestamp":1780316313882,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":111,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,4]],"date-time":"2021-01-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609718400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,4]],"date-time":"2021-01-04T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609718400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009244","name":"Stockholm University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009244","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["SN COMPUT. SCI."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Requirements engineering has traditionally been stakeholder-driven. In addition to domain knowledge, widespread digitalization has led to the generation of vast amounts of data (Big Data) from heterogeneous digital sources such as the Internet of Things (IoT), mobile devices, and social networks. The digital transformation has spawned new opportunities to consider such data as potentially valuable sources of requirements, although they are not intentionally created for requirements elicitation. A challenge to data-driven requirements engineering concerns the lack of methods to facilitate seamless and autonomous requirements elicitation from such dynamic and unintended digital sources. There are numerous challenges in processing the data effectively to be fully exploited in organizations. This article, thus, reviews the current state-of-the-art approaches to data-driven requirements elicitation from dynamic data sources and identifies research gaps. We obtained 1848 hits when searching six electronic databases. Through a two-level screening and a complementary forward and backward reference search, 68 papers were selected for final analysis. The results reveal that the existing automated requirements elicitation primarily focuses on utilizing human-sourced data, especially online reviews, as requirements sources, and supervised machine learning for data processing. The outcomes of automated requirements elicitation often result in mere identification and classification of requirements-related information or identification of features, without eliciting requirements in a ready-to-use form. This article highlights the need for developing methods to leverage process-mediated and machine-generated data for requirements elicitation and addressing the issues related to variety, velocity, and volume of Big Data for the efficient and effective software development and evolution.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s42979-020-00416-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,4]],"date-time":"2021-01-04T17:03:07Z","timestamp":1609779787000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":72,"title":["Data-Driven Requirements Elicitation: A Systematic Literature Review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"2","author":[{"given":"Sachiko","family":"Lim","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aron","family":"Henriksson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jelena","family":"Zdravkovic","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,4]]},"reference":[{"key":"416_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-12578-2","volume-title":"Requirements engineering: fundamentals, principles, and techniques","author":"K Pohl","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pohl K. Requirements engineering: fundamentals, principles, and techniques. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010."},{"issue":"4","key":"416_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1049\/iet-sen.2017.0144","volume":"12","author":"C Pacheco","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pacheco C, Garc\u00eda I, Reyes M. Requirements elicitation techniques: a systematic literature review based on the maturity of the techniques. IET Softw. 2018;12(4):365\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1049\/iet-sen.2017.0144.","journal-title":"IET Softw"},{"issue":"4","key":"416_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1165","DOI":"10.2307\/41703503","volume":"36","author":"H Chen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chen H, Chiang RHL, Storey VC. Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact. MIS Quart. 2012;36(4):1165\u201388.","journal-title":"MIS Quart"},{"key":"416_CR4","unstructured":"Manrique-Losada B, Zapata-Jaramillo CM, Burgos DA. Re-expressing business processes information from corporate documents into controlled language. In: International Conference on Applications of Natural Language Processing to Information Systems. Cham: Springer, 2016, pp. 376\u2013383."},{"key":"416_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hauksd\u00f3ttir D, Ritsing B, Andersen JC, Mortensen NH. Establishing reusable requirements derived from laws and regulations for medical device development. In 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), 2016, pp. 220\u2013228, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/REW.2016.045.","DOI":"10.1109\/REW.2016.045"},{"key":"416_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kaiya H, Saeki M. Using domain ontology as domain knowledge for requirements elicitation. In 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'06), pp. 189\u2013198. IEEE, 2006, pp. 186\u2013195, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2006.72.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2006.72"},{"key":"416_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zong-yong L, Zhi-xue W, Ying-ying Y, Yue W, Ying L. Towards a multiple ontology framework for requirements elicitation and reuse. In 31st Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC 2007), vol. 1, pp. 189\u2013195. IEEE, 2007, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/COMPSAC.2007.216.","DOI":"10.1109\/COMPSAC.2007.216"},{"key":"416_CR8","first-page":"40","volume":"2","author":"FA Nogueira","year":"2017","unstructured":"Nogueira FA, De Oliveira HC. Application of heuristics in business process models to support software requirements specification. ICEIS. 2017;2:40\u201351.","journal-title":"ICEIS"},{"key":"416_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bendjenna H, Zarour NE, Charrel P. MAMIE: A methodology to elicit requirements in inter-company co-operative information systems. In 2008 International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling Control & Automation, 2008, pp. 290\u2013295, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/CIMCA.2008.101.","DOI":"10.1109\/CIMCA.2008.101"},{"key":"416_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2016.09.043","volume":"126","author":"F Shao","year":"2017","unstructured":"Shao F, Peng R, Lai H, Wang B. DRank: a semi-automated requirements prioritization method based on preferences and dependencies. J Syst Softw. 2017;126:141\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2016.09.043.","journal-title":"J Syst Softw."},{"key":"416_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Abad ZSH, Karras O, Ghazi P, Glinz M, Ruhe G, Schneider K. \u201cWhat works better? A study of classifying requirements. In 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 496\u2013501. IEEE, 2017, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2017.36.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.36"},{"key":"416_CR12","unstructured":"Hayes JH, Antoniol G, Adams B, Gueh\u00e9n\u00e9uc YG. Inherent characteristics of traceability artifacts: Less is more. In: 2015 IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 196\u2013201. IEEE, 2015."},{"issue":"1","key":"416_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10515-016-0192-z","volume":"24","author":"M Kamalrudin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kamalrudin M, Hosking J, Grundy J. MaramaAIC: tool support for consistency management and validation of requirements. Automat Softw Eng. 2017;24(1):1\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10515-016-0192-z.","journal-title":"Automat Softw Eng"},{"key":"416_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ahmed MA, Butt WH, Ahsan I, Anwar MW, Latif M, Azam F. A novel natural language processing (NLP) approach to automatically generate conceptual class model from initial software requirements. In International Conference on Information Science and Applications, pp. 476\u2013484. Springer, Singapore, 2017.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-10-4154-9_55"},{"key":"416_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kifetew F, Munante D, Perini A, Susi A, Siena A, Busetta P. DMGame: A gamified collaborative requirements prioritisation tool. In: 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 2017, pp. 468\u2013469, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2017.46.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.46"},{"issue":"10","key":"416_CR16","first-page":"193","volume":"8","author":"S Ahmad","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ahmad S, Jalil IEA, Ahmad SSS. An enhancement of software requirements negotiation with rule-based reasoning: a conceptual model. J Telecommun Electron Comput Eng (JTEC). 2016;8(10):193\u20138.","journal-title":"J Telecommun Electron Comput Eng (JTEC)"},{"issue":"10","key":"416_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1695","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2013.03.008","volume":"55","author":"H Meth","year":"2013","unstructured":"Meth H, Brhel M, Maedche A. The state of the art in automated requirements elicitation. Inf Softw Technol. 2013;55(10):1695\u2013709. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.infsof.2013.03.008.","journal-title":"Inf Softw Technol"},{"issue":"9","key":"416_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1291","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2009.04.001","volume":"51","author":"J Nicol\u00e1s","year":"2009","unstructured":"Nicol\u00e1s J, Toval A. On the generation of requirements specifications from software engineering models: a systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol. 2009;51(9):1291\u2013307. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.infsof.2009.04.001.","journal-title":"Inf Softw Technol"},{"issue":"2","key":"416_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2017.33","volume":"34","author":"EC Groen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Groen EC, et al. The crowd in requirements engineering: the landscape and challenges. IEEE Softw. 2017;34(2):44\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/MS.2017.33.","journal-title":"IEEE Softw"},{"key":"416_CR20","unstructured":"Ferguson M. Big data-why transaction data is mission critical to success. Intelligence Business Strategies Limited. https:\/\/public.dhe.ibm.com\/common\/ssi\/ecm\/im\/en\/iml14442usen\/IML14442USEN.PDF, 2014."},{"issue":"1","key":"416_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"48","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2015.153","volume":"33","author":"W Maalej","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maalej W, Nayebi M, Johann T, Ruhe G. Toward data-driven requirements engineering. IEEE Softw. 2016;33(1):48\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/MS.2015.153.","journal-title":"IEEE Softw"},{"key":"416_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2016.11.027","volume":"125","author":"N Genc-Nayebi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Genc-Nayebi N, Abran A. A systematic literature review: opinion mining studies from mobile app store user reviews. J Syst Softw. 2017;125:207\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2016.11.027.","journal-title":"J Syst Softw"},{"issue":"1","key":"416_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-018-00308-3","volume":"25","author":"M Ghasemi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ghasemi M, Amyot D. From event logs to goals: a systematic literature review of goal-oriented process mining. Requir Eng. 2019;25(1):67\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-018-00308-3.","journal-title":"Requir Eng"},{"key":"416_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-28244-0_2","volume-title":"Engineering and managing software requirements","author":"D Zowghi","year":"2005","unstructured":"Zowghi D, Coulin C. Requirements elicitation: A survey of technique, approaches and tools. In: Engineering and managing software requirements. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 19\u201346."},{"key":"416_CR25","unstructured":"Arruda D, Madhavji NH. State of requirements engineering research in the context of Big Data applications. In International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 307\u2013323."},{"issue":"9","key":"416_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2016.2630689","volume":"43","author":"W Martin","year":"2017","unstructured":"Martin W, Sarro F, Jia Y, Zhang Y, Harman M. A survey of app store analysis for software engineering. IEEE Trans Software Eng. 2017;43(9):817\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TSE.2016.2630689.","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Software Eng"},{"key":"416_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2018.05.037","volume":"113","author":"M Tavakoli","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tavakoli M, Zhao L, Heydari A, Nenadi\u0107 G. Extracting useful software development information from mobile application reviews: a survey of intelligent mining techniques and tools. Exp Syst Appl. 2018;113:186\u201399.","journal-title":"Exp Syst Appl"},{"key":"416_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"De Mauro A, Greco M, Grimaldi M. What is big data? A consensual definition and a review of key research topics. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol. 1644, no. 1, pp. 97\u2013104. American Institute of Physics, 2015, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/1.4907823.","DOI":"10.1063\/1.4907823"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"416_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.3233\/AO-150150","volume":"10","author":"I Morales-Ramirez","year":"2015","unstructured":"Morales-Ramirez I, Perini A, Guizzardi RSS. An ontology of online user feedback in software engineering. Appl Ontol. 2015;10(3\u20134):297\u2013330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/AO-150150.","journal-title":"Appl Ontol."},{"issue":"1","key":"416_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1007\/s41019-015-0004-7","volume":"1","author":"D Firmani","year":"2016","unstructured":"Firmani D, Mecella M, Scannapieco M, Batini C. On the meaningfulness of \u2018big data quality\u2019 (invited paper). Data Sci Eng. 2016;1(1):6\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s41019-015-0004-7.","journal-title":"Data Sci Eng"},{"key":"416_CR31","unstructured":"Kitchenham B, Charters S. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. 2007."},{"issue":"1","key":"416_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310","volume":"33","author":"JR Landis","year":"1977","unstructured":"Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2529310.","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"issue":"7","key":"416_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"778","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2011.10.019","volume":"65","author":"MA Rotondi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Rotondi MA, Donner A. A confidence interval approach to sample size estimation for interobserver agreement studies with multiple raters and outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(7):778\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2011.10.019.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"issue":"1","key":"416_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.2307\/25148625","volume":"28","author":"AR Hevner","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 2004;28(1):75\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/25148625.","journal-title":"MIS Quart"},{"key":"416_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dhinakaran VT, Pulle R, Ajmeri N, Murukannaiah PK. App review analysis via active learning: Reducing supervision effort without compromising classification accuracy. In 2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 170\u2013181. IEEE, 2018, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2018.00026.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2018.00026"},{"key":"416_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Do QA, Bhowmik T. Automated generation of creative software requirements: a data-driven approach. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Automated Specification Inference, pp. 9\u201312. 2018, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3278177.3278180.","DOI":"10.1145\/3278177.3278180"},{"key":"416_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Groen EC, Kopczynska S, Hauer MP, Krafft TD, Doerr J. Users-the hidden software product quality experts?: A study on how app users report quality aspects in online reviews. In 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 80\u201389. IEEE, 2017, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2017.73.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.73"},{"issue":"3","key":"416_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-016-0251-9","volume":"21","author":"W Maalej","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maalej W, Kurtanovi\u0107 Z, Nabil H, Stanik C. On the automatic classification of app reviews. Requir Eng. 2016;21(3):311\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-016-0251-9.","journal-title":"Requir Eng"},{"key":"416_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Maalej W, Nabil H. Bug report, feature request, or simply praise? On automatically classifying app reviews. In 2015 IEEE 23rd international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp. 116\u2013125. IEEE, 2015, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2015.7320414.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2015.7320414"},{"key":"416_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guzman E, Maalej W. How do users like this feature? A fine grained sentiment analysis of app reviews. In 2014 IEEE 22nd international requirements engineering conference (RE), pp. 153\u2013162. IEEE, 2014, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2014.6912257.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2014.6912257"},{"key":"416_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jiang W, Ruan H, Zhang L, Lew P, Jiang J. For user-driven software evolution: Requirements elicitation derived from mining online reviews. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 584\u2013595. Springer, Cham, 2014.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-06605-9_48"},{"key":"416_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lu M, Liang P. Automatic classification of non-functional requirements from augmented app user reviews. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 2017, pp. 344\u2013353.","DOI":"10.1145\/3084226.3084241"},{"key":"416_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Deocadez R, Harrison R, Rodriguez D. Automatically classifying requirements from app stores: A preliminary study. In 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), Sep. 2017, pp. 367\u2013371, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/REW.2017.58.","DOI":"10.1109\/REW.2017.58"},{"key":"416_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Abad ZSH, Sims SDV, Cheema A, Nasir MB, Harisinghani P. Learn more, pay less! Lessons learned from applying the wizard-of-oz technique for exploring mobile app requirements. In 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), Sep. 2017, pp. 132\u2013138, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/REW.2017.71.","DOI":"10.1109\/REW.2017.71"},{"key":"416_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Panichella S, Di Sorbo A, Guzman E, Visaggio CA, Canfora G, Gall HC. How can I improve my app? Classifying user reviews for software maintenance and evolution. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), pp. 281\u2013290. IEEE, 2015, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICSM.2015.7332474.","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSM.2015.7332474"},{"key":"416_CR46","unstructured":"Dalpiaz F, Parente M. RE-SWOT: From user feedback to requirements via competitor analysis. In International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, pp. 55\u201370. Springer, Cham, 2019."},{"issue":"2","key":"416_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.3390\/fi11020052","volume":"11","author":"L Zhao","year":"2019","unstructured":"Zhao L, Zhao A. Sentiment analysis based requirement evolution prediction. Fut Internet. 2019;11(2):52.","journal-title":"Fut Internet"},{"issue":"6","key":"416_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3734","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-018-9605-x","volume":"23","author":"N Jha","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jha N, Mahmoud A. Using frame semantics for classifying and summarizing application store reviews. Empir Softw Eng. 2018;23(6):3734\u201367.","journal-title":"Empir Softw Eng"},{"key":"416_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Luiz W, et al. A feature-oriented sentiment rating for mobile app reviews. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, pp. 1909\u20131918. 2018.","DOI":"10.1145\/3178876.3186168"},{"key":"416_CR50","unstructured":"Jha N, Mahmoud A. MARC: a mobile application review classifier. In REFSQ Workshops. 2017."},{"key":"416_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jha N, Mahmoud A. Mining user requirements from application store reviews using frame semantics. In International working conference on requirements engineering: Foundation for software quality, pp. 273\u2013287. Springer, Cham, 2017.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-54045-0_20"},{"key":"416_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carreno LVG, Winbladh K. Analysis of user comments: an approach for software requirements evolution. In 2013 35th international conference on software engineering (ICSE), pp. 582\u2013591. IEEE, 2013, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICSE.2013.6606604.","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSE.2013.6606604"},{"key":"416_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-48634-4_6","volume-title":"Requirements engineering in the big data era","author":"D Sun","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sun D, Peng R. A scenario model aggregation approach for mobile app requirements evolution based on user comments. In: Requirements engineering in the big data era. Berlin: Springer; 2015. p. 75\u201391."},{"key":"416_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Higashi K, Nakagawa H, Tsuchiya T. Improvement of user review classification using keyword expansion. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), pp. 125\u2013124. 2018.","DOI":"10.18293\/SEKE2018-047"},{"key":"416_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bakiu E, Guzman E. Which feature is unusable? Detecting usability and user experience issues from user reviews. In 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), pp. 182\u2013187. IEEE, 2017, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/REW.2017.76.","DOI":"10.1109\/REW.2017.76"},{"key":"416_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Srisopha K, Behnamghader P, Boehm B. Do users talk about the software in my product? Analyzing user reviews on IoT products. In the Proceedings of CIbSE XXI Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering (CIbSE), pp. 551\u2013564, 2018.","DOI":"10.19153\/cleiej.22.1.1"},{"key":"416_CR57","unstructured":"Groen EC, Iese F, Schowalter J, Kopczynska S. Is there really a need for using NLP to elicit requirements? A benchmarking study to assess scalability of manual analysis. In REFSQ Workshops. 2018."},{"key":"416_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-43610-3_4","volume-title":"Requirements engineering communications in computer and information science","author":"W Jiang","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jiang W, Ruan H, Zhang L. Analysis of economic impact of online reviews: an approach for market-driven requirements evolution. In: Zowghi D, Jin Z, editors. Requirements engineering communications in computer and information science, vol. 432. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 45\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-662-43610-3_4."},{"key":"416_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Buchan J, Bano M, Zowghi D, Volabouth P. Semi-automated extraction of new requirements from online reviews for software product evolution. In 2018 25th Australasian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC), pp. 31\u201340. IEEE, 2018.","DOI":"10.1109\/ASWEC.2018.00013"},{"key":"416_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zhang Z, Qi J, Zhu G. Mining customer requirement from helpful online reviews. 2014 Enterprise Systems Conference, pp. 249\u2013254. IEEE, 2014, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ES.2014.38.","DOI":"10.1109\/ES.2014.38"},{"key":"416_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1297","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2016.07.048","volume":"49","author":"NH Bakar","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bakar NH, Kasirun ZM, Salleh N, Jalab HA. Extracting features from online software reviews to aid requirements reuse. Appl Soft Comput J. 2016;49:1297\u2013315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asoc.2016.07.048.","journal-title":"Appl Soft Comput J"},{"key":"416_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bakar NH, Kasirun ZM, Salleh N. Terms extractions: an approach for requirements reuse. In 2015 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Security (ICISS), pp. 1\u20134. IEEE, 2015.\u2013254. IEEE, 2015, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ICISSEC.2015.7371034.","DOI":"10.1109\/ICISSEC.2015.7371034"},{"key":"416_CR63","unstructured":"Bakar NH, Kasirun ZM, Salleh N, Halim A. Extracting software features from online reviews to demonstrate requirements reuse in software engineering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing & Informatics, pp. 184\u2013190. 2017."},{"key":"416_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Williams G, Mahmoud A. Mining twitter feeds for software user requirements. In 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 1\u201310. IEEE, 2017, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2017.14.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.14"},{"key":"416_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stanik C, Haering M, Maalej W. Classifying multilingual user feedback using traditional machine learning and deep learning. In 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), pp. 220\u2013226. IEEE, 2019.","DOI":"10.1109\/REW.2019.00046"},{"issue":"8","key":"416_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4191","DOI":"10.3837\/tiis.2019.08.021","volume":"13","author":"N Ali","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ali N, Hwang S, Hong J-E. Your opinions let us know: mining social network sites to evolve software product lines. KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst. 2019;13(8):4191\u2013211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3837\/tiis.2019.08.021.","journal-title":"KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst"},{"issue":"9","key":"416_CR67","first-page":"45","volume":"10","author":"A Alwadain","year":"2019","unstructured":"Alwadain A, Alshargi M. Crowd-generated data mining for continuous requirements elicitation. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2019;10(9):45\u201350.","journal-title":"Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl"},{"key":"416_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guzman E, Ibrahim M, Glinz M. A little bird told me: Mining tweets for requirements and software evolution. In 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 11\u201320. IEEE, 2017, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2017.88.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.88"},{"issue":"3","key":"416_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-017-0274-x","volume":"22","author":"E Guzman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Guzman E, Alkadhi R, Seyff N. An exploratory study of twitter messages about software applications. Requir Eng. 2017;22(3):387\u2013412.","journal-title":"Requir Eng."},{"key":"416_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guzman E, Alkadhi R, Seyff N. A needle in a haystack: What do twitter users say about software? In 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 96\u2013105. IEEE, 2016, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2016.67.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2016.67"},{"key":"416_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kuehl N. Needmining: towards analytical support for service design. In International Conference on Exploring Services Science, pp. 187\u2013200. Springer, Cham, 2016.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-32689-4_14"},{"key":"416_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nguyen V, Svee EO, Zdravkovic J. A semi-automated method for capturing consumer preferences for system requirements. In IFIP Working Conference on The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, pp. 117\u2013132. Springer, Cham, 2016.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-48393-1_9"},{"key":"416_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Svee EO, Zdravkovic J. A model-based approach for capturing consumer preferences from crowdsources: the case of twitter. In 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 1\u201312. IEEE, 2016, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RCIS.2016.7549323.","DOI":"10.1109\/RCIS.2016.7549323"},{"key":"416_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Martens D, Maalej W. Extracting and analyzing context information in user-support conversations on twitter. In 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 131\u2013141. IEEE, 2019.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2019.00024"},{"key":"416_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Han X, Li R, Li W, Ding G, Qin S. User requirements dynamic elicitation of complex products from social network service. In 2019 25th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC), pp. 1\u20136. IEEE, 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.23919\/IConAC.2019.8895140.","DOI":"10.23919\/IConAC.2019.8895140"},{"issue":"4","key":"416_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.2753\/MIS0742-1222280402","volume":"28","author":"RE Vlas","year":"2012","unstructured":"Vlas RE, Robinson WN. Two rule-based natural language strategies for requirements discovery and classification in open source software development projects. J Manag Inf Syst. 2012;28(4):11\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2753\/MIS0742-1222280402.","journal-title":"J Manag Inf Syst"},{"key":"416_CR77","volume-title":"Requirements engineering in the big data era Communications in Computer and Information Science","author":"M Xiao","year":"2015","unstructured":"Xiao M, Yin G, Wang T, Yang C, Chen M. Requirement acquisition from social Q&A sites. In: Liu L, Aoyama M, editors. Requirements engineering in the big data era Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 558. Berlin: Springer; 2015."},{"issue":"10","key":"416_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1145\/1562764.1562784","volume":"52","author":"J Cleland-Huang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cleland-Huang J, Dumitru H, Duan C, Castro-Herrera C. Automated support for managing feature requests in open forums. Commun ACM. 2009;52(10):68\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1562764.1562784.","journal-title":"Commun ACM"},{"key":"416_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Morales-Ramirez I, Kifetew FM, Perini A. Analysis of online discussions in support of requirements discovery. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), pp. 159\u2013174. Springer, Cham, 2017, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-59536-8_11.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-59536-8_11"},{"issue":"3","key":"416_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"242","DOI":"10.1049\/iet-sen.2019.0262","volume":"14","author":"JA Khan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Khan JA, Liu L, Wen L. Requirements knowledge acquisition from online user forums. IET Softw. 2020;14(3):242\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1049\/iet-sen.2019.0262.","journal-title":"IET Softw"},{"key":"416_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Khan JA, Xie Y, Liu L, Wen L. Analysis of requirements-related arguments in user forums. In 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 63\u201374. IEEE, 2019.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2019.00018"},{"key":"416_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Khan JA. Mining requirements arguments from user forums. In 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 440\u2013445. IEEE, 2019.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2019.00059"},{"key":"416_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tizard J, Wang H, Yohannes L, Blincoe K. Can a conversation paint a picture? Mining Requirements in software forums. In 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 17\u201327. IEEE, 2019.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2019.00014"},{"key":"416_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2018.08.003","volume":"86","author":"I Morales-Ramirez","year":"2018","unstructured":"Morales-Ramirez I, Kifetew FM, Perini A. Speech-acts based analysis for requirements discovery from online discussions. Inf Syst. 2018;86:94\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.is.2018.08.003.","journal-title":"Inf Syst"},{"key":"416_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Merten T, Falis M, H\u00fcbner P, Quirchmayr T, B\u00fcrsner S, Paech B. Software feature request detection in issue tracking systems. In 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 166\u2013175. IEEE, 2016, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2016.8.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2016.8"},{"key":"416_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Portugal RLQ, Do Prado Leite JCS, Almentero E. Time-constrained requirements elicitation: Reusing GitHub content. In 2015 IEEE Workshop on Just-In-Time Requirements Engineering (JITRE), pp. 5\u20138. IEEE, 2015, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/JITRE.2015.7330171.","DOI":"10.1109\/JITRE.2015.7330171"},{"key":"416_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nyamawe AS, Liu H, Niu N, Umer Q, Niu Z. Automated recommendation of software refactorings based on feature requests. In 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 187\u2013198. IEEE, 2019.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2019.00029"},{"key":"416_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Franch X, et al. Data-driven elicitation, assessment and documentation of quality requirements in agile software development. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 587\u2013602. Springer, Cham, 2018.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-91563-0_36"},{"key":"416_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11219-020-09509-y","author":"M Oriol","year":"2020","unstructured":"Oriol M, et al. Data-driven and tool-supported elicitation of quality requirements in agile companies. Softw Qual J. 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11219-020-09509-y.","journal-title":"Softw Qual J."},{"key":"416_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Do QA, Chekuri SR, Bhowmik T. Automated support to capture creative requirements via requirements reuse. In International Conference on Software and Systems Reuse, pp. 47\u201363. Springer, Cham, 2019, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-22888-0_4.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-22888-0_4"},{"issue":"2","key":"416_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1183","DOI":"10.3233\/JIFS-169892","volume":"36","author":"Y Kang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kang Y, Li H, Lu C, Pu B. A transfer learning algorithm for automatic requirement model generation. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2019;36(2):1183\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/JIFS-169892.","journal-title":"J Intell Fuzzy Syst."},{"key":"416_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang C, Zhang F, Liang P, Daneva M, van Sinderen M. Can app changelogs improve requirements classification from app reviews?: An exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM\/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 1\u20134. 2018, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3239235.3267428.","DOI":"10.1145\/3239235.3267428"},{"key":"416_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang C, Wang T, Liang P, Daneva M, Van Sinderen M. Augmenting app reviews with app changelogs: An approach for app reviews classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), pp. 398\u2013512. 2019, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18293\/SEKE2019-176.","DOI":"10.18293\/SEKE2019-176"},{"key":"416_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Johann T, Stanik C, Maalej W. SAFE: A simple approach for feature extraction from app descriptions and app reviews. In 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 21\u201330. IEEE, 2017, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2017.71.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2017.71"},{"issue":"2","key":"416_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"021010","DOI":"10.1115\/1.4041948","volume":"141","author":"H Voet","year":"2019","unstructured":"Voet H, Altenhof M, Ellerich M, Schmitt RH, Linke B. A framework for the capture and analysis of product usage data for continuous product improvement. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2019;141(2):021010.","journal-title":"J Manuf Sci Eng"},{"key":"416_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Liang W, Qian W, Wu Y, Peng X, Zhao W. Mining context-aware user requirements from crowd contributed mobile data. In Proceedings of the 7th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware, pp. 132\u2013140. 2015, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2875913.2875933.","DOI":"10.1145\/2875913.2875933"},{"key":"416_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2017.06.071","volume":"132","author":"H Xie","year":"2017","unstructured":"Xie H, Yang J, Chang CK, Liu L. A statistical analysis approach to predict user\u2019s changing requirements for software service evolution. J Syst Softw. 2017;132:147\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jss.2017.06.071.","journal-title":"J Syst Softw"},{"key":"416_CR98","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yang J, Chang CK, Ming H. A situation-centric approach to identifying new user intentions using the mtl method. In 2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), vol. 1, pp. 347\u2013356. IEEE, 2017.","DOI":"10.1109\/COMPSAC.2017.36"},{"key":"416_CR99","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"W\u00fcest D, Fotrousi F, Fricker S. Combining monitoring and autonomous feedback requests to elicit actionable knowledge of system use. In International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality, pp. 209\u2013225. Springer, Cham, 2019.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-15538-4_16"},{"key":"416_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Takahashi H, Nakagawa H, Tsuchiya T. Towards automatic requirements elicitation from feedback comments: Extracting requirements topics using LDA. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), pp. 489\u2013494. 2015, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18293\/SEKE2015-103.","DOI":"10.18293\/SEKE2015-103"},{"key":"416_CR101","unstructured":"Dhinakaran VT, Pulle R, Ajmeri N, Murukannaiah PK. App review analysis via active learning. In 2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 170\u2013181. IEEE, 2018."},{"issue":"9","key":"416_CR102","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"848","DOI":"10.17706\/jsw.11.9.848-869","volume":"11","author":"SA Licorish","year":"2016","unstructured":"Licorish SA. Exploring the prevalence and evolution of android concerns: a community viewpoint. JSW. 2016;11(9):848\u201369.","journal-title":"JSW"},{"key":"416_CR103","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tizard J, Wang H, Yohannes L, Blincoe K. Can a conversation paint a picture? Mining requirements in software forums. In 2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 17\u201327. IEEE, 2019, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/RE.2019.00014.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2019.00014"},{"key":"416_CR104","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Al Kilani N, Tailakh R, Hanani A. Automatic classification of apps reviews for requirement engineering: Exploring the customers need from healthcare applications. In 2019 6th International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS), pp. 541\u2013548. IEEE, 2019, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/SNAMS.2019.8931820.","DOI":"10.1109\/SNAMS.2019.8931820"},{"key":"416_CR105","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yan X, Guo J, Lan Y, Cheng X. A biterm topic model for short texts. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1445\u20131456. 2013.","DOI":"10.1145\/2488388.2488514"},{"key":"416_CR106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Merten T, Falis M, H\u00fcbner P, Quirchmayr T, B\u00fcrsner S, Paech B. Software feature request detection in issue tracking systems. In 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 166\u2013175. IEEE, 2016.","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2016.8"},{"issue":"1","key":"416_CR107","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.4018\/jswis.2012010101","volume":"8","author":"P Barnaghi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Barnaghi P, Wang W, Henson C, Taylor K. Semantics for the internet of things: early progress and back to the future. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst (IJSWIS). 2012;8(1):1\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4018\/jswis.2012010101.","journal-title":"Int J Semant Web Inf Syst (IJSWIS)"},{"issue":"7","key":"416_CR108","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.1162\/neco.1996.8.7.1341","volume":"8","author":"DH Wolpert","year":"1996","unstructured":"Wolpert DH. The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms. Neural Comput. 1996;8(7):1341\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/neco.1996.8.7.1341.","journal-title":"Neural Comput"},{"key":"416_CR109","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-10632-8","volume-title":"An introduction to design science","author":"P Johannesson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Johannesson P, Perjons E. An introduction to design science. Berlin: Springer; 2014."},{"key":"416_CR110","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berry DM. Evaluation of tools for hairy requirements engineering and software engineering tasks. In 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW), pp. 284\u2013291. IEEE, 2017.","DOI":"10.1109\/REW.2017.25"},{"issue":"3","key":"416_CR111","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1007\/s10994-014-5439-y","volume":"98","author":"G Dimitroff","year":"2015","unstructured":"Dimitroff G, Georgiev G, Tolo\u015fi L, Popov B. Efficient F measure maximization via weighted maximum likelihood. Mach Learn. 2015;98(3):435\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10994-014-5439-y.","journal-title":"Mach Learn"}],"container-title":["SN Computer Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s42979-020-00416-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s42979-020-00416-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s42979-020-00416-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,2,9]],"date-time":"2021-02-09T21:02:31Z","timestamp":1612904551000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s42979-020-00416-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,4]]},"references-count":111,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,2]]}},"alternative-id":["416"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s42979-020-00416-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["2662-995X","2661-8907"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2662-995X","type":"print"},{"value":"2661-8907","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 March 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 December 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 January 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with Ethical Standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"16"}}