{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,2]],"date-time":"2026-04-02T08:22:21Z","timestamp":1775118141971,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":90,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,1]],"date-time":"2025-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1743465600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,3]],"date-time":"2025-04-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1743638400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":2,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Digit. Soc."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>International regulation of autonomous weapon systems (AWS) is increasingly conceived as an exercise in risk management. This requires a shared approach for assessing the risks of AWS. This paper presents a structured approach to risk assessment and regulation for AWS, adapting a qualitative framework inspired by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It examines the interactions among key risk factors\u2014determinants, drivers, and types\u2014to evaluate the risk magnitude of AWS and establish risk tolerance thresholds through a risk matrix informed by background knowledge of event likelihood and severity. Further, it proposes a methodology to assess community risk appetite, emphasising that such assessments and resulting tolerance levels should be determined through deliberation in a multistakeholder forum. The paper highlights the complexities of applying risk-based regulations to AWS internationally, particularly the challenge of defining a global community for risk assessment and regulatory legitimisation.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s44206-025-00181-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,5]],"date-time":"2025-04-05T03:33:12Z","timestamp":1743823992000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["A Risk-Based Regulatory Approach To Autonomous Weapon Systems"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"4","author":[{"given":"Alexander","family":"Blanchard","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Claudio","family":"Novelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luciano","family":"Floridi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1181-649X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mariarosaria","family":"Taddeo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,3]]},"reference":[{"issue":"January","key":"181_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ress.2017.08.014","volume":"169","author":"E Abrahamsen","year":"2018","unstructured":"Abrahamsen, E., Bjorheim, H. B., Abrahamsen, M. F., Milazzo, & Jon T\u00f8mmer\u00e5s, S. (2018). Using the ALARP principle for safety management in the energy production sector of chemical industry. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 169(January), 160\u2013165. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ress.2017.08.014","journal-title":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety"},{"key":"181_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14410","DOI":"10.1109\/ACCESS.2018.2807385","volume":"6","author":"N Akhtar","year":"2018","unstructured":"Akhtar, N., & Mian, A. (2018). Threat of adversarial attacks on deep learning in computer vision: A survey. Ieee Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 6, 14410\u201314430. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ACCESS.2018.2807385","journal-title":"Ieee Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions"},{"issue":"3","key":"181_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"294","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9337.00157","volume":"13","author":"R Alexy","year":"2000","unstructured":"Alexy, R. (2000). On the structure of legal principles. Ratio Juris, 13(3), 294\u2013304. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1467-9337.00157","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"},{"key":"181_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anderson, K., & Waxman, M. C. (2017). Debating autonomous weapon systems, their ethics, and their regulation under international law. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY. https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/abstract=2978359","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199680832.013.33"},{"issue":"2","key":"181_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x","volume":"28","author":"TC Anthony Jr","year":"2008","unstructured":"Anthony, T. & Cox Jr, L. (2008). What\u2019s wrong with risk matrices?? Risk Analysis, 28(2), 497\u2013512. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x","journal-title":"Risk Analysis"},{"key":"181_CR6","unstructured":"Automated Decision Research. (2023). Convergences in state positions on human control. Automated Decision Research."},{"key":"181_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aven, T. (2015). Risk analysis (2nd ed.). Wiley. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9781119057819.ch2","DOI":"10.1002\/9781119057819.ch2"},{"key":"181_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aven, T. (2017). Improving risk characterisations in practical situations by highlighting knowledge aspects, with applications to risk matrices. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Special Section: Applications of Probabilistic Graphical Models in Dependability, Diagnosis and Prognosis, 167 (November):42\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ress.2017.05.006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ress.2017.05.006"},{"issue":"2","key":"181_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1111\/risa.12584","volume":"36","author":"T Aven","year":"2016","unstructured":"Aven, T., & Cox Jr, L. A. (2016). National and global risk studies: How can the field of risk analysis contribute?? Risk Analysis, 36(2), 186\u2013190. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/risa.12584","journal-title":"Risk Analysis"},{"issue":"8","key":"181_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1074","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssci.2011.04.015","volume":"49","author":"T Aven","year":"2011","unstructured":"Aven, T., Renn, O., & Rosa, E. A. (2011). On the ontological status of the concept of risk. Safety Science, 49(8), 1074\u20131079. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ssci.2011.04.015","journal-title":"Safety Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"181_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2202\/1938-2545.1041","volume":"4","author":"A Barak","year":"2010","unstructured":"Barak, A. (2010). Proportionality and principled balancing. Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 4(1), 1\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2202\/1938-2545.1041","journal-title":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights"},{"issue":"1","key":"181_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.1002\/prs.11599","volume":"33","author":"P Baybutt","year":"2014","unstructured":"Baybutt, P. (2014). The ALARP principle in process safety. Process Safety Progress, 33(1), 36\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/prs.11599","journal-title":"Process Safety Progress"},{"key":"181_CR14","unstructured":"Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage."},{"key":"181_CR15","unstructured":"Bhuta, N., & Stavros-Evdokimos Pantazopoulos (2016). Autonomy and Uncertainty: Increasingly Autonomous Weapons Systems and the International Legal Regulation of Risk. In Autonomous Weapons Systes: Law, Ethics, Policy, edited by Nehal Bhuta, Susanne Beck, Robin Gei\u03b2, Hin-Yan Liu, and Claus Kre\u03b2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"December","key":"181_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1016\/j.patcog.2018.07.023","volume":"84","author":"B Biggio","year":"2018","unstructured":"Biggio, B., & Roli, F. (2018). Wild patterns: Ten years after the rise of adversarial machine learning. Pattern Recognition, 84(December), 317\u2013331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.patcog.2018.07.023","journal-title":"Pattern Recognition"},{"key":"181_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Blanchard, A. (2023a). Autonomous force beyond armed conflict. Minds and Machines, March. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-023-09627-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-023-09627-z"},{"issue":"0","key":"181_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/15027570.2022.2157952","volume":"0","author":"A Blanchard","year":"2023","unstructured":"Blanchard, A., & Taddeo, M. (2023b). Jus in Bello necessity, the requirement of minimal force, and autonomous weapons systems. Journal of Military Ethics, 0(0), 1\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15027570.2022.2157952","journal-title":"Journal of Military Ethics"},{"key":"181_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Blanchard, A. & Bruun, L. (2024). Bias in military artificial intelligence. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.55163\/CJFT9557","DOI":"10.55163\/CJFT9557"},{"key":"181_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Blanchard, A., & Taddeo, M. (2022). Autonomous weapon systems and Jus ad bellum. AI & SOCIETY. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-022-01425-y. March.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-022-01425-y"},{"key":"181_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Blanchard, A., Thomas, C., & Taddeo, M. (2024). Ethical governance of artificial intelligence for defence: Normative tradeoffs for principle to practice guidance. AI & SOCIETY. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-024-01866-7. February.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-024-01866-7"},{"issue":"3","key":"181_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1017\/S0260210517000614","volume":"44","author":"I Bode","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bode, I., & Huelss, H. (2018). Autonomous weapons systems and changing norms in international relations. Review of International Studies, 44(3), 393\u2013413. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0260210517000614","journal-title":"Review of International Studies"},{"key":"181_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bongiovanni, G. & Valentini, C. (2018). Balancing, Proportionality and Constitutional Rights\u2019. In Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation, edited by Giorgio Bongiovanni, Gerald Postema, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Chiara Valentini, and Douglas Walton, 581\u2013612. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-90-481-9452-0_20","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-9452-0_20"},{"key":"181_CR25","unstructured":"Boulanin, V. (2015). Implementing Article 36 Weapon Reviews in the Light on Increasing Autonomy in Weapon Systems. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https:\/\/www.sipri.org\/sites\/default\/files\/files\/insight\/SIPRIInsight1501.pdf"},{"key":"181_CR26","unstructured":"Boulanin, V., Carlsson, M. P., Goussac, N. & Davidson, D. (2020). Limits on Autonomy in Weapon Systems: Identifying Practical Elements of Human Control\u2019. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute and the International Committee of the Red Cross. https:\/\/www.sipri.org\/publications\/2020\/other-publications\/limits-autonomy-weapon-systems-identifying-practical-elements-human-control-0"},{"key":"181_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bruun, L. (2024). Towards a Two-Tiered approach to regulation of autonomous weapon systems: Identifying pathways and possible elements. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.55163\/LPED7967","DOI":"10.55163\/LPED7967"},{"key":"181_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Canellas, M. C., & Haga, R. A. (2015). Toward Meaningful Human Control of Autonomous Weapons Systems through Function Allocation. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS), 1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ISTAS.2015.7439432","DOI":"10.1109\/ISTAS.2015.7439432"},{"key":"181_CR29","unstructured":"CCW GGE (2019). Guiding principles affirmed by Th group of governmental experts on emerging technologies in the area of lethal autonomous weapons system (Annex III). In, CCW\/MSP\/2019\/9. https:\/\/www.ccdcoe.org\/uploads\/2020\/02\/UN-191213_CCW-MSP-Final-report-Annex-III_Guiding-Principles-affirmed-by-GGE.pdf.Geneva, SwitzerlandUnited Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs."},{"key":"181_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chandler, K. (2021). Does Military AI Have Gender? Understanding Bias And Promoting Ethical Approaches In Military Applications of AI. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37559\/GEN\/2021\/04","DOI":"10.37559\/GEN\/2021\/04"},{"key":"181_CR31","first-page":"65","volume":"23","author":"T Chengeta","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chengeta, T. (2016). Are autonomous weapons systems the subject of Article 36 of additional protocol I to the Geneva conventions. UC Davis J Int\u2019l L & Pol\u2019y, 23, 65.","journal-title":"UC Davis J Int\u2019l L & Pol\u2019y"},{"key":"181_CR32","unstructured":"Conway, M. (2020). Smashing the Patriarchy The Feminist Case Against Killer Robots\u2019. Centre for Feminist Foreign Policy. https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/57cd7cd9d482e9784e4ccc34\/t\/5f356f1e5eb59d07e78fb329\/1597337376556\/Smashing+the+Patriarchy_+The+Feminist+Case+Against+Killer+Robots.pdf"},{"key":"181_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Copeland, D., Liivoja, R., & Sanders, L. (2022). The Utility of Weapons Reviews in Addressing Concerns Raised by Autonomous Weapon Systems. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, November. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jcsl\/krac035","DOI":"10.1093\/jcsl\/krac035"},{"issue":"July","key":"181_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssci.2015.02.014","volume":"76","author":"NJ Duijm","year":"2015","unstructured":"Duijm, N. J. (2015). Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices. Safety Science, 76(July), 21\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ssci.2015.02.014","journal-title":"Safety Science"},{"issue":"6","key":"181_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.1111\/pops.12629","volume":"40","author":"A Edney-Browne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Edney-Browne, A. (2019). The psychosocial effects of drone violence: Social isolation, Self\u2010Objectification, and depoliticization. Political Psychology, 40(6), 1341\u20131356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/pops.12629","journal-title":"Political Psychology"},{"key":"181_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Etzioni, A. (2018). Pros and Cons of Autonomous Weapons Systems (with Oren Etzioni). In Happiness Is the Wrong Metric: A Liberal Communitarian Response to Populism, edited by Amitai Etzioni, 253\u201363. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-69623-2_16","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-69623-2_16"},{"key":"181_CR37","first-page":"35","volume":"93","author":"J Farrant","year":"2017","unstructured":"Farrant, J., & Christopher, M. F. (2017). Autonomous weapons and weapon reviews: The UK second international weapon review forum. International Law Studies, 93, 35.","journal-title":"International Law Studies"},{"issue":"922","key":"181_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"278","DOI":"10.1017\/S1816383122000881","volume":"105","author":"M Figueroa","year":"2023","unstructured":"Figueroa, M., D\u00edaz, A. H., Orozco, J., Mart\u00ednez, & Wanda Mu\u00f1oz, J. (2023). The risks of autonomous weapons: An analysis centred on the rights of persons with disabilities. International Review of the Red Cross, 105(922), 278\u2013305. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1816383122000881","journal-title":"International Review of the Red Cross"},{"issue":"December","key":"181_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ress.2015.07.008","volume":"144","author":"R Flage","year":"2015","unstructured":"Flage, R., & Aven, T. (2015). Emerging Risk \u2013 Conceptual definition and a relation to black Swan type of events. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 144(December), 61\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ress.2015.07.008","journal-title":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety"},{"key":"181_CR40","unstructured":"Geiss, R. (2016). Autonomous Weapons Systems: Risk Management and State Responsibility. Geneva."},{"key":"181_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Holland Michel, A. (2020). The Black Box, Unlocked: Predictability and Understandability in Military AI. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37559\/SecTec\/20\/AI1","DOI":"10.37559\/SecTec\/20\/AI1"},{"key":"181_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Horowitz, M. C. (2021). When speed kills: Lethal autonomous weapon systems, deterrence and stability. Emerging technologies and international stability. Routledge.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781003179917-6"},{"key":"181_CR43","first-page":"117","volume":"51","author":"SS Hua","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hua, S. S. (2019). Machine learning weapons and international humanitarian law: Rethinking meaningful human control. Geo J Int\u2019l L, 51, 117.","journal-title":"Geo J Int\u2019l L"},{"key":"181_CR44","unstructured":"ICRC. (2021). ICRC position on autonomous weapon systems & background paper. International Committee of the Red Cross."},{"key":"181_CR45","unstructured":"ICRC (2022). Autonomous Weapons: The ICRC Remains Confident That States Will Adopt New Rules. Statement. International Committee of the Red Cross. 11 March 2022. https:\/\/www.icrc.org\/en\/document\/icrc-autonomous-adopt-new-rules"},{"issue":"2","key":"181_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1080\/03071847.2020.1752026","volume":"165","author":"J Johnson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Johnson, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence, drone swarming and escalation risks in future warfare. The RUSI Journal, 165(2), 26\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03071847.2020.1752026","journal-title":"The RUSI Journal"},{"key":"181_CR47","unstructured":"Laird, B. (2020). The risks of autonomous weapons systems for crisis stability and conflict escalation in future U.S.-Russia Confrontations. RAND Corporation. 3 June 2020. https:\/\/www.rand.org\/blog\/2020\/06\/the-risks-of-autonomous-weapons-systems-for-crisis.html"},{"issue":"1","key":"181_CR48","first-page":"48","volume":"12","author":"N Leys","year":"2018","unstructured":"Leys, N. (2018). Autonomous weapon systems and international crises. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 12(1), 48\u201373.","journal-title":"Strategic Studies Quarterly"},{"key":"181_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Longpre, S., Storm, M., & Shah, R. (2022). Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems & Artificial intelligence: Trends, Challenges, and Policies. Edited by Kevin McDermott. MIT Science Policy Review, 3 (August):47\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.38105\/spr.360apm5typ","DOI":"10.38105\/spr.360apm5typ"},{"key":"181_CR11","unstructured":"Margalit, A. & Walzer, M. (2009). Israel: Civilians & combatants. The New York Review of Books."},{"key":"181_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Markowski, A. S., & Sam Mannan, M. (2008). Fuzzy Risk Matrix. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Papers Presented at the 2006 Annual Symposium of the Mary Kay O\u2019Connor Process Safety Center, 159(1):152\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jhazmat.2008.03.055","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jhazmat.2008.03.055"},{"issue":"3","key":"181_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"387","DOI":"10.1093\/jcsl\/krac021","volume":"27","author":"T McFarland","year":"2022","unstructured":"McFarland, T. (2022). Minimum levels of human intervention in autonomous attacks. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 27(3), 387\u2013409. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jcsl\/krac021","journal-title":"Journal of Conflict and Security Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"181_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-023-09688-9","volume":"25","author":"T McFarland","year":"2023","unstructured":"McFarland, T., & Assaad, Z. (2023). Legal reviews of in situ learning in autonomous weapons. Ethics and Information Technology, 25(1), 9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-023-09688-9","journal-title":"Ethics and Information Technology"},{"issue":"4","key":"181_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1088-4963.2010.01196.x","volume":"38","author":"J McMahan","year":"2010","unstructured":"McMahan, J. (2010). The just distribution of harm between combatants and noncombatants: The just distribution of harm between combatants and noncombatants. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38(4), 342\u2013379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1088-4963.2010.01196.x","journal-title":"Philosophy & Public Affairs"},{"key":"181_CR54","unstructured":"Meier, M. W. (2016). Lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS): Conducting A comprehensive weapons review. Temp Int\u2019l & Comp LJ 30."},{"key":"181_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Melzer, N. (2008). The Principle of Distinction under International Humanitarian Law\u2019. In Targeted Killing in International Law, edited by Nils Melzer, 0. Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199533169.003.0011","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199533169.003.0011"},{"key":"181_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Meyer, T., & Reniers, G. (2022). Engineering risk management. In Engineering Risk Management. De Gruyter. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9783110665338","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110665338"},{"issue":"4","key":"181_CR57","first-page":"407","volume":"36","author":"C Mitchell","year":"2019","unstructured":"Mitchell, C. (2019). When laws govern laws: A review of the 2018 discussions of the group of governmental experts on the implementation and regulation of lethal autonomous weapons systems student notes. Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal, 36(4), 407\u2013432.","journal-title":"Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal"},{"key":"181_CR58","unstructured":"Molyneux, B. S. & Camilla. (2021). The Human Cost of Remote Warfare in Yemen\u2019. In Remote Warfare: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. E-International Relations. https:\/\/www.e-ir.info\/2021\/02\/16\/the-human-cost-of-remote-warfare-in-yemen\/"},{"key":"181_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moore, C. (1990). Unpredictability and undecidability in dynamical systems. Physical Review Letters, 64(20), 2354\u20132357.","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.64.2354"},{"key":"181_CR59","unstructured":"Mu\u00f1oz, W., Mariana, & D\u00edaz (2021). The Risks of Autonomous Weapons: An Intersectional Analysis. SEHLAC. https:\/\/img1.wsimg.com\/blobby\/go\/98c6dc90-096f-4389-9309-f1a33c0cad73\/downloads\/SEHLAC%20Autonomous%20Weapons%20and%20Interseccionalit.pdf?ver=1689286516267"},{"key":"181_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Musiolik, T. H., & Cheok, A. D. (Eds.). (2021). Analyzing future applications of AI, sensors, and robotics in society: Advances in computational intelligence and robotics. IGI Global. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4018\/978-1-7998-3499-1","DOI":"10.4018\/978-1-7998-3499-1"},{"issue":"10","key":"181_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssci.2010.04.005","volume":"48","author":"H Ni","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ni, H., Chen, A., & Chen, N. (2010). Some extensions on risk matrix approach. Safety Science, 48(10), 1269\u20131278. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ssci.2010.04.005","journal-title":"Safety Science"},{"key":"181_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"NIST. (2023). AI risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0)\u2019. NIST AI 100-1. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6028\/NIST.AI.100-1","DOI":"10.6028\/NIST.AI.100-1"},{"issue":"1","key":"181_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1007\/s44206-024-00095-1","volume":"3","author":"C Novelli","year":"2024","unstructured":"Novelli, C., Casolari, F., Rotolo, A., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2024). AI risk assessment: A Scenario-Based, proportional methodology for the AI act. Digital Society, 3(1), 13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s44206-024-00095-1","journal-title":"Digital Society"},{"issue":"4","key":"181_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"680","DOI":"10.2307\/2193409","volume":"39","author":"L Nurick","year":"1945","unstructured":"Nurick, L. (1945). The distinction between combatant and noncombatant in the law of war. American Journal of International Law, 39(4), 680\u2013697. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2193409","journal-title":"American Journal of International Law"},{"issue":"1","key":"181_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.2307\/3505049","volume":"20","author":"B Orend","year":"2001","unstructured":"Orend, B. (2001). Just and lawful conduct in war: Reflections on Michael Walzer. Law and Philosophy, 20(1), 1\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/3505049","journal-title":"Law and Philosophy"},{"key":"181_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Peel, J. (Ed.). (2010). Global risk governance and its legitimacy. Science and risk regulation in international law (pp. 12\u201357). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Lawhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511779879.003","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511779879.003"},{"key":"181_CR66","first-page":"146","volume":"76","author":"G Quinn","year":"2021","unstructured":"Quinn, G. (2021). Report of the special rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities. UN Doc A, 76, 146. https:\/\/documents.un.org\/doc\/undoc\/gen\/n21\/196\/98\/pdf\/n2119698.pdf?token=Zv9opyjmTJwPDE7rnf&fe=true","journal-title":"UN Doc A"},{"key":"181_CR67","unstructured":"Ramsay-Jones, H. (2019). Racism and Fully Autonomous Weapons. Soka Gakkai International. https:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/sites\/default\/files\/Documents\/Issues\/Racism\/SR\/Call\/campaigntostopkillerrobots.pdf"},{"key":"181_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rice, H. G. (1956). On completely recursively enumerable classes and their key arrays. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 21(3), 304\u2013308. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2269105","DOI":"10.2307\/2269105"},{"key":"181_CR69","unstructured":"Roff, H. M. & Moyes, R. (2016). Meaningful Human Control, Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Weapons. In Briefing Paper Prepared for the Informal Meeting of Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems, UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, Geneva, Switzerland."},{"issue":"1","key":"181_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1080\/15027570.2018.1481907","volume":"17","author":"HM Roff","year":"2018","unstructured":"Roff, H. M., & Danks, D. (2018). Trust but verify: The difficulty of trusting autonomous weapons systems. Journal of Military Ethics, 17(1), 2\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15027570.2018.1481907","journal-title":"Journal of Military Ethics"},{"issue":"2","key":"181_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1037\/pac0000601","volume":"28","author":"O Rosendorf","year":"2022","unstructured":"Rosendorf, O., Smetana, M., & Vranka, M. (2022). Autonomous weapons and ethical judgments: Experimental evidence on attitudes toward the military use of killer robots. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 28(2), 177\u2013183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/pac0000601","journal-title":"Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology"},{"issue":"3429","key":"181_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"741","DOI":"10.1126\/science.132.3429.741","volume":"132","author":"AL Samuel","year":"1960","unstructured":"Samuel, A. L. (1960). Some moral and technical consequences of Automation\u2013A refutation. Science, 132(3429), 741\u2013742. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.132.3429.741","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"8","key":"181_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1419","DOI":"10.1017\/S2071832200002339","volume":"14","author":"G Sartor","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sartor, G. (2013). The logic of proportionality: Reasoning with Non-Numerical magnitudes. German Law Journal, 14(8), 1419\u20131456. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S2071832200002339","journal-title":"German Law Journal"},{"key":"181_CR73","unstructured":"Sassoli, M. (2014). Autonomous Weapons and International Humanitarian Law: Advantages, Open Technical Questions and Legal Issues to Be Clarified. International Law Studies 90 (1). https:\/\/digital-commons.usnwc.edu\/ils\/vol90\/iss1\/1"},{"key":"181_CR74","unstructured":"Scharre, P. (2016). Autonomous weapons and operational risk. Center for a New American Security."},{"key":"181_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schwarz, E. (2021). Autonomous Weapons Systems, Artificial Intelligence, and the Problem of Meaningful Human Control. Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence. https:\/\/qmro.qmul.ac.uk\/xmlui\/bitstream\/handle\/123456789\/74360\/Schwarz%20Autonomous%20Weapons%20Systems,%20Artificial%20Intelligence,%20and%20the%20Problem%20of%20Meaningful%20Human%20Control%202021%20Accepted.pdf?sequence=2","DOI":"10.22618\/TP.PJCV.20215.1.139004"},{"issue":"4","key":"181_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oneear.2021.03.005","volume":"4","author":"NP Simpson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Simpson, N. P., Katharine, J., Mach, A., Constable, J., Hess, R., Hogarth, M., Howden, J., Lawrence, et al. (2021). A framework for complex climate change risk assessment. One Earth, 4(4), 489\u2013501. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.oneear.2021.03.005","journal-title":"One Earth"},{"key":"181_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taddeo, M. (2024). The ethics of artificial intelligence in defence. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780197745441.001.0001"},{"issue":"5","key":"181_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-022-00392-3","volume":"28","author":"M Taddeo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Taddeo, M., & Blanchard, A. (2022). A comparative analysis of the definitions of autonomous weapons systems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(5), 37. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-022-00392-3","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"181_CR79","unstructured":"Taddeo, M., Ziosi, M., Tsamados, A., Gilli, L., & Kurapati, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for National security: The predictability problem. Centre for Emerging Technology and Security."},{"key":"181_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Thurnher, J. S. (2018). Feasible Precautions in Attack and Autonomous Weapons. In Dehumanization of Warfare: Legal Implications of New Weapon Technologies, edited by Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg, Robert Frau, and Tassilo Singer, 99\u2013117. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-67266-3_6","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-67266-3_6"},{"key":"181_CR81","unstructured":"UKHSE (2001). Risk Management: Expert Guidance - ALARP at a Glance. 2001. https:\/\/www.hse.gov.uk\/managing\/theory\/alarpglance.htm"},{"key":"181_CR82","unstructured":"UN Women (2023). Women Are Increasingly At-Risk in Conflict, Underrepresented in Peace Processes, According to UN Secretary-General Report. UN Women \u2013 Headquarters. 24 October 2023. https:\/\/www.unwomen.org\/en\/news-stories\/feature-story\/2023\/10\/women-are-increasingly-at-risk-in-conflict-underrepresented-in-peace-processes-according-to-un-secretary-general-report"},{"key":"181_CR83","unstructured":"United Nations Human Rights Council (2022). 51\/22 Human Rights Implications of New and Emerging Technologies in the Military Domain. Resolution Adopted by the Human Rights Council on 7 October 2022. A\/HRC\/RES\/51\/22. New York: United Nations General Assembly. https:\/\/documents-dds-ny.un.org\/doc\/UNDOC\/GEN\/G22\/520\/64\/PDF\/G2252064.pdf?OpenElement"},{"key":"181_CR24","unstructured":"van den Boogaard, J. (2024). Warning! Obstacles Ahead! The Regulation of Autonomous Weapons Systems in the GGE LAWS. Opinio Juris (blog). 4 March 2024. https:\/\/opiniojuris.org\/2024\/03\/04\/warning-obstacles-ahead-the-regulation-of-autonomous-weapons-systems-in-the-gge-laws\/"},{"key":"181_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walzer, M. (1977). Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations. Basic Books.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1748-0922.1978.tb00022.x"},{"issue":"1","key":"181_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1186\/s40537-016-0043-6","volume":"3","author":"K Weiss","year":"2016","unstructured":"Weiss, K., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., DingDing, & Wang (2016). A survey of transfer learning. Journal of Big Data, 3(1), 9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40537-016-0043-6","journal-title":"Journal of Big Data"},{"issue":"3410","key":"181_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.1126\/science.131.3410.1355","volume":"131","author":"N Wiener","year":"1960","unstructured":"Wiener, N. (1960). Some moral and technical consequences of automation. Science, 131(3410), 1355\u20131358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.131.3410.1355","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"181_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1093\/jcsl\/krac001","volume":"27","author":"E Winter","year":"2022","unstructured":"Winter, E. (2022). The compatibility of autonomous weapons with the principles of international humanitarian law. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 27(1), 1\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jcsl\/krac001","journal-title":"Journal of Conflict and Security Law"}],"container-title":["Digital Society"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s44206-025-00181-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s44206-025-00181-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s44206-025-00181-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,22]],"date-time":"2025-05-22T14:44:46Z","timestamp":1747925086000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s44206-025-00181-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"references-count":90,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]}},"alternative-id":["181"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s44206-025-00181-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["2731-4650","2731-4669"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2731-4650","type":"print"},{"value":"2731-4669","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 April 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 March 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 April 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this paper.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}],"article-number":"23"}}