{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T14:11:14Z","timestamp":1779804674454,"version":"3.53.1"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779753600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779753600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Process Sci"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Existing methods for business process simulation mainly support tactical decision-making, estimating the long-term impact of process changes. In contrast, operational decision-making requires short-term forecasts starting from the current process state. A workaround to tackle this use case is to run long-term simulations up to a point where the workload is similar to the current one (warm-up), and measure performance thereon. This approach, however, does not consider the current state of ongoing cases and resources. We study an alternative approach that initializes the simulation from the current state reconstructed from an event log. We characterize the information a simulation engine needs to start from a current state and propose a method to derive this state from an event log. An experimental evaluation shows this approach yields more accurate short-term performance forecasts than warmed-up long-term simulations, especially under fluctuating workloads. Another challenge in short-term simulation is to communicate the reliability of simulation forecasts. Simulation replications quantify stochastic (aleatoric) uncertainty but not prediction error due to model imperfections (epistemic uncertainty). We propose an approach to quantify the epistemic uncertainty of short-term simulation forecasts. From historical short-term simulations started from reconstructed states, we measure prediction errors for a given performance indicator and learn prediction intervals as a function of workload features. We map start states to workload features, group similar states, and derive an empirical error distribution and prediction interval per group. Experiments show that the resulting intervals are generally well calibrated, and that state-based grouping produces tighter intervals than a global error model.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s44311-026-00045-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T13:26:15Z","timestamp":1779801975000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Short-term business process simulation: current-state initialization and uncertainty quantification"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"3","author":[{"given":"Maksym","family":"Avramenko","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Chapela-Campa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marlon","family":"Dumas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fredrik","family":"Milani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"45_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-45594-9_11","volume":"1806","author":"WMP Aalst","year":"2000","unstructured":"Aalst WMP (2000) Workflow verification: finding control-flow errors using petri-netbased techniques. Bus Process Manag, Model, Techniques, Empirical Stud. LNCS 1806:161\u2013183. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany","journal-title":"Bus Process Manag, Model, Techniques, Empirical Stud. LNCS"},{"key":"45_CR2","first-page":"1","volume":"63","author":"WMP Aalst","year":"2010","unstructured":"Aalst WMP (2010) Business process simulation revisited. Sel Papers 6th Int Workshop The Enterp Organizational Modeling Simul (EOMAS). LNBIP 63:1\u201314. Springer, Hammamet, Tunisia","journal-title":"Sel Papers 6th Int Workshop The Enterp Organizational Modeling Simul (EOMAS). LNBIP"},{"key":"45_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aalst WMP (2015) Business process simulation survival guide. In: Handbook on business process management 1, introduction, methods, and information systems, 2nd Ed edn. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 337\u2013370","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-45100-3_15"},{"issue":"9","key":"45_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1128","DOI":"10.1109\/TKDE.2004.47","volume":"16","author":"WMP Aalst","year":"2004","unstructured":"Aalst WMP, Weijters T, Maruster L (2004) Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 16(9):1128\u20131142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TKDE.2004.47","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng"},{"key":"45_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arias M, Munoz-Gama J, Sep\u00falveda M (2017) Towards a taxonomy of human resource allocation criteria. In: BPM workshops 2017. Springer, Barcelona, Spain, pp 475\u2013483","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-74030-0_37"},{"issue":"1","key":"45_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1145\/3289181","volume":"19","author":"A Armas-Cervantes","year":"2019","unstructured":"Armas-Cervantes A, Dumas M, Rosa ML, Maaradji A (2019) Local concurrency detection in business process event logs. ACM Trans. Internet Technol 19(1):1\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3289181","journal-title":"ACM Trans. Internet Technol"},{"key":"45_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Avramenko M, Chapela-Campa D, Dumas M, Milani F (2025) What\u2019s coming next? short-term simulation of business processes from current state. In: 7th International Conference on Process Mining, ICPM 2025, Montevideo, Uruguay, October 20-24. IEEE, Montevideo, Uruguay (2025), 1\u20138","DOI":"10.1109\/ICPM66919.2025.11220647"},{"key":"45_CR8","unstructured":"Bahrani S, Tchemeube RB, Mouttham A, Amyot D (2013) Real-time simulations to support operational decision making in healthcare. In: SCSC\u201913. Society for Computer Simulation International, Toronto, Canada, p 53"},{"issue":"12","key":"45_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1041","DOI":"10.1177\/0037549716673150","volume":"92","author":"L Bedoya-Valencia","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bedoya-Valencia L, Kirac E (2016) Evaluating alternative resource allocation in an emergency department using discrete event simulation. SIMULATION 92(12):1041\u20131051. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0037549716673150","journal-title":"SIMULATION"},{"key":"45_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berkenstadt G, Gal A, Senderovich A, Shraga R, Weidlich M (2020) Queueing inference for process performance analysis with missing life-cycle data. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM 2020), IEEE, Padua, Italy, 57\u201364","DOI":"10.1109\/ICPM49681.2020.00019"},{"key":"45_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102447","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2024.102447","volume":"127","author":"D Chapela-Campa","year":"2025","unstructured":"Chapela-Campa D, Benchekroun I, Baron O, Dumas M, Krass D, Senderovich A (2025) A framework for measuring the quality of business process simulation models. Inf Syst 127:102447. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.is.2024.102447","journal-title":"Inf Syst"},{"issue":"6","key":"45_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1977","DOI":"10.1007\/s10270-023-01132-2","volume":"22","author":"D Chapela-Campa","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chapela-Campa D, Dumas M (2023) From process mining to augmented process execution. Softw Syst Model 22(6):1977\u20131986. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10270-023-01132-2","journal-title":"Softw Syst Model"},{"key":"45_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102346","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2024.102346","volume":"122","author":"D Chapela-Campa","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chapela-Campa D, Dumas M (2024) Enhancing business process simulation models with extraneous activity delays. Inf Syst 122:102346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.is.2024.102346","journal-title":"Inf Syst"},{"issue":"2","key":"45_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"770","DOI":"10.1109\/TSC.2025.3547235","volume":"18","author":"D Chapela-Campa","year":"2025","unstructured":"Chapela-Campa D, Dumas M (2025) Efficient online computation of business process state from trace prefixes via n-gram indexing. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 18(2):770\u2013783. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TSC.2025.3547235","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Serv Comput"},{"key":"45_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102157","DOI":"10.1016\/j.softx.2025.102157","volume":"30","author":"D Chapela-Campa","year":"2025","unstructured":"Chapela-Campa D, L\u00f3pez-Pintado O, Suvorau I, Dumas M (2025) SIMOD: automated discovery of business process simulation models. SoftwareX 30:102157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.softx.2025.102157","journal-title":"SoftwareX"},{"key":"45_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-662-56509-4","volume-title":"Fundamentals of business process management","author":"M Dumas","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dumas M, Rosa ML, Mendling J, Reijers HA (2018) Fundamentals of business process management, Second edn. Springer, Cham","edition":"Second"},{"key":"45_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2013.12.004","volume":"47","author":"C Favre","year":"2015","unstructured":"Favre C, Fahland D, V\u00f6lzer H (2015) The relationship between workflow graphs and free-choice workflow nets. Inf Syst 47:197\u2013219. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.is.2013.12.004","journal-title":"Inf Syst"},{"key":"45_CR18","first-page":"1050","volume":"48","author":"Y Gal","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gal Y, Ghahramani Z (2016) Dropout as a bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. JMLR Workshop Conf Proc 48:1050\u20131059. JMLR.org, New York City, NY, USA (Balcan, M., Weinberger, K.Q. (eds.) Proceedings of the 33nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2016, New York City, NY, USA, June 19-24, 2016","journal-title":"JMLR Workshop Conf Proc"},{"key":"45_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139226424","volume-title":"Performance modeling and design of Computer Systems: queueing theory in action","author":"M Harchol-Balter","year":"2013","unstructured":"Harchol-Balter M (2013) Performance modeling and design of computer systems: queueing theory in action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK"},{"key":"45_CR20","unstructured":"Kendall A, Gal Y (2017) What uncertainties do we need in bayesian deep learning for computer vision? In: Guyon I, Luxburg U, Bengio S, Wallach HM, Fergus R, Vishwanathan SVN, Garnett R (eds) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4-9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, pp. 5574\u20135584"},{"key":"45_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2014.05.029","volume":"29","author":"I Khodyrev","year":"2014","unstructured":"Khodyrev I, Popova S (2014) Discrete modeling and simulation of business processes using event logs. ICCS\u201914. Procedia Comput Sci 29:322\u2013331. Elsevier, Cairns, Australia (https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.procs.2014.05.029","journal-title":"ICCS\u201914. Procedia Comput Sci"},{"key":"45_CR22","first-page":"204","volume":"15701","author":"A Kraus","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kraus A, Elyasi KA, Aa H (2025) On the use of steady-state detection for process mining: achieving more accurate insights. CAiSE\u201925. LNCS 15701:204\u2013220. Springer, Vienna, Austria","journal-title":"CAiSE\u201925. LNCS"},{"key":"45_CR23","unstructured":"Lakshminarayanan B, Pritzel A, Blundell C (2017) Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4-9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, pp. 6402\u20136413"},{"issue":"3","key":"45_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1287\/opre.9.3.383","volume":"9","author":"JDC Little","year":"1961","unstructured":"Little JDC (1961) A proof for the Queuing formula: l = lambda w. Oper Res 9(3):383\u2013387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1287\/opre.9.3.383","journal-title":"Oper Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"45_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dss.2011.11.003","volume":"52","author":"Y Liu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Liu Y, Zhang H, Li C, Jiao RJ (2012) Workflow simulation for operational decision support using event graph through process mining. Decis Support Syst 52(3):685\u2013697. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dss.2011.11.003","journal-title":"Decis Support Syst"},{"key":"45_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102289","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2023.102289","volume":"120","author":"O L\u00f3pez-Pintado","year":"2024","unstructured":"L\u00f3pez-Pintado O, Dumas M, Berx J (2024) Discovery, simulation, and optimization of business processes with differentiated resources. Inf Syst 120:102289. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.is.2023.102289","journal-title":"Inf Syst"},{"key":"45_CR27","first-page":"346","volume":"466","author":"O L\u00f3pez-Pintado","year":"2022","unstructured":"L\u00f3pez-Pintado O, Halenok I, Dumas M (2022) Prosimos: discovering and simulating business processes with differentiated resources. EDOC Demos 2022. LNBIP 466:346\u2013352. Springer, Bozen-Bolzano, Italy","journal-title":"EDOC Demos 2022. LNBIP"},{"key":"45_CR28","first-page":"457","volume":"8484","author":"FM Maggi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Maggi FM, Francescomarino CD, Dumas M, Ghidini C (2014) Predictive monitoring of business processes. CAiSE\u201914. LNCS 8484:457\u2013472. Springer, Thessaloniki, Greece","journal-title":"CAiSE\u201914. LNCS"},{"key":"45_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Martin N, Depaire B, Caris A (2015) Using event logs to model interarrival times in business process simulation. In Workshops of the 13th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM 2015). LNBIP, vol 256. Springer, Innsbruck, Austria, 255\u2013267","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-42887-1_21"},{"key":"45_CR30","unstructured":"McQueen JB (1967) Some methods of classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proc. of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Math. Stat. and Prob, Berkeley, CA, USA, 281\u2013297"},{"issue":"2","key":"45_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"991","DOI":"10.1007\/s10479-024-05943-4","volume":"347","author":"N Mehdiyev","year":"2025","unstructured":"Mehdiyev N, Majlatow M, Fettke P (2025) Quantifying and explaining machine learning uncertainty in predictive process monitoring: an operations research perspective. Ann Oper Res 347(2):991\u20131030. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10479-024-05943-4","journal-title":"Ann Oper Res"},{"key":"45_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102472","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2024.102472","volume":"128","author":"F Meneghello","year":"2025","unstructured":"Meneghello F, Francescomarino CD, Ghidini C, Ronzani M (2025) Runtime integration of machine learning and simulation for business processes: time and decision mining predictions. Inf Syst 128:102472. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.is.2024.102472","journal-title":"Inf Syst"},{"key":"45_CR33","first-page":"724","volume":"2","author":"F Pegoraro","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pegoraro F, Santos EAP, Freitas Rocha Loures E, Silva Dias G, Santos LM, Coelho RO (2018) Short-term simulation in healthcare management with support of the process mining. WorldCist 2:724\u2013735. Springer, Naples, Italy","journal-title":"WorldCist"},{"key":"45_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pourbafrani M, L\u00fccking N, Lucke M, Aalst WMP (2023) Steady state estimation for business process simulations. In: BPM forum 2023. LNBIP, vol 490. Springer, Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp 178\u2013195","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-41623-1_11"},{"key":"45_CR35","unstructured":"Pufahl L, Weske M (2016) Enabling batch processing in BPMN processes. In BPM Demos 2016. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol 1789. CEUR-WS, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 28\u201333"},{"key":"45_CR36","unstructured":"Reijers HA, Aalst WMP (1999) Short-term simulation: bridging the gap between operational control and strategic decision making. In: IASTED MS\u201999. Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp 417\u2013423"},{"issue":"1","key":"45_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2007.07.001","volume":"33","author":"A Rozinat","year":"2008","unstructured":"Rozinat A, Aalst WMP (2008) Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Inf Syst 33(1):64\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.is.2007.07.001","journal-title":"Inf Syst"},{"issue":"9","key":"45_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"834","DOI":"10.1016\/j.datak.2009.02.014","volume":"68","author":"A Rozinat","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rozinat A, Wynn MT, Aalst WMP, Hofstede AHM, Fidge CJ (2009) Workflow simulation for operational decision support. Data Knowl Eng 68(9):834\u2013850. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.datak.2009.02.014","journal-title":"Data Knowl Eng"},{"key":"45_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1016\/j.is.2019.01.007","volume":"84","author":"A Senderovich","year":"2019","unstructured":"Senderovich A, Francescomarino CD, Maggi FM (2019) From knowledge-driven to data-driven inter-case feature encoding in predictive process monitoring. Inf Syst 84:255\u2013264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.is.2019.01.007","journal-title":"Inf Syst"},{"key":"45_CR40","first-page":"201","volume":"712","author":"F Skouvas","year":"2024","unstructured":"Skouvas F, Papadopoulos H, Andreou AS (2024) Enhancing predictive process monitoring with conformal prediction. Int Fed Info Proc - 20th IFIP WG 12.5 Int Conf, AIAI 2024, Corfu, Greece, June 27-30, 2024, Proc, Part II. IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol 712:201\u2013214. Springer, Corfu, Greece","journal-title":"Int Fed Info Proc - 20th IFIP WG 12.5 Int Conf, AIAI 2024, Corfu, Greece, June 27-30, 2024, Proc, Part II. IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol"},{"key":"45_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109134","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asoc.2022.109134","volume":"125","author":"H Weytjens","year":"2022","unstructured":"Weytjens H, Weerdt JD (2022) Learning uncertainty with artificial neural networks for predictive process monitoring. Appl Soft Comput 125:109134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asoc.2022.109134","journal-title":"Appl. Soft Comput"},{"key":"45_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wynn MT, Dumas M, Fidge CJ, Hofstede AHM, Aalst WMP (2007) Business process simulation for operational decision support. In: BPM workshops 2007. LNCS, vol 4928. Springer, Brisbane, Australia, pp 66\u201377","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-78238-4_8"}],"container-title":["Process Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s44311-026-00045-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s44311-026-00045-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s44311-026-00045-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T13:26:22Z","timestamp":1779801982000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s44311-026-00045-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["45"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s44311-026-00045-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["2948-2178"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2948-2178","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 January 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 May 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 May 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable. This study does not involve human participants or animals.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to publish"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"12"}}