{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,4,24]],"date-time":"2024-04-24T13:51:30Z","timestamp":1713966690195},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"8","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/dcr.0b013e3181d5d9ac","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,4,7]],"date-time":"2011-04-07T19:07:07Z","timestamp":1302203227000},"page":"1176-1181","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Low-Volume Hybrid Bowel Preparation Combining Saline Laxatives With Oral Contrast Agents Versus Standard Polyethylene Glycol Lavage for Colonoscopy"],"prefix":"10.1097","volume":"53","author":[{"given":"Edward M.","family":"Lawrence","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Perry J.","family":"Pickhardt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"R1-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02054413","article-title":"Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods.","volume":"37","author":"Cohen","year":"1994","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"R2-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02054117","article-title":"Colonoscopic bowel preparations\u2014which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial.","volume":"38","author":"Golub","year":"1995","journal-title":"Dis Colon Rectum"},{"key":"R3-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2217","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2004.40482.x","article-title":"A prospective randomized trial comparing low-dose oral sodium phosphate plus stimulant laxatives with large volume polyethylene glycol solution for colon cleansing.","volume":"99","author":"Hookey","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"R4-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"276","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(98)70191-9","article-title":"Meta-analysis and cost comparison of polyethylene glycol lavage versus sodium phosphate for colonoscopy preparation.","volume":"48","author":"Hsu","year":"1998","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"R5-13-20210119","first-page":"1218","article-title":"A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation.","volume":"88","author":"Kolts","year":"1993","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"R6-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5107(93)70213-8","article-title":"Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation.","volume":"39","author":"Marshall","year":"1993","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"R7-13-20210119","first-page":"422","article-title":"A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.","volume":"85","author":"Vanner","year":"1990","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"R8-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.07.2136","article-title":"Screening CT colonography: how I do it.","volume":"189","author":"Pickhardt","year":"2007","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"R9-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.181.3.1810799","article-title":"Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation.","volume":"181","author":"Pickhardt","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"R10-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"675","DOI":"10.1016\/j.humpath.2003.12.005","article-title":"Renal failure due to acute nephrocalcinosis following oral sodium phosphate bowel cleansing.","volume":"35","author":"Markowitz","year":"2004","journal-title":"Hum Pathol"},{"key":"R11-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3389","DOI":"10.1681\/ASN.2005050496","article-title":"Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure.","volume":"16","author":"Markowitz","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Am Soc Nephrol"},{"key":"R12-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1148\/radiol.09090398","article-title":"Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis.","volume":"254","author":"Borden","year":"2010","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"R13-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1572-0241.2006.00494.x","article-title":"Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital.","volume":"101","author":"Aslinia","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"R14-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gie.2005.09.030","article-title":"A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.","volume":"64","author":"Rostom","year":"2006","journal-title":"Gastrointest Endosc"},{"key":"R15-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2191","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa031618","article-title":"Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.","volume":"349","author":"Pickhardt","year":"2003","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R16-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1713","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.291.14.1713","article-title":"Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia.","volume":"291","author":"Cotton","year":"2004","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"R17-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1016\/S0016-5085(03)00894-1","article-title":"Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps.","volume":"125","author":"Johnson","year":"2003","journal-title":"Gastroenterology"},{"key":"R18-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)17784-8","article-title":"Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison.","volume":"365","author":"Rockey","year":"2005","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"R19-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"791","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjmed.2006.02.013","article-title":"Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests.","volume":"119","author":"Bosworth","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Med"},{"key":"R20-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1136\/gut.2008.156448","article-title":"Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.","volume":"58","author":"Graser","year":"2009","journal-title":"Gut"},{"key":"R21-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1207","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0800996","article-title":"Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers.","volume":"359","author":"Johnson","year":"2008","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"R22-13-20210119","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"756","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jacr.2009.09.007","article-title":"ACR Colon Cancer Committee white paper: status of CT colonography 2009.","volume":"6","author":"McFarland","year":"2009","journal-title":"J Am Coll Radiol"}],"container-title":["Diseases of the Colon & Rectum"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/10.1007\/DCR.0b013e3181d5d9ac","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,5,13]],"date-time":"2021-05-13T16:27:45Z","timestamp":1620923265000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/00003453-201008000-00013"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2010]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/dcr.0b013e3181d5d9ac","relation":{},"ISSN":["0012-3706"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0012-3706","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2010,8]]}}}