{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,7]],"date-time":"2026-07-07T17:27:51Z","timestamp":1783445271875,"version":"3.54.6"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,20]],"date-time":"2025-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1737331200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,20]],"date-time":"2025-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1737331200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Universit\u00e4tsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein \u2013 Campus Kiel"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Clin Neuroradiol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>Magnetic Resonance Imaging based brain segmentation and volumetry has become an important tool in clinical routine and research. However the impact of the used hardware is only barely investigated. This study aims to assess the influence of scanner manufacturer, field strength and head-coil on volumetry results.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>10\u00a0healthy subjects (27.4\u202f\u00b1\u20091.71 years) were prospectively examined in a\u00a0Philips Achieva 1.5T, Philips Ingenia CX 3T, Siemens MAGNETOM Aera 1.5T and Siemens MAGNETOM Vida 3T, the latter equipped with three different head coils, within one day. Brain volumetry of the whole brain, total white and grey matter, the cortical grey matter of the supratentorial lobes as well as regions important for the differentiation of neurodegenerative diseases of the dementia and movement disorder spectrum and the ventricular system was performed using the CE-certified software mdbrain by mediaire (Berlin, Germany).\u202fBoth raw volumetry results and percentile allocation provided by the software were analysed.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>This study reveals significantly different volumetry results for all examined brain regions beside the ventricular system between the different MRI devices but comparable results between the different head coils. When examining the percentile allocation provided by used software, the Intraclass-Correlation-Coefficient (ICC) values were even lower than the raw volume ICC values ranging from poor to excellent correlation.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>\n          <jats:sec>\n            <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n            <jats:p>The present study reveals highly relevant results that need to be considered both in clinical routine when analysing follow-up examinations from different scanner types and clinical research, especially when planning longitudinal and\/or multicentre studies.<\/jats:p>\n          <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00062-024-01489-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,20]],"date-time":"2025-01-20T10:19:12Z","timestamp":1737368352000},"page":"363-378","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Volumetry of Selected Brain Regions\u2014Can We Compare MRI Examinations of Different Manufacturers and Field Strengths?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"35","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0001-2573-5770","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Svea","family":"Seehafer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lars-Patrick","family":"Schmill","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"S\u00f6nke","family":"Peters","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Olav","family":"Jansen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Schekeb","family":"Aludin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"1489_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1002\/jmri.23671","volume":"37","author":"A Giorgio","year":"2013","unstructured":"Giorgio\u00a0A, de Stefano\u00a0N. Clinical use of brain volumetry. J\u00a0Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37:1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jmri.23671.","journal-title":"J Magn Reson Imaging"},{"key":"1489_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1159\/000117417","volume":"37","author":"P Scheltens","year":"1997","unstructured":"Scheltens\u00a0P, Pasquier\u00a0F, Weerts\u00a0JG, Barkhof\u00a0F, Leys\u00a0D. Qualitative assessment of cerebral atrophy on MRI: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility in dementia and normal aging. Eur Neurol. 1997;37:95\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000117417.","journal-title":"Eur Neurol"},{"key":"1489_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"967","DOI":"10.1136\/jnnp.55.10.967","volume":"55","author":"P Scheltens","year":"1992","unstructured":"Scheltens\u00a0P, Leys\u00a0D, Barkhof\u00a0F, Huglo\u00a0D, Weinstein\u00a0HC, Vermersch\u00a0P, et\u00a0al. Atrophy of medial temporal lobes on MRI in \u201cprobable\u201d Alzheimer\u2019s disease and normal ageing: diagnostic value and neuropsychological correlates. J\u00a0Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:967\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jnnp.55.10.967.","journal-title":"J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry"},{"key":"1489_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2618","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-011-2205-4","volume":"21","author":"Koedam Elge","year":"2011","unstructured":"Koedam Elge, Lehmann\u00a0M, van der Flier\u00a0WM, Scheltens\u00a0P, Pijnenburg\u00a0YAL, Fox\u00a0N, et\u00a0al. Visual assessment of posterior atrophy development of a\u00a0MRI rating scale. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2618\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-011-2205-4.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"1489_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1159\/000051182","volume":"1","author":"F Fazekas","year":"1998","unstructured":"Fazekas\u00a0F, Schmidt\u00a0R, Scheltens\u00a0P. Pathophysiologic mechanisms in the development of age-related white matter changes of the brain. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1998;1:2\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000051182.","journal-title":"Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord"},{"key":"1489_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1062","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.21.27043","volume":"218","author":"YJ Heo","year":"2022","unstructured":"Heo\u00a0YJ, Baek\u00a0HJ, Skare\u00a0S, Lee\u00a0H\u2011J, Kim\u00a0D\u2011H, Kim\u00a0J, Yoon\u00a0S. Automated Brain Volumetry in Patients With Memory Impairment: Comparison of Conventional and Ultrafast 3D T1-Weighted MRI Sequences Using Two Software Packages. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022;218:1062\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.21.27043.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"1489_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pscychresns.2015.07.011","volume":"233","author":"I Fellhauer","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fellhauer\u00a0I, Z\u00f6llner\u00a0FG, Schr\u00f6der\u00a0J, Degen\u00a0C, Kong\u00a0L, Essig\u00a0M, et\u00a0al. Comparison of automated brain segmentation using a\u00a0brain phantom and patients with early Alzheimer\u2019s dementia or mild cognitive impairment. Psychiatry Res. 2015;233:299\u2013305. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pscychresns.2015.07.011.","journal-title":"Psychiatry Res"},{"key":"1489_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1186\/s12868-020-00585-1","volume":"21","author":"S Liu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Liu\u00a0S, Hou\u00a0B, Zhang\u00a0Y, Lin\u00a0T, Fan\u00a0X, You\u00a0H, Feng\u00a0F. Inter-scanner reproducibility of brain volumetry: influence of automated brain segmentation software. BMC Neurosci. 2020;21:35. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12868-020-00585-1.","journal-title":"BMC Neurosci"},{"key":"1489_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012","volume":"15","author":"TK Koo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Koo\u00a0TK, Li\u00a0MY. A\u00a0Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J\u00a0Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012.","journal-title":"J Chiropr Med"},{"key":"1489_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"746982","DOI":"10.3389\/fnagi.2021.746982","volume":"13","author":"MMJ Wittens","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wittens\u00a0MMJ, Allemeersch\u00a0G\u2011J, Sima\u00a0DM, Naeyaert\u00a0M, Vanderhasselt\u00a0T, Vanbinst\u00a0A\u2011M, et\u00a0al. Inter- and Intra-Scanner Variability of Automated Brain Volumetry on Three Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems in Alzheimer\u2019s Disease and Controls. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:746982. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fnagi.2021.746982.","journal-title":"Front Aging Neurosci"},{"key":"1489_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1459","DOI":"10.1007\/s00234-023-03189-8","volume":"65","author":"DR van Nederpelt","year":"2023","unstructured":"van Nederpelt\u00a0DR, Amiri\u00a0H, Brouwer\u00a0I, Noteboom\u00a0S, Mokkink\u00a0LB, Barkhof\u00a0F, et\u00a0al. Reliability of brain atrophy measurements in multiple sclerosis using MRI: an assessment of six freely available software packages for cross-sectional analyses. Neuroradiology. 2023;65:1459\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00234-023-03189-8.","journal-title":"Neuroradiology"},{"key":"1489_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"960","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.29011","volume":"87","author":"T MacLennan","year":"2022","unstructured":"MacLennan\u00a0T, Seres\u00a0P, Rickard\u00a0J, Stolz\u00a0E, Beaulieu\u00a0C, Wilman\u00a0AH. Characterization of B1+ field variation in brain at 3 T using 385 healthy individuals across the lifespan. Magn Reson Med. 2022;87:960\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/mrm.29011.","journal-title":"Magn Reson Med"},{"key":"1489_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1002\/mrm.27421","volume":"81","author":"Y Lee","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lee\u00a0Y, Callaghan\u00a0MF, Acosta-Cabronero\u00a0J, Lutti\u00a0A, Nagy\u00a0Z. Establishing intra- and inter-vendor reproducibility of T1 relaxation time measurements with 3T MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81:454\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/mrm.27421.","journal-title":"Magn Reson Med"},{"key":"1489_CR14","series-title":"cac","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1093\/braincomms\/fcac211","volume-title":"Brain atrophy in middle age using magnetic resonance imaging scans from","author":"S Mori","year":"2022","unstructured":"Mori\u00a0S, Onda\u00a0K, Fujita\u00a0S, Suzuki\u00a0T, Ikeda\u00a0M, Zay Yar Myint\u00a0K, et\u00a0al. Brain atrophy in middle age using magnetic resonance imaging scans from. cac, Vol. 211. Japan: s health screening programme. Brain Commun; 2022. p.\u00a04. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/braincomms\/fcac211."},{"key":"1489_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.3389\/fnagi.2014.00264","volume":"6","author":"O Voevodskaya","year":"2014","unstructured":"Voevodskaya\u00a0O, Simmons\u00a0A, Nordenskj\u00f6ld\u00a0R, Kullberg\u00a0J, Ahlstr\u00f6m\u00a0H, Lind\u00a0L, et\u00a0al. The effects of intracranial volume adjustment approaches on multiple regional MRI volumes in healthy aging and Alzheimer\u2019s disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fnagi.2014.00264.","journal-title":"Front Aging Neurosci"},{"key":"1489_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1601","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2009.08.008","volume":"49","author":"Z Caramanos","year":"2010","unstructured":"Caramanos\u00a0Z, Fonov\u00a0VS, Francis\u00a0SJ, Narayanan\u00a0S, Pike\u00a0GB, Collins\u00a0DL, Arnold\u00a0DL. Gradient distortions in MRI: characterizing and correcting for their effects on SIENA-generated measures of brain volume change. Neuroimage. 2010;49:1601\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2009.08.008.","journal-title":"Neuroimage"},{"key":"1489_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"507","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nicl.2017.09.002","volume":"16","author":"N Dieleman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Dieleman\u00a0N, Koek\u00a0HL, Hendrikse\u00a0J. Short-term mechanisms influencing volumetric brain dynamics. Neuroimage Clin. 2017;16:507\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.nicl.2017.09.002.","journal-title":"Neuroimage Clin"},{"key":"1489_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"606","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nicl.2015.06.009","volume":"8","author":"AS Chua","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chua\u00a0AS, Egorova\u00a0S, Anderson\u00a0MC, Polgar-Turcsanyi\u00a0M, Chitnis\u00a0T, Weiner\u00a0HL, et\u00a0al. Handling changes in MRI acquisition parameters in modeling whole brain lesion volume and atrophy data in multiple sclerosis subjects: Comparison of linear mixed-effect models. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;8:606\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.nicl.2015.06.009.","journal-title":"Neuroimage Clin"},{"key":"1489_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2216","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2009.10.066","volume":"49","author":"H-J Huppertz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Huppertz\u00a0H\u2011J, Kr\u00f6ll-Seger\u00a0J, Kl\u00f6ppel\u00a0S, Ganz\u00a0RE, Kassubek\u00a0J. Intra- and interscanner variability of automated voxel-based volumetry based on a\u00a03D probabilistic atlas of human cerebral structures. Neuroimage. 2010;49:2216\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2009.10.066.","journal-title":"Neuroimage"},{"key":"1489_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1111\/jon.13147","volume":"33","author":"KA Clark","year":"2023","unstructured":"Clark\u00a0KA, O\u2019Donnell\u00a0CM, Elliott\u00a0MA, Tauhid\u00a0S, Dewey\u00a0BE, Chu\u00a0R, et\u00a0al. Intersite brain MRI volumetric biases persist even in a\u00a0harmonized multisubject study of multiple sclerosis. J\u00a0Neuroimaging. 2023;33:941\u201352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jon.13147.","journal-title":"J Neuroimaging"},{"key":"1489_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1007\/s10334-020-00906-9","volume":"34","author":"M Dieckmeyer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Dieckmeyer\u00a0M, Roy\u00a0AG, Senapati\u00a0J, Wachinger\u00a0C, Grundl\u00a0L, D\u00f6pfert\u00a0J, et\u00a0al. Effect of MRI acquisition acceleration via compressed sensing and parallel imaging on brain volumetry. Magma. 2021;34:487\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10334-020-00906-9.","journal-title":"Magma"},{"key":"1489_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.3348\/kjr.2020.0518","volume":"22","author":"JY Lee","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lee\u00a0JY, Oh\u00a0SW, Chung\u00a0MS, Park\u00a0JE, Moon\u00a0Y, Jeon\u00a0HJ, Moon\u00a0WJ. Clinically Available Software for Automatic Brain Volumetry: Comparisons of Volume Measurements and Validation of Intermethod Reliability. Korean J Radiol. 2021;22:405\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3348\/kjr.2020.0518.","journal-title":"Korean J Radiol"},{"key":"1489_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.1186\/s12880-022-00841-2","volume":"22","author":"L Zhao","year":"2022","unstructured":"Zhao\u00a0L, Luo\u00a0Y, Mok\u00a0V, Shi\u00a0L. Automated brain volumetric measures with AccuBrain: version comparison in accuracy, reproducibility and application for diagnosis. BMC Med Imaging. 2022;22:117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12880-022-00841-2.","journal-title":"BMC Med Imaging"},{"key":"1489_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"539","DOI":"10.1002\/hbm.25234","volume":"42","author":"LEM Wisse","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wisse\u00a0LEM, Ch\u00e9telat\u00a0G, Daugherty\u00a0AM, de Flores\u00a0R, La Joie\u00a0R, Mueller\u00a0SG, et\u00a0al. Hippocampal subfield volumetry from structural isotropic 1\u202fmm3 MRI scans: A\u00a0note of caution. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42:539\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/hbm.25234.","journal-title":"Hum Brain Mapp"}],"container-title":["Clinical Neuroradiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00062-024-01489-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00062-024-01489-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00062-024-01489-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,17]],"date-time":"2025-06-17T07:19:05Z","timestamp":1750144745000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00062-024-01489-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,20]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,6]]}},"alternative-id":["1489"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00062-024-01489-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1869-1439","1869-1447"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1869-1439","type":"print"},{"value":"1869-1447","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,1,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"11 August 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 December 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 January 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"S.\u00a0Seehafer, L.-P.\u00a0Schmill, S.\u00a0Peters, O.\u00a0Jansen and S.\u00a0Aludin declare that they have no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}