{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,31]],"date-time":"2025-12-31T00:01:15Z","timestamp":1767139275796,"version":"build-2238731810"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,20]],"date-time":"2019-09-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1568937600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,20]],"date-time":"2019-09-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1568937600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>While most patients with wrist trauma are routinely referred for radiography, around 50% of these radiographs show no fracture. To avoid unnecessary radiographs, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) have previously been developed and validated. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of the AWR at the Emergency Department (ED).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>In a before-and-after comparative prospective cohort study, all consecutive adult patients with acute wrist trauma presenting at the ED of four hospitals were included. Primary outcome was the number of wrist radiographs before and after implementation of the AWR. Secondary outcomes were the number of clinically relevant missed fractures, the overall length of stay in the ED, physician compliance regarding the AWR, and patient satisfaction and experience with the care received at the ED.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 402 patients were included. The absolute reduction in wrist radiographs after implementation was 15% (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001). One clinically irrelevant fracture was missed. Non-fracture patients without wrist radiography due to the AWR spent 34\u00a0min less time in the ED compared with non-fracture patients who had a wrist radiograph (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.015). The physicians adhered to the AWR in 36% of patients. Of all patients who did not receive a radiographic examination of the wrist, 87% were satisfied.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Implementation of the AWR safely reduces the amount of wrist radiographs in selected patients and consequently reducing the length of stay in the ED.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-019-01194-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,20]],"date-time":"2019-09-20T12:17:32Z","timestamp":1568981852000},"page":"573-582","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["The Amsterdam Wrist Rules to reduce the need for radiography after a suspected distal radius fracture: an implementation study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"46","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0575-0447","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marjolein A. M.","family":"Mulders","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1371-7687","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Monique M. J.","family":"Walenkamp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3486-3202","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nico L.","family":"Sosef","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Frank","family":"Ouwehand","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Romuald","family":"van Velde","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3942-0304","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Carel","family":"Goslings","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6475-7286","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Niels W. L.","family":"Schep","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,20]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"1194_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2074","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajem.2016.07.013","volume":"34","author":"Y Karaca","year":"2016","unstructured":"Karaca Y, Turkmen S, Cansu A, Baki ME, Eroglu O, Tatli O, et al. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in wrist trauma: Karadeniz wrist rules. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(11):2074\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajem.2016.07.013 .","journal-title":"Am J Emerg Med."},{"issue":"11","key":"1194_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1615","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2013.07.006","volume":"44","author":"CL van den Brand","year":"2013","unstructured":"van den Brand CL, van Leerdam RH, van Ufford JH, Rhemrev SJ. Is there a need for a clinical decision rule in blunt wrist trauma? Injury. 2013;44(11):1615\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2013.07.006 .","journal-title":"Injury"},{"issue":"1","key":"1194_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-015-0829-2","volume":"16","author":"MM Walenkamp","year":"2015","unstructured":"Walenkamp MM, Bentohami A, Slaar A, Beerekamp MS, Maas M, Jager LC, et al. The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16(1):389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-015-0829-2 .","journal-title":"BMC Musculoskelet Disord."},{"issue":"4","key":"1194_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-0644(05)82656-3","volume":"21","author":"IG Stiell","year":"1992","unstructured":"Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, McKnight RD, Nair RC, McDowell I, Worthington JR. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(4):384\u201390.","journal-title":"Ann Emerg Med."},{"key":"1194_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"943","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.294.6577.943","volume":"294","author":"DN Gleadhill","year":"1987","unstructured":"Gleadhill DN, Thomson JY, Simms P. Can more efficient use be made of X ray examinations in the accident and emergency department? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;294:943\u20137.","journal-title":"Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)."},{"issue":"3","key":"1194_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/S0733-8627(20)30948-2","volume":"3","author":"AE Long","year":"1985","unstructured":"Long AE. Radiographic decision-making by the emergency physician. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1985;3(3):437\u201346.","journal-title":"Emerg Med Clin North Am."},{"issue":"9","key":"1194_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1269","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajem.2015.06.011","volume":"33","author":"S Turkmen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Turkmen S, Cansu A, Karaca Y, Baki ME, Eroglu O, Tatli O, et al. Determination of radiography requirement in wrist trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(9):1269\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajem.2015.06.011 .","journal-title":"Am J Emerg Med."},{"issue":"4","key":"1194_CR8","first-page":"257","volume":"9","author":"AA Cevik","year":"2003","unstructured":"Cevik AA, Gunal I, Manisali M, Yanturali S, Atilla R, Pekdemir M, et al. Evaluation of physical findings in acute wrist trauma in the emergency department. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2003;9(4):257\u201361.","journal-title":"Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg."},{"key":"1194_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Calvo-Lorenzo I, Mart\u00ednez-de la Llana O, Blanco-Santiago D, Zabala-Echenagusia J, Laita-Legarreta A, Azores-Galeano X. Would it be possible to develop a set of Ottawa wrist rules to facilitate clinical decision making?. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2008;52:315\u2013321. doi:10.1016\/S1988-8856(08)70115-9.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1988-8856(08)70115-9"},{"issue":"4","key":"1194_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/S0196-0644(99)70309-4","volume":"33","author":"IG Stiell","year":"1999","unstructured":"Stiell IG, Wells GA. Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33(4):437\u201347.","journal-title":"Ann Emerg Med."},{"key":"1194_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.1197\/j.aem.2007.06.039","volume":"14","author":"IG Stiell","year":"2007","unstructured":"Stiell IG, Bennett C. Implementation of clinical decision rules in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:955\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1197\/j.aem.2007.06.039 .","journal-title":"Acad Emerg Med."},{"key":"1194_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bentohami A, Walenkamp MMJ, Slaar A, Beerekamp MSH, de Groot JaH, Verhoog EM et al. Amsterdam wrist rules: a clinical decision aid. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:238. doi:10.1186\/1471\u20132474\u201312\u2013238.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-12-238"},{"key":"1194_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(2):94\u20139. doi:10.1056\/nejm200007133430203.","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200007133430203"},{"issue":"7005","key":"1194_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.311.7005.594","volume":"311","author":"I Stiell","year":"1995","unstructured":"Stiell I, Wells G, Laupacis A, Brison R, Verbeek R, Vandemheen K, et al. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1995;311(7005):594\u20137.","journal-title":"Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group. BMJ (Clin Res Ed)"},{"key":"1194_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"b4146","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b4146","volume":"339","author":"IG Stiell","year":"2009","unstructured":"Stiell IG, Clement CM, Grimshaw J, Brison RJ, Rowe BH, Schull MJ, et al. Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2009;339:b4146. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.b4146 .","journal-title":"BMJ (Clin Res Ed)."},{"issue":"11","key":"1194_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"827","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1994.03510350037034","volume":"271","author":"IG Stiell","year":"1994","unstructured":"Stiell IG, McKnight RD, Greenberg GH, McDowell I, Nair RC, Wells GA, et al. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. JAMA. 1994;271(11):827\u201332.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"8","key":"1194_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1077","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620x.94b8.28998","volume":"94","author":"ZG Yin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Yin ZG, Zhang JB, Kan SL, Wang XG. Diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities for suspected scaphoid fractures: meta-analysis combined with latent class analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(8):1077\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620x.94b8.28998 .","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Br."},{"key":"1194_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mallee WH, Wang J, Poolman RW, Kloen P, Maas M, de Vet HC et al. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015(6):Cd010023. doi:10.1002\/14651858.CD010023.pub2.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD010023.pub2"},{"issue":"22","key":"1194_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1860","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.o.00099","volume":"97","author":"JW Karl","year":"2015","unstructured":"Karl JW, Swart E, Strauch RJ. Diagnosis of Occult Scaphoid Fractures: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(22):1860\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.o.00099 .","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am."},{"issue":"8","key":"1194_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e245","DOI":"10.1097\/bot.0000000000000316","volume":"29","author":"ZG Yin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yin ZG, Zhang JB, Gong KT. Cost-Effectiveness of Diagnostic Strategies for Suspected Scaphoid Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(8):e245\u2013e252252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/bot.0000000000000316 .","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma."},{"issue":"3","key":"1194_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajem.2015.11.028","volume":"34","author":"PC Silveira","year":"2016","unstructured":"Silveira PC, Ip IK, Sumption S, Raja AS, Tajmir S, Khorasani R. Impact of a clinical decision support tool on adherence to the Ottawa Ankle Rules. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(3):412\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajem.2015.11.028 .","journal-title":"Am J Emerg Med."},{"issue":"6","key":"1194_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"712","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989x10386232","volume":"30","author":"M Ebell","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ebell M. AHRQ White Paper: Use of clinical decision rules for point-of-care decision support. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(6):712\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0272989x10386232 .","journal-title":"Med Decis Making."},{"issue":"2","key":"1194_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1017\/cem.2015.67","volume":"18","author":"WW Lee","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lee WW, Filiatrault L, Abu-Laban RB, Rashidi A, Yau L, Liu N. Effect of Triage Nurse Initiated Radiography Using the Ottawa Ankle Rules on Emergency Department Length of Stay at a Tertiary Centre. CJEM. 2016;18(2):90\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/cem.2015.67 .","journal-title":"CJEM."},{"issue":"3","key":"1194_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/j.aaen.2006.03.003","volume":"14","author":"P Miller","year":"2006","unstructured":"Miller P, Coffey F, Reid AM, Stevenson K. Can emergency nurses use the Canadian cervical spine rule to reduce unnecessary patient immobilisation? Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006;14(3):133\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.aaen.2006.03.003 .","journal-title":"Accid Emerg Nurs."},{"issue":"3","key":"1194_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"342","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.288.3.342","volume":"288","author":"BM Reilly","year":"2002","unstructured":"Reilly BM, Evans AT, Schaider JJ, Das K, Calvin JE, Moran LA, et al. Impact of a clinical decision rule on hospital triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. JAMA. 2002;288(3):342\u201350.","journal-title":"JAMA"}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-019-01256-5","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,8]],"date-time":"2019-11-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1573171200000}}],"container-title":["European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00068-019-01194-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00068-019-01194-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00068-019-01194-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,29]],"date-time":"2022-09-29T01:12:41Z","timestamp":1664413961000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00068-019-01194-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,20]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,6]]}},"alternative-id":["1194"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00068-019-01194-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-9933","1863-9941"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-9933","type":"print"},{"value":"1863-9941","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,9,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 February 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"22 July 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 September 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 November 2019","order":4,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Correction","order":5,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The spelling of the J. Carel Goslings\u2019 name was incorrect. The correct information is given above.","order":6,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"Dr. Mulders, Walenkamp, Sosef, Ouwehand, Van Velde, Goslings and Schep declare that they have no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}