{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,5]],"date-time":"2026-09-05T23:11:23Z","timestamp":1788649883963,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,20]],"date-time":"2025-03-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742428800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,20]],"date-time":"2025-03-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742428800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100011852","name":"Paracelsus Medical University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100011852","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Biomechanical testing is essential for evaluating osteosyntheses, particularly in assessing stability, stiffness, and fragment motion. However, traditional flat-fracture models created via osteotomy fail to replicate the complex morphology of real-world fractures, potentially reducing the applicability of results. This study introduces patient-specific distal femur fracture models to investigate the impact of fracture morphology on the biomechanical performance of osteosyntheses. Realistic fracture models were generated using 3D printing and molding, based on CT-derived geometry, alongside traditional osteotomy models. Four groups were tested: osteotomized and realistic fracture models, with and without gaps. All constructs were treated with distal femur locking plates and subjected to axial and torsional loading. Dynamic testing simulated physiological conditions and tracked interfragmentary motions with a 3D optical motion system. Realistic fracture models exhibited higher torsional stiffness and reduced interfragmentary motion compared to osteotomized models, particularly in closed fracture gaps. Axial stiffness increased significantly upon fracture gap closure in all gap groups, transitioning from exclusively plate-bearing to construct-bearing configurations. The irregular geometry of realistic fractures provided enhanced interlocking, improving stability under both axial and torsional loads. Patient-specific fracture models better replicate the mechanical behaviour of clinical distal femur fractures, demonstrating advantages over osteotomized fracture models. The inclusion of realistic fracture geometries in biomechanical testing improves the transfer of biomechanical results into a clinical setting and offers valuable insights for optimizing designs and improving clinical outcomes.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-025-02802-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,20]],"date-time":"2025-03-20T19:26:22Z","timestamp":1742498782000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Impact of fracture morphology on the biomechanical stability of osteosynthetic fixation"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"51","author":[{"given":"Marianne","family":"Hollensteiner","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mischa","family":"M\u00fchling","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Philipp","family":"Blum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sabrina","family":"Sandriesser","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dirk","family":"Baumeister","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Markus","family":"Greinwald","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Julian","family":"F\u00fcrmetz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peter","family":"Augat","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"2802_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aitchison GA, Hukins DW, Parry JJ, Shepherd DE, Trotman SG. A review of the design process for implantable orthopedic medical devices, Open Biomed Eng J, 2009;3:21\u2013\u20097 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/1874120700903010021","DOI":"10.2174\/1874120700903010021"},{"key":"2802_CR2","unstructured":"B.-B. f. A. u. Medizinprodukte. Health Technology Assessment. https:\/\/www.bfarm.de\/DE\/Das-BfArM\/Aufgaben\/HTA\/_node.html (accessed."},{"key":"2802_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gardner MJ, Silva MJ, Krieg JC. Biomechanical testing of fracture fixation constructs: variability, validity, and clinical applicability. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(2):86\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5435\/JAAOS-20-02-086.","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-20-02-086"},{"key":"2802_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Olson SA, Marsh JL, Anderson DD, Latta Pe LL. Designing a biomechanics investigation: choosing the right model. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(12):672\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BOT.0b013e3182724605.","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0b013e3182724605"},{"key":"2802_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Baumbach SF, et al. Assessment of a novel Biomechanical fracture model for distal radius fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2474-13-252.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-13-252"},{"key":"2802_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schader JF, et al. Standardized artificially created stable Pertrochanteric femur fractures present more homogenous results compared to osteotomies for orthopaedic implant testing. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-021-04234-4.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-021-04234-4"},{"key":"2802_CR7","unstructured":"Bahamonde L, Zamorano A. Management of distal femoral fractures. InTechOpen. (accessed."},{"key":"2802_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nauth A et al. Distal femur fractures: basic science and international perspectives, OTA Int. 2024;7(2):e320 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/OI9.0000000000000320","DOI":"10.1097\/OI9.0000000000000320"},{"key":"2802_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Larsen P, Ceccotti AA, Elsoe R. High mortality following distal femur fractures: a cohort study including three hundred and two distal femur fractures. Int Orthop. 2020;44(1):173\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-019-04343-9.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-019-04343-9"},{"key":"2802_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Barzen S, Buschbeck S, Hoffmann R. [Distal femoral fractures]. Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2022;125(7):507\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00113-022-01197-6. Distale Femurfraktur.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00113-022-01197-6"},{"key":"2802_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e867","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-17-00706","volume":"27","author":"ME Hake","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hake ME, Davis ME, Perdue AM, Goulet JA. Modern implant options for the treatment of distal femur fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27:e867\u2013e. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5435\/JAAOS-D-17-00706.","journal-title":"J Am Acad Orthop Surg"},{"key":"2802_CR12","unstructured":"Henderson CE, Lujan T, Bottlang M, Fitzpatrick DC, Madey SM, Marsh JL. Stabilization of distal femur fractures with intramedullary nails and locking plates: differences in callus formation, Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:61\u2013\u20098. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/21045973"},{"key":"2802_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Koso RE, Terhoeve C, Steen RG, Zura R. Healing, nonunion, and re-operation after internal fixation of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2018;42(11):2675\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-018-3864-4.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-018-3864-4"},{"key":"2802_CR14","unstructured":"Lupescu O, Nagea M, Patru C, Vasilache C, Popescu GI. Treatment options for distal femoral fractures. Maedica (Bucur). 2015;10(2):117\u2013122 [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/28275402"},{"key":"2802_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hollensteiner M, Sandriesser S, Hackl S, Augat P. Custom-made polyurethane-based synthetic bones mimic screw cut-through of intramedullary nails in human long bones. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;117:104405. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2021.104405.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2021.104405"},{"key":"2802_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hollensteiner M et al. PuReBone: Biomechanical validation of novel polyurethane-resin synthetic femoral bones in axial compression, four-point bending and torsion Med Eng Phys. 2024;x:xx-xx.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medengphy.2024.104210"},{"key":"2802_CR17","first-page":"xx","volume":"xx","author":"M Hollensteiner","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hollensteiner M, Sandriesser S, Augat P. Open the pores\u2013 Polydimethylsiloxane influences the porous structure of cancellous bone surrogates for Biomechanical testing of osteosyntheses. J Biomech. 2024;xx:xx\u2013xx.","journal-title":"J Biomech"},{"key":"2802_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Klinger S, Greinwald M, Augat P, Hollensteiner M. Mechanical and morphometric characterization of custom-made trabecular bone surrogates. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022;129:105146. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2022.105146.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2022.105146"},{"key":"2802_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beingessner D, Moon E, Barei D, Morshed S. Biomechanical analysis of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur: comparison of titanium versus stainless steel and bicortical versus unicortical fixation. J Trauma. 2011;71(3):620\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/TA.0b013e31820337c4.","DOI":"10.1097\/TA.0b013e31820337c4"},{"key":"2802_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Cole PA, Zardiackas LD, Kregor PJ. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system, Angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):494\u2013502. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00005131-200409000-00004.","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-200409000-00004"},{"key":"2802_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weight M, Collinge C. Early results of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur (AO\/OTA types A2, A3, C2, and C3). J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):503\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00005131-200409000-00005.","DOI":"10.1097\/00005131-200409000-00005"},{"key":"2802_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lee C, Brodke D, Gurbani A. Surgical tips and tricks for distal femur plating. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2021;29(18):770\u20139 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5435\/JAAOS-D-20-01221","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOS-D-20-01221"},{"key":"2802_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mehling I, Hoehle P, Sternstein W, Blum J, Rommens PM. Nailing versus plating for comminuted fractures of the distal femur: a comparative biomechanical in vitro study of three implants. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013;39(2):139\u2013\u200946 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00068-012-0247-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-012-0247-1"},{"key":"2802_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pietsch M, Hochegger M, Winkler M, Sandriesser S, Freude T, Augat P. Opening-wedge osteotomies of the distal femur: minor advantages for a biplanar compared to a uniplanar technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(7):2375\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00167-018-5332-5.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-018-5332-5"},{"key":"2802_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schmidt U, Penzkofer R, Bachmaier S, Augat P. Implant material and design alter construct stiffness in distal femur locking plate fixation: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(9):2808\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-013-2867-0.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-013-2867-0"},{"issue":"1","key":"2802_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e86035","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0086035","volume":"9","author":"G Bergmann","year":"2014","unstructured":"Bergmann G, et al. Standardized loads acting in knee implants. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86035. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0086035.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"2802_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Sandriesser S, Forch S, Mayr E, Schrodl F, von Ruden C, Augat P. Supplemental cerclage wiring in angle stable plate fixation of distal tibial spiral fractures enables immediate post-operative full weight-bearing: a Biomechanical analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(1):621\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00068-020-01503-0.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-020-01503-0"},{"key":"2802_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wahnert D, Hoffmeier K, Frober R, Hofmann GO, Muckley T. Distal femur fractures of the elderly\u2013different treatment options in a biomechanical comparison. Injury 2011;42(7):655-9 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2010.09.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2010.09.009"},{"key":"2802_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Buford WL Jr., Ivey FM Jr., Nakamura T, Patterson RM, Nguyen DK. Internal\/external rotation moment arms of muscles at the knee: moment arms for the normal knee and the ACL-deficient knee, Knee 2001;8(4):293\u2013303 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0968-0160(01)00106-5","DOI":"10.1016\/s0968-0160(01)00106-5"},{"key":"2802_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1692","DOI":"10.1100\/2011\/465371","volume":"11","author":"S Ochman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ochman S, Vordemvenne T, Paletta J, Raschke MJ, Meffert RH, Doht S. Experimental fracture model versus osteotomy model in metacarpal bone plate fixation. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:1692\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1100\/2011\/465371.","journal-title":"ScientificWorldJournal"},{"key":"2802_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.2174\/1874325001206010133","volume":"6","author":"H Arnold","year":"2012","unstructured":"Arnold H, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Hurschler C, Seehaus F, Bobrowitsch E, Waizy H. Biomechanical in vitro - stability testing on human specimens of a locking plate system against conventional screw fixation of a proximal first metatarsal lateral displacement osteotomy. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:133\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2174\/1874325001206010133.","journal-title":"Open Orthop J"},{"key":"2802_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kang KT, Koh YG, Lee JA, Lee JJ, Kwon SK. Biomechanical effect of a lateral hinge fracture for a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: finite element study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):63. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-020-01597-7.","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-020-01597-7"},{"key":"2802_CR33","first-page":"xx","volume":"xx","author":"M Hollensteiner","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hollensteiner M, Trawewger A, Augat P. Anatomic variability of the human femur and its implications for the use of artificial bones in Biomechanical testing. J Biomech. 2024;xx:xx\u2013xx.","journal-title":"J Biomech"},{"key":"2802_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rechter GR, Anthony RT, Rennard J, Kellam JF, Warner SJ. The Impact of Early Axial Interfragmentary Motion on the Fracture Healing Environment: A Scoping Review. Injury 2024;55(12):111917 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2024.111917","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2024.111917"},{"key":"2802_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Forch S, Sandriesser S, von Ruden C, Mayr E, Augat P. Cerclage wiring improves Biomechanical stability in distal tibia spiral fractures treated by intramedullary nailing. J Clin Med. 22 2023;12(5). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm12051770.","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm12051770"},{"key":"2802_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hollensteiner M, et al. Population-specific femur models: A step towards improved osteosynthetic Biomechanical testing in orthopaedics. Clin Biomech (Bristol). Jan 2025;121:106379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2024.106379.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2024.106379"},{"key":"2802_CR37","unstructured":"Davis KM et al. Muscle-bone interactions during fracture healing, J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2015;15(1):1\u20139. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/25730647"},{"key":"2802_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Foster AL et al. The influence of biomechanical stability on bone healing and fracture-related infection: the legacy of Stephan Perren. Injury 2021;52(1):43\u201352 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2020.06.044","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2020.06.044"},{"issue":"4","key":"2802_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0176735","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0176735","volume":"12","author":"N Meyers","year":"2017","unstructured":"Meyers N, et al. Characterization of interfragmentary motion associated with common osteosynthesis devices for rat fracture healing studies. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0176735. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0176735.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"2802_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Augat P et al. Biomechanical models: key considerations in study design. OTA Int. 2021;4(2) https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/OI9.0000000000000099","DOI":"10.1097\/OI9.0000000000000099"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00068-025-02802-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00068-025-02802-0","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00068-025-02802-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,10]],"date-time":"2026-02-10T11:08:25Z","timestamp":1770721705000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00068-025-02802-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,20]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["2802"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00068-025-02802-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-9933","1863-9941"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-9933","type":"print"},{"value":"1863-9941","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"17 December 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 March 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 March 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"144"}}