{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T21:55:13Z","timestamp":1781646913121,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774915200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774915200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Proximal femoral replacement (PFR) is a critical limb-salvage strategy for managing massive proximal femoral bone loss due to oncologic and non-oncologic conditions. Although oncologic outcomes are well described, evidence surrounding PFR for infection, periprosthetic fracture, and mechanical failure remains limited. This study evaluates short- to mid-term outcomes following PFR for multiple indications and compares primary with revision procedures.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing PFR at a Level I trauma center from 2009 to 2023. Cases were categorized by procedure type (primary vs. revision) and indication (tumor, infection, other causes). Outcomes included operative time, complications according to the Henderson classification, reoperation rates, and functional outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A total of 81 patients (84 procedures) were included with a median follow-up of 7 months (IQR 0\u201331); 57.1% were lost to follow-up. The overall complication rate was 42.9%, significantly higher in revision procedures than in primary PFRs. Infection (Henderson Type IV) was the most frequent complication and occurred predominantly in revision surgeries. No cases of aseptic loosening (Type II) were identified. Reoperation was required in 29% of all procedures, with the highest rates observed in infection cases.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>PFR remains a reliable limb-salvage option for extensive proximal femoral deficiency. Revision procedures, especially infection-related cases, carry substantially higher risks of complications and reoperation. In contrast, primary oncologic PFRs showed comparatively favorable outcomes. Infection remains the principal barrier to durable results, underscoring the need for optimized perioperative strategies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of evidence<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Therapeutic Level III (retrospective cohort study).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-026-03151-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]],"date-time":"2026-03-31T11:58:40Z","timestamp":1774958320000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Proximal femoral replacement for oncologic and non-oncologic indications: a retrospective study over a 13-year period"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"52","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0436-2415","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ricardo","family":"Ram\u00f3n","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Aktas","family":"G\u00f6kmen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jorge","family":"Mayor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"H\u00fcr","family":"\u00d6zbek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Adrian","family":"Niemann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-7922-6534","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luis","family":"Mar\u00edn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tarek","family":"Omar Pacha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mohamed","family":"Omar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marco","family":"Ezechieli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tilman","family":"Graulich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"3151_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1036","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200705000-00016","volume":"89","author":"J Parvizi","year":"2007","unstructured":"Parvizi J, Tarity TD, Slenker N, Wade F, Trappler R, Hozack WJ, et al. Proximal femoral replacement in patients with non-neoplastic conditions. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89(5):1036\u201343. 10.2106. \/JBJS.F.00241 PubMed PMID: 17473141.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"3151_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2025.07.014","author":"N Meissner","year":"2025","unstructured":"Meissner N, Carstens MF, Larson DR, Bedard NA, Hannon CP, Abdel MP. Proximal Femoral Replacement in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 20-Year Experience. J Arthroplasty. 2025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2025.07.014. PubMed PMID: 40659226.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"3","key":"3151_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"559","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2021.11.008","volume":"37","author":"J Strony","year":"2022","unstructured":"Strony J, Sukhonthamarn K, Tan TL, Parvizi J, Brown SA, Nazarian DG. Worse Outcomes Are Associated With Proximal Femoral Replacement Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(3):559\u201364. PubMed PMID: 34767911.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"6","key":"3151_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1055\/a-0596-8094","volume":"156","author":"PM Prodinger","year":"2018","unstructured":"Prodinger PM, Harrasser N, Scheele C, Knebel C, Hertel G, Suren C, et al. Megaimplants of the Proximal Femur: Current Concepts. Z Orthop Unfall. 2018;156(6):685\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/a-0596-8094. PubMed PMID: 30551246.","journal-title":"Z Orthop Unfall"},{"issue":"4","key":"3151_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-011-1332-5","volume":"36","author":"BJF Dean","year":"2012","unstructured":"Dean BJF, Matthews JJ, Price A, Stubbs D, Whitwell D, Gibbons CMLH. Modular endoprosthetic replacement for failed internal fixation of the proximal femur following trauma. Int Orthop. 2012;36(4):731\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-011-1332-5. PubMed PMID: 21826408.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"3151_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1007\/s00064-011-0061-7","volume":"24","author":"PH Pennekamp","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pennekamp PH, Wirtz DC, D\u00fcrr HR. Der proximale und komplette Femurersatz. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012;24(3):215\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00064-011-0061-7. PubMed PMID: 22743630.","journal-title":"Oper Orthop Traumatol"},{"issue":"10","key":"3151_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2227","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-018-4220-4","volume":"43","author":"I De Martino","year":"2019","unstructured":"De Martino I, D\u2019Apolito R, Nocon AA, Sculco TP, Sculco PK, Bostrom MP. Proximal femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2019;43(10):2227\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-018-4220-4. PubMed PMID: 30415464.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"4","key":"3151_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2275","DOI":"10.21873\/invivo.12500","volume":"35","author":"T Graulich","year":"2021","unstructured":"Graulich T, Kranz C, Korallus C, Oergel M, Pacha OT, Omar M, et al. Clinical outcome after replacement of distal femur\/ proximal tibia in a heterogeneous patient cohort: Function following tumour, trauma, and loosening. Vivo (Brooklyn). 2021;35(4):2275\u201381. 10. 21873\/INVIVO.12500 PubMed PMID: 34182506.","journal-title":"Vivo (Brooklyn)"},{"issue":"10","key":"3151_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"942","DOI":"10.1007\/s00132-009","volume":"39","author":"W Winkelmann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Winkelmann W. Proximaler Femurersatz mit dem MUTARS\u00ae-System. Orthopade. 2010;39(10):942\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00132-009-1566-8. PubMed PMID: 20844863.","journal-title":"Orthopade"},{"issue":"8","key":"3151_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1261","DOI":"10.1007\/s00264-010-1007-7","volume":"34","author":"C Gebert","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gebert C, Wessling M, G\u00f6tze C, Gosheger G, Hardes J. The Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS\u00ae) in endoprosthetic revision surgery. Int Orthop. 2010;34(8):1261\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00264-010-1007-7. PubMed PMID: 20379815.","journal-title":"Int Orthop"},{"issue":"3","key":"3151_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2483","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-021-01809-7","volume":"48","author":"E Pala","year":"2022","unstructured":"Pala E, Trovarelli G, Ippolito V, Berizzi A, Ruggieri P. A long-term experience with Mutars tumor megaprostheses: analysis of 187 cases. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(3):2483\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00068-021-01809-7. PubMed PMID: 34727192.","journal-title":"Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"3151_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.24339","volume":"114","author":"MT Houdek","year":"2016","unstructured":"Houdek MT, Watts CD, Wyles CC, Rose PS, Taunton MJ, Sim FH. Functional and oncologic outcome of cemented endoprosthesis for malignant proximal femoral tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(4):501\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jso.24339. PubMed PMID: 27353406.","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"3151_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chalmers BP, Berbari EF, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD, Berry DJ, Abdel MP. Elevated infection and complication rates in patients undergoing a primary THA with a history of a PJI in a prior hip or knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(7):1928\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2020.02.018. PubMed PMID: 32147342.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.02.018"},{"issue":"2","key":"3151_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"422","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2013.06.009","volume":"29","author":"M Colman","year":"2014","unstructured":"Colman M, Choi L, Chen A, Crossett L, Tarkin I, McGough R. Proximal femoral replacement in the management of acute periprosthetic fractures of the hip: A competing risks survival analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(2):422\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2013.06.009. PubMed PMID: 23856062.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"6","key":"3151_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1304.R1","volume":"107\u2013B","author":"MP Wijesekera","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wijesekera MP, Pandit H, Palan J, Jain S. A UK multicentre cohort study of clinical outcomes of proximal femoral replacement for nononcological conditions. Bone Joint J. 2025;107\u2013B(6):625\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1304.R1.","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"3151_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s10195-022-00632-z","author":"A Di Martino","year":"2022","unstructured":"Di Martino A, Pederiva D, Bordini B, Di Carlo G, Panciera A, Geraci G, et al. Proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic conditions: a systematic review on current outcomes. J Orthop Traumatol Springer Sci Bus Media Deutschland GmbH. 2022. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s10195-022-00632-z.","journal-title":"J Orthop Traumatol Springer Sci Bus Media Deutschland GmbH"},{"key":"3151_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Roustemis AG, Gavriil P, Goumenos S, Trikoupis I, Karampikas V, Koulouvaris P, et al. Implant survival and risk factors for failure after proximal femoral megaprosthetic reconstruction. SICOT J. 2025;11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1051\/sicotj\/2025031.","DOI":"10.1051\/sicotj\/2025031"},{"key":"3151_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mancino F, Di Matteo V, Mocini F, Cacciola G, Malerba G, Perisano C, et al. Survivorship and clinical outcomes of proximal femoral replacement in non-neoplastic primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-021-04711-w. PubMed PMID: 34749680.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-021-04711-w"},{"issue":"7","key":"3151_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-019-03130","volume":"139","author":"T Graulich","year":"2019","unstructured":"Graulich T, Steimer D, Zhang D, Omar M, Weber-Spickschen S, Krettek C, et al. High complication and revision rates after total femoral replacement: a retrospective single center analysis of indication, function, and complication. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(7):913\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-019-03130. -w PubMed PMID: 30687872.","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"3151_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S449","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2024.08.051","volume":"40","author":"SK Chandi","year":"2025","unstructured":"Chandi SK, Neitzke CC, O\u2019Donnell JA, Gausden EB, Sculco PK, Bostrom MPG, et al. Contemporary Outcomes of Proximal Femoral Replacement as a Salvage Treatment in Nononcologic Severe Bone Loss. J Arthroplasty. 2025;40(9):S449\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2024.08.051. PubMed PMID: 39903456.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"3151_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ahmad SS, Hoos L, Perka C, St\u00f6ckle U, Braun KF, Konrads C. Follow-up definitions in clinical orthopaedic research: a systematic review. Aims. 2021;2(5). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/2633-1462.25.BJO.","DOI":"10.1302\/2633-1462.25.BJO"},{"issue":"11","key":"3151_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1436","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.96B11.34747","volume":"96\u2013B","author":"ER Henderson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Henderson ER, O\u2019Connor MI, Ruggieri P, Windhager R, Funovics PT, Gibbons CL, et al. Classification of failure of limb salvage after reconstructive surgery for bone tumours. Bone Joint J. 2014;96\u2013B(11):1436\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.96B11.34747.","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"issue":"4 SUPPL","key":"3151_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2006","volume":"21","author":"AV Lombardi","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lombardi AV, Berend KR. The Shattered Femur: Radical Solution Options. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(4 SUPPL):107\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2006. 01.007 PubMed PMID: 16781442.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"issue":"1S","key":"3151_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.4081\/or.2020.8689","volume":"12","author":"MS Oliva","year":"2020","unstructured":"Oliva MS, Vitiello R, Cauteruccio M, Pesare E, Rovere G, Meschini C, et al. Cemented versus cementless megaprosthesis in proximal femur metastatic disease: A systematic review. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020;12(1S):129\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4081\/or.2020.8689.","journal-title":"Orthop Rev (Pavia)"},{"key":"3151_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Henderson ER, Groundland JS, Pala E, Dennis JA, Wooten R, Cheong D, et al. Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: Retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg. 2011;418\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.J.00834. PubMed PMID: 21368074.","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.J.00834"},{"key":"3151_CR26","unstructured":"PRO-IMPLANT Foundation. Pocket guide to diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2026 Feb 24]. Available from: https:\/\/pro-implant.org\/."},{"key":"3151_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Toepfer A, Harrasser N, Petzschner I, Pohlig F, Lenze U, Gerdesmeyer L, et al. Is total femoral replacement for non-oncologic and oncologic indications a safe procedure in limb preservation surgery? A single center experience of 22 cases. Eur J Med Res. 2018;23(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40001-018-0302-4. PubMed PMID: 29338761.","DOI":"10.1186\/s40001-018-0302-4"},{"key":"3151_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Potter BK, Chow VE, Adams SC, Letson GD, Temple HT. Endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement: Metastatic versus primary tumors. Surg Oncol. 2009;343\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.suronc.2008.08.007. PubMed PMID: 18835153.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2008.08.007"},{"issue":"4","key":"3151_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"531","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-0960.R1","volume":"99\u2013B","author":"ER Henderson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Henderson ER, Keeney BJ, Pala E, Funovics PT, Eward WC, Groundland JS, et al. The stability of the hip after the use of a proximal femoral endoprosthesis for oncological indications. Bone Joint J. 2017;99\u2013B(4):531\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-0960.R1.","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"3151_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Toepfer A, Harrasser N, Schwarz PR, Pohlig F, Lenze U, M\u00fchlhofer HML, et al. Distal femoral replacement with the MML system: a single center experience with an average follow-up of 86 months. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12891-017-1570-9. PubMed PMID: 28532493.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12891-017-1570-9"},{"issue":"3","key":"3151_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.99B3.BJJ-2016-0822.R1","volume":"99\u2013B","author":"A Viste","year":"2017","unstructured":"Viste A, Perry KI, Taunton MJ, Hanssen AD, Abdel MP. Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss. Bone Joint J. 2017;99\u2013B(3):325\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.99B3.BJJ-2016-0822.R1.","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00068-026-03151-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00068-026-03151-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00068-026-03151-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,16]],"date-time":"2026-06-16T21:14:43Z","timestamp":1781644483000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00068-026-03151-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3151"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00068-026-03151-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-9941"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-9941","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,31]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 January 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"7 March 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 March 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Artificial intelligence tools (Claude 4, Anthropic; ChatGPT, OpenAI; accessed February 2026) were used solely for assistance with writing, grammar, language editing, and reporting standards. All scientific content, methods, data interpretation, and conclusions are entirely the authors\u2019 own work, who take full responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the manuscript.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Artificial intelligence disclosure"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"116"}}