{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T17:51:38Z","timestamp":1792086698142,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1792022400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1792022400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Aims<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Trochanteric fractures (TF) are among the most frequent fractures and have major impact on the affected patients and the healthcare system. Cephalomedullary nails (CMN) are widely used for these fractures. Complications remain frequent, either due to comorbidities or concerning the implant. The goal of this retrospective, single-centre study was to compare the complication rates of two CMN from one manufacturer.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Materials and methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>All internal fixations TF performed between 01\/2017 and 07\/2021 in our institution were analysed retrospectively. Follow-up was at least two years. The CMN were the PFN-A or the TFN-A. Demographic data, all reoperations and revisions were recorded. Reoperations and revisions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with subgrouping as minor reoperation, minor revision or major revision, including conversion to total hip arthroplasty.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 492 CMN, used in 475 patients, could be included. Among these, 248 were PFN-A and 244 were TFN-A. The overall reoperation rate was 15%, 12.9% for the PFN-A and 17.2% for the TFN-A, respectively. The TFN-A group had significantly more major revisions (hazard ratio 3.57 (95% confidence interval 1.42\u20139.94;\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.004). No relevant differences were found regarding demographic data or the quality of reduction and internal fixation.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Discussion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The TFN-A had a significantly higher rate of complications leading to major revision than the former PFN-A. This may have been missed when considering only the reoperation rate for all causes due to a camouflage effect by minor complications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00068-026-03304-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T17:34:34Z","timestamp":1792085674000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The new trochanteric nail TFN-A has a higher complication rate in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures than the predecessor model PFN-A"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"52","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1542-7376","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hannes","family":"Kuttner","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0278-6276","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michel","family":"Schl\u00e4ppi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6944-9648","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christoph","family":"Meier","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Emanuel","family":"Benninger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8895-8621","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Peter","family":"Wahl","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"3304_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.23750\/abm.v91i4-S.9716","volume":"91","author":"L Murena","year":"2020","unstructured":"Murena L, Ratti C, Maritan G, Rasio N, Pistorio S, Cusitore M, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for contralateral proximal femur fracture: A single center retrospective cohort study on 1022 patients. Acta Biomed. 2020;91:115\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.23750\/abm.v91i4-S.9716.","journal-title":"Acta Biomed"},{"key":"3304_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"432","DOI":"10.4055\/jkoa.1993.28.3.1153","volume":"65","author":"M Machida","year":"2011","unstructured":"Machida M, Fujita M, Isefuku S, Tanaka T, Nitto H, Saito M, et al. Epidemiology of hip fractures. IRYO - Japanese J Natl Med Serv. 2011;65:432\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4055\/jkoa.1993.28.3.1153.","journal-title":"IRYO - Japanese J Natl Med Serv"},{"key":"3304_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"665","DOI":"10.3238\/arztebl.m2021.0238","volume":"118","author":"M Rupp","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rupp M, Walter N, Pfeifer C, Lang S, Kerschbaum M, Krutsch W, et al. Originalarbeit: Inzidenz von Frakturen in der Erwachsenenpopulation in Deutschland. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021;118:665\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3238\/arztebl.m2021.0238.","journal-title":"Dtsch Arztebl Int"},{"key":"3304_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01623184","volume":"2","author":"C Cooper","year":"1992","unstructured":"Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ. Hip fractures in the elderly: A world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int. 1992;2:285\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF01623184.","journal-title":"Osteoporos Int"},{"key":"3304_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Speitling A, Taglang G, Ekholm C, J\u00f6nsson A. 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2474-11-133.","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2474-11-133"},{"key":"3304_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"706","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-006-0117-6","volume":"126","author":"A Lenich","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lenich A, Mayr E, R\u00fcter A, M\u00f6ckl C, F\u00fcchtmeier B. First results with the Trochanter Fixation Nail (TFN): A report on 120 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126:706\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-006-0117-6.","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"3304_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"556","DOI":"10.4103\/0019-5413.101036","volume":"46","author":"AS Gavaskar","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gavaskar AS, Subramanian M, Tummala NC. Results of proximal femur nail antirotation for low velocity trochanteric fractures in elderly. Indian J Orthop. 2012;46:556\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0019-5413.101036.","journal-title":"Indian J Orthop"},{"key":"3304_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.55095\/achot2016\/048","volume":"83","author":"ML Falkensammer","year":"2016","unstructured":"Falkensammer ML, Benninger E, Meier C. Reduction techniques for trochanteric - And subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: A practical guide. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2016;83:1\u201311.","journal-title":"Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech"},{"key":"3304_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1097\/BCO.0000000000000424","volume":"27","author":"CS Whale","year":"2016","unstructured":"Whale CS, Hulet DA, Beebe MJ, Rothberg DL, Zhang C, Presson AP, et al. Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for fixation of AO 31 A1\/2 intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a 12-year comparison of failure, complications, and mortality. Curr Orthop Pract [Internet]. 2016;27:604\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BCO.0000000000000424.","journal-title":"Curr Orthop Pract [Internet]"},{"key":"3304_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s13018-019-1431-3","volume":"14","author":"MF Hoffmann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hoffmann MF, Khoriaty JD, Sietsema DL, Jones CB. Outcome of intramedullary nailing treatment for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Orthop Surg Res J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13018-019-1431-3.","journal-title":"J Orthop Surg Res J Orthop Surg Res"},{"key":"3304_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"668","DOI":"10.14744\/tjtes.2020.80733","volume":"28","author":"F Yapici","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yapici F, Ucpunar H, Gur V, Onac O, Alpay Y, Karakose R, et al. Functional and radiological comparison of three cephalomedullary nails with different designs used in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures of elderly. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022;28:668\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14744\/tjtes.2020.80733.","journal-title":"Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi"},{"key":"3304_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Parker MJ, Handoll HHG. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Reviews. 2010. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD000093.pub5.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD000093.pub5"},{"issue":"Suppl 8","key":"3304_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S25","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000187","volume":"28","author":"PJ Kregor","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kregor PJ, Obremskey WT, Kreder HJ, Swiontkowski MF. Unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(Suppl 8):S25\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000000187.","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"3304_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R\u00fcedi TP, Buckley RE, Moran CG, Theerachai A, Reto AJB, et al. AO principles of fracture management: principles. Specific Fractures. Thieme; 2017; 1.","DOI":"10.1055\/b-0038-160811"},{"key":"3304_CR15","unstructured":"DepuySynthes. TFN-advanced proximal femoral nailing system (TFNA) [Internet]. 2022. https:\/\/www.jnjmedtech.com\/en-US\/product\/tfn-advanced-proximal-femoral-nailing-system-tfna."},{"key":"3304_CR16","unstructured":"Federal statistical office. Sterberegister [Internet]. [cited 2025 Dec 4]. https:\/\/www.bfs.admin.ch\/bfs\/en\/home.html. Accessed 4 Dec 2025."},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"3304_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S1","DOI":"10.1097\/BOT.0000000000001063","volume":"32","author":"EG Meinberg","year":"2018","unstructured":"Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(Suppl 1):S1\u2013170. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BOT.0000000000001063.","journal-title":"J Orthop Trauma"},{"key":"3304_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197052030-00005","volume":"52","author":"M Singh","year":"1970","unstructured":"Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS. Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:457\u201367.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"3304_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wachter NJ, Augat P, Hoellen IP, Krischak GD, Sarkar MR, Mentzel M, et al. Predictive value of singh index and bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography in determining the local cancellous bone quality of the proximal femur. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) [Internet]. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2001 [cited 2025 Sep 2];16:257\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0268-0033(00)00093-0","DOI":"10.1016\/S0268-0033(00)00093-0"},{"key":"3304_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1016\/J.EJRAD.2008.03.019","volume":"71","author":"O Hauschild","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hauschild O, Ghanem N, Oberst M, Baumann T, Kreuz PC, Langer M, et al. Evaluation of Singh index for assessment of osteoporosis using digital radiography. Eur J Radiol [Internet] Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:152\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.EJRAD.2008.03.019. [cited 2025 Sep 2];.","journal-title":"Eur J Radiol [Internet] Eur J Radiol"},{"key":"3304_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;87\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00003086-199803000-00015.","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199803000-00015"},{"key":"3304_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1399","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-195941080-00003","volume":"41\u2013A","author":"M CLEVELAND","year":"1959","unstructured":"CLEVELAND M, BOSWORTH DM, THOMPSON FR, WILSON HJ. A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41\u2013A:1399\u2013408.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"3304_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1058","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199507000-00012","volume":"77","author":"MR Baumgaertner","year":"1995","unstructured":"Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1058\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/00004623-199507000-00012.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"3304_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ding K, Zhu Y, Li J, Yuwen P, Yang W, Zhang Y, et al. Age-related changes with the trabecular bone of ward\u2019s triangle and neck-shaft angle in the proximal femur: a radiographic study. Orthop Surg [Internet]. Orthop Surg; 2023 [cited 2026 Jan 31];15:3279\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/OS.13923.","DOI":"10.1111\/OS.13923"},{"key":"3304_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2019.1690873","volume":"91","author":"CS Fischer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fischer CS, K\u00fchn JP, V\u00f6lzke H, Ittermann T, G\u00fcmbel D, Kasch R, et al. The neck-shaft angle: an update on reference values and associated factors. Acta Orthop [Internet] Acta Orthop. 2020;91:53\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453674.2019.1690873. [cited 2026 Jan 31];.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop [Internet] Acta Orthop"},{"key":"3304_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2019.01.008","volume":"42","author":"JT Kim","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kim JT, Jung CH, Shen QH, Cha YH, Park CH, Yoo J, Il, et al. Mechanical effect of different implant caput-collum-diaphyseal angles on the fracture surface after fixation of an unstable intertrochanteric fracture: A finite element analysis. Asian J Surg [Internet] Elsevier Taiwan LLC. 2019;42:947\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.asjsur.2019.01.008.","journal-title":"Asian J Surg [Internet] Elsevier Taiwan LLC"},{"key":"3304_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1007\/S00590-016-1746-2","volume":"26","author":"M Marmor","year":"2016","unstructured":"Marmor M, Liddle K, Buckley J, Matityahu A. Effect of varus and valgus alignment on implant loading after proximal femur fracture fixation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol [Internet] Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;26:379\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S00590-016-1746-2. [cited 2025 Sep 3];.","journal-title":"Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol [Internet] Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol"},{"key":"3304_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jiamton C, Boernert K, Babst R, Beeres FJP, Link BC. The nail-shaft-axis of the of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) is an important prognostic factor in the operative treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg [Internet]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 [cited 2025 Sep 2];138:339\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/S00402-017-2857-X.","DOI":"10.1007\/S00402-017-2857-X"},{"key":"3304_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.4055\/CIOS.2019.11.1.36","volume":"11","author":"EY Jung","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jung EY, Oh IT, Shim SY, Yoon BH, Sung YB. The Effect of Valgus Reduction on the Position of the Blade of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures. Clin Orthop Surg [Internet] Korean Orthop Association. 2019;11:36. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4055\/CIOS.2019.11.1.36. [cited 2025 Sep 3];.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Surg [Internet] Korean Orthop Association"},{"key":"3304_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Parker MJ. Valgus reduction of trochanteric fractures. Injury [Internet]. Injury; 1993 [cited 2025 Sep 3];24:313\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0020-1383(93)90053-9.","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-1383(93)90053-9"},{"key":"3304_CR31","unstructured":"Miller MD, Thompson SR. Miller\u2019s review of orthopaedics. Elsevier. 2026;909."},{"key":"3304_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1322","DOI":"10.1016\/j.injury.2011.04.010","volume":"42","author":"S Erhart","year":"2011","unstructured":"Erhart S, Schmoelz W, Blauth M, Lenich A. Biomechanical effect of bone cement augmentation on rotational stability and pull-out strength of the Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation. Injury Elsevier Ltd. 2011;42:1322\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.injury.2011.04.010.","journal-title":"Injury Elsevier Ltd"},{"key":"3304_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2230","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.20299","volume":"24","author":"P von der Linden","year":"2006","unstructured":"von der Linden P, Gisep A, Boner V, Windolf M, Appelt A, Suhm N. Biomechanical evaluation of a new augmentation method for enhanced screw fixation in osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:2230\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jor.20299.","journal-title":"J Orthop Res"},{"key":"3304_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2011.07.006","volume":"27","author":"A Sermon","year":"2012","unstructured":"Sermon A, Boner V, Schwieger K, Boger A, Boonen S, Broos P, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of bone-cement augmented Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation blades in a polyurethane foam model with low density. Clin Biomech Elsevier Ltd. 2012;27:71\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinbiomech.2011.07.006.","journal-title":"Clin Biomech Elsevier Ltd"},{"key":"3304_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E29436","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000029436","volume":"101","author":"YK Lee","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lee YK, Kim JT, Park CH, Song JU, Kim TY, Koo KH. Analysis of risk factor for nail breakage in patients with mechanical failures after proximal femoral nail antirotation in intertrochanteric fractures. Med (United States). 2022;101:E29436. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MD.0000000000029436.","journal-title":"Med (United States)"},{"key":"3304_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bacaksiz T, Akan I. The Fate of reoperation after proximal femur fracture surgery in elderly population. Cureus [Internet]. Cureus; 2023 [cited 2025 Dec 21];15. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/CUREUS.39856.","DOI":"10.7759\/CUREUS.39856"},{"key":"3304_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1186\/s12889-020-8333-5","volume":"20","author":"S B\u00fchn","year":"2020","unstructured":"B\u00fchn S, Holstiege J, Pieper D. Are patients willing to accept longer travel times to decrease their risk associated with surgical procedures? A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12889-020-8333-5.","journal-title":"BMC Public Health"},{"key":"3304_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"804","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.18.00997","volume":"101","author":"A Lambers","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lambers A, Rieger B, Kop A, D\u2019Alessandro P, Yates P. Implant fracture analysis of the TFNA proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg - Am Volume. 2019;101:804\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.18.00997.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg - Am Volume"},{"key":"3304_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-007-0497-2","volume":"128","author":"YA Weil","year":"2008","unstructured":"Weil YA, Gardner MJ, Mikhail G, Pierson G, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Medial migration of intramedullary hip fixation devices: A biomechanical analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:227\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00402-007-0497-2.","journal-title":"Arch Orthop Trauma Surg"},{"key":"3304_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lee H, Lee SH, Lim W, Jo S. Comparison of helical blade systems for osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures using biomechanical analysis and clinical assessments. Med (Lithuania). 2022;58. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/medicina58121699.","DOI":"10.3390\/medicina58121699"},{"key":"3304_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.2340\/17453674.2022.1410","volume":"93","author":"PP Schmitz","year":"2022","unstructured":"Schmitz PP, Hannink G, Reijmer J, Somford MP, Van Susante JLC. Increased failure rates after the introduction of the TFNA proximal femoral nail for trochanteric fractures: implant related or learning curve effect? Acta Orthop. 2022;93:234\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2340\/17453674.2022.1410.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"}],"container-title":["European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00068-026-03304-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00068-026-03304-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00068-026-03304-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]],"date-time":"2026-10-15T17:34:36Z","timestamp":1792085676000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00068-026-03304-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,12]]}},"alternative-id":["3304"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00068-026-03304-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-9941"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-9941","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"21 June 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 August 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 October 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The study was performed following the Declaration of Helsinki standards, with the exception that national law waives submission to an ethical committee for a quality control study.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"321"}}