{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,29]],"date-time":"2026-10-29T06:12:19Z","timestamp":1793254339627,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,5]],"date-time":"2017-08-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1501891200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,5]],"date-time":"2017-08-05T07:29:17Z","timestamp":1501918157000},"page":"1617-1630","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Sofia Andrade","family":"de Oliveira","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marcelo C. M.","family":"Fonseca","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Maria A. T.","family":"Bortolini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Manoel J. B. C.","family":"Gir\u00e3o","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matheus T.","family":"Roque","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rodrigo A.","family":"Castro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,5]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"3433_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00058-6","volume":"89","author":"AL Olsen","year":"1997","unstructured":"Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501\u20136.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3433_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6874-11-4","volume":"11","author":"RJ Detollenaere","year":"2011","unstructured":"Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, et al. Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial). BMC Womens Health. 2011;11:4.","journal-title":"BMC Womens Health"},{"key":"3433_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1007\/s11934-013-0336-7","volume":"14","author":"N Kow","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kow N, Goldman HB, Ridgeway B. Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14:395\u2013402.","journal-title":"Curr Urol Rep"},{"key":"3433_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.75","volume":"188","author":"M Hefni","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hefni M, El-Toucky T, Bhaumik J, Katsimanis E. Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept. Am J Obset Gynecol. 2003;188:645\u201350.","journal-title":"Am J Obset Gynecol"},{"key":"3433_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1097\/00006250-199404000-00011","volume":"83","author":"LS Wilcox","year":"1994","unstructured":"Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, Strauss LT, Xia Z, Peterson HB. Hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:549\u201355.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3433_CR6","first-page":"299","volume":"40","author":"AG Thomas","year":"1995","unstructured":"Thomas AG, Brodman ML, Dottino PR, Bodian C, Friedman F Jr, Bogursky E. Manchester procedure vs. vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse. A comparison. J Reprod Med. 1995;40:299\u2013304.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"3433_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:332\u20139.","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b2535"},{"key":"3433_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0976-9","volume":"21","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association IUGA\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:5\u201326.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3433_CR9","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org . Accessed 23 Jul 2017."},{"issue":"1","key":"3433_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1513-1","volume":"23","author":"LC Chu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chu LC, Chuang FC, Kung FT, Huang KH. Comparison of short-term outcomes following pelvic reconstruction with Perigee and Apogee systems: hysterectomy or not? Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(1):79\u201384.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3433_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"642","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2005.04.022","volume":"48","author":"E Costantini","year":"2005","unstructured":"Costantini E, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A, Mearini E, Porena M. Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse. Eur Urol. 2005;48:642\u20139.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"3433_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1481","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-2041-3","volume":"24","author":"E Costantini","year":"2013","unstructured":"Costantini E, Porena M, Lazzeri M, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A. Changes in female sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse repair: role of hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1481\u20137.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3433_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1014-7","volume":"21","author":"V Dietz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Koops SES. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descensus: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:209\u201316.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"8","key":"3433_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"889","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-006-0262-z","volume":"18","author":"M Neuman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Neuman M, Lavy Y. Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18(8):889\u201393.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3433_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00001.x","volume":"111","author":"JPWR Roovers","year":"2004","unstructured":"Roovers JPWR, van der Vaart CH, van der Bom JG, van Leeuwen JHS, Scholten PC, Heintz APM. A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effects on urogenital function. BJOG. 2004;111:50\u20136.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"3433_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1687","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2761-2","volume":"26","author":"P Rahmanou","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rahmanou P, Price N, Jackson SR. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1687\u201394.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"6","key":"3433_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2008.08.010","volume":"5","author":"DMB Rosen","year":"2008","unstructured":"Rosen DMB, Shukla A, Cario GM, Carlton MA, Chou D. Is hysterectomy necessary for laparoscopic pelvic floor repair? A prospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;5(6):729\u201334.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3433_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1590\/S0100-69912009000100012","volume":"36","author":"S Carram\u00e3o","year":"2009","unstructured":"Carram\u00e3o S, Auge APF, Pacetta AM, et al. A randomized comparison of two vaginal procedures for the treatment of uterine prolapse using polypropylene mesh: hysteropexy versus hysterectomy. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2009;36(1):65\u201372.","journal-title":"Rev Col Bras Cir"},{"issue":"9","key":"3433_CR19","first-page":"669","volume":"50","author":"CJ Jeng","year":"2005","unstructured":"Jeng CJ, Yang YC, Tzeng CR, Shen J, Wang LR. Sexual functioning after vaginal hysterectomy or transvaginal sacrospinous uterine suspension for uterine prolapse. J Rep Med. 2005;50(9):669\u201374.","journal-title":"J Rep Med"},{"issue":"7","key":"3433_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1013","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2630-z","volume":"26","author":"LY Huang","year":"2015","unstructured":"Huang LY, Chu LC, Chiang HJ, Chuang FC, Kung FT, Huang KH. Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with Prolift\u2122 mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(7):1013\u201320.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"3433_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1313","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0945-3","volume":"20","author":"TA Boer de","year":"2009","unstructured":"de Boer TA, Milani AL, Kluivers KB, Withagen MI, Vierhout ME. The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20(11):1313\u20139.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3433_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1422-3","volume":"22","author":"ST Thys","year":"2011","unstructured":"Thys ST, Coolen AL, Martens IR, et al. A comparison of long-term outcome between Manchester Fothergill and vaginal hysterectomy as treatment for uterine descent. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1171\u20138.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"3433_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2012.10.014","volume":"20","author":"ND Bedford","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bedford ND, Seman EI, O\u2019Shea RT, Keirse MJNC. Effect of uterine preservation on outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(2):172\u20137.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3433_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"641","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90636-W","volume":"169","author":"DM Fedorkow","year":"1993","unstructured":"Fedorkow DM, Kalbfleisch RE. Total abdominal hysterectomy at abdominal sacrovaginopexy: a comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169(3):641\u20133.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3433_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.3349\/ymj.2005.46.1.112","volume":"46","author":"SW Bai","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bai SW, Kim EH, Shin JS, Kim SK, ParK KH, Lee DH. A comparison of different pelvic reconstruction surgeries using mesh for pelvic organ prolapse patients. Yonsei Med J. 2005;46(1):112\u20138.","journal-title":"Yonsei Med J"},{"key":"3433_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1635-5","volume":"23","author":"LJ Romanzi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Romanzi LJ, Tyagi R. Hysteropexy compared to hysterectomy for uterine prolapse surgery: does durability differ? Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:625\u201331.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3433_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Marschalek J, Trofaier ML, Yerlikaya G, et al. Anatomic outcomes after pelvic organ prolapse surgery comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;183:33\u20136.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.10.011"},{"issue":"3","key":"3433_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.12891\/ceog17102014","volume":"41","author":"RX Shi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Shi RX, Sun HT. Total pelvic floor reconstruction versus transvaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(3):323\u20137.","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"3433_CR29","first-page":"243","volume":"35","author":"VN Iliev","year":"2014","unstructured":"Iliev VN, Andonova IT. Uterus preserving vaginal surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy for correction of female pelvic organ prolapse. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2014;35(1):243\u20137.","journal-title":"Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki)"},{"issue":"5","key":"3433_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","volume":"209","author":"NB Korbly","year":"2013","unstructured":"Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, et al. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):470.e1\u2013e6.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"3433_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2564-x","volume":"26","author":"K Jirschele","year":"2015","unstructured":"Jirschele K, Seitz M, Zhou Y, Rosenblatt P, Culligan P, Sand P. A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(5):743\u20138.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3433_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1778","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(93)90689-G","volume":"168","author":"SR Kovac","year":"1993","unstructured":"Kovac SR, Cruikshank SH. Successful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries after sacrospinous uterosacral fixation in five of nineteen patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:1778\u201386.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3433_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e318186a7a9","volume":"14","author":"T Gamble","year":"2008","unstructured":"Gamble T, Aschkenazi S, Nguyen A, et al. Bilateral, graft-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy, anatomic and functional outcomes at one year. J Pelvic Med Surg. 2008;14:213\u2013352.","journal-title":"J Pelvic Med Surg"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,31]],"date-time":"2022-07-31T16:47:26Z","timestamp":1659286046000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,5]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,11]]}},"alternative-id":["3433"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,5]]}}}