{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,21]],"date-time":"2026-10-21T22:14:38Z","timestamp":1792620878426,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,9]],"date-time":"2018-07-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1531094400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3702-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,9]],"date-time":"2018-07-09T09:52:21Z","timestamp":1531129941000},"page":"545-555","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":33,"title":["Anatomical outcomes 1\u00a0year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy\/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Eduardo","family":"Bataller","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Cristina","family":"Ros","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sonia","family":"Angl\u00e8s","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Miriam","family":"Gallego","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Montserrat","family":"Espu\u00f1a-Pons","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Francisco","family":"Carmona","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"3702_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2413-y","volume":"26","author":"E L\u00f8wenstein","year":"2015","unstructured":"L\u00f8wenstein E, Ottesen B, Gimbel H. Incidence and lifetime risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Denmark from 1977 to 2009. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(1):49\u201355. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-014-2413-y\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"3702_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"463.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.025","volume":"212","author":"AA Khan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Khan AA, Eilber KS, Clemens JQ, Wu N, Pashos CL, Anger JT. Trends in management of pelvic organ prolapse among female Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(4):463.e1\u20138. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.10.025\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3702_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Glazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet. 2016;389:(10067):381\u201392\n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)31596-3.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)31596-3."},{"issue":"1","key":"3702_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2166-z","volume":"25","author":"SH Oversand","year":"2014","unstructured":"Oversand SH, Staff AC, Spydslaug AE, Svenningsen R, Borstad E. Long-term follow-up after native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(1):81\u20139. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2166-z\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"3702_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1483-3","volume":"23","author":"P D\u00e4llenbach","year":"2012","unstructured":"D\u00e4llenbach P, Jungo Nancoz C, Eperon I, Dubuisson J-B, Boulvain M. Incidence and risk factors for reoperation of surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(1):35\u201341. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-011-1483-3\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"9","key":"3702_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1221","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1736-9","volume":"23","author":"PT Gotthart","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gotthart PT, Aigmueller T, Lang PFJ, Ralph G, Bjelic-Radisic V, Tamussino K. Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse within 10 years of primary surgery for prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(9):1221\u20134. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-012-1736-9\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"3702_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3448-7","volume":"29","author":"S Manodoro","year":"2018","unstructured":"Manodoro S, Frigerio M, Cola A, Spelzini F, Milani R. Risk factors for recurrence after hysterectomy plus native-tissue repair as primary treatment for genital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(1):145\u201351. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3448-7\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"3702_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3475-4","volume":"29","author":"T Friedman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Friedman T, Eslick GD, Dietz HP. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(1):13\u201321. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3475-4\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"3702_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1559","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2695-8","volume":"26","author":"TFM Vergeldt","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vergeldt TFM, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(11):1559\u201373. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2695-8\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3702_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD004014","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004014.pub5","volume-title":"Cochrane database of systematic reviews","author":"C Maher","year":"2013","unstructured":"Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. In: Maher C, editor. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Chichester: Wiley; 2013. p. CD004014. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD004014.pub5\n                    \n                  ."},{"issue":"1","key":"3702_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.031","volume":"190","author":"CF Maher","year":"2004","unstructured":"Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter PJ. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(1):20\u20136. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.08.031\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"3702_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1885-x","volume":"24","author":"RM Freeman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, et al. A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):377\u201384. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-012-1885-x\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3702_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.013","volume":"191","author":"D Vandendriessche","year":"2015","unstructured":"Vandendriessche D, Giraudet G, Lucot J-P, Behal H, Cosson M. Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy learning curve on operative time, perioperative complications and short term results. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;191:84\u20139. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2015.05.013\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"11","key":"3702_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1413","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1156-7","volume":"21","author":"X Jia","year":"2010","unstructured":"Jia X, Glazener C, Mowatt G, et al. Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(11):1413\u201331. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-010-1156-7\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"3702_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"360.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.016","volume":"204","author":"CF Maher","year":"2011","unstructured":"Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, Nichlos CJ, Hickey KV, O\u2019Rourke P. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(4):360.e1\u20137. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.11.016\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"3702_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"654","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.22641","volume":"34","author":"M Gracia","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gracia M, Perell\u00f3 M, Bataller E, et al. Comparison between laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy and subtotal hysterectomy plus cervicopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: a pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(7):654\u20138. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.22641\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"4","key":"3702_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000180","volume":"21","author":"EJ Stanford","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stanford EJ, Moore RD, J-PWR R, et al. Elevate and uterine preservation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(4):205\u201310. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000180\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"3702_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.1719","volume":"311","author":"MD Barber","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1023. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2014.1719\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"2","key":"3702_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2932-1","volume":"27","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(2):165\u201394. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-015-2932-1\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3702_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al. An international urogynecological association (IUGA)\/international continence society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(1):2\u201312. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.21036\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.21036"},{"issue":"1","key":"3702_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70243-0","volume":"175","author":"RC Bump","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bump RC, Mattiasson A, B\u00f8 K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10\u20137. \n                    http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/8694033\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3702_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD012079","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD012079","volume-title":"Cochrane database of systematic reviews, vol 2","author":"C Maher","year":"2016","unstructured":"Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Marjoribanks J. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. In: Maher C, editor. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, vol 2. Chichester: Wiley; 2016. p. CD012079. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD012079\n                    \n                  ."},{"issue":"5","key":"3702_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"519.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.07.004","volume":"201","author":"TV Sanses","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sanses TV, Shahryarinejad A, Molden S, et al. Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows\u2019 Pelvic Research Network study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201(5):519.e1\u2013519.e8. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.07.004\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"3702_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"334","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.03.012","volume":"42","author":"J-P Lucot","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lucot J-P, Fritel X, Debodinance P, et al. \u00c9tude randomis\u00e9e comparant la promontofixation c\u0153lioscopique \u00e0 la chirurgie proth\u00e9tique par voie vaginale pour le traitement des cystoc\u00e8les : PROSPERE (PROSthetic PElvic organ prolapse REpair). J Gyn\u00e9col Obstet Biol Reprod. 2013;42(4):334\u201341. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jgyn.2013.03.012\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"J Gyn\u00e9col Obstet Biol Reprod"},{"key":"3702_CR25","unstructured":"Fauconnier A, Cosson M, Debodinance P, Bader G, Youssef Azer Akladios C, Salet-Lizee D, et al. Anatomical and functional outcomes of vaginal mesh surgery versus laparoscopic sacrocolpohysteropexy for cystocele repair: 12-month results of the PROSPERE (PROSthetic PElvic floor REpair) randomised controlled trial. Neurourol Urodynam Abstr. 2016;35(S1):S471."},{"key":"3702_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gutman RE, Rardin CR, Sokol ER, et al. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(1):38.e1\u201311. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.08.035\n                    \n                  .","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.08.035"},{"issue":"12","key":"3702_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1825","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3379-3","volume":"28","author":"V To","year":"2017","unstructured":"To V, Hengrasmee P, Lam A, Luscombe G, Lawless A, Lam J. Evidence to justify retention of transvaginal mesh: comparison between laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and transvaginal elevate\u2122 mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(12):1825\u201332. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3379-3\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"7","key":"3702_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"743","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-006-0234-3","volume":"18","author":"B Fatton","year":"2007","unstructured":"Fatton B, Amblard J, Debodinance P, Cosson M, Jacquetin B. Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse: preliminary results of a new tension-free vaginal mesh (Prolift\u2122 technique)\u2014a case series multicentric study. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18(7):743\u201352. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-006-0234-3\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3702_CR29","unstructured":"De Tayrac R, Gervaise A, Chauveaud A, Fernandez H. Tension-free polypropylene mesh for vaginal repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. J Reprod Med. 2005;50(2):75\u201380. \n                    http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/15755042\n                    \n                  ."},{"issue":"11","key":"3702_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1803","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2","volume":"24","author":"R Gutman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gutman R, Maher C. Uterine-preserving POP surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1803\u201313. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2171-2\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"3702_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00001.x","volume":"111","author":"J-P Roovers","year":"2004","unstructured":"Roovers J-P, van der Vaart CH, van der Bom JG, van Leeuwen JHS, Scholten PC, Heintz APM. A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effects on urogenital function. BJOG. 2004;111(1):50\u20136. \n                    http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/14687052\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"BJOG"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3702-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3702-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3702-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,26]],"date-time":"2019-08-26T21:18:56Z","timestamp":1566854336000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3702-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,9]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,4]]}},"alternative-id":["3702"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3702-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,7,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 February 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 June 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 July 2018","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"Dr Bataller was a consultant for AMS (Astora, women\u2019s health). The remaining authors claim no conflicts of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}