{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,12]],"date-time":"2026-10-12T21:49:40Z","timestamp":1791841780650,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,10]],"date-time":"2018-12-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1544400000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003945","name":"Link\u00f6ping University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003945","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-018-3838-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,10]],"date-time":"2018-12-10T12:42:40Z","timestamp":1544445760000},"page":"939-944","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"30","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4378-0663","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sofia","family":"Pihl","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eva","family":"Uustal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marie","family":"Blomberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"3838_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"195","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2006.00799.x","volume":"113","author":"V Andrews","year":"2006","unstructured":"Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, et al. Occult anal sphincter injuries\u2014myth or reality? BJOG. 2006;113:195\u2013200.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"3838_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e318142cdf4","volume":"247","author":"TC Dudding","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dudding TC, Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and management. Ann Surg. 2008;247:224\u201337.","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"3838_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000165273.68486.95","volume":"106","author":"DL Faltin","year":"2005","unstructured":"Faltin DL, Boulvain M, Floris LA, et al. Diagnosis of anal sphincter tears to prevent fecal incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:6\u201313.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3838_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2273-x","volume":"25","author":"EJ Geller","year":"2014","unstructured":"Geller EJ, Robinson BL, Matthews CA, et al. Perineal body length as a risk factor for ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear at first delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:631\u20136.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"3838_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1131","DOI":"10.1016\/S1701-2163(16)30081-0","volume":"37","author":"MA Harvey","year":"2015","unstructured":"Harvey MA, Pierce M, Alter JE, et al. Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): prevention, recognition, and repair. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37:1131\u201348.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Can"},{"key":"3838_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.06.017","volume":"134","author":"S Maslovitz","year":"2007","unstructured":"Maslovitz S, Jaffa A, Levin I, et al. The clinical significance of postpartum transperineal ultrasound of the anal sphincter. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;134:115\u20139.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"3838_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Orno AK, Marsal K Fau-Herbst A, Herbst A. Ultrasonographic anatomy of perineal structures during pregnancy and immediately following obstetric injury.\u00a0Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.\u00a02008;32:527\u201334.","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6122"},{"key":"3838_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ozyurt S, Aksoy H, Fau-Gedikbasi A, Gedikbasi A, Fau-Yildirim G et al. Screening occult anal sphincter injuries in primigravid women after vaginal delivery with transperineal use of vaginal probe: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.\u00a0Arch Gynecol Obstet.\u00a02015;292:853\u20139.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3708-z"},{"key":"3838_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pihl S, Uustal E, Hjertberg L et al. Interobserver agreement in perineal ultrasound measurement of the anovaginal distance: a methodological study. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:697\u2013701.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3392-6"},{"key":"3838_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"597","DOI":"10.1016\/j.crad.2010.11.017","volume":"66","author":"AM Roos","year":"2011","unstructured":"Roos AM, Abdool Z, Sultan AH, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal and transperineal ultrasound for detecting anal sphincter defects: the PREDICT study. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:597\u2013604.","journal-title":"Clin Radiol"},{"key":"3838_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7512","volume":"36","author":"AM Roos","year":"2010","unstructured":"Roos AM, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): does the grade of tear matter? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:368\u201374.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3838_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.8816","volume":"37","author":"GA Santoro","year":"2011","unstructured":"Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Dietz HP, et al. State of the art: an integrated approach to pelvic floor ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:381\u201396.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3838_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00068-1","volume":"78","author":"SA Shobeiri","year":"2002","unstructured":"Shobeiri SA, Nolan TE, Yordan-Jovet R, et al. Digital examination compared to trans-perineal ultrasound for the evaluation of anal sphincter repair. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;78:31\u20136.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"3838_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.173.1.10397123","volume":"173","author":"LK Stewart","year":"1999","unstructured":"Stewart LK, Wilson SR. Transvaginal sonography of the anal sphincter: reliable, or not? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:179\u201385.","journal-title":"AJR Am J Roentgenol"},{"key":"3838_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1827","volume":"25","author":"IE Timor-Tritsch","year":"2005","unstructured":"Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Smilen SW, et al. Simple ultrasound evaluation of the anal sphincter in female patients using a transvaginal transducer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:177\u201383.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"3838_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"442","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2013.767787","volume":"33","author":"K Delft Van","year":"2013","unstructured":"Van Delft K, Schwertner-Tiepelmann N, Thakar R, et al. Recruitment of pregnant women in research. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33:442\u20136.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"3838_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walsh KA, Grivell RM. Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;CD010826.\u00a0\n                    https:\/\/www.cochranelibrary.com\/cdsr\/doi\/10.1002\/14651858.CD010826.pub2\/full\n                    \n                  . Accessed 21 Nov 2018.","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD010826.pub2"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3838-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3838-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3838-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,20]],"date-time":"2020-05-20T15:16:29Z","timestamp":1589987789000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3838-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,10]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]}},"alternative-id":["3838"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-018-3838-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,12,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"20 September 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 November 2018","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 December 2018","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}