{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,21]],"date-time":"2026-10-21T22:14:35Z","timestamp":1792620875903,"version":"4.5.0"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,29]],"date-time":"2019-06-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561766400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,29]],"date-time":"2019-06-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1561766400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-04017-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,29]],"date-time":"2019-06-29T07:30:45Z","timestamp":1561793445000},"page":"401-407","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":26,"title":["Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"31","author":[{"given":"Alexandra","family":"Dubinskaya","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Diego","family":"Hernandez-Aranda","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dorothy B.","family":"Wakefield","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jonathan P.","family":"Shepherd","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,29]]},"reference":[{"key":"4017_CR1","unstructured":"FDA. Urogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal mesh placement for pelvic organ prolapse. US Food and Drug Administration; 2011. Accessed 20 March 2017."},{"key":"4017_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000286","volume":"123","author":"JM Wu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1201\u20136.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4017_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2016","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.4919","volume":"309","author":"I Nygaard","year":"2013","unstructured":"Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309:2016\u201324.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"4017_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000079","volume":"26","author":"M Rosati","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rosati M, Bramante S, Conti F. A review on the role of laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26:281\u20139.","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4017_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.1097\/OGX.0000000000000335","volume":"71","author":"P Campbell","year":"2016","unstructured":"Campbell P, Cloney L, Jha S. Abdominal versus laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71:435\u201342.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"4017_CR6","first-page":"45","volume":"11","author":"KA O'Hanlan","year":"2007","unstructured":"O'Hanlan KA, Dibble SL, Garnier AC, Reuland ML. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and complications of 830 cases. JSLS. 2007;11:45\u201353.","journal-title":"JSLS"},{"key":"4017_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2013.828027","volume":"33","author":"SI Ismail","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ismail SI, Emery SJ. Patient awareness and acceptability of antenatal perineal massage. J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;33:8.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4017_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610701227893","volume":"27","author":"SI Ismail","year":"2007","unstructured":"Ismail SI. Recurrent prolapse after sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;27:292\u20136.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4017_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1328","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002913","volume":"132","author":"K Dallas","year":"2018","unstructured":"Dallas K, Elliott CS, Syan R, Sohlberg E, Enemchukwu E, Rogo-Gupta L. Association between concomitant hysterectomy and repeat surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair in a cohort of nearly 100,000 women. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:1328\u201336.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4017_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818ce394","volume":"112","author":"EJ Geller","year":"2008","unstructured":"Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:1201\u20136.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4017_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1630","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.11.026","volume":"192","author":"KJ Stepp","year":"2005","unstructured":"Stepp KJ, Barber MD, Yoo EH, et al. Incidence of perioperative complications of urogynecologic surgery in elderly women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1630\u20136.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4017_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2012.09.033","volume":"81","author":"MA Liss","year":"2013","unstructured":"Liss MA, Skarecky D, Morales B, et al. Preventing perioperative complications of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2013;81:319\u201323.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"4017_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1251","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-014-2391-0","volume":"25","author":"LC Turner","year":"2014","unstructured":"Turner LC, Kantartzis K, Lowder JL, Shepherd JP. The effect of age on complications in women undergoing minimally invasive sacral colpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1251\u20136.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"311","key":"4017_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.1719","volume":"12","author":"MD Barber","year":"2014","unstructured":"Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Nygaard I, Weidner AC, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. JAMA. 2014;12(311):1023\u201334.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"4017_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000270","volume":"22","author":"CW Nager","year":"2016","unstructured":"Nager CW, Zyczynski H, Rogers RG, Barber MD, Richter HE, Visco AG, et al. The design of randomized trial of vaginal surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: vaginal hysterectomy with native tissue vault suspension versus mesh hysteropexy suspension (the study of uterine prolapse procedures randomized trial). Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22:182\u20139.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"4017_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000370","volume":"23","author":"LE Giugale","year":"2017","unstructured":"Giugale LE, Sears S, Lavelle ES, Carter-Brooks CM, Bonidie M, Shepherd JP. Evaluating the impact of intraoperative surgical team handoffs on patient outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23:288\u201392.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"4017_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"272","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000388","volume":"23","author":"ES Lavelle","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lavelle ES, Turner LC, Shepherd JP. Impact of case order on laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: do surgeons need a warm-up? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23:272\u20135.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"key":"4017_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3093-6","volume":"28","author":"D Vandendriessche","year":"2017","unstructured":"Vandendriessche D, Sussfeld J, Giraudet G, Lucot JP, Behal H, Cosson M. Complications and reoperations after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a mean follow-up of 4 years. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:231\u20139.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4017_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2066","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa0912658","volume":"362","author":"HE Richter","year":"2010","unstructured":"Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, et al. Urinary incontinence treatment network. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2066\u201376.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"4017_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002492","volume":"131","author":"RG Rogers","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rogers RG, Nolen TL, Weidner AC, Richter HE, Jelovsek JE, Shepherd JP, et al. Surgical outcomes after apical repair for vault compared with uterovaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:475\u201383.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4017_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.129160","volume":"187","author":"PJ Culligan","year":"2002","unstructured":"Culligan PJ, Murphy M, Blackwell L, Hammons G, Graham C, Heit MH. Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1473\u201380.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-019-04017-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-019-04017-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-019-04017-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,27]],"date-time":"2020-06-27T23:15:42Z","timestamp":1593299742000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-019-04017-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,29]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,2]]}},"alternative-id":["4017"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-019-04017-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,29]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 March 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 May 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"29 June 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}