{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,8]],"date-time":"2026-10-08T23:31:47Z","timestamp":1791502307200,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,23]],"date-time":"2020-07-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1595462400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,23]],"date-time":"2020-07-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1595462400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000738","name":"University of Leicester","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000738","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction and hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There is a lack of robust evidence guiding treatment options for recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and limited comparative outcome data. The aim of this study was to examine the pattern of surgery for recurrent SUI performed by gynaecologists in the UK and compare subjective success rates.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Retrospective review of the British Society of Urogynaecologists database for patients having repeat incontinence procedures (2007\u20132015) including the number of each procedure and outcome recorded by the International Consultation on Incontinence Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) questionnaire. Procedures were compared by year and outcomes by operation. Categorical comparisons were performed using Chi-squared test and numerical comparisons using appropriate non-parametric tests.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      A total of 2,938 records were obtained (269 were excluded) and 2,164 women (88.8%) had undergone one previous procedure, most commonly retropubic midurethral sling (MUS; 28.6%). Pelvic floor exercises were offered to 76.2% women. Urodynamic investigation was carried out in 96.2% women: 76.5% had urodynamic stress incontinence. Repeat MUS was the most common procedure (77.3%), followed by bladder neck injections (BNI; 10.2%). Follow-up details were available for 66.1%. Outcome data were poorly reported. Median ICIQ-UI-SF score fell from 16 (0\u201321) to 0 (0\u201321) (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001), 81.6% felt \u201cmuch better\u201d or \u201cvery much better\u201d on Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), and 89.3% \u201ccured\u201d or \u201cimproved\u201d. MUS, colposuspension and fascial sling showed the best results with regard to the PGI-I score and \u201cchange in SUI\u201d (\n                      <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009&lt;\u20090.001).\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>MUS and BNI were the most common repeat continence procedures. Follow-up data suggest that MUS, colposuspension and fascial sling are most effective.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04420-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,23]],"date-time":"2020-07-23T02:58:11Z","timestamp":1595473091000},"page":"167-172","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["Recurrent stress urinary incontinence surgery in the United Kingdom: an analysis of the British Society of Urogynaecology database (2007\u20132015)"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Dina","family":"El-Hamamsy","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6385-851X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Douglas G.","family":"Tincello","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,23]]},"reference":[{"key":"4420_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2003.04609.x","volume":"93","author":"S Hunskaar","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU Intl. 2004;93:324\u201330.","journal-title":"BJU Intl"},{"key":"4420_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.1093\/pubmed\/22.3.427","volume":"22","author":"S Perry","year":"2000","unstructured":"Perry S, Shaw C, Assassa P, Dallosso H, Williams K, Brittain KR, et al. An epidemiological study to establish the prevalence of urinary symptoms and felt need in the community: the Leicestershire MRC incontinence study. J Public Health Med. 2000;22:427\u201334.","journal-title":"J Public Health Med"},{"key":"4420_CR3","unstructured":"BSUG Audit and Database Committee. Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery in the UK 2008\u20132017. First National Report. British Society Of Urogynaecology (BSUG), 2018. https:\/\/bsug.org.uk\/budcms\/includes\/kcfinder\/upload\/files\/reports\/BSUG-Stress-Incontinence-Surgery%2D%2D-1st-National-Report.pdf. Accessed 14 April 2020."},{"key":"4420_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"546.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.04.047","volume":"199","author":"M Fialkow","year":"2008","unstructured":"Fialkow M, Symons RG, Flum D. Reoperation for urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:546.e1\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4420_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e000206","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2011-000206","volume":"1","author":"M Abdel-Fattah","year":"2011","unstructured":"Abdel-Fattah M, Familusi A, Fielding SFJ, Bhattacharya S. Primary and repeat surgical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in parous women in the UK: a register linkage study. BMJ Open. 2011;1:e000206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjopen-2011-000206.","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"4420_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318258fbde","volume":"120","author":"YM Jonsson Funk","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jonsson Funk YM, Siddiqui MN, Kawasaki MA, Wu MJ. Long-term outcomes after stress urinary incontinence surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:83\u201390.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4420_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.22648","volume":"34","author":"MP Wu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Wu MP, Long CY, Liang CC, Weng SF, Tong YC. Trends in reoperation for female stress urinary incontinence: a nationwide study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:693\u20138.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"4420_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3376-6","volume":"29","author":"DG Tincello","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tincello DG, Armstrong N, Hilton P, Buckley B, Mayne C. Surgery for recurrent stress urinary incontinence: the views of surgeons and women. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:45\u201354.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4420_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"CD009407","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD009407.pub3","volume":"9","author":"E Bakali","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bakali E, Johnson E, Buckley BS, Hilton P, Walker B, Tincello DG. Interventions for treating recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic midurethral tape surgery in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;9:CD009407. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/14651858.CD009407.pub3.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"4420_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.04.034","volume":"64","author":"W Agur","year":"2013","unstructured":"Agur W, Riad M, Secco S, Litman H, Madhuvrata P, Novara G, et al. Surgical treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Euro Urol. 2013;64:323\u201336.","journal-title":"Euro Urol"},{"key":"4420_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"831","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1803-2","volume":"23","author":"A Pradhan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pradhan A, Jain P, Latthe PM. Effectiveness of midurethral slings in recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:831\u201341.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4420_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.379","volume":"189","author":"I Yalcin","year":"2003","unstructured":"Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:98\u2013101.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4420_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1063","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)00348-4","volume":"175","author":"P Abrams","year":"2006","unstructured":"Abrams P, Avery K, Gardener N, Donovan J. ICIQ advisory board. The International Consultation on Incontinence modular questionnaire: www.iciq.net. J Urol. 2006;175:1063\u20136.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"4420_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urpr.2015.10.004","volume":"3","author":"B Welk","year":"2016","unstructured":"Welk B, Winick-Ng J. Repeat surgical intervention for stress urinary incontinence after a failed mid urethral sling. Urol Pract. 2016;3:475\u201380.","journal-title":"Urol Pract"},{"key":"4420_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1285","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2696-7","volume":"26","author":"I Giarenis","year":"2015","unstructured":"Giarenis I, Thiagamoorthy G, Zacch\u00e8 M, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed midurethral sling: a survey of members of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1285\u201391.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4420_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"716","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2010.506965","volume":"30","author":"HM Elbiss","year":"2010","unstructured":"Elbiss HM, Thomson AJM, Moran PA. How useful are the BSUG database outcome criteria: validation using the MESA questionnaire. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30:716\u201320.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"4420_CR17","unstructured":"HQIP. Interim Surgical Mesh Database Feasibility Report. https:\/\/www.hqip.org.uk\/resource\/interim-surgical-mesh-database-feasibility-report\/ Accessed 1 June 2020."},{"key":"4420_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-005-1371-9","volume":"17","author":"JL Segal","year":"2006","unstructured":"Segal JL, Vassallo BJ, Kleeman SD, Hungler M, Karram MM. The efficacy of the tension-free vaginal tape in the treatment of five subtypes of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:120\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-005-1371-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"4420_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1431","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0378-9","volume":"18","author":"SW Bai","year":"2007","unstructured":"Bai SW, Jung YH, Jeon MJ, Jung DJ, Kim SK, Kim JW. Treatment outcome of tension-free vaginal tape in stress urinary incontinence: comparison of intrinsic sphincter deficiency and nonintrinsic sphincter deficiency patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2007;18:1431\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-007-0378-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4420_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31827c5de7","volume":"121","author":"MA Parden","year":"2013","unstructured":"Parden MA, Gleason LJ, Jauk EV, Garner ER, Ballard EA, Richter EH. Incontinence outcomes in women undergoing primary and repeat midurethral sling procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:273\u20138.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4420_CR21","first-page":"239","volume":"9","author":"A Cerniauskiene","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cerniauskiene A, Barisiene M, Jankevicius F, Januska G. Treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence in women: comparison of treatment results for different surgical techniques. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014;9:239\u201345.","journal-title":"Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne"},{"key":"4420_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1117","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1720-4","volume":"23","author":"I Giarenis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Giarenis I, Mastoroudes H, Cardozo L, Robinson D. What do we do when a midurethral tape fails? Rediscovery of open colposuspension as a salvage continence operation. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:1117\u201322.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4420_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0506-6","volume":"19","author":"E Cuyper","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cuyper E, Ismail R, Maher C. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension after failed sub-urethral tape procedures: a retrospective audit. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:681\u20135.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4420_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60336-2","volume":"8","author":"RD Moore","year":"2001","unstructured":"Moore RD, Speights SE, Miklos JR. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8:389\u201392.","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"key":"4420_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08373.x","volume":"106","author":"C Maher","year":"1999","unstructured":"Maher C, Dwyer P, Carey M, Gilmour D. The Burch colposuspension for recurrent urinary stress incontinence following retropubic continence surgery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:719\u201324.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"4420_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12625","volume":"94","author":"KI Nikolopoulos","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nikolopoulos KI, Betschart C, Doumouchtsis SK. The surgical management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:568\u201376.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"4420_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.22502","volume":"34","author":"D Lee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lee D, Murray S, Bacsu CD, Zimmern PE. Long-term outcomes of autologous pubovaginal fascia slings: is there a difference between primary and secondary slings? Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:18\u201323.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"4420_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70368-6","volume":"181","author":"FA Amaye-Obu","year":"1999","unstructured":"Amaye-Obu FA, Drutz HP. Surgical management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;181:1296\u2013307.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4420_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1207","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000282","volume":"123","author":"LA Gaddi","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gaddi LA, Guaderrama LN, Bassiouni LN, Bebchuk LJ, Whitcomb LE. Repeat midurethral sling compared with urethral bulking for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1207\u201312.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4420_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"68","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2016.10.011","volume":"207","author":"K Futyma","year":"2016","unstructured":"Futyma K, Nowakowski \u0141, Ga\u0142czy\u0144ski K, Miot\u0142a P, Rechberger T. Nonabsorbable urethral bulking agent\u2014clinical effectiveness and late complications rates in the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after 2 years of follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;207:68\u201372.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"4420_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23007","volume":"36","author":"I Zivanovic","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zivanovic I, Rautenberg O, Lobodasch K, Von B\u00fcnau G, Walser C, Viereck V. Urethral bulking for recurrent stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling failure. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:722\u20136.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"4420_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"701","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2008.10.027","volume":"181","author":"G Isom-Batz","year":"2009","unstructured":"Isom-Batz G, Zimmern PE. Collagen injection for female urinary incontinence after urethral or periurethral surgery. J Urol. 2009;181:701\u20134.","journal-title":"J Urol"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04420-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04420-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04420-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,22]],"date-time":"2021-07-22T19:13:32Z","timestamp":1626981212000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04420-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,23]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]}},"alternative-id":["4420"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04420-3","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.3410\/f.738387078.793593497","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 February 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 June 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 July 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}