{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T03:24:22Z","timestamp":1740108262030,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,26]],"date-time":"2020-08-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598400000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,26]],"date-time":"2020-08-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1598400000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04471-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,26]],"date-time":"2020-08-26T09:03:00Z","timestamp":1598432580000},"page":"2035-2041","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Pain after permanent versus delayed absorbable monofilament suture for vaginal graft attachment during minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"31","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8129-9643","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"C. Emi","family":"Bretschneider","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kimberly","family":"Kenton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Elizabeth J.","family":"Geller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jennifer M.","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Catherine A.","family":"Matthews","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,26]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"4471_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.03.046","volume":"205","author":"JM Wu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):230.e1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.03.046.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"4471_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","volume":"24","author":"MD Barber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"3","key":"4471_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"235.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.07.020","volume":"221","author":"MR Meister","year":"2019","unstructured":"Meister MR, Sutcliffe S, Badu A, Ghetti C, Lowder JL. Pelvic floor myofascial pain severity and pelvic floor disorder symptom bother: is there a correlation? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(3):235.e1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.07.020.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4471_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.07.038","volume":"221","author":"CS Bradley","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bradley CS. Prolapse, pain, and pelvic floor muscle dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(3):177\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.07.038.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4471_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0000000000000006","volume":"123","author":"JT Anger","year":"2014","unstructured":"Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C, et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):5\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0000000000000006.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"4471_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318231537c","volume":"118","author":"MF Paraiso","year":"2011","unstructured":"Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1005\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318231537c.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"4471_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"382","DOI":"10.1097\/spv.0000000000000300","volume":"22","author":"K Kenton","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kenton K, Mueller ER, Tarney C, Bresee C, Anger JT. One-year outcomes after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(5):382\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/spv.0000000000000300.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"4471_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.06.004","volume":"221","author":"MD Barber","year":"2019","unstructured":"Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, et al. Pain and activity after vaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(3):233.e1\u2013e16. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2019.06.004.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4471_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.016","volume":"197","author":"VL Handa","year":"2007","unstructured":"Handa VL, Zyczynski HM, Brubaker L, et al. Sexual function before and after sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):629.e1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.08.016.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"4471_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003884","volume":"136","author":"CA Matthews","year":"2020","unstructured":"Matthews CA, Geller EJ, Henley BR, et al. Permanent compared with absorbable suture for vaginal mesh fixation during total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(2):355\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003884.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4471_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"731","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2265-x","volume":"25","author":"PJ Culligan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Culligan PJ, Gurshumov E, Lewis C, et al. Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(6):731\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-013-2265-x.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"4471_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e8","DOI":"10.1097\/spv.0000000000000218","volume":"22","author":"M Buechel","year":"2016","unstructured":"Buechel M, Tarr ME, Walters MD. Vaginal apical pain after Sacrocolpopexy in absence of vaginal mesh erosion: a case series. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(1):e8\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/spv.0000000000000218.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"4471_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1469","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3296-5","volume":"28","author":"AWM Coolen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Coolen AWM, van Oudheusden AMJ, Mol BWJ, van Eijndhoven HWF, Roovers JWR, Bongers MY. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(10):1469\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-017-3296-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"15","key":"4471_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2018.2827","volume":"319","author":"JE Jelovsek","year":"2018","unstructured":"Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, et al. Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(15):1554\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2018.2827.","journal-title":"JAMA"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04471-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04471-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04471-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,25]],"date-time":"2021-08-25T23:11:55Z","timestamp":1629933115000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04471-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,26]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]}},"alternative-id":["4471"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04471-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0937-3462"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1433-3023"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,26]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 June 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 July 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 August 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"Catherine A. Matthews and Kimberly Kenton are consultants for Boston Scientific Corporation and expert witnesses for defense, Johnson & Johnson. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest. \u201cPermanent versus delayed absorbable monofilament suture for vaginal graft attachment during minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy: a randomized control trial\u201d (PACT trial) was sponsored by Boston Scientific Corporation.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}