{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T06:03:23Z","timestamp":1771567403517,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,21]],"date-time":"2020-11-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1605916800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,21]],"date-time":"2020-11-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1605916800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04601-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,21]],"date-time":"2020-11-21T14:02:46Z","timestamp":1605967366000},"page":"1591-1593","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Native tissue sacrospinous hysteropexy from an anterior approach"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"32","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7429-7060","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andre","family":"Plair","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Catherine","family":"Matthews","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"9","key":"4601_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1285","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3291-x","volume":"28","author":"S Kapoor","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kapoor S, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(9):1285\u201394.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"11","key":"4601_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1887","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-019-03950-9","volume":"30","author":"KR Husby","year":"2019","unstructured":"Husby KR, et al. Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(11):1887\u201393.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"4601_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2016.03.028","volume":"135","author":"P Petruzzelli","year":"2016","unstructured":"Petruzzelli P, et al. Combined sacrospinous hysteropexy and cystopexy using a single anterior incision. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;135(1):101\u20136.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"4601_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1007\/s001920170017","volume":"12","author":"CF Maher","year":"2001","unstructured":"Maher CF, et al. Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(6):381\u20134 discussion 384-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"3","key":"4601_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.75","volume":"188","author":"M Hefni","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hefni M, et al. Sacrospinous cervicocolpopexy with uterine conservation for uterovaginal prolapse in elderly women: an evolving concept. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(3):645\u201350.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"4601_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.12678","volume":"41","author":"TS Lo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lo TS, et al. Long-term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: hysterectomy versus hysteropexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(7):1099\u2013107.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"2","key":"4601_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1014-7","volume":"21","author":"V Dietz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dietz V, et al. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(2):209\u201316.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4601_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"l5149","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l5149","volume":"366","author":"SFM Schulten","year":"2019","unstructured":"Schulten SFM, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. BMJ. 2019;366:l5149.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"2","key":"4601_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsxm.2015.12.006","volume":"13","author":"RJ Detollenaere","year":"2016","unstructured":"Detollenaere RJ, et al. The impact of sacrospinous Hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments on sexual function in women with uterine prolapse: a secondary analysis of a randomized comparative study. J Sex Med. 2016;13(2):213\u20139.","journal-title":"J Sex Med"},{"key":"4601_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.08.003","volume":"216","author":"S Cavkaytar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cavkaytar S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after transvaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;216:204\u20137.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04601-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04601-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04601-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,14]],"date-time":"2021-06-14T15:04:46Z","timestamp":1623683086000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04601-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,21]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,6]]}},"alternative-id":["4601"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04601-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 August 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"28 October 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 November 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"Andre Plair, grant support from Neomedic.Catherine Matthews, consultant for Boston Scientific; grant support from Boston Scientific and Neomedic; expert witness for defense, Johnson and Johnson.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article and any accompanying images.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent"}}]}}