{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,1]],"date-time":"2026-08-01T00:59:16Z","timestamp":1785545956881,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,24]],"date-time":"2021-03-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1616544000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,24]],"date-time":"2021-03-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1616544000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04741-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,24]],"date-time":"2021-03-24T10:02:47Z","timestamp":1616580167000},"page":"297-308","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":43,"title":["Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Chia-Lun","family":"Chang","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chun-Hua","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shang-Jen","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,24]]},"reference":[{"issue":"11","key":"4741_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","volume":"24","author":"MD Barber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1783\u201390.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"2","key":"4741_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1177\/2053369120937594","volume":"26","author":"K Fleischer","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fleischer K, Thiagamoorthy G. Pelvic organ prolapse management. Post Reprod Health. 2020;26(2):79\u201385.","journal-title":"Post Reprod Health"},{"issue":"10","key":"4741_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1997","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04407-0","volume":"31","author":"N Ng-Stollmann","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ng-Stollmann N, et al. The international discussion and the new regulations concerning transvaginal mesh implants in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):1997\u20132002.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"4741_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000036","volume":"20","author":"PA Nosti","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nosti PA, et al. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(1):33\u20137.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"4741_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"355","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2763-0","volume":"27","author":"M De Gouveia De Sa","year":"2016","unstructured":"De Gouveia De Sa, M., et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2016;27(3):355\u2013366.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunction"},{"issue":"3","key":"4741_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"284","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.08.008","volume":"132","author":"K Pan","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pan K, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):284\u201391.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"4741_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2019.07.043","volume":"134","author":"E Illiano","year":"2019","unstructured":"Illiano E, et al. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for high-stage pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective, randomized, single-center study. Urology. 2019;134:116\u201323.","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"4","key":"4741_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0000000000000269","volume":"22","author":"MG Mueller","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mueller MG, et al. Outcomes in 450 women after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016;22(4):267\u201371.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"4741_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"547.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2014.07.054","volume":"211","author":"CA Unger","year":"2014","unstructured":"Unger CA, et al. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(5):547.e1\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4741_CR10","first-page":"113","volume":"37","author":"G Cucinella","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cucinella G, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse: a case-control study. Il Giornale di chirurgia. 2016;37(3):113\u20137.","journal-title":"Il Giornale di chirurgia"},{"issue":"1","key":"4741_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70243-0","volume":"175","author":"RC Bump","year":"1996","unstructured":"Bump RC, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10\u20137.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"4741_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","volume":"6","author":"D Moher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"4741_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.12","volume":"1","author":"M Borenstein","year":"2010","unstructured":"Borenstein M, et al. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1(2):97\u2013111.","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"},{"issue":"5","key":"4741_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1005","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318231537c","volume":"118","author":"MF Paraiso","year":"2011","unstructured":"Paraiso MF, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1005\u201313.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4741_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000006","volume":"123","author":"JT Anger","year":"2014","unstructured":"Anger JT, et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):5\u201312.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4741_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-011-0748-2","volume":"30","author":"J Seror","year":"2012","unstructured":"Seror J, et al. Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. World J Urol. 2012;30(3):393\u20138.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"issue":"6","key":"4741_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1181","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2691-x","volume":"287","author":"N Awad","year":"2013","unstructured":"Awad N, et al. Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(6):1181\u20136.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"4741_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31824b218d","volume":"18","author":"DD Antosh","year":"2012","unstructured":"Antosh DD, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(3):158\u201361.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"2","key":"4741_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"122","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e31824a3995","volume":"18","author":"SJ Pulliam","year":"2012","unstructured":"Pulliam SJ, Weinstein MM, Wakamatsu MM. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(2):122\u20136.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"4741_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/SPV.0b013e3181fa44cf","volume":"17","author":"J Tan-Kim","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tan-Kim J, et al. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operative times, costs and outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011;17(1):44\u20139.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"4741_CR21","first-page":"54","volume":"17","author":"SSC Chan","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chan SSC, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance. Hong Kong Medical Journal. 2011;17(1):54\u201360.","journal-title":"Hong Kong Medical Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"4741_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"76","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.07.010","volume":"25","author":"S Choussein","year":"2018","unstructured":"Choussein S, et al. Robotic assistance confers ambidexterity to laparoscopic surgeons. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(1):76\u201383.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"4741_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"304","DOI":"10.1097\/GCO.0000000000000293","volume":"28","author":"M Truong","year":"2016","unstructured":"Truong M, et al. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28(4):304\u201310.","journal-title":"Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04741-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04741-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04741-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,31]],"date-time":"2022-01-31T13:03:16Z","timestamp":1643634196000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04741-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,24]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]}},"alternative-id":["4741"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04741-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 December 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 February 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 March 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This is a systematic review and meta-analysis study. The Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval"}},{"value":"None.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}