{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T03:24:39Z","timestamp":1740108279225,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,24]],"date-time":"2021-06-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1624492800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,24]],"date-time":"2021-06-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1624492800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Beijing Natural Science Foundation","award":["Z190021"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Z190021"]}]},{"name":"Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences","award":["CIFMS\u20102017\u2010I2M\u20101\u2010002"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["CIFMS\u20102017\u2010I2M\u20101\u2010002"]}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"The National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["81971366"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["81971366"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"The National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["81671442"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["81671442"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Introduction and hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>This study aimed to investigate the evaluation and management of complications after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in China.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Complications of pelvic floor reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapses from 27 institutions were reported from November 2017 to October 2019. All complications were coded according to the category-time-site system proposed by the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS). The severity of the complications was graded by the Clavien-Dindo grading system. Four scales were used to evaluate patient satisfaction and quality of life after management of the complications: the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire Short Form (PFIQ-7), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS), and a 5-point Likert-type scale that evaluated the patient\u2019s choice of surgery.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>Totally, 256 cases were reported. The occurrence of complications related to transvaginal mesh (TVM) and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) had a significantly longer post-surgery delay than those of native tissue repair surgery (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001 and <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.010, respectively). Both PFIQ-7 and POP-SS score were lower after management of complications (<jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.001). Most respondents (81.67%) selected very much better, much better, or a little better on the PGI-I scale. Only 13.3% respondents selected unlikely or highly unlikely on the 5-point Likert-type scale.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec><jats:sec>\n                <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                <jats:p>The occurrence of complications related to TVM surgery and LSC had a longer post-surgery delay than native tissue repair surgery. Long-term regular follow-up was vital in complication management. Patient satisfaction with the management of TVM complications was acceptable.<\/jats:p>\n              <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04892-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,24]],"date-time":"2021-06-24T06:02:47Z","timestamp":1624514567000},"page":"2149-2157","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Current situation of complications related to reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a multicenter study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Zhi-jing","family":"Sun","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tao","family":"Guo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xiu-qi","family":"Wang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jing-he","family":"Lang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tao","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lan","family":"Zhu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,24]]},"reference":[{"issue":"6","key":"4892_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1201","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0000000000000286","volume":"123","author":"JM Wu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Michele JF. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0000000000000286.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"4892_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-007-0459-9","volume":"19","author":"MF Fialkow","year":"2008","unstructured":"Fialkow MF, Newton KM, Lentz GM, Wiess NS. Lifetime risk of surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(3):437\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-007-0459-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"issue":"1","key":"4892_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0000000000001451","volume":"128","author":"MO Schimpf","year":"2016","unstructured":"Schimpf MO, Abed H, Sanses T, White AB, Lowenstein L, Ward RM, et al. Graft and mesh use in transvaginal prolapse repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):81\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0000000000001451.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"4892_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0000000000000570","volume":"125","author":"NY Siddiqui","year":"2015","unstructured":"Siddiqui NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, Abed HT, Jeppson PC, Olivera CK, et al. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):44\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0000000000000570.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"7","key":"4892_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0036-1585074","volume":"38","author":"CR Juliato","year":"2016","unstructured":"Juliato CR, Santos J\u00fanior LC, Haddad JM, Castro RA, Lima M, Castro EB. Mesh surgery for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a meta-analysis. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016;38(7):356\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0036-1585074.","journal-title":"Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet"},{"issue":"7","key":"4892_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"789","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1384-5","volume":"22","author":"H Abed","year":"2011","unstructured":"Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(7):789\u201398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-011-1384-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"19","key":"4892_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1826","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1009521","volume":"364","author":"D Altman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Altman D, V\u00e4yrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1826\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa1009521.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"10069","key":"4892_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(16)32572-7","volume":"389","author":"JR Morling","year":"2017","unstructured":"Morling JR, DA MA, Agur W, Fischbacher CM, Glazener CM, Guerrero K, et al. Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997-2016: a population-based cohort study. Lancet (London, England). 2017;389(10069):629\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0140-6736(16)32572-7.","journal-title":"Lancet (London, England)"},{"issue":"2","key":"4892_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.12932","volume":"147","author":"A Ugianskiene","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ugianskiene A, Davila GW, Su TH. FIGO review of statements on use of synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;147(2):147\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.12932.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"4892_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Developed by the Joint Writing Group of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association. Joint position statement on the management of mesh-related complications for the FPMRS specialist.\u00a0 Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(4):679-694. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-020-04248-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-020-04248-x"},{"issue":"1","key":"4892_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-010-1324-9","volume":"22","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2011","unstructured":"Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davilla GW, Deprest J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(1):3\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-010-1324-9.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"4","key":"4892_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"608","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2017.02.014","volume":"4","author":"D Mitropoulos","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Biyani CS, Jorgen BJ, Roupret M, Truss M. Validation of the Clavien-Dindo grading system in urology by the European Association of Urology guidelines ad hoc panel. European Urology Focus. 2018;4(4):608\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.euf.2017.02.014.","journal-title":"European Urology Focus"},{"key":"4892_CR13","volume-title":"Assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Revised, 1976","author":"WA Guy","year":"1976","unstructured":"Guy WA. Assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Revised, 1976. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, US Dept Health, Education, and Welfare publication (ADM); 217; 1976."},{"issue":"1","key":"4892_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01903.x","volume":"116","author":"S Hagen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hagen S, Glazener C, Sinclair L, Stark D, Bugge C. Psychometric properties of the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score. BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2009;116(1):25\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2008.01903.x.","journal-title":"BJOG : an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology"},{"issue":"1","key":"4892_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.025","volume":"193","author":"MD Barber","year":"2005","unstructured":"Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):103\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.025.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"9","key":"4892_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1030","DOI":"10.1097\/gme.0b013e31820fbcbe","volume":"18","author":"L Zhu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Zhu L, Yu S, Xu T, Yang X, Lu Y, Li B, et al. Chinese validation of the pelvic floor impact questionnaire short form. Menopause. 2011;18(9):1030\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/gme.0b013e31820fbcbe.","journal-title":"Menopause"},{"issue":"8","key":"4892_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1139","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3256-5","volume":"28","author":"S Warembourg","year":"2017","unstructured":"Warembourg S, Labaki M, de Tayrac R, Costa P, Fatton B. Reoperations for mesh-related complications after pelvic organ prolapse repair: 8-year experience at a tertiary referral center. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(8):1139\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-016-3256-5.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"4892_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0000000000000042","volume":"123","author":"EC Crosby","year":"2014","unstructured":"Crosby EC, Abernethy M, Berger MB, DeLancey JO, Fenner DE, Morgan DM. Symptom resolution after operative management of complications from transvaginal mesh. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):134\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0000000000000042.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"4892_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1050-3","volume":"21","author":"N Marcus-Braun","year":"2010","unstructured":"Marcus-Braun N, von Theobald P. Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(4):423\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-1050-3.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"10","key":"4892_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1387","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-012-1741-z","volume":"23","author":"X Deffieux","year":"2012","unstructured":"Deffieux X, Thubert T, de Tayrac R, Fernandez H, Letouzey V. Long-term follow-up of persistent vaginal polypropylene mesh exposure for transvaginally placed mesh procedures. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(10):1387\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-012-1741-z.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"5","key":"4892_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1111\/bju.14763","volume":"123","author":"NICE Guidance - Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: \u00a9 NICE","year":"2019","unstructured":"NICE Guidance - Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: \u00a9 NICE. Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management (2019). BJU Int. 2019;123(5):777\u2013803. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bju.14763.","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"4892_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163.e161","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.012","volume":"210","author":"S Abbott","year":"2014","unstructured":"Abbott S, Unger CA, Evans JM, Jallad K, Mishra K, Karram MM, et al. Evaluation and management of complications from synthetic mesh after pelvic reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(2):163.e161\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.10.012.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"4892_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1395","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-011-1476-2","volume":"22","author":"MM Tijdink","year":"2011","unstructured":"Tijdink MM, Vierhout ME, Heesakkers JP, Withagen MI. Surgical management of mesh-related complications after prior pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(11):1395\u2013404. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-011-1476-2.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"issue":"1","key":"4892_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.15958","volume":"127","author":"P Carter","year":"2020","unstructured":"Carter P, Fou L, Whiter F, Delgado Nunes V, Hasler E, Austin C, et al. Management of mesh complications following surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Bjog. 2020;127(1):28\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.15958.","journal-title":"Bjog"},{"issue":"5","key":"4892_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.22756","volume":"35","author":"RP Batalden","year":"2016","unstructured":"Batalden RP, Weinstein MM, Foust-Wright C, Alperin M, Wakamatsu MM, Pulliam SJ. Clinical application of IUGA\/ICS classification system for mesh erosion. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(5):589\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.22756.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"3","key":"4892_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1097\/spv.0000000000000142","volume":"21","author":"ED Hokenstad","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hokenstad ED, El-Nashar SA, Blandon RE, Occhino JA, Trabuco EC, Gebhart JB, et al. Health-related quality of life and outcomes after surgical treatment of complications from vaginally placed mesh. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(3):176\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/spv.0000000000000142.","journal-title":"Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"4892_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1239","DOI":"10.1097\/aog.0000000000000008","volume":"122","author":"KS Wong","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wong KS, Nguyen JN, White T, Menefee SA, Walter AJ, Krulewitch CJ, et al. Adverse events associated with pelvic organ prolapse surgeries that use implants. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(6):1239\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/aog.0000000000000008.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04892-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04892-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04892-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,6]],"date-time":"2021-08-06T09:10:22Z","timestamp":1628241022000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04892-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,24]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["4892"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04892-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0937-3462"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1433-3023"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 April 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 May 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 June 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest"}}]}}