{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,17]],"date-time":"2026-06-17T01:40:08Z","timestamp":1781660408111,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]],"date-time":"2021-07-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625184000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]],"date-time":"2021-07-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1625184000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04913-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]],"date-time":"2021-07-02T13:02:47Z","timestamp":1625230967000},"page":"1917-1925","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":14,"title":["Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"33","author":[{"given":"Li","family":"He","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Dan","family":"Feng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xi","family":"Zha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiao-Yan","family":"Liao","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhao-Lin","family":"Gong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ding-Qian","family":"Gu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yong-Hong","family":"Lin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lu","family":"Huang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"4913_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1027","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)60462-0","volume":"369","author":"JE Jelovsek","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet. 2007;369:1027\u201338.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"4913_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1783","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-013-2169-9","volume":"24","author":"MD Barber","year":"2013","unstructured":"Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2013;24:1783\u201390.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"4913_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.22922","volume":"35","author":"BT Haylen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)\/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:137\u201368.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"4913_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.04.029","volume":"158","author":"TA De Boer","year":"2011","unstructured":"De Boer TA, Slieker-ten Hove MC, Burger CW, Kluivers KB, Vierhout ME. The prevalence and factors associated with previous surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and or urinary incontinence in a cross sectional study in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;158:343\u20139.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"4913_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2010.01145.x","volume":"50","author":"R Vanspauwen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Vanspauwen R, Seman E, Dwyer P. Survey of current management of prolapse in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50:262\u20137.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"4913_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"129","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.01.018","volume":"219","author":"KV Meriwether","year":"2018","unstructured":"Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219:129\u2013146.e2.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4913_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"470.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2013.08.003","volume":"209","author":"NB Korbly","year":"2013","unstructured":"Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, et al. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:470.e1\u20136.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4913_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1623","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-008-0718-4","volume":"19","author":"P D\u00e4llenbach","year":"2008","unstructured":"D\u00e4llenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Jacob S, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M. Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:1623\u20139.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"4913_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-003-1084-x","volume":"14","author":"HJ Brummen","year":"2003","unstructured":"Brummen HJ, van de Pol G, Aalders CIM, Heintz APM, van der Vaart CH. Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effect on urinary symptoms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:350\u20135.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct"},{"key":"4913_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2016.08.035","volume":"216","author":"RE Gutman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gutman RE, Rardin CR, Sokol ER, et al. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:38.e1\u201338.e11.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"4913_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00001.x","volume":"111","author":"JP Roovers","year":"2004","unstructured":"Roovers JP, van der Vaart CH, van der Bom JG, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effects on urogenital function. BJOG. 2004;111:50\u20136.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"4913_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1590\/S0100-69912009000100012","volume":"36","author":"S Carram\u00e3o","year":"2009","unstructured":"Carram\u00e3o S, Auge AP, Pacetta AM, et al. Estudo rand\u00f4mico da corre\u00e7\u00e3o cir\u00fargica do prolapso uterino atrav\u00e9s de tela sint\u00e9tica de polipropileno tipo I comparando histerectomia versus preserva\u00e7\u00e3o uterina [A randomized comparison of two vaginal procedures for the treatment of uterine prolapse using polypropylene mesh: hysteropexy versus hysterectomy]. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2009;36:65\u201372.","journal-title":"Rev Col Bras Cir"},{"key":"4913_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-1014-7","volume":"21","author":"V Dietz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dietz V, van der Vaart CH, van der Graaf Y, Heintz P, Schraffordt Koops SE. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:209\u201316.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4913_CR14","first-page":"95","volume":"35","author":"H Qiao","year":"2015","unstructured":"Qiao H. Comparison of the effect of pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse. Clin Med. 2015;35:95\u20136.","journal-title":"Clin Med"},{"key":"4913_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1687","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-015-2761-2","volume":"26","author":"P Rahmanou","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rahmanou P, Price N, Jackson SR. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:1687\u201394.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4913_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"h3717","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h3717","volume":"351","author":"RJ Detollenaere","year":"2015","unstructured":"Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"4913_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.3724\/j.issn.1000-0518.1993.6.102105","volume":"10","author":"L Song","year":"2016","unstructured":"Song L. Observation on the curative effect of pelvic floor reconstruction with improved uterus preservation in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Chin J Mod Drug Appl. 2016;10:102\u20133.","journal-title":"Chin J Mod Drug Appl"},{"key":"4913_CR18","first-page":"58","volume":"22","author":"H Rao","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rao H. Comparative study of pelvic floor reconstruction with preservation of uterus and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse. Contemp Med. 2016;22:58\u20139.","journal-title":"Contemp Med"},{"key":"4913_CR19","first-page":"29","volume":"23","author":"H Xie","year":"2017","unstructured":"Xie H, Zhao F, Huang H. The application of laparoscopic uterine vaginal sacral fixation in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Contemp Med. 2017;23:29\u201331.","journal-title":"Contemp Med"},{"key":"4913_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2019.12812","volume":"322","author":"CW Nager","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, et al. Effect of vaginal mesh hysteropexy vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322:1054\u201365.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"4913_CR21","first-page":"35","volume":"6","author":"Z He","year":"2019","unstructured":"He Z. Comparative study of pelvic floor reconstruction with preservation of uterus and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse. Women Heal Res. 2019;6:35\u20137.","journal-title":"Women Heal Res"},{"key":"4913_CR22","first-page":"17","volume":"6","author":"H Qin","year":"2019","unstructured":"Qin H. Clinical effect of modified traditional uterine prolapse surgery in the treatment of uterine prolapse. Electron J Pract Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;6:17\u20139.","journal-title":"Electron J Pract Gynecol Endocrinol"},{"key":"4913_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","volume":"6","author":"D Moher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"4913_CR24","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed 10 Jul 2020."},{"key":"4913_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"646","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X05282643","volume":"25","author":"AE Ades","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP. The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Mak. 2005;25:646\u201354.","journal-title":"Med Decis Mak"},{"key":"4913_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","volume":"327","author":"JPT Higgins","year":"2003","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557\u201360.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"4913_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","volume":"315","author":"M Egger","year":"1997","unstructured":"Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629\u201334.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"4913_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1088","DOI":"10.2307\/2533446","volume":"50","author":"CB Begg","year":"1994","unstructured":"Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088\u2013101.","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"key":"4913_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1617","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-017-3433-1","volume":"28","author":"SA de Oliveira","year":"2017","unstructured":"de Oliveira SA, Fonseca MCM, Bortolini MAT, Gir\u00e3o MJBC, Roque MT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1617\u201330.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04913-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04913-9\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04913-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,3]],"date-time":"2024-09-03T05:35:20Z","timestamp":1725341720000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04913-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,7]]}},"alternative-id":["4913"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04913-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,2]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 April 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 June 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 July 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study did not involve humans or animals, so ethical approval was not required.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics committee approval statement"}},{"value":"None.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}