{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,17]],"date-time":"2026-08-17T15:15:30Z","timestamp":1786979730220,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]],"date-time":"2021-09-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1631577600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]],"date-time":"2021-09-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1631577600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int Urogynecol J"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction and hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The continence dish has been a treatment option since 2002 for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who decline surgery, but few quantitative objective efficacy data are published. We aimed to determine the efficacy and acceptability of this device for pure SUI or mixed incontinence (MUI).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Prospective interventional cohort study of 100 women with SUI or stress-predominant MUI who were interested to use the device; International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) was primary outcome measure; 24-h pad test and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ) were secondary outcomes. Acceptability was determined by device retention for 4 weeks, adverse events and ability to self-insert the device.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of 100 suitable women, 9 were not actually fitted, and 27 did not complete (acceptability: 64\/100). The rate of adverse events was 7.7%, with 62.5% of users able to self-insert the device: 22 (34%) had pure SUI; 66% had MUI. In SUI, 68% were \u2018dry\u2019 on ICIQ median value 4.0 (IQR 2.5\u20138.5); 88% were dry on 24-h pad test (median 0.0, IQR 0.0\u20138.5). The \u201cdry rate\u201d was lower in MUI: 36% for ICIQ (median 9.0, IQR 5.0\u201315.0) and 62% for 24-h pad test (median 6.2, IQR 0.95\u201319.7). A \u201cgood\u201d response on IIQ occurred in 88% of SUI and 69% of MUI.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>These new data showing strong objective benefits of the continence dish should be further validated by randomized trials, but this information should be made available to women seeking treatment options for SUI\/MUI (particularly in view of concerns regarding mesh mid-urethral slings).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-021-04969-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]],"date-time":"2021-09-14T05:02:57Z","timestamp":1631595777000},"page":"1199-1205","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Efficacy and patient acceptability of the continence dish"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"33","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6947-9839","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kate H.","family":"Moore","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wendy","family":"Allen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Katrina","family":"Parkin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fiona","family":"Beaupeurt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Chris","family":"Chan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zhuoran","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]]},"reference":[{"key":"4969_CR1","first-page":"756","volume":"101","author":"K Holst","year":"1988","unstructured":"Holst K, Wilson PD. The prevalence of female urinary incontinence and reasons for not seeking treatment. NZ Med J. 1988;101:756\u20138.","journal-title":"NZ Med J"},{"key":"4969_CR2","first-page":"271","volume":"7","author":"NC Biswas","year":"1988","unstructured":"Biswas NC. A silastic vaginal device for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 1988;7:271\u20132.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"4969_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"464","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)68592-8","volume":"162","author":"KH Moore","year":"1999","unstructured":"Moore KH, Simons A, Dowell C, Bryant C, Prashar S. Efficacy and user acceptability of the urethral occlusive device in women with urinary incontinence. J Urol. 1999;162:464\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)68592-8.","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"4969_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"711","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1464-410x.1996.95416.x","volume":"77","author":"I Hahn","year":"1996","unstructured":"Hahn I, Milson I. Treatment of female stress urinary incontinence with a new anatomically shaped vaginal device (Conveen continence guard). Br J Urol. 1996;77:711\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1046\/j.1464-410x.1996.95416.x.","journal-title":"Br J Urol"},{"key":"4969_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08083.x","volume":"106","author":"KH Moore","year":"1999","unstructured":"Moore KH, Foote A, Burton G, King J. An open study of the bladder neck support prosthesis in genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;106:42\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08083.x.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4969_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"412","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-003-1094-8","volume":"14","author":"AR Morris","year":"2003","unstructured":"Morris AR, Moore KH. The contiform device. Int Urogynecol J. 2003;14:412\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-003-1094-8.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4969_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-005-1362-x","volume":"17","author":"LA Hanson","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hanson LA, Schulz JA, Flood CG, Cooley B, Tam F. Vaginal pessaries in managing women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: patient characteristics and factors contributing to success. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17:155\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-005-1362-x.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4969_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1163","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-004-1163-7","volume":"15","author":"MJ Donnelly","year":"2004","unstructured":"Donnelly MJ, Powell-Morgan S, Olsen AL, Nygaard IE. Vaginal pessaries for the management of stress and mixed urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2004;15:1163\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-004-1163-7.","journal-title":"Int Urogynecol J"},{"key":"4969_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d055d4","volume":"115","author":"HE Richter","year":"2010","unstructured":"Richter HE, Burgio KL, Brubaker L, et al. Continence pessary compared with behavioural therapy or combined therapy for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:609\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181d055d4.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4969_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1023","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-009-0866-1","volume":"20","author":"CW Nager","year":"2009","unstructured":"Nager CW, Richter HE, Nygaard I, et al. Incontinence pessaries: size, POP-Q measures and successful fitting. Int Urogynaecol J. 2009;20:1023\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-009-0866-1.","journal-title":"Int Urogynaecol J"},{"key":"4969_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1007\/s00192-016-3070-0","volume":"28","author":"D Karmakar","year":"2017","unstructured":"Karmakar D, Mostafa A, Abdel-Fattah M. A new validated score for detecting patient-reported success on postoperative ICIQ-SF: a novel two-stage analysis from two large RCT cohorts. Int Urogynaecol J. 2017;28:95\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-016-3070-0.","journal-title":"Int Urogynaecol J"},{"key":"4969_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09669.x","volume":"103","author":"E Versi","year":"1996","unstructured":"Versi E, Orrego G, Hardy E, Seddon G, Smith P, Anand D. Evaluation of the home pad test in the investigation of female urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:162\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09669.x.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"4969_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"859","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00211.x","volume":"111","author":"R O\u2019Sullivan","year":"2004","unstructured":"O\u2019Sullivan R, Karantanis E, Stevermuer TL, Allen W, Moore KH. Definition of mild, moderate and severe incontinence on the 24-hour pad test. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;111:859\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00211.x.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"4969_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.1930140206","volume":"14","author":"JS Uebersax","year":"1995","unstructured":"Uebersax JS, Wyman JF, Shumaker SA, McClish DK, Fantl JA. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14:131\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.1930140206.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"4969_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"198","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.10005","volume":"21","author":"J Corcos","year":"2002","unstructured":"Corcos J, Behlouli H, Beaulieu S. Identifying cut-off scores with neural networks for interpretation of the incontinence impact questionnaire. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:198\u2013203. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.10005.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"4969_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1007\/s001920200070","volume":"13","author":"M Robert","year":"2002","unstructured":"Robert M, Mainprize TC. Long-term assessment of the incontinence ring pessary for the treatment of stress incontinence. Int Urogynaecol J. 2002;13:326\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s001920200070.","journal-title":"Int Urogynaecol J"},{"key":"4969_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"563.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.01.047","volume":"198","author":"YM Komesu","year":"2008","unstructured":"Komesu YM, Ketai LH, Rogers RG, Eberhardt SC, Pohl J. Restoration of continence by pessaries: magnetic resonance imaging assessment of mechanism of action. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:563.e1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.01.047.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4969_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"592.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.02.004","volume":"198","author":"KL Noblett","year":"2008","unstructured":"Noblett KL, McKinney A, Lane FL. Effects of the incontinence dish pessary on urethral support and urodynamic parameters. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:592.e1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.02.004.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"4969_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08272.x","volume":"106","author":"U Ulmsten","year":"1999","unstructured":"Ulmsten U, Johnson P, Rezapour M. A three year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment if female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet & Gynaecol. 1999;106:345\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08272.x.","journal-title":"Br J Obstet & Gynaecol"},{"key":"4969_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20243","volume":"25","author":"KL Burgio","year":"2006","unstructured":"Burgio KL, Goode PS, Richter HE, Locher JL, Roth DE. Global ratings of patient satisfaction and perception of improvement with treatment for urinary incontinence: validation of three global patient ratings. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25:411\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/nau.20243.","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"4969_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"268","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02202011","volume":"15","author":"JO DeLancey","year":"1997","unstructured":"DeLancey JO. The pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence in women and its implications for surgical treatment. World J Urol. 1997;15:268\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF02202011.","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"4969_CR22","first-page":"426","volume":"81","author":"E Hanzal","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hanzal E, Berger E, Koelbl H. Levator ani muscle morphology and recurrent genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:426\u20139.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["International Urogynecology Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04969-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04969-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04969-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,19]],"date-time":"2022-05-19T10:04:29Z","timestamp":1652954669000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04969-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,5]]}},"alternative-id":["4969"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00192-021-04969-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["0937-3462","1433-3023"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0937-3462","type":"print"},{"value":"1433-3023","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,9,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"6 April 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 August 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 September 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}